Yes there is an imposter posting there, impersonating more than just a few of us. It's one thing to insult each other at these forums, quite another to post where someone's family (especially bereaved family) might view the nonsense.
The original question shouldn't be hard to follow.Quote: MDawgA little hard to follow all of that If this Then that will happen, logic, but, okay!
And air filtration machines at the casino gym.
Nowadays you can't always find an antibacterial gel dispensing machine, or masks. If you want either, that is.
Pool chairs were separated, 2 by 2.
Sanitation packets in all rooms at all casinos upon arrival.
Plastic covered drinking glasses.
Plexiglass at tables.
Plexiglass at the cages remains. Probably a good anti-robbery deterrent, like at banks.
And at at least one casino, high limit lounge remains No Smoking.
Quote: AxelWolfQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: AxelWolfTo name a few: You also believed many things Rob singer has said. You also believe you saw 18 yo's in a row. You believed your son hit 5 royals in one day and still lost. I don't think you're the best person to judge the situation.Quote: AlanMendelson
Personally I think Mdawg has some kind of an advantage play. And it's no doubt something his critics never heard of and therefore don't suspect it.
link to original post
link to original post
Why are you insulting me?
And why are you insulting me with incidents that have nothing to do with Mdawg.
Do you always insult people when they disagree with you?
Yes, there are some things that Rob Singer said that I believe.
My son misled me with incorrect information. Being his father I believed him. That's what fathers do.
And you just had to bring up the 18 yos?
There's no need for you to insult and attack me.
link to original post
No, not usually.
I guess there would have to be something for you to believe.
He mislead or you assumed? A good reporter would've followed up when pressed on the issue many times for a
a long period of time, especially before suggesting a 5k challenge/bet.
Yes, the 18 yo's thing helps support my opinion that your opinion is probably flawed.
I don't think it's insulting and attacking. I guess it was flippant and unnecessary and for that, I apologize.
link to original post
Is that like apologizing after you run someone over with your car?
Perhaps they walked in front of my moving car, I would still feel bad and apologize for hitting them, even tho they walked right into it.Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: AxelWolfQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: AxelWolfTo name a few: You also believed many things Rob singer has said. You also believe you saw 18 yo's in a row. You believed your son hit 5 royals in one day and still lost. I don't think you're the best person to judge the situation.Quote: AlanMendelson
Personally I think Mdawg has some kind of an advantage play. And it's no doubt something his critics never heard of and therefore don't suspect it.
link to original post
link to original post
Why are you insulting me?
And why are you insulting me with incidents that have nothing to do with Mdawg.
Do you always insult people when they disagree with you?
Yes, there are some things that Rob Singer said that I believe.
My son misled me with incorrect information. Being his father I believed him. That's what fathers do.
And you just had to bring up the 18 yos?
There's no need for you to insult and attack me.
link to original post
No, not usually.
I guess there would have to be something for you to believe.
He mislead or you assumed? A good reporter would've followed up when pressed on the issue many times for a
a long period of time, especially before suggesting a 5k challenge/bet.
Yes, the 18 yo's thing helps support my opinion that your opinion is probably flawed.
I don't think it's insulting and attacking. I guess it was flippant and unnecessary and for that, I apologize.
link to original post
Is that like apologizing after you run someone over with your car?
link to original post
As demonstrated also by just a stainless Tag Heuer on his wrist (it might be a Zenith, but - same company). Assuming he's not getting paid to wear it, that is.
No we didn't ask him about vaccination!
Quote: MDawgAxelWolf, never mind forget the whole thing. Dropped.
If you want to PM me a question or two about my casino play, do so.
link to original post
Thank you. That is one less monkey on my back. For the record, at the time the challenge was dropped, I had not received sufficient evidence to support Axel's quote of Mdawg.
As a reminder, quoting from other forums is against the rules here. If one does quote another forum member, please use the exact words and a link to the original post in this forum.
$5 billion stadium has little AC: How LA plans to cool fans down for Thursday’s NFL opener
Aaron looks like he has taken one to many hits to the head in that photoQuote: MDawgAaron Rodgers appears to be a pretty humble, simple guy.
