2020 Election

Quote: AZDuffman

Perhaps you should google "LA Homeless." Or learn about the gang infested areas, where men are afraid to leave their blocks.

Brazil has nice areas like Brentwood, I am sure.

It does make me feel better that the most liberal cities tend to be the ones most in decay as it shows how liberalism is a failure. Detroit to LA, same results. Just CA has palm trees.

Quote: darkoz

There are homeless everywhere

Naturally in high density populations you have higher density homeless

Quote:

If its making you feel better (laughingly you actually confirmed what I said that if your fantasies are making you feel better all the more power to you) why are you so upset?

Quote: AZDuffman

You don't get it. The liberals who hate "income inequality" when they run their own entities with no resistance produce the most of what they hate. SF is getting filled with needles and human waste. Meanwhile the top earners live great lives as they step over both. If the liberal policies were so great why all these homeless?



Only upset that people are so blind they keep voting for more of what gave them the problem. They vote for people than ban straws yet hand out free needles. Been out there 2-3 times, I do not understand how people live in CA. Wait for the next slowdown when state income tax crashes, again. Look to see 30-40 billion deficits that need closed and new taxes on anything and everything imaginable. One day it will break stretched to the limit working families.

Quote: darkoz

I prefer the freedom to be poor to the tyranny of right wing groups that want anyone different from them to be villainized.

Quote: AZDuffman

So you would rather stick with the left wing groups where anyone who does not think like them is villainized?

Quote: darkoz

So asks the guy with the Confederate flag

Quote: RS

I think you just proved AZD’s point. 🤣

Quote: AZDuffman

Detroit to LA, same results. Just CA has palm trees.

Quote:

There are homeless everywhere

Quote: EvenBob

I visited LA a few times around 1980. It
was a hole 40 years ago, mile after
mile of strip malls. And homeless bums.
I can't even imagine it today.

Quote: RS

I think you just proved AZD’s point. 🤣

Quote: darkoz

I am certain you guys support the nazi swasticka because it originated before nazism and was not a hateful symbol.

Unfortunately conservativism (sticking with the old) has the problem that liberalism (moving ahead, acceptance of change) does not.

Quote:

The power to recognize when symbols take on new and hateful power.

Thats why conservatives will defend the Confederate flag and the nazi swastikas. (As evidenced by so many white supremacists)

Symbolism is what it means to people in the here and now. Symbols that no longer are recognized have no meaning.

Quote: AZDuffman

. What sane person would want to live there?

Quote: AZDuffman

So you would rather stick with the left wing groups where anyone who does not think like them is villainized?

Quote: rxwine

So, wait, the confederate flag waver has just been waiting to embrace the rainbow flag waver all this time? I never knew that, I just suspected you wanted to reinforce how abnormal they are -- is the only reason you want to have a discussion in the first place.

Quote: AZDuffman

Huh? What on earth are you talking about.

For the upteenth time, the Confederate Flag does not have a coiled snake on it BTW.

Quote: rxwine

And the Gadsden flag doesn't look like that piece of crap.

Quote: rxwine

Proved to be a useful reference, is why.

Quote: AZDuffman

Beta wants to spend 5 Trillion on climate change.

$5 Trillion for a problem that does not exist except in people's imaginations.

"The candidate says he’ll pay the bill for his plan with $1.5 trillion from "revenues generated by structural changes to the tax code that ensure corporations and the wealthiest among us pay their fair share and that we finally end the tens of billions of dollars of tax breaks currently given to fossil fuel companies,” according to his campaign’s release."

Talk about a roundabout way of saying he is going to propose a huge tax increase.

The circus continues!

Quote: darkoz

AZ

I am just curious why you believe scientists around the world are conducting what would be one of the biggest hoaxes ever

Why do you believe scientists are lying about climate change

Quote:

Why do you believe you know better than scientists studying the situation

Quote: Fleaswatter

Is this the week that pencil neck Adam Schiff reveals all his collusion evidence?

Quote: EvenBob

A 21-year-old man named Hunter Kelly posted a short article to Medium in which he accuses Buttigieg of sexually assaulting him in February.
“I was sexually assaulted by Mayor Pete Buttigieg. I didn’t know who he was back in February, only that he told me he was an important politician. When I started seeing him on television three weeks ago as a Presidential candidate, I thought about coming forward,” writes Kelly, adding, “This is by far the hardest thing I have ever had to do.”

And so it begins..

Quote: EvenBob

A 21-year-old man named Hunter Kelly posted a short article to Medium in which he accuses Buttigieg of sexually assaulting him in February.
“I was sexually assaulted by Mayor Pete Buttigieg. I didn’t know who he was back in February, only that he told me he was an important politician. When I started seeing him on television three weeks ago as a Presidential candidate, I thought about coming forward,” writes Kelly, adding, “This is by far the hardest thing I have ever had to do.”

And so it begins..

