Someone can always sue me anyway, but rendering an interpretation of statute is not the same as "practicing law without a license." You can't possibly believe that licensed attorneys are the only group permitted to discuss the law.Quote: TheGrimReaper13Lol. Non-lawyers ought not publicize legal advice or opinion. (Someone might sue you?)
if you got nuttin to lose, you don't have to worry 'bout sueers, suitors, sueez, sootties, zooers, sew (ers), or aliens from space. Life is good, for some....Quote: TheGrimReaper13Lol. Non-lawyers ought not publicize legal advice or opinion. (Someone might sue you?)
Giving bad advice is now a form of legal negligence.Quote: MathExtremistYou can't possibly believe that licensed attorneys are the only group permitted to discuss the law.
Not where there is no representation. If I tell you on this forum that you should sue your grocer for selling GMO foods, and you do and you lose, I'm not on the hook for that. If you *hired me* to give you the same advice, I would be.Quote: TheGrimReaper13Giving bad advice is now a form of legal negligence.
Think about what that would mean otherwise. Everyone who has ever published their "winning gambling system" would be on the hook for giving bad advice and therefore legally negligent.
Quote: TheGrimReaper13Lol. Non-lawyers ought not publicize legal advice or opinion. (Someone might sue you?)
Oh, I see what you did there.
Let's all go hang out a shingle.Quote: RSOh, I see what you did there.
Wouldn't that be nice. If you could actually collect, you could go around free rolling them.Quote: MathExtremist
Think about what that would mean otherwise. Everyone who has ever published their "winning gambling system" would be on the hook for giving bad advice and therefore legally negligent.
I'm wondering if you could actually win a case if you used someone's gambling system who promised you would make money?
I guess it depends who the someone is.Quote: AxelWolfI'm wondering if you could actually win a case if you used someone's gambling system who promised you would make money?
I can sell you a system, I can promise you will win. You send me money now. Should you lose you wondering if you can sue me for bad advice? Your atty has to file suit, they have to serve 'papers' on me. 'Cept I'm down in the islands buyin' H&B with what was 'your money', hard to serve those papers on me now. I'll still read the forums, maybe I'll post a pic or two of what your money bought ;-)Quote: AxelWolfWouldn't that be nice. If you could actually collect, you could go around free rolling them.
I'm wondering if you could actually win a case if you used someone's gambling system who promised you would make money?
I think it depends on what the deal was. If you paid money for a system and then lost money with it, you may have a fraud claim as long as you were truly duped -- that is, you weren't someone who knew that it was bunk in advance and was trying to freeroll. That happened just last month in Vegas:Quote: AxelWolfWouldn't that be nice. If you could actually collect, you could go around free rolling them.
I'm wondering if you could actually win a case if you used someone's gambling system who promised you would make money?
http://news3lv.com/news/local/suspect-with-guaranteed-system-of-gambling-arrested-for-securities-fraud
Truly strange thinking. Nobody would then. 2F already alluded to the civil suit consequences.Quote: MathExtremist...as long as you were truly duped -- that is, you weren't someone who knew that it was bunk in advance and was trying to freeroll.
Quote: TwoFeathersATLI can sell you a system, I can promise you will win. You send me money now. Should you lose you wondering if you can sue me for bad advice? Your atty has to file suit, they have to serve 'papers' on me. 'Cept I'm down in the islands buyin' H&B with what was 'your money', hard to serve those papers on me now. I'll still read the forums, maybe I'll post a pic or two of what your money bought ;-)
You would have to figure out how to post pictures first 2F lol.
Quote: PokerGrinderYou would have to figure out how to post pictures first 2F lol.
RR+ 1, and counting ;-)
<edit> Actually, RR+2, I forgot I charge Canadians double ;-)
on that trade. I miss Kewlj every single day,
there is nobody like him here now. He was
always willing to share so much of what
he does, I learned a lot from him.
BS is easy and fun to learn.Quote: EvenBobQfit for Kewlj, the forum really got screwed
on that trade. I miss Kewlj every single day,
there is nobody like him here now. He was
always willing to share so much of what
he does, I learned a lot from him.
I'm in no hurry to find out.Quote: MoosetonI can't wait to find out who TheGrimReaper is. 😒
Quote: MoosetonI can't wait to find out who TheGrimReaper is. 😒
Kerkebet?
that's kinda what I always thought.Quote: GreasyjohnKerkebet?
If you figured it out, everything, but it had a lot of three's and six's in it, would you still go with it?Quote: AxelWolfthat's kinda what I always thought.
I just thought it was a possibility I really haven't thought about it much. It's really not that important as long as you are not B79.Quote: TheGrimReaper13If you figured it out, everything, but it had a lot of three's and six's in it, would you still go with it?
Another thread just got locked, shut down, and of course I just happened to just post in it.
That would be the 'Discovering Beatable Games' thread.
I must be guilty, again.
Though I don't know why, again.
Seemed like mostly friendly banter, again.
Some parts of that illustrate perfectly why I have not, HAVE NOT, been added as an administrator here.
In spite of the nuance I add, I miss much of the nuance of others.
Story of my life... Just 2F
Did he tell the story here about getting mad, and throwing the baccarat shoe on the floor? Funny stuff. The casino banned him for a month.Quote: AxelWolfIt's really not that important as long as you are not B79.
I don't recall that. I'm sure it's just another one of his BS burning building stories.Quote: TheGrimReaper13Did he tell the story here about getting mad, and throwing the baccarat shoe on the floor? Funny stuff. The casino banned him for a month.
Spam.
Shoe fly, don't bother me....
Meaning someone should throw a shoe at it.
<edit> Joeldezes blog post bothers me too!
<2nd edit> is there a panic button here somewhere ;-?
<3rd edit > Eraamjeef's , what Eraamjeef's ?
And Laurietootoomuch went poof as well.
Someone's watching, I should go now....
Boz is still in jail?Quote: TwoFeathersATLSomeone's watching, I should go now....
Quote: TheGrimReaper13Boz is still in jail?
Ask Sonuvabish69.
Quote: beachbumbabsAlso, due to massive trolling in the same thread, and previous offenses, TheGrimReaper13 has been suspended, nuclear option.
Halleluia. About time.
So..... was he Kerkabet in another guise? His generally mangled and obtuse use of English grammar, logical argument and conversational English will not be missed (because he will surely return with another ID)
Quote: OnceDearHalleluia. About time.
So..... was he Kerkabet in another guise? His generally mangled and obtuse use of English grammar, logical argument and conversational English will not be missed (because he will surely return with another ID)
I always wondered how he lasted as long as he did.
From his first post, it seemed clear to me that he had been around previously.
'Having been around previously' is a term worth remembering. Credit to AMS, as far as I know he 'coined' the term. Causing Havoc after having been around previously is another term. I discern a distinction. I'm good with that ;-)Quote: ams288I always wondered how he lasted as long as he did.
From his first post, it seemed clear to me that he had been around previously.
The Reaper and I almost became buddies, I don't have many. Now I'm down to..well there's ( forgot an unfortunate incident )... I count one or two possibles, but very nearly zero actuals seems to be the way the math plays out.....
I called EB 'Buddy' once and he's had me blocked ever since ;-)
Still 'under the fridge'.... Still 2F
+1 funny point for GJ!Quote: GreasyjohnI suspected it was Kerkebet but he was trying to communicate more like normal.
'Bye' Reaper. Until we cross paths again.... ;-(
I get that Boz may have ruffled some feathers with his comment "that Larry and Freddy may be right." If the W feels that he has suffered a personal insult then I understand the suspension. But for him to add "feel free to not come back" IMO was a bit much.
I am a relatively new poster here and I also belong to other sites. I read the posts from both and so far have not made any judgment because it seems that there are two sides to the stories. The consensus is that this site has seen a decline in it's traffic/visitors. What is the benefit of suspending posters at "the drop of a hat" or hinting that certain posters are not welcome back?
I joined this forum to learn about the different games, how to and the best way to play them, and maybe seek advises from the more knowledgeable posters. Unfortunately everything that I have read and gleaned so far have only led me to the conclusion: Tread lightly.
Can you use the word "dick" on this board and not get suspended?
Let me say this again. DEEPLY TROUBLED
Quote: WizardofnothingI have spoken with norm via email and I am deeply troubled. BY what he claims in that email-
Let me say this again. DEEPLY TROUBLED
Why even bring it up? Why even contact the man responsible for all this? Why, when you go to that other site, do you not address the other mans issues but resort to profanity? Everyone here walks on eggshells.
Hi WoV. kJ posted an email address. Have you reached out to him to compare the two sides of the story? I guess it's possible that both sides will just say the other is lying, or at least exaggerating.Quote: WizardofnothingI have spoken with norm via email and I am deeply troubled. BY what he claims in that email-
Let me say this again. DEEPLY TROUBLED
kJ's posts have been surprisingly bitter, at least surprising to me, but he hasn't come off like a total nutjob. Unlike some others, cough, cough.
Quote: WizardofnothingYes I spoke to kj as well via email and judging on the two sides I would say nothing norm pressed the issue and is 72.8 percent at fault kj 23.2 and Mike 4 percent
What about the other 9900%?