As demonstrated also by just a stainless Tag Heuer on his wrist (it might be a Zenith, but - same company). Assuming he's not getting paid to wear it, that is.
No we didn't ask him about vaccination!
link to original post
Quote: WizardQuote: MDawgAxelWolf, never mind forget the whole thing. Dropped.
If you want to PM me a question or two about my casino play, do so.
link to original post
Thank you. That is one less monkey on my back. For the record, at the time the challenge was dropped, I had not received sufficient evidence to support Axel's quote of Mdawg.
As a reminder, quoting from other forums is against the rules here. If one does quote another forum member, please use the exact words and a link to the original post in this forum.
link to original post
Well now that it's over let me give my own two cents worth on the matter
Over the years of the adventures threads several wishabees (and wannabes as well) have expressed that MDawg plays without a mathematical advantage!
Posters like Coachbelly, and even Alan recently have vociferously defended MDawg as telling the truth about winning against negative expectation games with no more than luck and demonstrably proven methods that fail.
MDawg has been known to quote some of these posters sometimes out of context, especially when they praise him, including even repeatedly quoting me when I said"MDawg is for real" which simply meant the guy exists because the Wizard met him". (It may not have been out of context for any reason than to highlight a compliment)
MDawg therefore has implicitly allowed the conception he plays with no advantage.
I know some will argue he can't be held accountable for the words of others but...
I am quite certain if posters repeatedly defended Axel as someone who gambled without an advantage you would be hearing words from him. Axel would consider such statements as reflection of his reputation.
You guys know I certainly would be vocal!
So my conclusion is that MDawg allowed misconception through silence.
Quote: darkozQuote: WizardQuote: MDawgAxelWolf, never mind forget the whole thing. Dropped.
If you want to PM me a question or two about my casino play, do so.
link to original post
Thank you. That is one less monkey on my back. For the record, at the time the challenge was dropped, I had not received sufficient evidence to support Axel's quote of Mdawg.
As a reminder, quoting from other forums is against the rules here. If one does quote another forum member, please use the exact words and a link to the original post in this forum.
link to original post
Well now that it's over let me give my own two cents worth on the matter
Over the years of the adventures threads several wishabees (and wannabes as well) have expressed that MDawg plays without a mathematical advantage!
Posters like Coachbelly, and even Alan recently have vociferously defended MDawg as telling the truth about winning against negative expectation games with no more than luck and demonstrably proven methods that fail.
MDawg has been known to quote some of these posters sometimes out of context, especially when they praise him, including even repeatedly quoting me when I said"MDawg is for real" which simply meant the guy exists because the Wizard met him". (It may not have been out of context for any reason than to highlight a compliment)
MDawg therefore has implicitly allowed the conception he plays with no advantage.
I know some will argue he can't be held accountable for the words of others but...
I am quite certain if posters repeatedly defended Axel as someone who gambled without an advantage you would be hearing words from him. Axel would consider such statements as reflection of his reputation.
You guys know I certainly would be vocal!
So my conclusion is that MDawg allowed misconception through silence.
link to original post
Yes. I can see how Mdawg can profit. But I've never said he doesnt play without an advantage.
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
So even if Mdawg plays only with a Martingale system he can win.
And I'm not ruling out that he counts cards or edge sorts or uses smoke and mirrors.
Quote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
I disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
Quote: MDawgAaron Rodgers appears to be a pretty humble, simple guy.
As demonstrated also by just a stainless Tag Heuer on his wrist (it might be a Zenith, but - same company). Assuming he's not getting paid to wear it, that is.
No we didn't ask him about vaccination!
link to original post
From everything I have heard and read he is quite the arrogant a-hole.
Quote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
Went for the 50 yard line tickets.
Would have been happy with either team winning, first part of game a little slow, Chargers took the lead and maintained it to the end.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
link to original post
I was only going to apologize if OnceDear said my interpretation was wrong - and he didn't - so there is no apology
you are touting the martingale as a winning system under certain conditions
I'm not going to spend time rebutting this other than to say:
no legit professional gambler would ever make such a ridiculous statement
in any event - I'm done commenting on your posts - life is too short to get animated over your nonsense
I'm going to leave the work for others - I've done my share - you won't ever again be bothered by me
.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
link to original post
I was only going to apologize if OnceDear said my interpretation was wrong - and he didn't - so there is no apology
you are touting the martingale as a winning system under certain conditions
I'm not going to spend time rebutting this other than to say:
no legit professional gambler would ever make such a ridiculous statement
in any event - I'm done commenting on your posts - life is too short to get animated over your nonsense
I'm going to leave the work for others - I've done my share - you won't ever again be bothered by me
.
link to original post
Thank you for saying this. I'm not a professional gambler. Thank heaven I never needed to be.
And having you disappear would be a blessing.
Please stick to this. Please.
I disagree.Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
link to original post
There can be no bankroll without limits, so the rest falls apart.
Quote: AlanMendelson
And having you disappear would be a blessing.
Please stick to this. Please.
link to original post
Alan. That is, in my opinion, a most obnoxious statement. If anyone said that of you, I would expect you to rightly feel insulted.
As it is, I believe LLR has broad shoulders and won't complain.
I ask that you show some grace and accept that he has derided your posts as is his right.
Quote: OnceDearQuote: AlanMendelson
And having you disappear would be a blessing.
Please stick to this. Please.
link to original post
Alan. That is, in my opinion, a most obnoxious statement. If anyone said that of you, I would expect you to rightly feel insulted.
As it is, I believe LLR has broad shoulders and won't complain.
I ask that you show some grace and accept that he has derided your posts as is his right.
link to original post
Right?
Would he say it to my face at a cocktail or dinner party?
Sometimes people on Internet forums don't realize that there is a cordial way to disagree.
Quote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
link to original post
There can be no bankroll without limits, so the rest falls apart.
link to original post
I was quite clear when I said "if Mdawg has the bankroll."
This goes hand in hand with all the other theoretical long term posts used to discuss gambling.
It was theoretical just like all the other math discussions about edges and returns.
Or are the rules different for me and perhaps Mdawg?
there can be no bankroll without limits.Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: OnceDearI disagree.Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
link to original post
Thank you OnceDear.
Lilredrooster, do you feel good insulting me?
link to original post
I believe you misread the meaning of OnceDear's post
I believe he meant that other posts by you were more ridiculous - not that this one was not ridiculous
hopefully he will read this and clarify
I feel bad for the Wizard - he tried to set up a site for highly accurate info about games
and because he is a gentleman his rules require him to accept a horrible post such as this re the martingale on his site
Edit:
OnceDear has been around for more than an hour this morning since I originally posted this and he has not commented
I'm all but sure that is because I am right that you misread his post and he has not commented because he does not want to make yet another negative comment
if I'm wrong - I'm sure he will correct me - and if that is the case - I will also apologize
.
link to original post
Apparently shooting first and apologizing later is okay in your book? Well it's not in mine.
To continue my point: if Mdawg has the bankroll and the table limits available then yes he can use a Martingale to have an edge.
When the player has no limits to his bankroll or betting limits the Martingale will make you a winner.
link to original post
There can be no bankroll without limits, so the rest falls apart.
link to original post
I was quite clear when I said "if Mdawg has the bankroll."
This goes hand in hand with all the other theoretical long term posts used to discuss gambling.
It was theoretical just like all the other math discussions about edges and returns.
Or are the rules different for me and perhaps Mdawg?
link to original post
Mdawg cannot and does not have infinite bankroll. IF he used martingale it would not give him an edge.
All rather moot since in this thread, he denies that any edge
that he might have is derived from martingale
If you just lost a bet or two or three in a row that might mean that things are not happening as expected, so why jump the bet?
Here's exactly what I said responding to a post by Darkoz.
Quote: AlanMendelson
Yes. I can see how Mdawg can profit. But I've never said he doesnt play without an advantage.
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
So even if Mdawg plays only with a Martingale system he can win.
And I'm not ruling out that he counts cards or edge sorts or uses smoke and mirrors.
link to original post
So again, lilredrooster attacked and insulted me and Oncedear you're perpetuating it.
And here is his comment. Tell me how my comment is wrong? I can give you reference after reference via Google that my comment about a Martingale is correct.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AlanMendelson
As I've said, even a Martingale betting system gives you an advantage if you have the bankroll and the betting limits allow it.
this is maybe the most ridiculous post ever from you
and that's really saying something
.
link to original post
Quote: DRichQuote: MDawg
Aaron Rodgers appears to be a pretty humble, simple guy.
link to original post
From everything I have heard and read he is quite the arrogant a-hole.
link to original post
Quote: avianrandyI will say I enjoyed his brief stint as guest host on Jeopardy. He was absolutely aloof though when the green bay packers was one of the answers to the questions and no one got it lol
link to original post
Maybe it was an act he was putting on but both during this fireside chat and when we met him personally, also when we took pictures with him, he seemed more like someone who recognizes that his fifteen minutes might end at any time. We talked about how he used to live in southern Cal, and how he likes to surf, normal stuff. He liked my wife and in a sort of respectful way not like say a celebrity trying to make an impression on her or anything like that, which was another point in his favor.
My Dad spent a lot of time around a lot of celebrities in southern Cal during their heyday when celebrities were given great deference and treated like royalty and he says that he wouldn't bring his girlfriends around some of them because they'd always try to hit on them.
Also if you're willing to fill out the survey on your receipt the next time you come in you'll get a discount, something free or at least a buy one get one free deal.
It's rare when we eat fast food, but when we do might as well make it an easy discounted process. Fast food isn't inexpensive anymore, I don't think? isn't it something like five dollars for French Fries these days? (Tell them to take it easy on the salt! though.)
A list of foods has been mentioned. In the context of my post about fast food....
lettuce
celery
broccoli
carrots
peas
stringbeans
cabbage
cauliflower
eggplant
beets
okra
bean sprouts
chickpeas
brussels sprouts
kidney beans
lima beans
soybeans
bean sprouts
alfalfa sprouts
bok choy
Today we will eat at least 6 items off that list. Even when we travel we will eat at least several off that list. A day Louie, a day!
None of that stuff is boring. It is healthful.
Keep in mind that a McDonald's hamburger with cheese might contain something from all four food groups, including lettuce and tomatoes but doesn't mean it is a balanced meal or healthful.
Ready to get on with the day.
Vegas Shooter's Gambling Draws New Attention To Video Poker
Shackleford said, if players stay true to a perfect strategy — one designed to maximize their performance over the long haul, such as by getting rid of potentially decent cards like low pairs to increase chances of a big-payout royal flush — their luck will turn, based on statistics, and they'll break even or come close to it. When you add in the freebies from the casino, the player can come out ahead.
"Vegas is full of people that are basically just gambling for free," Shackleford said. "I think the shooter was one of these people who was basically milking the system, getting free vacations."
Las Vegas shooter gambled $100,000 an hour in video poker with 'constant stream of booze' and was VIP guest at tournaments with free rooms and shopping sprees
I bring this up because in the second article there is a reference to Bob Dancer made $1 million from video poker, but also as to the Wizard, Shackleford himself used to lose $25,000 in a single day - but once won $40,000 when he got a royal flush. He said: 'In the long run I can say it's averaged out and my results are where they should be.' meaning, what, that the Wizard is a net loser at video poker? I wasn't actually aware that he used to play at that level, losing and winning at that level. Did the Wizard play for "freebies" too like the person he describes in the article?
Video poker was described by the National Gambling Impact Study Commission in the late 1990s as being the 'crack-cocaine' of gambling because it is so addictive.
WhY the F would anyone do that? YOU HAD A CLEAR ADVANTAGE. I would be willing to propose a challenge that would test some of the things you have claimed. I don't need to be there. I would take the same deal that you did any day of the week. You did nothing special or prove anything other than you are willing to take a good deal whenever you see it.Quote: MDawgLet's do another Dark Oz challenge! At 20K a week (even if not every week), you have money to burn! How about it, $2K for me, another $500. for the Wizard. Same terms, I'll win again, and the crowds will roar with approval over all three of us.
link to original post
(1) DarkOz continues to have money to burn.
(2) MDawg wins.
And, Wizard and I will get to pal around as he gets paid and enjoys comp'ed drinks.
A win-win all the way around.
Quote: MDawgFreshly squeezed orange juice off oranges that were on the tree just minutes prior, and some kind of vegetable cold press wife made herself this morning. And a shot containing ginger and turmeric among other things.
We just bought a Myer Lemon and a Key Lime tree. I might also need to get an Orange tree.
I have no doubt DarkOz makes a significant amount of money doing what he does. .. He's not the only one doing the EC run.Quote: MDawgIt will establish two things,
(1) DarkOz continues to have money to burn.
(2) MDawg wins.
And, Wizard and I will get to pal around as he gets paid and enjoys comp'ed drinks.
A win-win all the way around.
link to original post
He's absolutely a nice guy, .but he is absolutely NOT the MFAPOTEC.
SURE, I give him shit, BUT I have respect what he specializes at.
NO, I don't like the fact he feel as if he has something to prove and gives up TMI.
Whatever the case DO is a good guy IMHO.
Quote: AxelWolfI have no doubt DarkOz makes a significant amount of money doing what he does. .. He's not the only one doing the EC run.Quote: MDawgIt will establish two things,
(1) DarkOz continues to have money to burn.
(2) MDawg wins.
And, Wizard and I will get to pal around as he gets paid and enjoys comp'ed drinks.
A win-win all the way around.
link to original post
He's absolutely a nice guy, .but he is absolutely NOT the MFAPOTEC.
SURE, I give him shit, BUT I have respect what he specializes at.
NO, I don't like the fact he feel as if he has something to prove and gives up TMI.
Whatever the case DO is a good guy IMHO.
link to original post
Thank you very much.
Now if I can figure out what MFAPOTEC stands for?
The thing about AxelWolf is that his feeling towards you might depend on how he feels that day. He might give you (qualified) praise one day, and lay an insult on you another, or both at the same time.
Most Feared AP On The East Coast
ETA: fixed typo
Quote: unJon
Most Feared AP On The East Coast
link to original post
I'm afraid that's too many letters for a license plate.
Since Darkoz has suggested "crew" as appropriate,
Quote: darkoz
Just call us the crew.
link to original post
I think his license plate should be
C L A P
Crew Leader AP
No security people will dare approach him when he's known as The Clap.
Quote: unJonJeez scene I know that one
Most Feared AP On The East Coast
link to original post
Lol, wow, thanks.
Point to one other AP with APB's placed on him by NJ state troopers with the words, "no charges against him but be on the lookout for him" and I will agree.
Thanks Unjon for the translation.
Quote: MDawgThe thing about AxelWolf is that his feeling towards you might depend on how he feels that day. He might give you (qualified) praise one day, and lay an insult on you another, or both at the same time.
link to original post
Yes but AWolf's saying that you are "absolutely NOT the MFAPOTEC" goes hand in hand with his dubbing you BusBoy.
I.E. Don't be so quick to accept praise from AWolf as what he giveth with one hand, he taketh with the other. Or just not care too much about what he says one way or another.
Quote: MDawgQuote: MDawgThe thing about AxelWolf is that his feeling towards you might depend on how he feels that day. He might give you (qualified) praise one day, and lay an insult on you another, or both at the same time.
link to original post
Yes but AWolf's saying that you are "absolutely NOT the MFAPOTEC" goes hand in hand with his dubbing you BusBoy.
I.E. Don't be so quick to accept praise from AWolf as what he giveth with one hand, he taketh with the other. Or just not care too much about what he says one way or another.
link to original post
I have to agree under the circumstances.
IMO Dark's stories are 10000000 % more believable than yours.Quote: MDawgQuote: MDawgThe thing about AxelWolf is that his feeling towards you might depend on how he feels that day. He might give you (qualified) praise one day, and lay an insult on you another, or both at the same time.
link to original post
Yes but AWolf's saying that you are "absolutely NOT the MFAPOTEC" goes hand in hand with his dubbing you BusBoy.
I.E. Don't be so quick to accept praise from AWolf as what he giveth with one hand, he taketh with the other. Or just not care too much about what he says one way or another.
link to original post
Quote: MDawgOr just not care too much about what AxelWolf says one way or another.
link to original post
The next Vegas trip is coming up soon. Or...we might already be here. Session reports will be presented.