Discussion II about the Suspension List
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:18:54 PM
permalink
This is a continuation of the overlong Discussion about the Suspension List. That thread has been closed as administratively unmanageable.
The Suspension List is found here.
The Suspension List is found here.
Last edited by: beachbumbabs on Mar 3, 2016
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:27:36 PM
permalink
Why not get rid of this ridiculous thread
altogether? All it's done is cause trouble,
how many have been suspended or banned
because if this thread.
altogether? All it's done is cause trouble,
how many have been suspended or banned
because if this thread.
It does not suck to be me.
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:39:12 PM
permalink
Quote: EvenBobWhy not get rid of this ridiculous thread
altogether? All it's done is cause trouble,
how many have been suspended or banned
because if this thread.
Personally, I'd be glad to see it gone. However, people do get suspended, mostly for comments in another thread. Then THAT thread, whatever it is, gets hijacked or sidetracked about what got said or why did that happen or whatever. So this thread (and the old one) are intended to collect that discussion instead of ruining numerous threads. However, that is the sole purpose of THIS thread, and it, in turn, should be kept at least mostly to that topic.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:44:01 PM
permalink
Just a quick sidebar BBB, if that thread was getting unmanageable, I would assume the Election 2016 thread is not far behind?
A flute with no holes is not a flute, a donut with no holes is a danish
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:45:09 PM
permalink
Indicative and insightful when the most popular thread on a gambling forum is about who has been / is suspended.
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:45:59 PM
permalink
My suggestion is that there is no need for discussion about it- the thread should be for mods only simply putting the suspension in witting and what it was for end of story .... The rest is just nonsense
No longer hiring, don’t ask because I won’t hire you either
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:48:40 PM
permalink
I agree there is no need to discuss it, but like BBB said, people will talk when they see a name, especially one as popular here as kewlj and want to discuss it. This allows a thread for that, rather than doing it on the thread that it happened, and on the thread another suspension happened and so on and so forth. It really is a necessary evil
A flute with no holes is not a flute, a donut with no holes is a danish
March 3rd, 2016 at 2:58:07 PM
permalink
Bbb, you should edit your original post to add a link to the suspension list itself.
(Edit: Good idea, thanks. Done. BBB)
(Edit: Good idea, thanks. Done. BBB)
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Mar 3, 2016
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed.
I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
March 3rd, 2016 at 3:01:47 PM
permalink
Quote: Gabes22I agree there is no need to discuss it
There isn't. Make a rule that no discussion
of suspensions are allowed. That would
be great.
It does not suck to be me.
March 3rd, 2016 at 3:19:13 PM
permalink
Before this thread existed there were complaints about every suspension all over the forum. I wanted to consolidate the complaining into one sty where those who liked it could frolic in the mud and those who didn't could easily avoid it.
I know 99.54% of my decisions here get questioned, but creating the original discussion of the suspension list thread I think was one of my better ones.
To those who don't like it, let me make a radical suggestion -- don't read it.
I know 99.54% of my decisions here get questioned, but creating the original discussion of the suspension list thread I think was one of my better ones.
To those who don't like it, let me make a radical suggestion -- don't read it.
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan
