USC just looked pathetic on defense. They looked like JVers trying to tackle the varsity boys. I’ll be betting against them in whatever bowl game they are in.
Michigan -3.5 @ $1.85 in the 1st quarter, so I had 2^^^ units on it.
^^^: If I didn't already have a bet earlier on them (full game ATS) then I would have just had 3 units on this (so in other words, I think this is "x x x").
Bet / Option | Unit Won / Lost |
---|---|
3.3 units Utah Utes +3.5 @ $1.83 | 2.750 |
2.2 units Michigan Wolverines -15.5 @ $1.84 | 1.848 |
3.2 units on Over 50.5 @ $1.85 | 2.720 |
Michigan -3.5 @ $1.85 in the 1st quarter, so I had 2 units on it. | -2.000 |
Total For Week | 5.318 |
NFL:
Bet / Option | Unit Won / Lost |
---|---|
2 units on the Dolphins +3.5 @ $1.90 | -2.000 |
2 units on the Seahawks' -12.5 @ $2.60 | -2.000 |
1.5 units on the New England Patriots -5.5*** @ +400 | -1.500 |
0.2 units on the Dolphins -5.5 @ +400 | -0.200 |
Total For Period | -5.700 |
Current Results:
NCAAF:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 228.055
Profit: 16.904
"Profit on Turnover": 7.41...%
NFL:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 100.06
Profit: 5.423
"Profit on Turnover": 5.41...%
Combined:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 328.115
Profit: 22.327
"Profit on Turnover": 6.80...%
I had on 2.7 units on them @ -135 ml
——
Sent by phone
Quote: ksdjdjNavy -2.5 @ -115 is about “x x”
I had on 2.7 units on them @ -135 ml
——
Sent by phone
link to original post
Luckily I couldn’t bet on this because STUPID rule prevents me from betting on a college team (ARMY) located in NYS.
What are your picks for NFL today!? Quick, games start in 3 hours!
Quote: billryanI took a flyer on Big Blue. $25 on the ML and $100 on the GMen, getting seven. With my track record, the Giants are doomed.
link to original post
I got 7.5. And also took small chance on ML too. My track record is probably worse than yours!!!!!
We can sink together….
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdj(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
What are your picks for NFL today!? Quick, games start in 3 hours!
link to original post
Just (4 bets), ATM:
2 units Panthers' +3.5 @ -110 ($1.90)
2 units Bucs' game Under 38.5 @ -110 ($1.90)
3 units Chargers' +3.5 @ -110 ($2.00)
(1.8 units Chargers' game Under 54.5 @ $1.93)
The above edits/updates were made @ about 1210 am, Pac time (all of the above in brackets are the relevant changes).
-----
Comments:
Wasn't watching the "Navy game" live (at work) but bad luck^^^ with the "TD on the blocked punt by Army".
^^^: I don't remember the exact figure, but I think Navy were about 100 yards (?) better on total yards, and just as important they also had a bigger "yards per carry/attempt" (at least before OT).
----
Update (at about half-time, for the Bucs' game):
While I was at the "betting shop" I had another look at my Bucs' bet (I don't care if anyone believes me or not) but I was very lucky that the 'book has updated their app, and have swapped the way they do the totals (used to be under on the left, and over on the right).
Anyway, long story short I am on the over 38.5 (not the under) so while I was at the "betting shop" I had $2.2k live bet on the under 45.5 @ $1.90. ###
### (important): This bet won't count as part of the "official results" for this thread, as "I posted that I am on the under 38.5" (since that is the one that I thought was value, at the time of the post / bet).
If the Chiefs' are up by 28 + pts and / or the total is 30 + pts, I plan to bet on the Broncos' and Under (respectively).
I would want to get at least:
+31.5 for the Broncos' (if down by 28) and
54.5 for the Under (if the score was 30-0)
Note 1: I would count both of these as "x x " bets, if I end up being able to have them.
Note 2: I started writing this when the score was 20-0 (it is now 27-0).
Strike-through all of the above, because the score is now 27 - 14
----
Update:
Similar plan for the Bucs' game:
If the score is 28-0, then I would want Under 45.5***
***: "x x" 49ers under 31.5 @ +100 ^^^
----
Update 2:
^^^ Lucky for me, by the time I drove to the "betting shop" the total changed to 35.5, as the 49ers went to 28-0.
I had 2.4 units on the 49ers under 35.5 @ -120
I also had 1.5 units on the Bucs' +27.5 @ $1.90 (so about "x grade")
Note: For the purposes of the "official graded bets/ results", I will still count the bet as a loss, if the 49ers total is over 31.5 but under 35.5.
Quote: ksdjdj(snip)
(1.8 units Chargers' game Under 54.5 @ $1.93)
(snip)
... and have swapped the way they do the totals (used to be under on the left, and over on the right).
Anyway, long story short I am on the over 38.5...
(snip)
link to original post
This is ridiculous, because it makes me look like a "complete amateur" , but I am on the over 54.5### for 1.8 units @ $1.93 (for the same reason as the previous total I bet).
So I took the under 55.5^^^ @ $1.90 (for 3 units).
###: This is the total that I will use for "betting on the under" in my "official graded bet results" for this game, but I am actually hoping for a total of exactly 55 (so 7 x "7-pt TDs", and 2 x FGs, is the most likely way to get that exact total).
^^^: If you are following/copying my bets, then I think the under 55.5 is between a "high x x to low x x x". So, if you haven't bet yet, then I recommend you use 110% x whatever you normally bet on my "x x" grades (the original 54.5 was a solid "x " @ $1.90 / -111, IMO).
-----
Comment(s):
This weeks' adjustment figures are going to be even messier, compared to the last time I showed " "Graded bet to real bet" adjustments".
-----
Edits (1700, Pac Time): Some minor edits to the wording in this, so didn't bother saying what was amended.
