Thank you. Just ignoring him was growing difficult and probably would have resulted in my own 'time-out'.Quote: WizardBased on a post made outside of the forum, mrjjj has just been upgraded to the nuclear option.
Quote: WizardLet's see, here is what I can remember:
Chuck for life for insulting the Wizard.
mkl for I think a week for personal insult.
JerryLogan 2 or 3 times. I just remember that last time was for a week for a combination of hijacking and personal insults.
Who I am forgetting?
The entire cheerleading squad for laughing at your "unit size" and poor penetration, perhaps? What I mean is you were betting chips and were getting half-shoed, of course.
I'm going to take this risk at becoming unpopular. This suspension was richly deserved. No doubt about it. The post was unnecessarily rude. However, I think it was clearly obvious, not only to myself, but to other members of the forum, that the individual would get suspended. Is it really necessary for people to make comments to that effect? The "countdown" to suspension and any of the other comments regarding the individual's behavior and certain suspension just seem to be further unnecessary comments that clutter up the thread and the forum, and serve no real purpose.Quote: WizardNewAP gets 10 days for this post, among others in that thread.
We all know the person is going to get suspended. And he should get suspended. I just don't see the need to make comments about it. I feel we should just flag the post, report it to the Wizard, allow the Wizard to make the necessary suspensions/decisions, and the rest of can either contribute the original post if it has merits, or just ignore the thread.
Again, I know I'm taking a weak point, and nobody will agree with me. Thus, this post itself qualifies as my previously mentioned unnecessary clutter with no real purpose. I just think people might want to at least think about it, and not contribute toward other people's bad behavior.
Quote: konceptumI just don't see the need to make comments about it.
That is a fair comment. It isn't that I mean to stir things up. My intent is to make the rules and expectations clear and to keep such discussion in a central place. I don't want legitimate threads hijacked with people discussing the latest ban.
Speaking of which, NewAP is upgraded to the nuclear option for multiple identities.
Quote: konceptumI'm going to take this risk at becoming unpopular. This suspension was richly deserved. No doubt about it. The post was unnecessarily rude. However, I think it was clearly obvious, not only to myself, but to other members of the forum, that the individual would get suspended. Is it really necessary for people to make comments to that effect? The "countdown" to suspension and any of the other comments regarding the individual's behavior and certain suspension just seem to be further unnecessary comments that clutter up the thread and the forum, and serve no real purpose.Quote: WizardNewAP gets 10 days for this post, among others in that thread.
Fair point. I was the one that posted the countdown to suspension comment. Won't happen again. I'm sorry.
To the point of "unnecessary comments that clutter up the thread and forum." That describes BuzzPaff perfectly!. This guy is a troll.
I discovered the BLOCK feature yesterday, and promptly blocked him. Now I won't have to read any of his 4,956 daily posts.
Great site! Thanks.
Quote: scirecesspit...What's a sock puppet?
A childs toy made from a sock, a couple googly eyes and some felt, that you stick on your hand a pretend isnt you while talking.
In the internet world, its jargon for a user making a second account to help trolling, or to pretend that you have more support in a debate, or to add recommedations to a review.
I do.Quote: konceptum... I just don't see the need to make comments about it...
Except the place to make the comments is not within the thread in question. Don't assume Mike reads every post or views every thread.
Either send a PM to the Wizard, or post in this thread, or both. And they should include a link to the offending post. (If you don't know how to do that, just right-click the "Permalink" at the top right of the post, then select "Copy Shortcut". Then paste it into the PM and post.)
Posting the "countdown" in that thread may have been fun for the observers/participants, but it only elevates the anger of the offender.
Further, it was NewAP's own thread, so thread derailment isn't much of a concern. He derailed his own thread by way of the very comments that were the subject of the Suspension.
Quote: Mission146I don't personally see the problem with a few light-hearted comments in thread such as the countdown. I think it would be different if it were some kind of border-line case where the Wizard would have to step in and make a judgment call, but this was a blatant infraction of the Rules to such an extent that there was no doubt as to what was about to happen.
Further, it was NewAP's own thread, so thread derailment isn't much of a concern. He derailed his own thread by way of the very comments that were the subject of the Suspension.
I agree with this.
And if you look backward, even NewAP's introduction was probably a setup to troll later. He identified as a friendly, then lowered his camouflage and fired. Q-ship.
For clarification sake, my comment wasn't directed at you. I think that the notification of suspension as well as the reason for suspension is fairly important. It helps for us to know what is going on, as well as reinforcing what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior.Quote: WizardIt isn't that I mean to stir things up. My intent is to make the rules and expectations clear and to keep such discussion in a central place.
Well stated. Others may argue that angering the offender is ok, because that person was an offender. I disagree with that. However, I also feel that it's just a waste of time and resources.Quote: DJTeddyBearPosting the "countdown" in that thread may have been fun for the observers/participants, but it only elevates the anger of the offender.
The fact that it was blatant, to me, is even more reason why comments don't need to be made. As DJ and I said, simply report the post to the Wizard, and we know it will get taken care of. And, even though it was his own thread, the original topic matter could still be discussed by others.Quote: Mission146but this was a blatant infraction of the Rules to such an extent that there was no doubt as to what was about to happen.
Further, it was NewAP's own thread, so thread derailment isn't much of a concern. He derailed his own thread by way of the very comments that were the subject of the Suspension.
Quote: RoundManThat describes BuzzPaff perfectly!. This guy is a troll.
You're new, so I'm going to let that go with a warning. No personal insults. As you wrote, if you don't like him, just block him.
Do you have the ability to know who is blocking who? How many people does the average forum member have blocked? Knowing who the most blocked member is would be fun, although I'm guessing you wouldn't share that.
Quote: FinsRuleIn regards to blocking - Wizard, any stats you can share with us?
We don't implicitly quantify that. Even if we did, I'm not sure I would share it.
Quote: WizardYou're new, so I'm going to let that go with a warning. No personal insults. As you wrote, if you don't like him, just block him.
Thanks. Warning received.
Now I know bad language "attacking" another is worthy of suspension....is that trolling-- also????
Wizard, sorry for being so dumb on this but a good definition of trolling would be helpful to me.(maybe others as well)
As far as "pretending one has more support than they may actually have in a debate"....well I realize there are as many different opinions today on many subjects. Am I not supposed to express mine just because many others wouldn't support or agree with it? Is this trolling??
I believe this is what internet posting is about...entertainment thru difference of opinion and possibly getting someone else to think differently on a particular matter.
If trolling is something "you just know when you see it' please clue me in on it.
In humility. Scire
Quote:Troll: an internet term for a person who, through willful action, attempts to disrupt a community or garner attention and controversy through provocative messages.
Not that i have the answer LOL I wait until it is about to drop off the bottom before posting something to move it back up to the top.
Quite often a question will just disappear without an answer or any reply at all. Sometimes the poster thinks I am trolling, whatever the hell that is. Blocking is fairly easy to do and i am never offended when i am blocked. Most people just say " Damn, he's just being Buzz"
I only know of one instance where I overstepped the line and enjoyed my 3 day suspension.
Quote: DJTeddyBearhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
Provacative ? NEVER IGNORANT ? Too numerous to count.
or agree with. Those are the people that get accused
of being trolls, usually.
(Trolling is what you do with a fishing line in the water, running bait through the fish to get one to bite on the hook. However the image of a big ugly monster under the bridge fits as well).
I don't often agree with EvenBob, but I'd not call him a troll. I've seen here people troll with whose points I would agree with, but I know they are looking to get a rise. I also know a certain former poster thinks I was trolling him. But I like to use words how they should be used, not as a random insult.
For the record, I do not consider you a troll.
Pot-stirrer. But not troll.
Quite the opposite.Quote: buzzpaffToo often my attempts at satire go UN-noticed.
There noticed, but generally ignored. Although, quite frankly, I wish you'd cut it out.
Quote: DJTeddyBearBuzz -
For the record, I do not consider you a troll.
Pot-stirrer. But not troll.
Quite the opposite.
There noticed, but generally ignored. Although, quite frankly, I wish you'd cut it out.
Pay closer attention Teddy. Some of my most asinine statements are not only believed, but commented upon by the naive.
And the above statements do qualify you as a " preacher "
please everybody, so to heck with em. Just
be yourself.
Quote: EvenBobWhat you discover in the end is you can't
please everybody, so to heck with em. Just
be yourself.
My dad always used to tell people " If you do not like me, we are even !
Quote: DeMangoWizard: Did you check IP addresses, was the poster Mrjjj (Ken)?
Seemed kind of like wbuballa23, the guy who started the thread about a joker showing up in a blackjack hand.
Quote: buzzpaffJames garner wants you to pay a licensing fee.
If i quit driving the gold Firebird, you think he would let it go?
Enjoy your moment in the sun, Buzz.
Part of an 18 item 99cent menu. I only stopped in because you were to timid to order a 99cent meal.
At SASQUTCH, no less . LOL
Quote: rdw4potusDidn't Flea's suspension end yesterday?
Oops. Sorry about that Flea. I owe you a day.
On another topic, we have another secret admin effective yesterday. He is tougher than me, so be on your best behavior.
Quote: WizardOops. Sorry about that Flea. I owe you a day.
What is this--Logan's Run? :D
Quote: rdw4potusDidn't Flea's suspension end yesterday?
He hasn't logged in since he was banned, doesn't
look like he's worried about it.
Quote: WizardOn another topic, we have another secret admin effective yesterday. He is tougher than me, so be on your best behavior.
I hope it is a fair and objective admin. Would hate it if it were one of the agenda oriented members. But you know I trust your judgement Wiz!
Quote: avargovI hope it is a fair and objective admin. Would hate it if it were one of the agenda oriented members. But you know I trust your judgement Wiz!
I heard its jerry logan.
Quote: avargovI hope it is a fair and objective admin. Would hate it if it were one of the agenda oriented members. But you know I trust your judgement Wiz!
I will say that I select admins who are generally respected and liked by the whole forum. Those who tend to stay out of fights to begin with. I don't want any secret admins who already have a lot of enemies.
Quote: WizardI will say that I select admins who are generally respected and liked by the whole forum. Those who tend to stay out of fights to begin with. I don't want any secret admins who already have a lot of enemies.
I can think of two people I hope it is!
And a whole bunch I hope it isn't.