Quote: MaxPen

Trump's approval ratings are getting ready to bust 50%.

Quote: MaxPen

Trump's approval ratings are getting ready to bust 50%.

Quote: terapined

Translation
He is currently below 50% which means he is currently an unpopular President
Conservatives cant deal with the current reality so they go for the hopeful fantasy of "getting ready"

Quote: MaxPen

I love posting #REALNEWS then sitting back and watching the river of DeNial run deep.😀

Quote: MaxPen

I love posting #REALNEWS then sitting back and watching the river of DeNial run deep.😀

Quote: AZDuffman

Adding to this Beta climate plan:


Beta: We only have ’10 years’ left on Earth if we don’t address climate change

How unintelligent can a person sound? Forget for the minute we have heard these 10 year predictions for 30 years now. Forget that Limbaugh had a famous 10 year countdown clock when Algore made the same prediction and no surprise we are all still here and doing great. Forget all that.

If civilization had only 10 years left, NOTHING would save us. We would be too far gone. Critical mass. Over.

Yet sheep will lap it up and say, "he cares so much!"

I was asked yesterday why I do not believe in GW. This is it! Guy says we will die in 10 years, but for $5 trillion, maybe just maybe all will be well.

Wake up!

Quote: darkoz

Quote: AZDuffman

Adding to this Beta climate plan:


Beta: We only have ’10 years’ left on Earth if we don’t address climate change

How unintelligent can a person sound? Forget for the minute we have heard these 10 year predictions for 30 years now. Forget that Limbaugh had a famous 10 year countdown clock when Algore made the same prediction and no surprise we are all still here and doing great. Forget all that.

If civilization had only 10 years left, NOTHING would save us. We would be too far gone. Critical mass. Over.

Yet sheep will lap it up and say, "he cares so much!"

I was asked yesterday why I do not believe in GW. This is it! Guy says we will die in 10 years, but for $5 trillion, maybe just maybe all will be well.

Wake up!

So AZ, I woke up.

This morning!

But seriously it is obvious that stating the world will end in 10 years thru carbon emissions is erroneous and I was going to 100% AGREE WITH YOU that Beto had lost any potential with me as a vote (although currently he is not my first choice anyway.)

Then I googled the statement you claimed he made and found several sources that backed you up

And was again going to post how I AGREE WITH YOU 100% that Beto had lost it.

And then I watched the interview...

And that is NOT what he said. He actually says with his new plan "we CAN cut emissions by 2030 which is just 10 years away". He does NOT say the world will end in 10 years.

I will wholeheartedly agree with you AZ if you can show me Beto actually saying what these news articles claim.

Otherwise its just fake news sorry to report to you

(And thats not even addressing why you are so gungho over your own favorite candidate Trump who says hundreds of patently false statements)

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: darkoz

Quote: AZDuffman

Adding to this Beta climate plan:


Beta: We only have ’10 years’ left on Earth if we don’t address climate change

How unintelligent can a person sound? Forget for the minute we have heard these 10 year predictions for 30 years now. Forget that Limbaugh had a famous 10 year countdown clock when Algore made the same prediction and no surprise we are all still here and doing great. Forget all that.

If civilization had only 10 years left, NOTHING would save us. We would be too far gone. Critical mass. Over.

Yet sheep will lap it up and say, "he cares so much!"

I was asked yesterday why I do not believe in GW. This is it! Guy says we will die in 10 years, but for $5 trillion, maybe just maybe all will be well.

Wake up!

So AZ, I woke up.

This morning!

But seriously it is obvious that stating the world will end in 10 years thru carbon emissions is erroneous and I was going to 100% AGREE WITH YOU that Beto had lost any potential with me as a vote (although currently he is not my first choice anyway.)

Then I googled the statement you claimed he made and found several sources that backed you up

And was again going to post how I AGREE WITH YOU 100% that Beto had lost it.

And then I watched the interview...

And that is NOT what he said. He actually says with his new plan "we CAN cut emissions by 2030 which is just 10 years away". He does NOT say the world will end in 10 years.

I will wholeheartedly agree with you AZ if you can show me Beto actually saying what these news articles claim.

Otherwise its just fake news sorry to report to you

(And thats not even addressing why you are so gungho over your own favorite candidate Trump who says hundreds of patently false statements)

I am going by the headline and also what other liberal pols have claimed on years the planet has left.

Here is where it falls apart for him. The USA is in the lead in cutting CO2 emissions. We did it by switching to natural gas! See, the left hates fracking yet because of fracking we have cut CO2 more than anyone else. We are actually meeting the goals of many of these treaties we thankfully got out of. It happened mostly on its own. No taxes, no carbon-trading schemes. None of it.

GW is still junk science gone wild. Beta still wants to tax you to death to reduce emissions. Guess what? If he gets his way the taxes will come but the cuts will not. You can count on that. We are not going back to 1800 style living. The rest of the world is even less going to do this.

