Quote: MrVCould you please expunge my prior suspension, too?
That was for the infamous heifer/fatso insult.
It isn't that I'm opposed to forgiveness, or that you're not deserving of it, but it would set a bad precedent if I started expunging past suspensions. Everybody will ask for it. In Nareed's case there was some disagreement between the admins about whether "nitwit" crossed the line. In the end we decided it didn't, so it was expunged.
Sorry for being a Grinch about it.
Quote: WizardIt isn't that I'm opposed to forgiveness, or that you're not deserving of it, but it would set a bad precedent if I started expunging past suspensions. Everybody will ask for it. In Nareed's case there was some disagreement between the admins about whether "nitwit" crossed the line. In the end we decided it didn't, so it was expunged.
I agree. Forgiveness for transgressions comes in the form of reinstatement of membership at the end of the sentence. The record of the trangression and sentence should remain.
In the recent "Nitwit" case, I was the "target" and agreed that I overreacted. So there really wasn't a transgression and the entry was removed from the list.
---
Regarding the comments about clickable urls in signature lines:
I would like them as well. If there is any inclination to include them, then I suggest some method of ranking members into three categories: Newbie, Member, Senior Member.
Newbies are those members still on anti-bot limitations. Members are newbies that have outlasted the initial limitations. Senior Members are those that have met certain criteria (duration and/or number of posts) and are allowed to put urls and other formatting code (up to a limit) in signatures.
For the record, I include urls to Dave Miller Weddings and DJ Dave Miller in the signature of the DJ forums I belong to, and Reverend Dave Miller on the church's forum.
I wish I could put an url to Poker For Roulette in my signature here. I guess I'll just have to settle for adding a link in any thread where the opportunity presents itself. Like this one. So far Mike hasn't objected to it, so I gotta say thanks for that. Thanks Mike!
---
On a somewhat unrelated note, I recently received a private message, where I spent a good 15 minuted carefully choosing the words for my reply, only to discover that the user is not accepting private messages (or has me blocked). There's 15 minutes of my life I'll never get back....
There should be a loophole that allows replies.
If they are spammers, they will be gone in short order anyway.
If they are new to the forum, and legit, if you make it too difficult, you will drive them away before you can see their value.
I think what we have been doing has been working pretty well. Spammers get busted right away, and the newer, "Hi, I am new here" gets a short life,and then gets busted.
Let's not fix what is working.
Quote: WizardPerhaps it does need to be spelled out better. There is already a rule against spam. I consider somebody who is obviously only posting to get his/her URL or Email in the signature as a spammer. Lately I've seen a lot of new members saying something like "Hi, I'm new here," with a URL in the signature to a commercial site, usually an Internet casino. Those posts are quickly busted and the member nuked, without even the dignity of being remembered in the suspension list.
So far your "I know it when I see it" standard has worked. I'm more for common-law than code law whenever possible. I would just request something simple. My guide would be like when you see an op-Ed in the newspaper where they mention the writers site. A short tag no more than a sentence and thu URL
Eg: have you tried the newest side bet? Casinowaronsevenout.com.
Nobody here plans on making a fortune from the link, but just allows quality back link for being a quality member.
Just my thought.
Quote: DocJust as a side comment, I noticed that the forum was visited today by mkl654321. I wonder how often he drops by.
I for one would be happy to have him back posting.
Quote: RaleighCrapsI for one would be happy to have him back posting.
I welcome him back too.
Quote: WizardI welcome him back too.
Oh ye of short memories....
Quote: EvenBobOh ye of short memories....
It's been 1 year, 8 months, 20 days since
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/tables/4892-pai-gow-tiles-help/#post64400
Quote: WizardI don't think so. My monitor nearly caught on fire after displaying the words in his resignation. I do not want to go through that again.
Quote: tringlomaneThis is probably the strictest site I have seen. It's definitely moderated tighter than 2+2 Poker. I'm okay with that though since I generally behave myself.
Thank you, that's closer to what I meant. Da Buzzard must have woken up on the wrong end of the bed.
Quote: EvenBobOh ye of short memories....
Speaking of short memories...
I never caught the "I was completely and utterly wrong about everything I posted about who would win the election" Can someone link me to that post?
Of course, mkl and EvenBob would still disagree on everything, but their battles (without Jerry's input) were no more violent or offensive than what goes on around here much of the time.
Quote: DocI think mkl would be a fine member of this forum, in the absence of JerryLogan and all of his sock puppets. Not only was Jerry nasty, he was outstandingly effective at getting under mkl's skin and setting him on fire.
Of course, mkl and EvenBob would still disagree on everything, but their battles (without Jerry's input) were no more violent or offensive than what goes on around here much of the time.
mkl was a nasty troll who went out of his way to intentionally insult and alienate anyone he could, regardless of whether or not they agreed with him. He could not stand to not have the last word on any subject. This forum has been much better for his absence.
Quote: Mosca
mkl was a nasty troll .
Didn't he send a hugely nasty PM to Mike that
got him nuked?
Quote: EvenBobDidn't he send a hugely nasty PM to Mike that
got him nuked?
I'm too lazy to look it up, but I thought he resigned.
Tell you what--I'll "admit" I was wrong if you'll "admit" to having been a complete, unmitigated asshole about it.
Quote: DocI think mkl would be a fine member of this forum,
I'm sure the good Father can check me on this one, but I think the Anti-Christ has to come to the forum before the Apocalypse. See? That's why the world didn't end yesterday
And that was the problem -- I don't think it was possible for them to co-exist. I got amusement by posting several times that there was no single topic on which Jerry, mkl, and EvenBob could agree. Because there were three of them, you would occasionally see a semi-random two of them on the same side of an issue. Usually (but not always) it was EvenBob sorta agreeing with one or the other of Jerry and mkl briefly, with the other two being vicious to each other. EvenBob was the most clever, in that he could survive here while the others fought to their mutual demise. Jerry was banned in multiple identities -- it's hard to keep the devil dead -- and mkl resigned several times, the final (?) time in response to a short suspension.
My understanding is that mkl could return to the forum if he were to submit an un-resignation request to the Wizard. If he did that, I sense that an accompanying apology would be quite in order.
But Doc, what if he did not accept your apology ?
Quote: 1BBHe's generated over a dozen posts just for visiting the forum and he's got to be getting a kick out of that.
Oh, absolutely. I'm taking that into account as I write, that he is being talked about and cannot reply. "I have no mouth, but I must scream."
Quote: Buzzard" If he did that, I sense that an accompanying apology would be quite in order. "
But Doc, what if he did not accept your apology ?
Too Funny
Quote: BuzzardSometimes people take me serious.
Shirley, you jest. (I know -- don't call you surely.)
How does anyone KNOW this mkl character isn't sitting back laughing his behind off at each and every one of the "clever" comments being elicited by his "absenteeism"?
MENSA
Quote: iluvdisco33An incredibly educational thread-point.
How does anyone KNOW this mkl character isn't sitting back laughing his behind off at each and every one of the "clever" comments being elicited by his "absenteeism"?
MENSA
He probably is. Who cares, as long as he isn't disturbing anyone. It's like the difference between jacking off in private and jacking off in public. One, no one cares about; the other is an arrest on decency charges.
Quote: MoscaIt's like the difference between jacking off in private and jacking off in public. One, no one cares about; the other is an arrest on decency charges.
Its not necessary to bring up your past indiscretions
to make a point, we don't need those images in our
heads.
Too late, there they are!
Quote: MoscaHe probably is. Who cares, as long as he isn't disturbing anyone. It's like the difference between jacking off in private and jacking off in public. One, no one cares about; the other is an arrest on decency charges.
You're right, who should care. But as far as disturbing anybody, these posts could disturb one or two. And I'm not buying that Evenbob was overly clever for not being slashed. I see it as a sign of weakness that anyone who is addicted to something just isn't willing to risk by putting it on the line. If mkl123456 was chopped for whatever, I'd look up to a guy who isn't chicken to identify a superior intelligence along with being able to walk away from a bunch of anonymous pretenders. Just my opinion.
Quote: iluvdisco33If mkl123456 was chopped for whatever, I'd look up to a guy who isn't chicken to identify a superior intelligence along with being able to walk away from a bunch of anonymous pretenders..
MKL, I knew it was you. Thats why you've been on my
case since you arrived here 5 days ago.
Quote: EvenBobMKL, I knew it was you. Thats why you've been on my
case since you arrived here 5 days ago.
Nope! And please don't leave on my behalf like Buzzard just suggested. I'm just a normal, alert and intuitive guy who's enjoyed reading this forum over the years. I remember mkl and he was full of himself along with a knack for making people piss their pants. Except for Jerry Logan.
Quote: iluvdisco33Nope!
And I don't believe you. Blocked. Buh Bye..
Quote: EvenBobAnd I don't believe you. Blocked. Buh Bye..
What's buh suppose to mean?
Quote: EvenBobMKL, I knew it was you.
What was the pattern? New poster, types normal for a bit, then has all sorts of information on posts that happened a long time ago, in this case years?
We'll see. I had my own suspicions. But in any case, welcome Disco. If that is your real name... ;)
(If you are mkl, then welcome back)
Quote: MoscaHe probably is. Who cares, as long as he isn't disturbing anyone.
Why would anyone spend a picosecond of their time wondering what mkl is doing? I could care less what he does, as long as he does it somewhere else.
Quote: NareedWhy would anyone spend a picosecond of their time wondering what mkl is doing? I could care less what he does, as long as he does it somewhere else.
It' "couldn't" care less Nareed. Hey this is funny: when I typed in your name my spellchecker changed it to "Barred"!
Quote: iluvdisco33when I typed in your name my spellchecker changed it to "Barred"!
Meet the real Nareed ?
https://plus.google.com/102657308676321068412/posts
http://www.wizardofvegas.com/forum/info/rules/12685-can-the-management-please-refrain-from-vandalizing-posts/#post211785
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/craps/12780-show-tomorrow-night-at-7-30pm/3/#post214901
Quote: 1BBThanks guys. I guess I didn't miss him that much. I'm surprised that banned members can still log on. What's the point?
to read the forum?