Quote: DRichIn Las Vegas high income tip earning jobs are one of the reasons the education system here is rated so low. So many kids are dropping out of high school because the tip earning jobs pay so much and don't require a HS diploma.
A 17 year old kid can easily get a job earning $40k-$50k valet parking cars in Las Vegas. If he stays in the business he will be making $60k-$70k in 10 years. I know, I have a step son in that position.
I also think there are many other reasons the education system there is rated so low, but under the new rules, I'll pretty much stop at this point.
Quote: tringlomaneI also think there are many other reasons the education system there is rated so low, but under the new rules, I'll pretty much stop at this point.
Schools in Henderson are above average in everything but graduation rate. It's keeping them in school when recruiters are offering kids crazy money that is challenging.
Quote: billryanOne of my neighbors does something for the Clark County school system. We were talking one day and he told me about the drop out problem in Henderson. Between the boys leaving for casinos and girls leaving to dance.....
Contrast that with Bisbee where I have sixty plus applications for four part time jobs.
What do make HS dropouts do for casinos? Leaving for casinos? Am I missing something? What are they doing? I'm confused.
Thank you, and no problem, I'm glad we could clear that up. BTW, you might not have seen my separate Tipping Guide page, where I say, "I'm a bit of a communist when I tip. If I see that a dealer is making $30/hr. from other people overtipping, I might not tip at all, even if it's at the Bellagio and I'm betting black. But at a low-end casino like the El Cortez where dealers make as little as $88 a day, I might tip twice what I normally do even if I'm betting red. A typical dealer at the El Cortez needs my $10/hr. more than a typical dealer at the Bellagio needs my $5/hr."Quote: tringlomaneUghhhhh...I apologize. I had a major reading comprehension fail. I read it as you suggested you should tip them based on what they actually make, not what you THINK they should make. So ignore the rest of my post other than the Linq, Harrah's, Casino Royale thing, which you already fixed.
Perhaps the average age for a high school graduate in Las Vegas is 22 and they drop out at 21 to get those wonderful Casino jobs. 😁Quote: MaxPenWhat do make HS dropouts do for casinos? Leaving for casinos? Am I missing something? What are they doing? I'm confused.
REALLY?Quote: DRich
A 17 year old kid can easily get a job earning $40k-$50k valet parking cars in Las Vegas. .
I have no idea if this is true or not but I would be willing to bet one has to be at least 18. I can't even imagine an insurance company allowing this. That sounds like lawsuit City if something bad were to happen.
Quote: MaxPenWhat do make HS dropouts do for casinos? Leaving for casinos? Am I missing something? What are they doing? I'm confused.
I am not saying that they are dropping out to go directly to the casinos. The point is they know they don't need a diploma to make a middle class living in Las Vegas.
Quote: MaxPenWhat do make HS dropouts do for casinos? Leaving for casinos? Am I missing something? What are they doing? I'm confused.
That's the first step.
Zero shock at all in who brought it up.
Quote: BozAmazed communism could still be brought up under the new “rule”.
Zero shock at all in who brought it up.
But he's not facilitating a political argument by using the word in this context. It would be akin to someone saying, "I'm a capitalist when I tip. The harder they work, the more they get." That statement isn't arguing the merits of doing it that way. If people would get suspended for statements like this, then we're over policing this thing.
Quote: EvenBob
After watching several of these dumpster
diving videos, I have to wonder how you
keep your dignity and self respect while
standing in a dumpster looking for food.
After awhile it has to get to you. Like
George Costanza fishing the eclair out
of the garbage and eating it. The last
10 seconds of this says it all:
I know it doesn't calculate every conceivable thing someone might want an answer about, so there's no need to suggest other calculations; I have a laundry list of things to add to the calculator already if I can find the time.
Interesting request.Quote: MichaelBluejayI just added a Roulette Calculator to Easy Vegas. It's in beta, so there's a good chance something doesn't work right, if not the math then the interface. Feel free to bang on it and see if you can get it to break.
Nice calculator, I agree.
I found 2 errors just looking (not banging yet)
#1) avg number of uniques 37 numbers/20 spins = 15.6097 my calculation (15.62 fast sim)
THE calculator shows 9.7
note:
a formula found at math.stackexchange.com is just wrong as are many others I found there
so I did my own using a Markov chain.
It can be done easily in Excel using (binomial probability function) this
37-(BINOMDIST(0,20,1/37,FALSE)*37) = 15.6097
pari/gp code (has the formula)
spins=20;
numbers=37;
\\do not change below
k=0;\\successes
p=1/numbers;
a=binomial(spins,k)*p^k*(1-p)^(spins-k);\\formula binomial probability
aa=numbers-(a*numbers);\\formula mean uniques X spins
aaDec=1.*aa;
aa
aaDec
Spins | not hit (37) | unique #s(37) | not hit (38) | unique #s(38) | Spins |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 36.00 | 1.00 | 37.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
2 | 35.03 | 1.97 | 36.03 | 1.97 | 2 |
3 | 34.08 | 2.92 | 35.08 | 2.92 | 3 |
4 | 33.16 | 3.84 | 34.16 | 3.84 | 4 |
5 | 32.26 | 4.74 | 33.26 | 4.74 | 5 |
6 | 31.39 | 5.61 | 32.38 | 5.62 | 6 |
7 | 30.54 | 6.46 | 31.53 | 6.47 | 7 |
8 | 29.72 | 7.28 | 30.70 | 7.30 | 8 |
9 | 28.91 | 8.09 | 29.89 | 8.11 | 9 |
10 | 28.13 | 8.87 | 29.10 | 8.90 | 10 |
11 | 27.37 | 9.63 | 28.34 | 9.66 | 11 |
12 | 26.63 | 10.37 | 27.59 | 10.41 | 12 |
13 | 25.91 | 11.09 | 26.87 | 11.13 | 13 |
14 | 25.21 | 11.79 | 26.16 | 11.84 | 14 |
15 | 24.53 | 12.47 | 25.47 | 12.53 | 15 |
16 | 23.87 | 13.13 | 24.80 | 13.20 | 16 |
17 | 23.22 | 13.78 | 24.15 | 13.85 | 17 |
18 | 22.60 | 14.40 | 23.51 | 14.49 | 18 |
19 | 21.98 | 15.02 | 22.89 | 15.11 | 19 |
20 | 21.39 | 15.61 | 22.29 | 15.71 | 20 |
21 | 20.81 | 16.19 | 21.71 | 16.29 | 21 |
22 | 20.25 | 16.75 | 21.13 | 16.87 | 22 |
23 | 19.70 | 17.30 | 20.58 | 17.42 | 23 |
24 | 19.17 | 17.83 | 20.04 | 17.96 | 24 |
25 | 18.65 | 18.35 | 19.51 | 18.49 | 25 |
26 | 18.15 | 18.85 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 26 |
27 | 17.66 | 19.34 | 18.50 | 19.50 | 27 |
28 | 17.18 | 19.82 | 18.01 | 19.99 | 28 |
29 | 16.72 | 20.28 | 17.54 | 20.46 | 29 |
30 | 16.26 | 20.74 | 17.07 | 20.93 | 30 |
31 | 15.82 | 21.18 | 16.62 | 21.38 | 31 |
32 | 15.40 | 21.60 | 16.19 | 21.81 | 32 |
33 | 14.98 | 22.02 | 15.76 | 22.24 | 33 |
34 | 14.58 | 22.42 | 15.35 | 22.65 | 34 |
35 | 14.18 | 22.82 | 14.94 | 23.06 | 35 |
36 | 13.80 | 23.20 | 14.55 | 23.45 | 36 |
37 | 13.43 | 23.57 | 14.17 | 23.83 | 37 |
38 | 13.06 | 23.94 | 13.79 | 24.21 | 38 |
39 | 12.71 | 24.29 | 13.43 | 24.57 | 39 |
40 | 12.37 | 24.63 | 13.08 | 24.92 | 40 |
41 | 12.03 | 24.97 | 12.73 | 25.27 | 41 |
42 | 11.71 | 25.29 | 12.40 | 25.60 | 42 |
43 | 11.39 | 25.61 | 12.07 | 25.93 | 43 |
44 | 11.08 | 25.92 | 11.75 | 26.25 | 44 |
45 | 10.78 | 26.22 | 11.44 | 26.56 | 45 |
46 | 10.49 | 26.51 | 11.14 | 26.86 | 46 |
47 | 10.21 | 26.79 | 10.85 | 27.15 | 47 |
48 | 9.93 | 27.07 | 10.56 | 27.44 | 48 |
49 | 9.66 | 27.34 | 10.29 | 27.71 | 49 |
50 | 9.40 | 27.60 | 10.02 | 27.98 | 50 |
51 | 9.15 | 27.85 | 9.75 | 28.25 | 51 |
52 | 8.90 | 28.10 | 9.50 | 28.50 | 52 |
53 | 8.66 | 28.34 | 9.25 | 28.75 | 53 |
54 | 8.43 | 28.57 | 9.00 | 29.00 | 54 |
55 | 8.20 | 28.80 | 8.77 | 29.23 | 55 |
56 | 7.98 | 29.02 | 8.53 | 29.47 | 56 |
57 | 7.76 | 29.24 | 8.31 | 29.69 | 57 |
58 | 7.55 | 29.45 | 8.09 | 29.91 | 58 |
59 | 7.35 | 29.65 | 7.88 | 30.12 | 59 |
60 | 7.15 | 29.85 | 7.67 | 30.33 | 60 |
61 | 6.96 | 30.04 | 7.47 | 30.53 | 61 |
62 | 6.77 | 30.23 | 7.27 | 30.73 | 62 |
63 | 6.58 | 30.42 | 7.08 | 30.92 | 63 |
64 | 6.41 | 30.59 | 6.90 | 31.10 | 64 |
65 | 6.23 | 30.77 | 6.71 | 31.29 | 65 |
66 | 6.07 | 30.93 | 6.54 | 31.46 | 66 |
67 | 5.90 | 31.10 | 6.36 | 31.64 | 67 |
68 | 5.74 | 31.26 | 6.20 | 31.80 | 68 |
69 | 5.59 | 31.41 | 6.03 | 31.97 | 69 |
70 | 5.44 | 31.56 | 5.88 | 32.12 | 70 |
71 | 5.29 | 31.71 | 5.72 | 32.28 | 71 |
72 | 5.15 | 31.85 | 5.57 | 32.43 | 72 |
73 | 5.01 | 31.99 | 5.42 | 32.58 | 73 |
74 | 4.87 | 32.13 | 5.28 | 32.72 | 74 |
75 | 4.74 | 32.26 | 5.14 | 32.86 | 75 |
76 | 4.61 | 32.39 | 5.01 | 32.99 | 76 |
77 | 4.49 | 32.51 | 4.88 | 33.12 | 77 |
78 | 4.37 | 32.63 | 4.75 | 33.25 | 78 |
79 | 4.25 | 32.75 | 4.62 | 33.38 | 79 |
80 | 4.13 | 32.87 | 4.50 | 33.50 | 80 |
81 | 4.02 | 32.98 | 4.38 | 33.62 | 81 |
82 | 3.91 | 33.09 | 4.27 | 33.73 | 82 |
83 | 3.81 | 33.19 | 4.15 | 33.85 | 83 |
84 | 3.70 | 33.30 | 4.04 | 33.96 | 84 |
85 | 3.60 | 33.40 | 3.94 | 34.06 | 85 |
86 | 3.51 | 33.49 | 3.83 | 34.17 | 86 |
87 | 3.41 | 33.59 | 3.73 | 34.27 | 87 |
88 | 3.32 | 33.68 | 3.64 | 34.36 | 88 |
89 | 3.23 | 33.77 | 3.54 | 34.46 | 89 |
90 | 3.14 | 33.86 | 3.45 | 34.55 | 90 |
91 | 3.06 | 33.94 | 3.36 | 34.64 | 91 |
92 | 2.97 | 34.03 | 3.27 | 34.73 | 92 |
93 | 2.89 | 34.11 | 3.18 | 34.82 | 93 |
94 | 2.82 | 34.18 | 3.10 | 34.90 | 94 |
95 | 2.74 | 34.26 | 3.02 | 34.98 | 95 |
96 | 2.67 | 34.33 | 2.94 | 35.06 | 96 |
97 | 2.59 | 34.41 | 2.86 | 35.14 | 97 |
98 | 2.52 | 34.48 | 2.78 | 35.22 | 98 |
99 | 2.46 | 34.54 | 2.71 | 35.29 | 99 |
100 | 2.39 | 34.61 | 2.64 | 35.36 | 100 |
101 | 2.32 | 34.68 | 2.57 | 35.43 | 101 |
102 | 2.26 | 34.74 | 2.50 | 35.50 | 102 |
103 | 2.20 | 34.80 | 2.44 | 35.56 | 103 |
104 | 2.14 | 34.86 | 2.37 | 35.63 | 104 |
105 | 2.08 | 34.92 | 2.31 | 35.69 | 105 |
106 | 2.03 | 34.97 | 2.25 | 35.75 | 106 |
107 | 1.97 | 35.03 | 2.19 | 35.81 | 107 |
108 | 1.92 | 35.08 | 2.13 | 35.87 | 108 |
109 | 1.87 | 35.13 | 2.08 | 35.92 | 109 |
110 | 1.82 | 35.18 | 2.02 | 35.98 | 110 |
111 | 1.77 | 35.23 | 1.97 | 36.03 | 111 |
112 | 1.72 | 35.28 | 1.92 | 36.08 | 112 |
113 | 1.67 | 35.33 | 1.87 | 36.13 | 113 |
114 | 1.63 | 35.37 | 1.82 | 36.18 | 114 |
115 | 1.58 | 35.42 | 1.77 | 36.23 | 115 |
116 | 1.54 | 35.46 | 1.72 | 36.28 | 116 |
117 | 1.50 | 35.50 | 1.68 | 36.32 | 117 |
118 | 1.46 | 35.54 | 1.63 | 36.37 | 118 |
119 | 1.42 | 35.58 | 1.59 | 36.41 | 119 |
120 | 1.38 | 35.62 | 1.55 | 36.45 | 120 |
[1] "Number of numbers:37, spins:20, mean numbers show:15.6097, mean numbers NOT shown:21.3903"
> print(formatC(data, digits=16),quote=FALSE)
not drawn Probability or less at least
u=1 36 1.600174122010431e-30 1.600174122010431e-30 1
u=2 35 3.020221763663338e-23 3.02022192368075e-23 0.9999999999999998
#2) probability of at least 1 unique number should be 1 or 100% for spins >=1
I hard code this in my code so it is always that.
calculator took some time to put together
well done
Quote: MichaelBluejayI just added a Roulette Calculator
Nice whistle and bell, not sure of
it's usefulness in playing the
actual game of roulette.
I actually forgot to code in the "Avg. number of unique hits" case, so the code was defaulting to another case (probably the avg. number of hits of an even-money bet). I just coded it in, using your formula. And good catch on "at least 1 unique" needing to show 100%. Incidentally, I had already trapped other cases, so that <0.01 is reported as such (rather than rounding down to zero), and >99.9% is reported as such (rather than rounding up to 100%, except when the answer truly is 100%).
Would you like a thank-you credit on that page, and if so, using your screen name or real name?
what is easier for you?Quote: MichaelBluejayWould you like a thank-you credit on that page, and if so, using your screen name or real name?
I still have not got back to the calculator as the Arizona/Hawaii game is STILL going
45-35. 5 minutes left in game. I took Hawaii. should have taken the over.
I just looked at the Calc and something still is not right, but will look closer tomorrow.
Are you only coding for recent computers using recent browsers?
probability of hitting a specific number [x] times in a row.
That 'x' box should open up as a tall narrow box with 1,2,3,4, etc. in it, but instead is totally blank.
I got me a Dell Inspiron 15 windows something and internet explorer 10?
Java is a nick name for coffee, Script is a man in the middle processor for encryption.
IE10 is 7 years old. Microsoft replaced it with IE 11 in 2013, then with a totally new browser (Microsoft Edge) in 2015. IE market share for versions 10 and 11 *combined* is only 5%. I would suggest you upgrade to MS Edge, but a better solution would be to install Chrome, Safari, or Firefox instead. Microsoft has a long history of putting out crappy, incompatible browsers, and although the latest versions aren't as lousy as earlier versions, I distrust them just because of their reputation. It's not a coincidence that the error report you just gave me was for IE. The calculator works fine in the three major browsers, and tellingly, I didn't have to put in any special code to get it to work on any of those browsers.
But I'll make you a deal: If you really want to stick with MS for some reason, install the latest MS Edge and see if you have the same problem. If you do, I'll buy a PC laptop so I can troubleshoot it.
upgrade? Install?Quote: MichaelBluejay. I would suggest you upgrade to MS Edge, but a better solution would be to install Chrome, Safari, or Firefox instead.
I had a recent episode involving the loss of 110 pounds and a crisis of some magnitude involving persistent loss of cerebral spinal fluid and lymph fluid. i'm trying to bounce back from the mental effects but I live in the county poorhouse at an even higher rent than before. I have friends who are helping me re-learn rules for playing blackjack and relearning Ultra-Basic Strategy, because social workers won't pay for a tutor for anything related to gambling. It took me three weeks to relearn how to read a book during which I covered up the deficit by just carrying one around with me.
Even on the computer that I have, I cant recall how to invoke certain programs or how to highlight text for copying or how to find stuff I know is stored on the drives.
so financially upgrading anything is unlikely and even if I could afford new software I probably cant learn it yet.
To be clear, all web browsers are free, and always have been. So it wouldn't cost you anything to download and install a better browser, but given your recent challenges, I'll understand if it's something you'd rather not bother with right now.
well known IE bug. Has something to do when the width (or height) of the drop down box not being specified, IIRC.Quote: FleaStiffultimate roulette calculator
probability of hitting a specific number [x] times in a row.
That 'x' box should open up as a tall narrow box with 1,2,3,4, etc. in it, but instead is totally blank.
IE sucks
Google Chrome can download to Win 10 with no problem and import your IE bookmarks if that matters.
I did that years ago and happy I did.
The only reason why IE was popular in the 1st place was because it was FREE and knocked out the competition when others charged for their browser.
It really was/is a horrible browser.
at leastQuote: MichaelBluejayAnd good catch on "at least 1 unique" needing to show 100%.
9 unique numbers over 10 spins (38 slots) should be about 0.6972321476726648, The calc still shows 100%.
I have not looked at your code.
'at least' would be the sum of exactly X or more
I do not know of a simple formula for that.
added: or one could for 'at least' 9 subtract from 1 '8 or less'
exactly 9 unique numbers over 10 spins should be 0.4239925222333773
The calc shows 32%.
that should be enough for now as i am still getting over the win by Hawaii last night (NCAAF)
[1] "Number of numbers:38, spins:10, mean numbers show:8.89518, mean numbers NOT shown:29.1048"
> print(formatC(data, digits=16),quote=FALSE)
not drawn Probability or less at least
u=1 37 6.052678839146945e-15 6.052678839146945e-15 1
u=2 36 1.144379988117513e-10 1.144440514905905e-10 0.9999999999999939
u=3 35 7.522002943422907e-08 7.533447348571966e-08 0.9999999998855559
u=4 34 9.623608642540555e-06 9.698943116026274e-06 0.9999999246655265
u=5 33 0.0004079840069144484 0.0004176829500304747 0.9999903010568839
u=6 32 0.007227058919520089 0.007644741869550564 0.9995823170499695
u=7 31 0.05957170921701931 0.06721645108656987 0.9923552581304493
u=8 30 0.2355514012407652 0.3027678523273351 0.9327835489134301
u=9 29 0.4239925222333773 0.7267603745607123 0.6972321476726648
u=10 28 0.2732396254392876 1 0.2732396254392876
simulation data
group middle freq freq/100
----------------------------------------------
3.50 <= x < 4.50 4.00 17 0.00%
4.50 <= x < 5.50 5.00 425 0.04%
5.50 <= x < 6.50 6.00 7305 0.73%
6.50 <= x < 7.50 7.00 59638 5.96%
7.50 <= x < 8.50 8.00 235038 23.50%
8.50 <= x < 9.50 9.00 424491 42.45%
9.50 <= x < 10.50 10.00 273086 27.31%
----------------------------------------------
4.00 17
5.00 425
6.00 7305
7.00 59638
8.00 235038
9.00 424491
10.00 273086
----------------------------------------------
cumulative
----------------------------------------------
3.50 <= x < 4.50 4.00 17 0.00%
4.50 <= x < 5.50 5.00 442 0.04%
5.50 <= x < 6.50 6.00 7747 0.77%
6.50 <= x < 7.50 7.00 67385 6.74%
7.50 <= x < 8.50 8.00 302423 30.24%
8.50 <= x < 9.50 9.00 726914 72.69%
9.50 <= x < 10.50 10.00 1000000 100.00%
----------------------------------------------
4.00 17
5.00 442
6.00 7747
7.00 67385
8.00 302423
9.00 726914
10.00 1000000
Quote: MichaelBluejayWow, I'm very sorry to hear about your troubles. I can't imagine how difficult that must be.
To be clear, all web browsers are free, and always have been. So it wouldn't cost you anything to download and install a better browser, but given your recent challenges, I'll understand if it's something you'd rather not bother with right now.
So says the end all, be all King of Knowledge.
Just ask him.
looking here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/437172/probability-of-number-of-unique-numbers-in-37-roulette-wheel-spinsQuote: 7crapsat least
9 unique numbers over 10 spins (38 slots) should be about 0.6972321476726648, The calc still shows 100%.
I have not looked at your code.
'at least' would be the sum of exactly X or more
I do not know of a simple formula for that.
Now, I do know of a simple formula for that.
I have the formulas working (They are inclusion/exclusion)
The one post has 2 different ways of doing the same thing, I have just worked with the first.
'at least' X uniques in N spins
pari/gp code
s=10;\\spins
u=9;\\uniques
n=38;\\number of numbers
a=sum(k=0,n,((-1)^(k+u-n)*\
binomial(k-1,n-u)*binomial(n,k)*(n-k)^s)/n^s);
aDec=1.*a;
a
aDec
returns: 0.69723214767266493262987345154757660700
'at least' X uniques in N spins formula: sum(k=0,n,((-1)^(k+u-n)*binomial(k-1,n-u)*binomial(n,k)*(n-k)^s)/n^s)
binomial() is the number of combinations
added: the formula for the probability of exactly X uniques would be
sum(k=0,n,((-1)^(k+u-n)*binomial(k,n-u)*binomial(n,k)*(n-k)^s)/n^s)
pari/gp code
s=20;\\spins
u=15;\\uniques
n=37;\\number of numbers
a=sum(k=0,n,((-1)^(k+u-n)*\
binomial(k,n-u)*binomial(n,k)*(n-k)^s)/n^s);
aDec=1.*a;
a1chanceIn=1/aDec;
a
aDec
a1chanceIn
this should help The calc out
I found the typo in my code. After I'd verified that my test case got the right answer using hard-coded values, I changed all the hard-coded values to variables, except one. So my test case continued to get the right answer even with the faulty formula, because the value for the test case was hard-coded. The formula failed as soon as the inputs were changed, as with your 9 in 10 example. Anyway, I changed the last value to a variable, and it seems to work now, getting 70% (rounded) for your test case.