The whole thing will take care of itself. Trees will make O2 out of CO2. Same as it has been since the first tree sprouted. Meanwhile, the pols like Beta and AOC will go to GW rallies in their Ford Expeditions which they have their drivers idle so the a/c keeps them cool. The believers will lap it up like some old shut in laps up what the televangelist preaches.

Quote: darkoz

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: darkoz

Quote: AZDuffman

Adding to this Beta climate plan:


Beta: We only have ’10 years’ left on Earth if we don’t address climate change

How unintelligent can a person sound? Forget for the minute we have heard these 10 year predictions for 30 years now. Forget that Limbaugh had a famous 10 year countdown clock when Algore made the same prediction and no surprise we are all still here and doing great. Forget all that.

If civilization had only 10 years left, NOTHING would save us. We would be too far gone. Critical mass. Over.

Yet sheep will lap it up and say, "he cares so much!"

I was asked yesterday why I do not believe in GW. This is it! Guy says we will die in 10 years, but for $5 trillion, maybe just maybe all will be well.

Wake up!

So AZ, I woke up.

This morning!

But seriously it is obvious that stating the world will end in 10 years thru carbon emissions is erroneous and I was going to 100% AGREE WITH YOU that Beto had lost any potential with me as a vote (although currently he is not my first choice anyway.)

Then I googled the statement you claimed he made and found several sources that backed you up

And was again going to post how I AGREE WITH YOU 100% that Beto had lost it.

And then I watched the interview...

And that is NOT what he said. He actually says with his new plan "we CAN cut emissions by 2030 which is just 10 years away". He does NOT say the world will end in 10 years.

I will wholeheartedly agree with you AZ if you can show me Beto actually saying what these news articles claim.

Otherwise its just fake news sorry to report to you

(And thats not even addressing why you are so gungho over your own favorite candidate Trump who says hundreds of patently false statements)

I am going by the headline and also what other liberal pols have claimed on years the planet has left.

Here is where it falls apart for him. The USA is in the lead in cutting CO2 emissions. We did it by switching to natural gas! See, the left hates fracking yet because of fracking we have cut CO2 more than anyone else. We are actually meeting the goals of many of these treaties we thankfully got out of. It happened mostly on its own. No taxes, no carbon-trading schemes. None of it.

GW is still junk science gone wild. Beta still wants to tax you to death to reduce emissions. Guess what? If he gets his way the taxes will come but the cuts will not. You can count on that. We are not going back to 1800 style living. The rest of the world is even less going to do this.

The whole thing will take care of itself. Trees will make O2 out of CO2. Same as it has been since the first tree sprouted. Meanwhile, the pols like Beta and AOC will go to GW rallies in their Ford Expeditions which they have their drivers idle so the a/c keeps them cool. The believers will lap it up like some old shut in laps up what the televangelist preaches.

Np.

Regardless of the GW issues (you and I disagree on their validity) we all have to beware of the headlines these days.

Looks like actually viewing video and/or sound bites is required otherwise we will fall prey to misinformation

Quote: AZD

I am going by the headline and also what other liberal pols have claimed on years the planet has left.

Quote: beachbumbabs

...and then you go on for several paragraphs misquoting and mischaracterizing what actually got said by the people you claim to oppose.

That's an incredibly weak argument you're making. YOU GO BY THE HEADLINES AND SOUND BITES? What?? And then you use that garbage spin to prove your point?

At least darkoz took the trouble to go to the source. And it should prove to you that you're not hearing what got said. You're hearing what some slanted editor wants you to hear.

Quote: AZDuffman

I took the quote from a trusted source. He still wants to steal $5 trillion to pay for it a questionable problem. That is not in dispute. And it is really the more important thing, all that money vs. what a crank might or might not have exactly said.

Quote: ams288

Sorry to bust your bubble, righties:

Far-Right Smear Merchants Try to Slime Pete Buttigieg with Bogus Sex Assault Claim

Quote: darkoz

Now now, choice of words.

It is not stealing if it is done legislatively. Then it is within the law.

It is not semantics.

I am certain we all go into casino gift shops, pay $6 for a can of pepsi and say we got robbed, but we all know the horrible truth.

It was legal. It was not theft.

If government legislates $5 trillion for GW it is not stealing even if you feel that way. Its perfectly legal appropriation

Quote: beachbumbabs

. YOU GO BY THE HEADLINES AND SOUND BITES? What?? And then you use that garbage spin to prove your point?

Quote: SOOPOO

just like the one against Kavanaugh was.

Quote: beachbumbabs

...and then you go on for several paragraphs misquoting and mischaracterizing what actually got said by the people you claim to oppose.

That's an incredibly weak argument you're making. YOU GO BY THE HEADLINES AND SOUND BITES? What?? And then you use that garbage spin to prove your point?

At least darkoz took the trouble to go to the source. And it should prove to you that you're not hearing what got said. You're hearing what some slanted editor wants you to hear.