College / NFL / "Live NFL Betting" | Bet / Option | Unit Won / Lost |
---|---|---|
College Football | 2.7 units on Navy @ -135 ml | -2.700 |
NFL | 2 units Panthers' +3.5 @ $1.90 | 1.800 |
-------- | 2 units Bucs' game Under 38.5 @ $1.90 | -2.000 |
-------- | 3 units Chargers' +3.5 @ $2.00 | 3.000 |
NFL | 1.8 units Chargers' game Under 54.5 @ $1.93 | 1.674 |
"Live NFL Betting" | 2 units on the 49ers under 31.5 @ +100 | -2.000 |
"Live NFL Betting" | 1.5 units on the Bucs' +27.5 @ $1.90 | -1.500 |
-------- | Total For Period | -1.726 |
Note1: I have done the table above a bit differently this week (only one bet on College Football, is part of the reason I am doing it this way)
Note 2: I am also putting in a "Live NFL Betting" section in the "Current Results:" , below.
Current Results:
NCAAF:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 230.755
Profit: 14.204
"Profit on Turnover": 6.15...%
NFL:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 108.86
Profit: 9.897
"Profit on Turnover": 9.09...%
"Live NFL...":
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 3.5
Profit: -3.5
"Profit on Turnover": -100%
Combined:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 343.115
Profit: 20.601
"Profit on Turnover": 6.00...%
-----
"Graded bet / Real bet" adjustments : | Actual Bet | Adjustment (+ / -) | "Proof / Working " |
---|---|---|---|
NFL – Charger's Game: | 1.8 units Over 54.5 @ $1.93 | ---- | ^^^ |
NFL – Charger's Game: | under 55.5 @ $1.90 (for 3 units) | -0.774 | ^^^ |
NFL – 49ers' Game | 2 units game Over 38.5 @ $1.90 | ---- | *** |
"Live NFL Betting" – 49ers' Game | 2.2 unit live bet on the under 45.5 @ $1.90 | 5.780 | *** |
"Live NFL Betting" – 49ers' Game | 2.4 units on the 49ers under 35.5 @ -120 | 4.000 | ### |
^^^: I am actually -0.774 units worse for these parts, when adjusting from "Graded bets to Real bets" as the real money that I won for these bets was 0.9 units and not 1.674 ("Proof": +2.7 -1.8 - 1.674 = -0.774 )
***: ... 5.78 units better for these parts, ... , as the real money that I won for these bets was 1.8 units and not -2.0 ("Proof": +1.98 +1.8 + 2.0 = 5.78).
###: ... 4 units better for this part ..., as the real money that I won for these bets was 2.0 units and not -2.0 ("Proof": +2.0 + 2.0 = 4).
Overall these adjustments mean that my actual results were ~ 9 units better than what the "Graded bets" showed.
Note: The "adjustments" part is mainly for my reference &&&, so I can reconcile how I am actually going.
&&& (Edit): I decided to put the above adjustments within a "spoiler " (as I think that will look better, overall).
***: It is a Prime Time / Marquee Game, so I will probably wait until closer to the game (because then it will be a no vig market, for me).
----
Extra info:
Games | ---- | Points | Points | Expected | Actual | Predicted No. | Actual No. | ---- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Played | Team | For | Against | Win % | Win % | of Wins | of Wins | Team |
13 | PHI | 386 | 248 | 71.38% | 92.31% | 9.28 | 12 | PHI |
13 | BUF | 353 | 221 | 72.45% | 76.92% | 9.42 | 10 | BUF |
13 | KC | 384 | 298 | 62.94% | 76.92% | 8.18 | 10 | KC |
13 | MIN | 312 | 313 | 50.26% | 76.92% | 6.53 | 10 | MIN |
13 | DAL | 360 | 229 | 71.79% | 76.92% | 9.33 | 10 | DAL |
13 | SF | 317 | 197 | 72.75% | 69.23% | 9.46 | 9 | SF |
13 | BAL | 301 | 250 | 59.68% | 69.23% | 7.76 | 9 | BAL |
13 | CIN | 335 | 265 | 62.03% | 69.23% | 8.06 | 9 | CIN |
13 | MIA | 316 | 312 | 51.07% | 61.54% | 6.64 | 8 | MIA |
13 | WSH | 253 | 256 | 49.83% | 57.69% | 6.48 | 7.5 | WSH |
13 | NYG | 267 | 300 | 44.57% | 57.69% | 5.79 | 7.5 | NYG |
13 | TEN | 241 | 276 | 43.63% | 53.85% | 5.67 | 7 | TEN |
13 | LAC | 295 | 326 | 45.40% | 53.85% | 5.90 | 7 | LAC |
13 | NYJ | 264 | 243 | 54.59% | 53.85% | 7.10 | 7 | NYJ |
13 | SEA | 342 | 334 | 51.62% | 53.85% | 6.71 | 7 | SEA |
13 | NE | 276 | 239 | 57.63% | 53.85% | 7.49 | 7 | NE |
13 | TB | 224 | 254 | 44.12% | 46.15% | 5.74 | 6 | TB |
13 | DET | 349 | 347 | 50.71% | 46.15% | 6.59 | 6 | DET |
13 | GB | 263 | 302 | 43.49% | 38.46% | 5.65 | 5 | GB |
13 | JAX | 294 | 294 | 50.42% | 38.46% | 6.55 | 5 | JAX |
13 | LV | 308 | 313 | 49.61% | 38.46% | 6.45 | 5 | LV |
13 | CAR | 260 | 290 | 44.94% | 38.46% | 5.84 | 5 | CAR |
13 | ATL | 288 | 312 | 46.40% | 38.46% | 6.03 | 5 | ATL |
13 | CLE | 300 | 323 | 46.70% | 38.46% | 6.07 | 5 | CLE |
13 | PIT | 227 | 293 | 37.83% | 38.46% | 4.92 | 5 | PIT |
13 | IND | 209 | 298 | 33.25% | 34.62% | 4.32 | 4.5 | IND |
13 | ARI | 277 | 348 | 39.11% | 30.77% | 5.08 | 4 | ARI |
13 | NO | 265 | 297 | 44.70% | 30.77% | 5.81 | 4 | NO |
13 | LAR | 218 | 296 | 35.46% | 30.77% | 4.61 | 4 | LAR |
13 | DEN | 194 | 238 | 40.26% | 23.08% | 5.23 | 3 | DEN |
13 | CHI | 270 | 333 | 40.00% | 23.08% | 5.20 | 3 | CHI |
13 | HOU | 211 | 314 | 31.37% | 11.54% | 4.08 | 1.5 | HOU |
Important: I haven't adjusted these results to any "strength of schedule" yet, so it is just the "raw data".
Note 1: If any figure in the "Actual No. of Wins" ends in 0.5, then that just means that they had an "odd number of tied games" (all of those have teams have only tied once, so far this season).
Note 2: I am just using the info on the standings page on ESPN (feel free to check for errors, if you like).
----
How to use the above table to work out how to get a "ball-park estimated spread" for a game,
1) Find two teams that are playing each other this week
2) Go to the column "Expected win %" and find the figure for each team.
3) Multiply the above figures by 16.
4) Subtract the bigger figure from the smaller figure.
5a) Multiply that figure by 2 (that will be the 'dogs' "estimated spread")
5b) To work out the "estimated spread" for the favorite, just put a "- " in front of the figure.
6) Optional: Adjust for any home field advantage (I usually set this between 0 and 1 , but you can use any figure you think is a good estimated).
Important 1: This method is based on the "old"16 game regular season, so that is why step 3 is to "Multiply ... by 16".
Important 2 (but obvious): The team with the bigger "Expected win %" will always be the favorite (before making any adjustments, at least).
Important 2: This will just get you a "ball park" estimate, as it doesn't take into account things like "strength of schedule", "key injuries", "eliminate teams, tanking for draft picks^^^ ",and any other factors you think will need to make an adjustment for.
^^^: Any teams that have been eliminated from the playoffs may be subject to this. Though I personally don't believe in it strongly enough to account for it in my own estimates (I find this a very hard area to account for, so if you do use this, then it is just another adjustment you have to make to the "ball-park estimate").
Hypothetical Example using the above method ("Strongest team" vs "weakest team"):
1) Pretend SF is playing HOU this week, whether they are or aren't (I haven't checked)
2) SF = 72.75%, and HOU = 31.37%, "Expected win %"
3) SF = 11.64, and HOU = 5.02
4) 11.64 - 5.02 = 6.62.
5a) 6.62 x 2 = 13.24 = +13.24
5b) -13.24
6) I will use 0 for this game, since it is just a "hypothetical game".
Therefore, the "ball-park estimate" for SF should have them as a 13 to 13.5 point favorite when playing against HOU, (using the above figures).
-----
Other:
Have to go to work now, post has not been checked for errors.
Quote: ksdjdjI like the Giants +4.5 @ $1.90 (~ -111) as an >>> x grade*** <<< not putting this in quotes from now on (if I can remember).
***: It is a Prime Time / Marquee Game, so I will probably wait until closer to the game (because then it will be a no vig market, for me).
----
Extra info:
Games ---- Points Points Expected Actual Predicted No. Actual No. ---- Played Team For Against Win % Win % of Wins of Wins Team 13 PHI 386 248 71.38% 92.31% 9.28 12 PHI 13 BUF 353 221 72.45% 76.92% 9.42 10 BUF 13 KC 384 298 62.94% 76.92% 8.18 10 KC 13 MIN 312 313 50.26% 76.92% 6.53 10 MIN 13 DAL 360 229 71.79% 76.92% 9.33 10 DAL 13 SF 317 197 72.75% 69.23% 9.46 9 SF 13 BAL 301 250 59.68% 69.23% 7.76 9 BAL 13 CIN 335 265 62.03% 69.23% 8.06 9 CIN 13 MIA 316 312 51.07% 61.54% 6.64 8 MIA 13 WSH 253 256 49.83% 57.69% 6.48 7.5 WSH 13 NYG 267 300 44.57% 57.69% 5.79 7.5 NYG 13 TEN 241 276 43.63% 53.85% 5.67 7 TEN 13 LAC 295 326 45.40% 53.85% 5.90 7 LAC 13 NYJ 264 243 54.59% 53.85% 7.10 7 NYJ 13 SEA 342 334 51.62% 53.85% 6.71 7 SEA 13 NE 276 239 57.63% 53.85% 7.49 7 NE 13 TB 224 254 44.12% 46.15% 5.74 6 TB 13 DET 349 347 50.71% 46.15% 6.59 6 DET 13 GB 263 302 43.49% 38.46% 5.65 5 GB 13 JAX 294 294 50.42% 38.46% 6.55 5 JAX 13 LV 308 313 49.61% 38.46% 6.45 5 LV 13 CAR 260 290 44.94% 38.46% 5.84 5 CAR 13 ATL 288 312 46.40% 38.46% 6.03 5 ATL 13 CLE 300 323 46.70% 38.46% 6.07 5 CLE 13 PIT 227 293 37.83% 38.46% 4.92 5 PIT 13 IND 209 298 33.25% 34.62% 4.32 4.5 IND 13 ARI 277 348 39.11% 30.77% 5.08 4 ARI 13 NO 265 297 44.70% 30.77% 5.81 4 NO 13 LAR 218 296 35.46% 30.77% 4.61 4 LAR 13 DEN 194 238 40.26% 23.08% 5.23 3 DEN 13 CHI 270 333 40.00% 23.08% 5.20 3 CHI 13 HOU 211 314 31.37% 11.54% 4.08 1.5 HOU
Important: I haven't adjusted these results to any "strength of schedule" yet, so it is just the "raw data".
Note 1: If any figure in the "Actual No. of Wins" ends in 0.5, then that just means that they had an "odd number of tied games" (all of those have teams have only tied once, so far this season).
Note 2: I am just using the info on the standings page on ESPN (feel free to check for errors, if you like).
----
How to use the above table to work out how to get a "ball-park estimated spread" for a game,
1) Find two teams that are playing each other this week
2) Go to the column "Expected win %" and find the figure for each team.
3) Multiply the above figures by 16.
4) Subtract the bigger figure from the smaller figure.
5a) Multiply that figure by 2 (that will be the 'dogs' "estimated spread")
5b) To work out the "estimated spread" for the favorite, just put a "- " in front of the figure.
6) Optional: Adjust for any home field advantage (I usually set this between 0 and 1 , but you can use any figure you think is a good estimated).
Important 1: This method is based on the "old"16 game regular season, so that is why step 3 is to "Multiply ... by 16".
Important 2 (but obvious): The team with the bigger "Expected win %" will always be the favorite (before making any adjustments, at least).
Important 2: This will just get you a "ball park" estimate, as it doesn't take into account things like "strength of schedule", "key injuries", "eliminate teams, tanking for draft picks^^^ ",and any other factors you think will need to make an adjustment for.
^^^: Any teams that have been eliminated from the playoffs may be subject to this. Though I personally don't believe in it strongly enough to account for it in my own estimates (I find this a very hard area to account for, so if you do use this, then it is just another adjustment you have to make to the "ball-park estimate").
Hypothetical Example using the above method ("Strongest team" vs "weakest team"):
1) Pretend SF is playing HOU this week, whether they are or aren't (I haven't checked)
2) SF = 72.75%, and HOU = 31.37%, "Expected win %"
3) SF = 11.64, and HOU = 5.02
4) 11.64 - 5.02 = 6.62.
5a) 6.62 x 2 = 13.24 = +13.24
5b) -13.24
6) I will use 0 for this game, since it is just a "hypothetical game".
Therefore, the "ball-park estimate" for SF should have them as a 13 to 13.5 point favorite when playing against HOU, (using the above figures).
-----
Other:
Have to go to work now, post has not been checked for errors.
link to original post
So for ‘prime time’ games you get to bet ‘vig free’? Is there a $ limit? I often get ‘+110 instead of -110’ offers but limit is sometimes$10, sometimes $25.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdjI like the Giants +4.5 @ $1.90 (~ -111) as an >>> x grade*** <<< not putting this in quotes from now on (if I can remember).
***: It is a Prime Time / Marquee Game, so I will probably wait until closer to the game (because then it will be a no vig market, for me).
(snip)
link to original post
So for ‘prime time’ games you get to bet ‘vig free’? Is there a $ limit? I often get ‘+110 instead of -110’ offers but limit is sometimes$10, sometimes $25.
link to original post
Seemingly a "high ceiling" for the last lot of bets', as I think I managed to get $15k+ down on one side at the "no vig odds".
Note: I would guess that I won't get that for much longer, because they are already limiting me to win about $5k on the "alt odds markets".
Not that you asked, but I meant to write in the previous post that if I can get Giants +4.5 @ +100, then that bet almost automatically becomes an xxx grade one (assuming no late "key player changes").
x grade / 1.5 units Texans' +14.5 @ $1.84
***: Tried to over-bet and get on for $10k @ $1.95, but they cut me, so I had to settle with $1.92 as my average odds.
----
Extra:
Before adjusting for other factors (like Run Defense) I had the Eagles @ -10, but I think I will stay out of that game ( the Bears' will probably "surprise me" here).
Quote: ksdjdjQuote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdjI like the Giants +4.5 @ $1.90 (~ -111) as an >>> x grade*** <<< not putting this in quotes from now on (if I can remember).
***: It is a Prime Time / Marquee Game, so I will probably wait until closer to the game (because then it will be a no vig market, for me).
(snip)
link to original post
So for ‘prime time’ games you get to bet ‘vig free’? Is there a $ limit? (snip)
link to original post
Seemingly a "high ceiling" for the last lot of bets', as I think I managed to get $15k+ down on one side at the "no vig odds".
Note: I would guess that I won't get that for much longer, because they are already limiting me to win about $5k on the "alt odds markets". (snip)
link to original post
As a test***, I had $8k on the Seahawks +3.0 @ +113^^^ / $2.13 .
***: They took about 15 to 20 seconds to process it this time, though (last time I put $15k down, it went through almost instantly).
^^^: Using the link here , you should find the RTP is about the same as getting +3.5 @ $1.92 (for the "50/50" line).
For reference, they had the other side @ $1.87 / ~ -115, so almost a "no vig market" (the vig is between 1/230 to 1/240, at those odds).
Note 1: I plan on hedging all of that back, either before the game or live (if the Seahawks' are in front at any stage).
Note 2: The above bet won't count towards the graded results (since I was mainly just testing to see what limits I can currently get with that ;book).
----
Update (1650, Pac Time):
At the "special odds" the 49ers' are -3 @ $1.92### / ~ -109 and the Seahawks' are $2.08 / +108.
###: The next best odds I can get is -3 @ $1.91 / ~ -110, but I will probably try and "bet live" (and hope the Seahawks' have a lead, at least once).
Note: I could chop out the "test bet" if I wanted to and make a bit less than 1% (I probably won't because I don't like betting both sides with the same account / 'book).
---
Update 2 (1700, Pac Time):
At another 'book (the one that I took the 2.5 units +3.5 @ an average of $1.92) I can now get the 49ers' for -3.5 @ $2.30 / +130
Note: I am in the same boat though as stated in my previous update, as "...I don't like betting both sides with the same account / 'book ".
Note 1: All odds are $1.90 / ~ -111 , unless otherwise stated
Note 2 (Reminder): x = 2 units, xx = 2.5 (NA, at this time), xxx = 3 units, unless otherwise stated.
--------
Game Totals:
Cinci / Louisville: Over 39 = x
-----
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
Florida / Oregon St: Florida +10 = xxx
---
Not on these games' yet, as I am waiting to see how I go in the earlier games first (so that I don't tie-up too much of my funds).
Note: These are my planned bets (since I am not on, ATM)
E. Michigan / SJS : Under 54 = xx (2.7 units)
'Bama / K State: Over 54 = x
Mississippi St / Illinois: Over 46= xx (2.7 units)
Baylor / Air Force: Air Force +5.5 = xx (2.7 units)
C. Carolina / E. Carolina: C. Carolina +8.5 = x
Maryland / NC State: NC State +2 = xxx
----
Important:
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
Quote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
Quote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
I haven’t looked, but how many USC starters are not going to play due to not wanting to risk injury before NFL draft or now ‘the transfer portal’. Caleb Williams is injured but at least now he says he will be playing. I think ‘insiders’ will be able to clean up with the info on who won’t be playing before that info goes public.
Quote: ksdjdjCollege Bowl Grades (subject to change, especially since some of them are are close to two weeks away):
Note 1: All odds are $1.90 / ~ -111 , unless otherwise stated
Note 2 (Reminder): x = 2 units, xx = 2.5 (NA, at this time), xxx = 3 units, unless otherwise stated.
--------
Game Totals:
Cinci / Louisville: Over 39 = x
-----
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
Florida / Oregon St: Florida +10 = xxx
---
Not on these games' yet, as I am waiting to see how I go in the earlier games first (so that I don't tie-up too much of my funds).
Note: These are my planned bets (since I am not on, ATM)
E. Michigan / SJS : Under 54 = xx (2.7 units)
'Bama / K State: Over 54 = x
Mississippi St / Illinois: Over 46= xx (2.7 units)
Baylor / Air Force: Air Force +5.5 = xx (2.7 units)
C. Carolina / E. Carolina: C. Carolina +8.5 = x
Maryland / NC State: NC State +2 = xxx
----
Important:
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
link to original post
I’m in with you on Troy. Got +2.5 at -105.
I also have Miami OH + 10.5 on third leg of parlay that first two hit already! I’ll probably hedge a little. Don’t tell Mike!
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
I haven’t looked, but how many USC starters are not going to play due to not wanting to risk injury before NFL draft or now ‘the transfer portal’. Caleb Williams is injured but at least now he says he will be playing. I think ‘insiders’ will be able to clean up with the info on who won’t be playing before that info goes public.
link to original post
My first thought as well plus transfer portal.
Quote: ksdjdj(snip)
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
(snip)
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
link to original post
I had 2.2 units on BYU @ +150 /$2.50 ML (xxx)
Note: The odds available to me were "not good enough ATS" so that is why I changed it to ML.
-----
Comment(s):
Troy have gone from +1.5 to +3 since I had my bet. : (
Quote: billryanQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
link to original post
Normally these are the exact situations that I am looking for in bowl games. I want a team that is disappointed to be playing in a game against a smaller team trying to prove something.
I agree 100%. USC has no motivation.
Quote: DRichQuote: billryanQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
link to original post
Normally these are the exact situations that I am looking for in bowl games. I want a team that is disappointed to be playing in a game against a smaller team trying to prove something.
I agree 100%. USC has no motivation.
link to original post
Please name one player on USC that will not be motivated to play as hard as he can? You don’t think their left cornerback isn’t going to run his ass off stay with Tulane’s best receiver? That USC’s RB doesn’t want to add his name to the list of USC RBs that had 100 yard games in a Bowl?
I think the ‘not motivated’ trope is pure bullshit. Kind of like the ‘trap game’ bullshit. If Philly loses this week it’s because it was a ‘trap game’. If Philly wins this week it wasn’t a trap game.
I DO agree that certain players may not play in a lower bowl game but would have played in a playoff game. The presence or lack thereof of important players can of course make a difference.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: billryanQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
link to original post
Normally these are the exact situations that I am looking for in bowl games. I want a team that is disappointed to be playing in a game against a smaller team trying to prove something.
I agree 100%. USC has no motivation.
link to original post
Please name one player on USC that will not be motivated to play as hard as he can? You don’t think their left cornerback isn’t going to run his ass off stay with Tulane’s best receiver? That USC’s RB doesn’t want to add his name to the list of USC RBs that had 100 yard games in a Bowl?
I think the ‘not motivated’ trope is pure bullshit. Kind of like the ‘trap game’ bullshit. If Philly loses this week it’s because it was a ‘trap game’. If Philly wins this week it wasn’t a trap game.
I DO agree that certain players may not play in a lower bowl game but would have played in a playoff game. The presence or lack thereof of important players can of course make a difference.
link to original post
I guess I should say less motivated. Will the players put in as much effort in the month of practices before the game against Tulane as they would if they were playing Georgia for a chance at a national championship? My guess is no.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: billryanQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
link to original post
Normally these are the exact situations that I am looking for in bowl games. I want a team that is disappointed to be playing in a game against a smaller team trying to prove something.
I agree 100%. USC has no motivation.
link to original post
Please name one player on USC that will not be motivated to play as hard as he can? You don’t think their left cornerback isn’t going to run his ass off stay with Tulane’s best receiver? That USC’s RB doesn’t want to add his name to the list of USC RBs that had 100 yard games in a Bowl?
I think the ‘not motivated’ trope is pure bullshit. Kind of like the ‘trap game’ bullshit. If Philly loses this week it’s because it was a ‘trap game’. If Philly wins this week it wasn’t a trap game.
I DO agree that certain players may not play in a lower bowl game but would have played in a playoff game. The presence or lack thereof of important players can of course make a difference.
link to original post
I guess I should say less motivated. Will the players put in as much effort in the month of practices before the game against Tulane as they would if they were playing Georgia for a chance at a national championship? My guess is no.
link to original post
Much less motivation, and you can bet practices weren't nearly as intense. The coaching staff won't be developing new plays for a minor bowl, and the players will spend more time sightseeing before the game. It's a meaningless exhibition for USC, but a national showcase for their opponents.
Quote: billryanQuote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: billryanQuote: DRichTwo weeks ago USC was assumed to be in the college football playoffs as one of the four best teams. Today they are a 2 point favorite over Tulane, How far can you fall? I know, Tulane is decent, they beat Kansas State but did lose to that powerhouse of Southern Mississippi.
link to original post
Perhaps the Trojan's motivations aren't so strong. As you said, two weeks ago they were preparing to play for a National Title. Now they are playing Tulane.
link to original post
Normally these are the exact situations that I am looking for in bowl games. I want a team that is disappointed to be playing in a game against a smaller team trying to prove something.
I agree 100%. USC has no motivation.
link to original post
Please name one player on USC that will not be motivated to play as hard as he can? You don’t think their left cornerback isn’t going to run his ass off stay with Tulane’s best receiver? That USC’s RB doesn’t want to add his name to the list of USC RBs that had 100 yard games in a Bowl?
I think the ‘not motivated’ trope is pure bullshit. Kind of like the ‘trap game’ bullshit. If Philly loses this week it’s because it was a ‘trap game’. If Philly wins this week it wasn’t a trap game.
I DO agree that certain players may not play in a lower bowl game but would have played in a playoff game. The presence or lack thereof of important players can of course make a difference.
link to original post
I guess I should say less motivated. Will the players put in as much effort in the month of practices before the game against Tulane as they would if they were playing Georgia for a chance at a national championship? My guess is no.
link to original post
Much less motivation, and you can bet practices weren't nearly as intense. The coaching staff won't be developing new plays for a minor bowl, and the players will spend more time sightseeing before the game. It's a meaningless exhibition for USC, but a national showcase for their opponents.
link to original post
I bet practices are as intense as always. These are kids who want to make ‘tape’ that an NFL team will see. Best I can recall, the practices are limited by NCAA rules, and I’ll bet $1 USC does the max. Probably like EVERY other bowl team.
If Caleb Williams is playing I’ll be betting USC. If he’s not, Tulane.
By the way, it’s not like USC is some perennial playoff team. Have they ever qualified? Certainly not recently. These kids are just doing what they’ve done each year. Have a pretty good year and go to a bowl.
Quote: ksdjdjCollege Bowl Grades (subject to change, especially since some of them are are close to two weeks away):
Note 1: All odds are $1.90 / ~ -111 , unless otherwise stated
Note 2 (Reminder): x = 2 units, xx = 2.5 (NA, at this time), xxx = 3 units, unless otherwise stated.
--------
Game Totals:
Cinci / Louisville: Over 39 = x
-----
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
Florida / Oregon St: Florida +10 = xxx
---
Not on these games' yet, as I am waiting to see how I go in the earlier games first (so that I don't tie-up too much of my funds).
Note: These are my planned bets (since I am not on, ATM)
E. Michigan / SJS : Under 54 = xx (2.7 units)
'Bama / K State: Over 54 = x
Mississippi St / Illinois: Over 46= xx (2.7 units)
Baylor / Air Force: Air Force +5.5 = xx (2.7 units)
C. Carolina / E. Carolina: C. Carolina +8.5 = x
Maryland / NC State: NC State +2 = xxx
----
Important:
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
link to original post
Florida only gets 8 now.
I went with you on EMU under 54.5
And BYU +4.5
Both 1/2 point better than you got.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdjCollege Bowl Grades (subject to change, especially since some of them are are close to two weeks away):
Note 1: All odds are $1.90 / ~ -111 , unless otherwise stated
Note 2 (Reminder): x = 2 units, xx = 2.5 (NA, at this time), xxx = 3 units, unless otherwise stated.
--------
Game Totals:
Cinci / Louisville: Over 39 = x
-----
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
Florida / Oregon St: Florida +10 = xxx
---
Not on these games' yet, as I am waiting to see how I go in the earlier games first (so that I don't tie-up too much of my funds).
Note: These are my planned bets (since I am not on, ATM)
E. Michigan / SJS : Under 54 = xx (2.7 units)
'Bama / K State: Over 54 = x
Mississippi St / Illinois: Over 46= xx (2.7 units)
Baylor / Air Force: Air Force +5.5 = xx (2.7 units)
C. Carolina / E. Carolina: C. Carolina +8.5 = x
Maryland / NC State: NC State +2 = xxx
----
Important:
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
link to original post
Florida only gets 8 now.
I went with you on EMU under 54.5
And BYU +4.5
Both 1/2 point better than you got.
link to original post
Comment(s):
28^^^ pts in the first half and 3 pts in the 2nd half for the Cinci game. But I wasn't watching the game, as I think it started ~2am "East Australia Time"?
^^^: I am guessing the "live betting total" was around 47 to 48.5 at half-time(?)
I don't know why Florida went to +8, has anyone recently opted in/out or any other late injuries/changes, for that game?
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdjQuote: ksdjdj(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
... Next is Bills. This one is just ML.
link to original post
I like the Bills @ -9.0^^^, so I had them -7.5*** @ +105 for 2 units / as an x grade bet.
^^^: The raw/gross figure was Bills' ~ -6.8, before "taking a guess" for strength of schedule, injuries, etc.
***: Reminder to use the link here , or the one here preferably, as it is more "up to date" (for "estimating which spread is better value at any particular price-point").
Note: BOLD text added a bit before 1600, Pac Time
----
Update (Made before 1630, Pac Time):
I "forgot about the weather" (stupid me, was too "enthralled" by the Vikings' game, and to a lessor extent the Browns' game) but I think the "statistically lower scoring due to snowy/windy/cold weather" will be off-set "a little bit" by the Bills' (maybe) being a bit more used to "playing in that kind of climate/ those kinds of conditions", and more importantly "Tua not having any / or negligible experience in those types of conditions".
Note 1(a): The above bet will still count towards my "graded bet results", but I would probably reduce the estimated line to about -8 (from -9).
Note 1(b): Because of this, I would recommend you not have the bet "Bills' -7.5 @ +105 (or "alt line equivalent") " now, if you are generally trying to copy my bets (so hopefully you haven't made this one, yet).
Also, during that play I thought the Dolphins' were giving away some "smart penalties" with all those holds near the end (but too bad for them, it still didn't prevent a TD).
----
Live-betting (half-time):
I had a $1300 "quasi-hedge-bet" on the "Dolphins to score 10 (or more) pts in the 2nd half @ ~ -130 ",
Note 1: This hedge bet, won't count towards my "graded bets" (I will put it in the adjustment section, if I decide to post it anywhere, in this thread).
Note 2: Unlike what I said in another thread recently, this is my real bet (both in odds and amount bet) because I had it live with a "betting shop" (they can't bar me or restrict my business as easily at the "betting shop", when compared to online 'books ).
Bengals (-9.5): 1 unit @ +215
Bengals (-10.5): 1 unit @ +250
Note: Probably ~ xx grade, if taking the -3.5 / "standard spread for the Bengals"
Jaguars (-9.5): 1 unit @ +700
Note: Probably ~xx grade, if taking the +4.5 / "standard spread for the Jags' ".
------
This is xx:
Trevor Lawrence Total Passing Yards Over 245.5: 0.1 units @ -115 (tried to get on for 2.5 units, but they cut me to well short of what I wanted, and moved the Passing Yards to 250.5, too).
Comment: Hopefully this is because it is a "prop/novelty" bet, and not because they are looking to bar me soon (?)
------
This is x:
Steelers' (+3): 2 units @ $1.85 / ~ -117.5
Steelers' (ML): 0.1 units @ +136
Quote: ksdjdjQuote: SOOPOOQuote: ksdjdjQuote: ksdjdj(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
link to original post
(snip)
Update (Made before 1630, Pac Time):
(snip)..."statistically lower scoring due to snowy/windy/cold weather"... (snip)
link to original post
Comment(s):
When I wrote the above supposedly I was watching the live weather, and then I found out the "live weather feed" was 3+ hours old (si when I posted this, it was way off what was actually happening, at the time).
Anyway, I need to try and find some friends or acquaintances living near these stadiums, so I can be "in the loop" a bit more (and to confirm what I am seeing, is actually happening).
Note: This is at the "Prime Times - Special odds", so if you can get +4.5 @ -110, then it is only x grade (in other words, I would have had ~2 units, at those odds).
----
Extra:
Not watching the games live, as I am just looking at the scores on ESPN's website, but who would have thought that after 3 4 TDs the Chiefs would be behind 7 the Chiefs would be behind 1 going into the 2nd half (I know it is still early, so anything can happen...?).
Going by the live odds at one 'book, I had the chance of 2 TDs by each team as ~5/18 (this is after knowing 4 TDs were going to be scored, but not who would score them).
Note: A lot of this was being written when the Texans' were up by 7, (see strike-through(s) )
-----
Extra (2):
After looking at just the Net Yards and Average Yards (YPP) the score should be about 23 - 7 to KC, but when you take into account the Fumble by KC, then the current score of 16-14 makes sense.
Note: KC were on ~284 Net Yards / 6.6 YPP and HOU were 139 / 4, when I wrote this update.
Quote: ksdjdjThese are grade xxx:
Bengals (-9.5): 1 unit @ +215
Bengals (-10.5): 1 unit @ +250
(snip)
link to original post
Not over yet, but I am glad the Bucs' just went for two and missed, because it is an 11 pt game (Fingers' crossed).
Edit: Looks' good as the Bengals' have the ball now, and are in Victory Formation.
----
Update (about 1705, Pac Time):
Quote: ksdjdjxxx / 3 units Giants +4.5 @ +100
(snip)
link to original post
If I had a someone I trust with another account, I could take Commanders' *** -3.5 @ +100 at the "promotional odds" .
***: Probably want it to move to -3 @ -110 (or better) before I would have considered doing that, though.
Quote: ksdjdjCollege Bowl Grades (subject to change, especially since some of them are are close to two weeks away):
Note 1: All odds are $1.90 / ~ -111 , unless otherwise stated
Note 2 (Reminder): x = 2 units, xx = 2.5 (NA, at this time), xxx = 3 units, unless otherwise stated.
--------
Game Totals:
Cinci / Louisville: Over 39 = x
-----
Spreads (ATS):
UTSA / Troy: Troy +1.5 = xxx (2.8 units)
Florida / Oregon St: Florida +10 = xxx
---
Not on these games' yet, as I am waiting to see how I go in the earlier games first (so that I don't tie-up too much of my funds).
Note: These are my planned bets (since I am not on, ATM)
E. Michigan / SJS : Under 54 = xx (2.7 units)
'Bama / K State: Over 54 = x
Mississippi St / Illinois: Over 46= xx (2.7 units)
Baylor / Air Force: Air Force +5.5 = xx (2.7 units)
C. Carolina / E. Carolina: C. Carolina +8.5 = x
Maryland / NC State: NC State +2 = xxx
----
Important:
Not on this game yet, as I think the line may change in my favor (?)
SMU / BYU: BYU +4 = xxx (2.8 units)
link to original post
This post is to mainly show me what I have already bet on, and what I still plan to bet on, for the College Bowl Games:
Note 1: All the ones in bold in the above quote have been wagered on.
Note 2 (Reminder): Had 2.2 units on BYU @ $2.50 ML (so not on ATS, for that one).
----
Next lot of bets (since I am betting these games in batches):
2.8 units on Michigan / SJS : Under 54.5 @ $1.86 (still a high xx bet).
2.2 units Air Force +4.5 @ $1.94 (downgraded from xx to x, because the best line I can get went from +5.5 to +4.5).
I wanted to bet on at least one more, but this was all that was available to me, ATM.
***: I think this is about x grade @ +100 (so ~ 54% estimated chance).
###: I would prefer to wait and see if the Rams' are down 17+ points at half time (or even a bit into the 2nd half) and then back them at +20.5 or higher (I think this will be roughly xx if I can get the Rams' +20.5, if the above or similar occurs).
Quote: ksdjdj(snip)
###: I would prefer to wait and see if the Rams' are down 17+ points at half time (or even a bit into the 2nd half) and then back them at +20.5 or higher (I think this will be roughly xx if I can get the Rams' +20.5, if the above or similar occurs).
link to original post
I will wait for one more stop (hopefully) by the packers defense, and then probably bet live.
Score is 24-6 to GB at the time of this post
Edit/Update (~2315, Pac Time):The strike-through above was my "excuse" at the time, but I was really waiting for my lunch and didn't want to leave the table, even to make a "great +EV bet", IMO (the time was around 1315 where I live, when I originally made this post).
——
Sent from phone
——
Score 24-12 update
Took rams +15.5 @ 1.8 for 2.5 units (so xx)
——
Sent from phone, again
NFL / "Live NFL Betting" | Bet / Option | Units Won / Lost |
---|---|---|
NFL | 2.5 units Seahawks' +3.5 @ $1.92 | -2.500 |
-------- | 1.5 units Texans' +14.5 @ $1.84 ### | 1.260 |
-------- | Bills @ -7.5 @ +105 for 2 units | -2.000 |
-------- | Bengals (-9.5): 1 unit @ +215 | 2.150 |
-------- | Bengals (-10.5): 1 unit @ +250 | 2.500 |
-------- | Jaguars (-9.5): 1 unit @ +700 | -1.000 |
-------- | T Lawrence Total Passing Yards Over 245.5: 0.1 units @ $1.87 ^^^ | 0.087 |
-------- | Steelers' (+3): 2 units @ $1.85 | 1.700 |
-------- | Steelers' (ML): 0.1 units @ +136 | 0.136 |
-------- | 3 units Giants +4.5 @ +100 | 3.000 |
NFL | 3.3 units on the Chargers -2.5 @ $1.83 / -120 | 2.750 |
"Live NFL Betting" | Rams' +15.5 @ $1.8 for 2.5 units*** | 2.000 |
-------- | Total For Period | 10.083 |
###: Two "blunders" with the game, 1: I could have received $1.90 closer to game time, so that would have become a "high xx bet" / a ~2.7 unit bet (but at least that was an error I don't have much control over)
2 (more important / more control): I should have had at least another 0.5 units on it closer to game time, but forgot. : (
^^^: Going by memory here, as well, but I think I had this one as "... I wanted 2.5(?) units but they cut my bet to 0.1 units... " , so I won't bother doing the work for these kinds of bets anymore (I thought the fair / "50/50" total should have been somewhere between 285.5 to 295.5 passing yards).
***: Glad it won, I had to "sweat out" that bet. Also, too bad I was waiting for my lunch@@@, other-wise I would have taken the Rams @ the +22.5 that I could have received when it was 24-6 (like I originally planned).
@@@: I am the type of person who seemingly "prefers' to eat my food when it is hot, over making money" (in other words, an "idiot").
Current NFL Results:
NCAAF:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 230.755
Profit: 14.204
"Profit on Turnover": 6.15...%
NFL:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 126.36
Profit: 17.98
"Profit on Turnover": 14.22...%
"Live NFL...":
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 6
Profit: -1.5
"Profit on Turnover": -25%
Combined:
Turnover (Total bet, so far): 343.115
Profit: 20.601
"Profit on Turnover": 6.00...%
Note: I will update the NCAAF and Combined Results, when all College Bowl bets have been resolved.
------
. Lost $8k on a "limit testing" bet on the Seahawks' (main reason decided not to hedge: "I don't like hedging with the same 'book"),
. Won ~$1.9k on the Packers' @ ML / $1.31,
. Won ~$1.8k on the Packers -5.5 @ $1.68
. Won $1,650 on "Green Bay Packers -6.5 x Under 41.5 Points " @ +220
. Won $750 on the Giants -6.5 @ +500.
. Won $5k on the Browns' $7.5k @ -150
. Won $1,520 on the Browns' -2.5 @ $1.95.
. Somehow won $1.3k on the Vikings +1.5 @ $1.52
. I lost $2.7k on the 49ers' (most @ -9.5, and some @ -10.5).
. I think I lost roughly $900 on other bets', an example of one of those bets is in the link here (I lost ~$70 on the series of bets, in that example)
. Total adjustments: ~ +$2.3k for the period.
-----
Other:
. Spelling not checked
. The figures in this post seem ok to me (haven't doubled checked them, though).
Quote: SOOPOODo you have any picks on the 3 college games today? I am already in on EMU under 54.5. The line is now 53. I have 4 profit boosts I need to use!
link to original post
I really like San Jose -4.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOODo you have any picks on the 3 college games today? I am already in on EMU under 54.5. The line is now 53. I have 4 profit boosts I need to use!
link to original post
I really like San Jose -4.
link to original post
I took your advice. Go San Jose St!
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOODo you have any picks on the 3 college games today? I am already in on EMU under 54.5. The line is now 53. I have 4 profit boosts I need to use!
link to original post
I really like San Jose -4.
link to original post
. 2 units Toledo over 51.5 @ $1.90 (x)
. 2.1 units San Jose -3.5 @ $1.85 (x) - spread changed to -4.5 as I was having the bet, so I am not on : (
. 2.5 units San Jose ML @ $1.53 / ~ -190 (x) - would have preferred the -3.5 @ $1.85, though.
Note: The above are in bold, so that I know that I already had my bets on these games.
. Also, a $100 / "for fun bet" on Liberty +3.5 @ $1.90***
***: I originally liked them as ~x, but a site that I use to track the "smart money" (amongst other things) suggests that they are betting on Toledo in that game (so up to you)?
----
Other:
I can only find 2 college games today ?
----
Update (~1230): Minor edit, removed a word from a sentence (the one starting with " *** ").
. Thanks. Only two games today. I’ll check the O/U on Toledo and will join you if it’s available. I already have Liberty +5 from around a week ago. I took San Jose -4 at +100.Quote: ksdjdjQuote: DRichQuote: SOOPOODo you have any picks on the 3 college games today? I am already in on EMU under 54.5. The line is now 53. I have 4 profit boosts I need to use!
link to original post
I really like San Jose -4.
link to original post
. 2 units Toledo over 51.5 @ $1.90 (x)
. 2.1 units San Jose -3.5 @ $1.85 (x) - spread changed to -4.5 as I was having the bet, so I am not on : (
. 2.5 units San Jose ML @ $1.53 / ~ -190 (x) - would have preferred the -3.5 @ $1.85, though.
Note: The above are in bold, so that I know that I already had my bets on these games.
. Also, a $100 / "for fun bet" on Liberty +3.5 @ $1.90***
***: I originally liked them as ~x, but a site that I use to track the "smart money" (amongst other things) suggests that the they are betting on Toledo in that game (so up to you)?
----
Other:
I can only find 2 college games today ?
link to original post
Quote: SOOPOO
I took your advice. Go San Jose St!
link to original post
After the Eagles stopped them on the one yard line in the 2nd quarter it seems the momentum has switched and the Eagles are playing better.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOO
I took your advice. Go San Jose St!
link to original post
After the Eagles stopped them on the one yard line in the 2nd quarter it seems the momentum has switched and the Eagles are playing better.
link to original post
Another example of two really bad football teams playing a totally meaningless game. And as usual, I’ve picked the more bad team instead of the less bad team!