With any luck, that's the last bug, but I won't be surprised if there are more.
Would you like a thank-you credit on the calculator page, and if so, what name should I use?
I repeat my invitation for anyone reading this to bang on the calculator and see if you can get it to break (either a wrong answer, or an interface problem).
I can play with it more tonight. Looks good so far.Quote: MichaelBluejayWith any luck, that's the last bug, but I won't be surprised if there are more.
I have yet to look at your javascript code to see how you did all this and that would be nice to see it and understand it for myself. You might scramble it (I think that is common these days), that is ok too.
7Craps is fine. SReno is also fine. ThanksQuote: MichaelBluejayWould you like a thank-you credit on the calculator page, and if so, what name should I use?
My JS is indeed obfuscated, my stuff gets stolen a lot. If you really want to see it let me know and I'll PM it to you.
I hear good JS gets stolen a lot.Quote: MichaelBluejayMy JS is indeed obfuscated, my stuff gets stolen a lot.
I used to copy others JS just to see how it worked and learned some from it. Never used it online. Most JS I used was learned from W3Schools.com
yes, that would be nice. Thanks.Quote: MichaelBluejayIf you really want to see it let me know and I'll PM it to you.
"It doesn't calculate every possible idea you might have,... "Quote: MichaelBluejayI repeat my invitation for anyone reading this to bang on the calculator and see if you can get it to break (either a wrong answer, or an interface problem).
and this could be added
below the calculator
as the numbers can get large quickly.
For the 'average number of spins' for a streak
to see 'any' or a 'specific' number hit in a row (streak)
average does not mean it is certain as many think it does (about a 63.5% chance of success, give or take)
↓run / wheel→ | 38 any # | 38 specific # | 37 any # | 37 specific # |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 39 | 1,482 | 38 | 1,406 |
3 | 1,483 | 56,354 | 1,407 | 52,059 |
4 | 56,355 | 2,141,490 | 52,060 | 1,926,220 |
5 | 2,141,491 | 81,376,658 | 1,926,221 | 71,270,177 |
6 | 81,376,659 | 3,092,313,042 | 71,270,178 | 2,636,996,586 |
pari/gp code
run=2;
N=37;\\equal numbers
\\do not change below
any=1+sum(i=1,run-1,N^i); \\formula
sp=sum(i=1,run,N^i); \\formula
any\\any number
sp\\specific number
Quote: 7craps"It doesn't calculate every possible idea you might have,... "Quote: MichaelBluejayI repeat my invitation for anyone reading this to bang on the calculator and see if you can get it to break (either a wrong answer, or an interface problem).
and this could be added
below the calculator
as the numbers can get large quickly.
For the 'average number of spins' for a streak
to see 'any' or a 'specific' number hit in a row (streak)
average does not mean it is certain as many think it does (about a 63.5% chance of success, give or take)
↓run / wheel→ 38 any # 38 specific # 37 any # 37 specific # 2 39 1,482 38 1,406 3 1,483 56,354 1,407 52,059 4 56,355 2,141,490 52,060 1,926,220 5 2,141,491 81,376,658 1,926,221 71,270,177 6 81,376,659 3,092,313,042 71,270,178 2,636,996,586
pari/gp coderun=2;
N=37;\\equal numbers
\\do not change below
any=1+sum(i=1,run-1,N^i); \\formula
sp=sum(i=1,run,N^i); \\formula
any\\any number
sp\\specific number
Does all of this tell you where to
place the next bet? That's all that's
important.
BTW, Easy Vegas still has a theme song.
Quote: MichaelBluejayIs imitation the sincerest form of flattery? I don't know, but I didn't feel especially flattered when I ran across this eBook being sold on Amazon which is comprised almost entirely of articles lifted word-for-word from Easy Vegas.
BTW, Easy Vegas still has a theme song.
Not sure why you keep pushing the theme song. No one cares about a song
Eta: just listened to it, that is absolutely terrible. I mean just really bad. I would not be proud of that.
Quote: MichaelBluejayI pushed the song because I was hoping to hear someone comment on it. I'm sorry you don't like it, I guess we just have a different sense of humor.
Yea very possible, but I didn't think your site was a humor site.
It's not a humor site per se, but it's a site with a sense of humor. Look at the original Cheapo Vegas and Vital Vegas, those sites aren't "humor sites", but they had/have a *great* sense of humor. I'm not as funny as those guys so I can't compete on that basis, although I do take a stab at injecting some humor into an article every once in a while.Quote: GWAEYea very possible, but I didn't think your site was a humor site.
Isn’t Capitalism great?
The “About Me” page is a great read for anyone who has some time to understand where he is coming from.
https://michaelbluejay.com/michael/
Quote: GWAE
Eta: just listened to it, that is absolutely terrible.
Just a bunch of loud noise and
then it stops.
Quote: BozAnother day, more promotion of his site.
Isn’t Capitalism great?
The “About Me” page is a great read for anyone who has some time to understand where he is coming from.
https://michaelbluejay.com/michael/
He should probably update his How to Buy a House article. He left out the section on soliciting a loan on "gambling" sites.https://michaelbluejay.com/house/loan.html
By the way, that about me page really puts it all into perspective......oof
DOUBLE BLOCKED.Quote: GWAEQuote: MichaelBluejayIs imitation the sincerest form of flattery? I don't know, but I didn't feel especially flattered when I ran across this eBook being sold on Amazon which is comprised almost entirely of articles lifted word-for-word from Easy Vegas.
BTW, Easy Vegas still has a theme song.
Not sure why you keep pushing the theme song. No one cares about a song
Eta: just listened to it, that is absolutely terrible. I mean just really bad. I would not be proud of that.
p.s. when did you become such an @$$ ****?
I like it.
Quote: AxelWolfDOUBLE BLOCKED.Quote: GWAEQuote: MichaelBluejayIs imitation the sincerest form of flattery? I don't know, but I didn't feel especially flattered when I ran across this eBook being sold on Amazon which is comprised almost entirely of articles lifted word-for-word from Easy Vegas.
BTW, Easy Vegas still has a theme song.
Not sure why you keep pushing the theme song. No one cares about a song
Eta: just listened to it, that is absolutely terrible. I mean just really bad. I would not be proud of that.
p.s. when did you become such an @$$ ****?
I like it.
Even the most polite and sane person will walk away from those sites with the biggest case of WTF the world has ever known.
I actually was looking for the manifesto. It is an unbelievable collection of nonsense.
Take for example these quotes in air travel
"A single roundtrip flight to Asia generates as much pollution as your car does for a whole year.
A single coast to coast roundtrip flight is equivalent to driving the average car 375 miles a month for a whole year.
Air travel is particularly damaging because of various factors related to the planes being up in the sky, vs. pollution which happens on the ground."
Usually on the trip to Asia there are hundreds of others along for the ride. So what's the problem? I don't know to many people that drive the equivalent of 100's of trips to Asia annually. Sounds like a win to fly.
If driving my car 4500 miles generated the same emissions as flying 6000 miles r/t coast to coast aren't I being environmentally conscious by flying?
Then he goes on to promoting travelling by cargo ship.....lol
You really can't make this stuff up. 15 cargo ships pollute more than all the entire cars in the world combined.
https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/cargo-container-shipping-carbon-pollution/amp/
#VeganismAffectsYourBrain
If you're wondering why I'm not commenting on your posts, there you go.
Quote: MichaelBluejayWhat the forum looks like for me:
If you're wondering why I'm not commenting on your posts, there you go.
Too bad, MBJ. Axelwolf actually liked your theme song. Of course, you may have me blocked too, idk.