Thread Rating:

MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
December 9th, 2021 at 10:15:32 AM permalink
Was it in fact "artful insinuation" or "Inartful implication?"

Subtle.
"What, me worry?"
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
December 9th, 2021 at 10:49:51 AM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Quote: kewlj

And let me say this about sock puppets: The common use of a sock puppet is for someone banned to return with a new account. That is the one many people almost have fun with. Think, Nathan/karen or Buzz.

But the real dastardly use of a sock puppet is for someone making claims or something that haze ZERO credibility with any of the members, then creates a sock puppet to support him, so he gains some credibility. For this one the classic example was Rob Singer/Jerry Logan, although there may be more recent really good examples. (eyeroll)
link to original post



Without revealing any methods, let me say that this forum does take countermeasures to detect sock puppets. Paranoia about sock puppets may be fun to roll around in, but to date, there is no evidence that MarcusClarke is a sock puppet of MDawg, which is what you are clearly implying and there is indeed circumstantial evidence that he is not a sock puppet.

If you have evidence, then please state it. Otherwise eyeroll your eyes back into your head and go about your business and stop disparaging people by artful insinuation.
link to original post



Gordon I resent the "implied" accusation. I said nothing about anyone in particular. by restrictions placed on me that no one else has, I am prohibited from from saying anything about the person implied, so was careful not to. I also am over that particular situation because it has been resolved to my satisfaction. That is all I can and will say.

But not specific to any situation (so please don't imply) the use sock puppets for the purpose of someone gaining credibility where there otherwise is none, because not a single member believes them.....again, I will use the Rob Singer example just to be sure we are not talking about something else, IS STILL a concern. It is enables and encourages more of these situations.

No offense to you but your countermeasures and methods of detecting this TYPE of situation is not up to par. Dan Druff who owns and runs VCT is an expert. He is able to see through or past VPN's which is the problem today. And on the rare occasion he is unable to, he will ask a member to "unmask" for a single post, just to ensure there is no shenanigans going on.

Since Dan Druff is a member here, I asked him to come here to discuss this several months ago (possible just before you became mod). I believe it was oncedear who participated in the discussion with Dan Druff and it became clear WoV was lagging. I trust that the intent is good. But WoV seems to have been left behind a bit and that is a concern in this type of sock puppetry for credibility.

The sock puppetry of Tasha/nathan, and Buzz, and that type, that is almost harmless. Annoying but harmless. So I don't care. It is specifically sock puppets created to gain credibility where there otherwise is none that is my concern...going forward.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 7464
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
December 9th, 2021 at 11:04:31 AM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Quote: gordonm888

Without revealing any methods, let me say that this forum does take countermeasures to detect sock puppets.link to original post


No offense to you but your countermeasures and methods of detecting this TYPE of situation is not up to par.
link to original post

Kewl,
I'll allow gordon to address your concerns with his post. He may not have been aware of posting restrictions you are under.

As to how we counter socks, I'll acknowledge that this forum used to lack certain security features. But we have requested and received a number of software enhancements. I'm not going to discuss technicalities because we are in a constant technical war with trolls spammers and socks. It does us no favours to reveal our methods or capabilities.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
Thanked by
OnceDear
December 9th, 2021 at 11:21:15 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

[

As to how we counter socks, I'll acknowledge that this forum used to lack certain security features. But we have requested and received a number of software enhancements. I'm not going to discuss technicalities because we are in a constant technical war with trolls spammers and socks. It does us no favours to reveal our methods or capabilities.



Good to hear of the enhancements. All that kind of thing is way beyond me. I am sure you guys are doing your best, oncedear. I was just voicing a concern in the hope it can be addressed or improved upon before it comes into play again.
mwalz9
mwalz9
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 754
Joined: Feb 7, 2012
December 9th, 2021 at 12:22:00 PM permalink
I dont think MarcusClark is a sock puppet of MDawg, but Im not sure how to word why without getting suspended.

I guess I'll just say, Love MDawg or hate him, he seems like a smart guy.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 7464
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
December 9th, 2021 at 12:36:27 PM permalink
Quote: mwalz9

I dont think MarcusClark is a sock puppet of MDawg, but Im not sure how to word why without getting suspended.

I guess I'll just say, Love MDawg or hate him, he seems like a smart guy.
link to original post

Tricky isn't it? Let's not stray into personal insult territory.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
mwalz9
mwalz9
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 754
Joined: Feb 7, 2012
December 9th, 2021 at 12:39:52 PM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: mwalz9

I dont think MarcusClark is a sock puppet of MDawg, but Im not sure how to word why without getting suspended.

I guess I'll just say, Love MDawg or hate him, he seems like a smart guy.
link to original post

Tricky isn't it? Let's not stray into personal insult territory.
link to original post



I didnt and wont. Thats why I worded it best I could.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 4987
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
December 9th, 2021 at 3:02:02 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Quote: gordonm888

Quote: kewlj

And let me say this about sock puppets: The common use of a sock puppet is for someone banned to return with a new account. That is the one many people almost have fun with. Think, Nathan/karen or Buzz.

But the real dastardly use of a sock puppet is for someone making claims or something that haze ZERO credibility with any of the members, then creates a sock puppet to support him, so he gains some credibility. For this one the classic example was Rob Singer/Jerry Logan, although there may be more recent really good examples. (eyeroll)
link to original post



Without revealing any methods, let me say that this forum does take countermeasures to detect sock puppets. Paranoia about sock puppets may be fun to roll around in, but to date, there is no evidence that MarcusClarke is a sock puppet of MDawg, which is what you are clearly implying and there is indeed circumstantial evidence that he is not a sock puppet.

If you have evidence, then please state it. Otherwise eyeroll your eyes back into your head and go about your business and stop disparaging people by artful insinuation.
link to original post



Gordon I resent the "implied" accusation. I said nothing about anyone in particular. by restrictions placed on me that no one else has, I am prohibited from from saying anything about the person implied, so was careful not to. I also am over that particular situation because it has been resolved to my satisfaction. That is all I can and will say.

But not specific to any situation (so please don't imply) the use sock puppets for the purpose of someone gaining credibility where there otherwise is none, because not a single member believes them.....again, I will use the Rob Singer example just to be sure we are not talking about something else, IS STILL a concern. It is enables and encourages more of these situations.

No offense to you but your countermeasures and methods of detecting this TYPE of situation is not up to par. Dan Druff who owns and runs VCT is an expert. He is able to see through or past VPN's which is the problem today. And on the rare occasion he is unable to, he will ask a member to "unmask" for a single post, just to ensure there is no shenanigans going on.

Since Dan Druff is a member here, I asked him to come here to discuss this several months ago (possible just before you became mod). I believe it was oncedear who participated in the discussion with Dan Druff and it became clear WoV was lagging. I trust that the intent is good. But WoV seems to have been left behind a bit and that is a concern in this type of sock puppetry for credibility.

The sock puppetry of Tasha/nathan, and Buzz, and that type, that is almost harmless. Annoying but harmless. So I don't care. It is specifically sock puppets created to gain credibility where there otherwise is none that is my concern...going forward.
link to original post



The only thing I will add to OnceDear's response is that, in my 4+ months, I think the moderators have spent more time on spammers (and potential spammers/AI bots) and analyzing potential sock puppets then we have on discussing possible violations and suspension of the regular members. When a new member logs onto the forum, (and often before the new member makes a post) both Dieter and OnceDear (in particular) are all over it and doing things that I will not discuss. We usually don't create a record on the Suspension List of the spammers and non-posting socks that we nuke, but there have been quite a number. We often refrain from immediate bans to wait until someone does take a clearly objectionable action- and on occasion we even have delayed just so we can educate ourselves by watching the progression of the potential spammer's behavior - to see if we can learn something.

It would be weird if a tiny backwater forum like the WOV was among the social media leaders in software to combat spammers and socks, so no surprise that some people may have more impressive technology. But there are online resources (regarding, say, VPNs) that at least one of us now utilizes to help us do a better job of identifying potential threats. Again, I'm being deliberately vague.

The proof is in the pudding - we are not overrun. Although, we could almost organize a deadpool, lol, because we do currently have a number of new-ish members who are sporadically active and whose motives and identities we highly suspect. The fact that these members are still on the forum doesn't mean that we are asleep on the job; rather we are diligently watching them and waiting.

BTW, we have indeed recently seen at least one example of new member accounts who are either two persons collaborating or who are puppets of a single person - the kind of situation you have expressed concern about. We think we understand the motivation behind what they are doing and we do believe we are on top of the situation.
Last edited by: gordonm888 on Dec 9, 2021
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
Thanked by
RogerKint
December 9th, 2021 at 3:57:06 PM permalink
I'm reminded of a tale my Grandma used to tell us of the neighbor who spent so much time pressing her lace curtains that she didn't notice her house had been infested by vermin.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 9th, 2021 at 6:29:33 PM permalink
We often try to offer some benefit of doubt.

Not every malicious poster blasts online pharmacy ads for an assortment of enhancement pills on their first try.

We usually try to apply a proportional response to infractions. I have been known to miscalculate, but permanent bans for every nuisance would be disproportionate.

Since we're sharing abstract old lady stories, one of my ex's great aunts used to dribble the watering can on the carpet between the potted plastic plants. She apparently had some really interesting stories to share.
May the cards fall in your favor.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
December 9th, 2021 at 6:47:50 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Quote: kewlj

Quote: gordonm888

Quote: kewlj

And let me say this about sock puppets: The common use of a sock puppet is for someone banned to return with a new account. That is the one many people almost have fun with. Think, Nathan/karen or Buzz.

But the real dastardly use of a sock puppet is for someone making claims or something that haze ZERO credibility with any of the members, then creates a sock puppet to support him, so he gains some credibility. For this one the classic example was Rob Singer/Jerry Logan, although there may be more recent really good examples. (eyeroll)
link to original post



Without revealing any methods, let me say that this forum does take countermeasures to detect sock puppets. Paranoia about sock puppets may be fun to roll around in, but to date, there is no evidence that MarcusClarke is a sock puppet of MDawg, which is what you are clearly implying and there is indeed circumstantial evidence that he is not a sock puppet.

If you have evidence, then please state it. Otherwise eyeroll your eyes back into your head and go about your business and stop disparaging people by artful insinuation.
link to original post



Gordon I resent the "implied" accusation. I said nothing about anyone in particular. by restrictions placed on me that no one else has, I am prohibited from from saying anything about the person implied, so was careful not to. I also am over that particular situation because it has been resolved to my satisfaction. That is all I can and will say.

But not specific to any situation (so please don't imply) the use sock puppets for the purpose of someone gaining credibility where there otherwise is none, because not a single member believes them.....again, I will use the Rob Singer example just to be sure we are not talking about something else, IS STILL a concern. It is enables and encourages more of these situations.

No offense to you but your countermeasures and methods of detecting this TYPE of situation is not up to par. Dan Druff who owns and runs VCT is an expert. He is able to see through or past VPN's which is the problem today. And on the rare occasion he is unable to, he will ask a member to "unmask" for a single post, just to ensure there is no shenanigans going on.

Since Dan Druff is a member here, I asked him to come here to discuss this several months ago (possible just before you became mod). I believe it was oncedear who participated in the discussion with Dan Druff and it became clear WoV was lagging. I trust that the intent is good. But WoV seems to have been left behind a bit and that is a concern in this type of sock puppetry for credibility.

The sock puppetry of Tasha/nathan, and Buzz, and that type, that is almost harmless. Annoying but harmless. So I don't care. It is specifically sock puppets created to gain credibility where there otherwise is none that is my concern...going forward.
link to original post



The only thing I will add to OnceDear's response is that, in my 4+ months, I think the moderators have spent more time on spammers (and potential spammers/AI bots) and analyzing potential sock puppets then we have on discussing possible violations and suspension of the regular members. When a new member logs onto the forum, (and often before the new member makes a post) both Dieter and OnceDear (in particular) are all over it and doing things that I will not discuss. We usually don't create a record on the Suspension List of the spammers and non-posting socks that we nuke, but there have been quite a number. We often refrain from immediate bans to wait until someone does take a clearly objectionable action- and on occasion we even have delayed just so we can educate ourselves by watching the progression of the potential spammer's behavior - to see if we can learn something.

It would be weird if a tiny backwater forum like the WOV was among the social media leaders in software to combat spammers and socks, so no surprise that some people may have more impressive technology. But there are online resources (regarding, say, VPNs) that at least one of us now utilizes to help us do a better job of identifying potential threats. Again, I'm being deliberately vague.

The proof is in the pudding - we are not overrun. Although, we could almost organize a deadpool, lol, because we do currently have a number of new-ish members who are sporadically active and whose motives and identities we highly suspect. The fact that these members are still on the forum doesn't mean that we are asleep on the job; rather we are diligently watching them and waiting.

BTW, we have indeed recently seen at least one example of new member accounts who are either two persons collaborating or who are puppets of a single person - the kind of situation you have expressed concern about. We think we understand the motivation behind what they are doing and we do believe we are on top of the situation.
link to original post



Gordon, I really am unable to continue with these discussions due to restrictions I agreed to.

I will say, I think you guys are trying and I appreciate that, BUT busting some spammers selling furniture or kitchen fixtures is NOT the same as busting a well organized and thought out sock puppet designed to bolster a member's credibility where he has none. Again, I will use the Singer/jerry Logan example just to be sure no one is implying I am speaking of anything different.

With technology available and these kinds of people having more tools and ever changing advantages in hiding who they are or where they originate from, I do think Mods have to use some common sense. There are some members of this forum that are excellent, I mean really good at spotting similarities that give away sock puppets.
rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12144
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
December 9th, 2021 at 6:57:42 PM permalink
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 4987
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
December 9th, 2021 at 8:29:30 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj



Gordon, I really am unable to continue with these discussions due to restrictions I agreed to.

I will say, I think you guys are trying and I appreciate that, BUT busting some spammers selling furniture or kitchen fixtures is NOT the same as busting a well organized and thought out sock puppet designed to bolster a member's credibility where he has none. Again, I will use the Singer/jerry Logan example just to be sure no one is implying I am speaking of anything different.

With technology available and these kinds of people having more tools and ever changing advantages in hiding who they are or where they originate from, I do think Mods have to use some common sense. There are some members of this forum that are excellent, I mean really good at spotting similarities that give away sock puppets.
link to original post



1. kewlj, you are free to PM any of the moderators and share information privately. Others have done that in the past, and in your specific case it would not violate your gag order.

2. Everyone else is free to PM us moderators - especially any members who have sock-spotting gifts that were not part of our inheritance when we were born. Seriously, guys, all PM channels to the moderators are open to everyone all the time.

Quote: kewlj

Again, I will use the Singer/jerry Logan example just to be sure no one is implying I am speaking of anything different.



Since your example is from long ago, and you are insisting that we not infer anything different - well, let's just stop wasting time and electrons chatting about an issue of no immediate interest. Dieter, OD and I will return to our simple-minded routine of pressing the lace curtains and overlooking the vermin.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
December 10th, 2021 at 12:47:13 PM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Wizard Bolding mine

....
I am still furious about the Marcus statement. However, I don't like to make decisions when on an emotional high or low. Plus, it involves me, so there would clearly be bias. Thus, I will leave sentencing, including none at all, up to the other admins. Let the record show I am absolutely pressing charges for, at the least, false quoting.
link to original post

OK. We have a decision.
Whether he intended it or not, MarcusClark66 mischaracterized Wizard's previous statements about MDawg.
This has clearly annoyed Wizard, who was inclined to penalise Marcus with a suspension for 'false quoting'. But we try not to impose penalties based on mood or anger or offence felt, even by Wizard or moderators.
As I see it, what Marcus did was not exactly what I would call a 'false-quote', nor 'putting words into wizard's mouth', but he did strongly imply a high level of endorsement or verification of the whole of MDawgs contribution here. Wizard has only verified observations of a very few specific facets of MDawg's posts.


link to original post




I will comment one time here and one time within MDawgs thread about this.

I did not in any way attempt to imply that MDawg was fully verified or witnessed, etc., by The Wizard for all of his postings/thread.

I was only ONLY saying that The Wizard met him and watched him play which would verify he was a real person and not a fictional character or anything if the likes. Yes, one time and one time only.

I apology to The Wizard for what I posted that upset him and was thought to imply what he believed and interpreted to be.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
rainman
rainman
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 1855
Joined: Mar 28, 2012
Thanked by
OnceDear
December 10th, 2021 at 1:45:11 PM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Wizard Bolding mine

....
I am still furious about the Marcus statement. However, I don't like to make decisions when on an emotional high or low. Plus, it involves me, so there would clearly be bias. Thus, I will leave sentencing, including none at all, up to the other admins. Let the record show I am absolutely pressing charges for, at the least, false quoting.
link to original post

OK. We have a decision.
Whether he intended it or not, MarcusClark66 mischaracterized Wizard's previous statements about MDawg.
This has clearly annoyed Wizard, who was inclined to penalise Marcus with a suspension for 'false quoting'. But we try not to impose penalties based on mood or anger or offence felt, even by Wizard or moderators.
As I see it, what Marcus did was not exactly what I would call a 'false-quote', nor 'putting words into wizard's mouth', but he did strongly imply a high level of endorsement or verification of the whole of MDawgs contribution here. Wizard has only verified observations of a very few specific facets of MDawg's posts.


link to original post




I will comment one time here and one time within MDawgs thread about this.

I did not in any way attempt to imply that MDawg was fully verified or witnessed, etc., by The Wizard for all of his postings/thread.

I was only ONLY saying that The Wizard met him and watched him play which would verify he was a real person and not a fictional character or anything if the likes. Yes, one time and one time only.

I apology to The Wizard for what I posted that upset him and was thought to imply what he believed and interpreted to be.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark
link to original post




How do you know? ...Were you present to verify the verification?

Disrespectfully,
rainman
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 10th, 2021 at 2:28:17 PM permalink
Do we really need to go down the "who verifies the verifiers" rabbit hole?
May the cards fall in your favor.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 10th, 2021 at 2:37:41 PM permalink
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 10th, 2021 at 2:42:42 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
link to original post



The moderators moderately moderate each other.
May the cards fall in your favor.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 7464
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
December 10th, 2021 at 3:22:29 PM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: billryan

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
link to original post



The moderators moderately moderate each other.
link to original post

Very true. It works well.
And we have the bruises to prove it.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 10th, 2021 at 3:37:44 PM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: billryan

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
link to original post



The moderators moderately moderate each other.
link to original post

Very true. It works well.
And we have the bruises to prove it.
link to original post



Pictures or it didn't happen, as my favorite television judge sez.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 10th, 2021 at 4:27:43 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: billryan

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
link to original post



The moderators moderately moderate each other.
link to original post

Very true. It works well.
And we have the bruises to prove it.
link to original post



Pictures or it didn't happen, as my favorite television judge sez.
link to original post



I do not believe that photographs of the injuries could be provided which do not constitute a "doxx".
May the cards fall in your favor.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 7464
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
December 10th, 2021 at 4:33:07 PM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: billryan

Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: billryan

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
link to original post



The moderators moderately moderate each other.
link to original post

Very true. It works well.
And we have the bruises to prove it.
link to original post



Pictures or it didn't happen, as my favorite television judge sez.
link to original post



I do not believe that photographs of the injuries could be provided which do not constitute a "doxx".
link to original post

The bruises are cleverly concealed and I cannot reach around far enough to take a photo.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 22nd, 2021 at 10:03:00 AM permalink
The world seems a little darker today. Speaking for myself, "that" thread was the most fun I've had here since the new regime took over.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
mwalz9
mwalz9
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 754
Joined: Feb 7, 2012
December 22nd, 2021 at 10:04:03 AM permalink
The new norm.
MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
December 22nd, 2021 at 10:08:45 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

The bruises are cleverly concealed and I cannot reach around far enough to take a photo.



Hopefully none are friction burns.
"What, me worry?"
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 22nd, 2021 at 10:46:55 AM permalink
Quote: mwalz9

The new norm.
link to original post




It's a brave new world.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 636
  • Posts: 4246
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
Thanked by
unJon
December 22nd, 2021 at 11:04:07 AM permalink
Quote: billryan

The world seems a little darker today. Speaking for myself, "that" thread was the most fun I've had here since the new regime took over.
link to original post

what did i miss?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 22nd, 2021 at 11:39:32 AM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

Quote: billryan

The world seems a little darker today. Speaking for myself, "that" thread was the most fun I've had here since the new regime took over.
link to original post

what did i miss?
link to original post



Fun. We can't be having that now, can we?
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
MDawg
MDawg
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 7202
Joined: Sep 27, 2018
December 22nd, 2021 at 11:58:41 AM permalink
From now on, gang, we won't let Rudolph join in any reindeer games, right?
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people. https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
Mission146
Mission146
  • Threads: 142
  • Posts: 16832
Joined: May 15, 2012
December 22nd, 2021 at 1:25:44 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

The world seems a little darker today. Speaking for myself, "that" thread was the most fun I've had here since the new regime took over.
link to original post



What thread?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219
rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12144
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
December 26th, 2021 at 8:18:08 AM permalink
Quote: billryan


I hate math and think it sucks. Personally, I am thrilled that the forum has gotten away from being strictly math and fact-based and is drifting into fantasy. I'm hoping we expand into cosplay but that might be too soon. Viva La Forum!!!!!!
link to original post



I thought billryan was saying the opposite of what he meant. But I guess any pokes at anything could be trolling by definition.
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11409
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
December 26th, 2021 at 8:44:24 AM permalink
Quote: rxwine

Quote: billryan


I hate math and think it sucks. Personally, I am thrilled that the forum has gotten away from being strictly math and fact-based and is drifting into fantasy. I'm hoping we expand into cosplay but that might be too soon. Viva La Forum!!!!!!
link to original post



I thought billryan was saying the opposite of what he meant. But I guess any pokes at anything could be trolling by definition.
link to original post



It's difficult to tell.

I have seen Bill on the right side of math.

But he also has said he believes MC claims are more believable than mine https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/trip-reports/36763-having-to-show-id-at-check-in/

Of course he likes to goad me a lot. He has been getting suspended almost solely for goading people.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12144
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
December 26th, 2021 at 8:48:56 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Quote: rxwine

Quote: billryan


I hate math and think it sucks. Personally, I am thrilled that the forum has gotten away from being strictly math and fact-based and is drifting into fantasy. I'm hoping we expand into cosplay but that might be too soon. Viva La Forum!!!!!!
link to original post



I thought billryan was saying the opposite of what he meant. But I guess any pokes at anything could be trolling by definition.
link to original post



It's difficult to tell.

I have seen Bill on the right side of math.

But he also has said he believes MC claims are more believable than mine https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/trip-reports/36763-having-to-show-id-at-check-in/

Of course he likes to goad me a lot. He has been getting suspended almost solely for goading people.
link to original post



Well, I can't say that cosplay around here wouldn't be interesting, but that bit seems a big hint that the post wasn't serious.
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
darkoz
darkoz
  • Threads: 296
  • Posts: 11409
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
December 26th, 2021 at 10:22:38 AM permalink
Quote: rxwine

Quote: darkoz

Quote: rxwine

Quote: billryan


I hate math and think it sucks. Personally, I am thrilled that the forum has gotten away from being strictly math and fact-based and is drifting into fantasy. I'm hoping we expand into cosplay but that might be too soon. Viva La Forum!!!!!!
link to original post



I thought billryan was saying the opposite of what he meant. But I guess any pokes at anything could be trolling by definition.
link to original post



It's difficult to tell.

I have seen Bill on the right side of math.

But he also has said he believes MC claims are more believable than mine https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/trip-reports/36763-having-to-show-id-at-check-in/

Of course he likes to goad me a lot. He has been getting suspended almost solely for goading people.
link to original post



Well, I can't say that cosplay around here wouldn't be interesting, but that bit seems a big hint that the post wasn't serious.
link to original post



Yeah, I think his history of goading people caused that not serious post to be seen as more goading.

I.e. trolling.
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
Thanked by
teliot
December 26th, 2021 at 10:54:46 AM permalink
I will go on record as saying billryan's comment seemed pretty innocuous to me. But then again, I frequently don't seem to "get" how things work around here. :/
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 4987
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
December 26th, 2021 at 12:56:24 PM permalink
billryan will indeed be getting an early release. Others may explain.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
MDawg
MDawg
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 7202
Joined: Sep 27, 2018
December 26th, 2021 at 2:49:50 PM permalink
There are those who do and talk about it. And those who just like to talk about those who do.
Last edited by: MDawg on Dec 26, 2021
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people. https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
December 26th, 2021 at 6:09:03 PM permalink
There are plenty of forums to discuss Las Vegas, why should this be just one more?

The "Wizard of Odds" website has no forum, but posts a link to this one, which has nothing to do with math and is a Las Vegas travel forum.

Really?

Kill this board and substitute a new one, "Wizard of Odds" and limit it to gambling math-based matters.
"What, me worry?"
TwelveOr21
TwelveOr21
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 72
Joined: Nov 18, 2018
December 26th, 2021 at 6:14:37 PM permalink
I don't think killing this one would be an option - the ad revenue must be worthwhile. ;)
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 636
  • Posts: 4246
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
December 26th, 2021 at 8:32:48 PM permalink
Quote: TwelveOr21

I don't think killing this one would be an option - the ad revenue must be worthwhile. ;)
link to original post

Has LCB made that $2.4M back for the purchase of this and the odds site?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 27th, 2021 at 3:09:21 AM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

billryan will indeed be getting an early release. Others may explain.
link to original post



The post could be argued to be sarcasm.

The post could also be taken at face value as a broad insult.

It's National Playing Card day eve, so I'm in a good mood.
May the cards fall in your favor.
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
Thanked by
teliot
December 27th, 2021 at 7:46:54 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: gordonm888

billryan will indeed be getting an early release. Others may explain.
link to original post



The post could be argued to be sarcasm.

The post could also be taken at face value as a broad insult.

It's National Playing Card day eve, so I'm in a good mood.
link to original post



Doesn't an insult need to be directed at someone? If I say disco sucks, is that statement an insult? I can use some guidance here.
Mr. Wizard suspended me for a month and his rationale was I complained about the state of the forum. So I no longer complain about it, and defend the current status quo and qet suspended for it. Help a brother out here.
Someone yesterday said football betting sucks. Why is that allowed but I get suspended for saying math sucks?
As I read the rules, you can't insult a member. If my statement is an insult because some people here use math, where do you draw the line?
T.S. Elliot said that only those willing to go too far will find out just how far they can go. Help us out here. Can I safely say Muzak sucks or is that a thinly veiled insult to any board members who happen to enjoy its hypnotic pulsations?
I'm not being sarcastic. Help me understand the rules. My last three or four suspensions weren't for a violation of any written rule.
First I'm suspended for insulting a hypothetical nonmember, next I'm suspended for a month for having a negative attitude. Then bluejoy flips out because I tell him you aren't going to get a hundred rounds an hour at a BJ table, and I'm suspended because he used bad words. Then this latest one.
As I honestly have no idea what I can post without getting suspended, I think I'll just enjoy the rest of the vacation you so generously gave me. I look forward to your guidance.
As I understand the rules, this thread is designed for exactly this kind of post as I am discussing suspensions. Then again, it's pretty clear I don't understand your rules. Educate me.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
  • Threads: 110
  • Posts: 4711
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
December 27th, 2021 at 8:04:20 AM permalink
I hate COVID, but COVID won't hate you.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5451
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
December 27th, 2021 at 1:47:07 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Doesn't an insult need to be directed at someone? If I say disco sucks, is that statement an insult? I can use some guidance here.
link to original post



It probably would, on a disco music forum where many members are disco musicians.

The reviewers generally thought it was sarcasm, not literal. I am sorry for my mistaken read of your statement.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1489
  • Posts: 26400
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
gordonm888AZDuffman
December 27th, 2021 at 2:05:18 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Educate me.link to original post



We allow members here to voice their complaints in moderation. We get that you don't agree with the forum's position on free speech. You've complained about it publicly hundreds of times. I get it! When you make the same complaint over and over and over, it becomes trolling. Your complaint to post ratio is much too high. If you want to stay on the good side of the rules, make your comments about forum management to me privately or not at all.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 27th, 2021 at 2:33:01 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Quote: billryan

Educate me.link to original post



We allow members here to voice their complaints in moderation. We get that you don't agree with the forum's position on free speech. You've complained about it publicly hundreds of times. I get it! When you make the same complaint over and over and over, it becomes trolling. Your complaint to post ratio is much too high. If you want to stay on the good side of the rules, make your comments about forum management to me privately or not at all.
link to original post



When was the last time I complained about the forum management? I've completely embraced it. What complaint have I made over and over? As everything here is out front and open, it should be easy to copy my complaining about something over and over? Your position on free speech seems to be everyone has it, but me.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
December 27th, 2021 at 3:23:42 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Mr. Wizard suspended me for a month and his rationale was I complained about the state of the forum. So I no longer complain about it, and defend the current status quo and qet suspended for it.



Sounds a bit hypocritical, but I get it: sometimes you just have zip your lip to save your ship.
"What, me worry?"
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 121
  • Posts: 10898
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
December 27th, 2021 at 3:27:22 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

Quote: Wizard

Quote: billryan

Educate me.link to original post



We allow members here to voice their complaints in moderation. We get that you don't agree with the forum's position on free speech. You've complained about it publicly hundreds of times. I get it! When you make the same complaint over and over and over, it becomes trolling. Your complaint to post ratio is much too high. If you want to stay on the good side of the rules, make your comments about forum management to me privately or not at all.
link to original post



When was the last time I complained about the forum management? I've completely embraced it. What complaint have I made over and over? As everything here is out front and open, it should be easy to copy my complaining about something over and over? Your position on free speech seems to be everyone has it, but me.
link to original post



Easy answer. Above post is OBVIOUSLY a complaint about forum management!
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
December 27th, 2021 at 3:41:16 PM permalink
I am going to express an opinion. I hope it doesn't get me in trouble.

Why can't there be respectful discussion (in a thread entitled discussion no less) of the forum rules, involving suggestions and yes even complaints? In private discussion with Mike over the years, I can remember a couple times that he responded with something like, yeah you make a good point. And there have been times he explained his reasoning and although I probably didn't like it, maybe it helped me see where he was coming from and understand a little better.

So why can't that happen publicly as well. Why can't there be some input from the membership? Make us feel like part of the forum family? It won't undermine Wizard or any other mods. In the end, Wizard will still be "the big cheeze" and what he says ultimately goes. But I don't know why that can't mean there can't be some open and respectful discussion and input, in an effort to make the forum better and more enjoyable for all.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1489
  • Posts: 26400
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 27th, 2021 at 3:59:13 PM permalink
Quote: billryan

When was the last time I complained about the forum management? I've completely embraced it. What complaint have I made over and over? As everything here is out front and open, it should be easy to copy my complaining about something over and over? Your position on free speech seems to be everyone has it, but me.
link to original post



Your sarcasm doesn't fool me. Here is the post you last got suspended for.

Quote:

I hate math and think it sucks. Personally, I am thrilled that the forum has gotten away from being strictly math and fact-based and is drifting into fantasy. I'm hoping we expand into cosplay but that might be too soon. Viva La Forum!!!!!!

"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
  • Jump to: