Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
My Knicks to win the Championship at 100-1 is looking good! They are now around 20-1. Julius Randle ankle injury is big. And Jimmy Butler just had two games in a row for the ages.
Edit…. FD has Lakers ML parlayed with Anthony Davis double/double at +100. He will score 10+ points unless he gets injured. His O/U on rebounds is 13.5. This has to be a +EV bet. I even think he gets more rebounds than usual as coaches may play the stars a bit more in a close out game.
Quote: SOOPOOGrizzlies have lost their last 16 games when underdogs on the road. The Lakers are -200 favorites. Seems too easy?
Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
My Knicks to win the Championship at 100-1 is looking good! They are now around 20-1. Julius Randle ankle injury is big. And Jimmy Butler just had two games in a row for the ages.
Edit…. FD has Lakers ML parlayed with Anthony Davis double/double at +100. He will score 10+ points unless he gets injured. His O/U on rebounds is 13.5. This has to be a +EV bet. I even think he gets more rebounds than usual as coaches may play the stars a bit more in a close out game.
link to original post
That was easy money! Fried shutout Mets through 5. Braves scored 4 through 5. Then the rain came but not until it was an official game.
Anthony Davis had his double/double by halftime! Lakers are up 20 or so. So unless miracle comeback, Grizzlies will be the first team in NBA history to win zero games as a road underdog.
Quote: SOOPOOGrizzlies have lost their last 16 games when underdogs on the road. The Lakers are -200 favorites. Seems too easy?
Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
very, very nice calls
I too am leery of picks that seem too easy - and quite a few times I've tanked on them
but this time you were on the money - congrats
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
the pitchers are bad this year but not previous years and not that bad this year
the highest I've seen this year on an o/u is 12.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't know
.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: SOOPOOGrizzlies have lost their last 16 games when underdogs on the road. The Lakers are -200 favorites. Seems too easy?
Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
very, very nice calls
I too am leery of picks that seem too easy - and quite a few times I've tanked on them
but this time you were on the money - congrats
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
the pitchers are bad this year but not previous years and not that bad this year
the highest I've seen this year on an o/u is 12.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't know
.
link to original post
Musgrove versus Manaea. A few years back would have been considered ‘a pitchers matchup’. Both struggling recently. Combined ERAs this year around 12. But that’s far less than the 15.5 on BetMGM. I bet the under. Most likely a -EV bet. Padres 8, Giants 7?
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: SOOPOOGrizzlies have lost their last 16 games when underdogs on the road. The Lakers are -200 favorites. Seems too easy?
Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
very, very nice calls
I too am leery of picks that seem too easy - and quite a few times I've tanked on them
but this time you were on the money - congrats
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
the pitchers are bad this year but not previous years and not that bad this year
the highest I've seen this year on an o/u is 12.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't know
.
link to original post
The games are in Mexico City. The elevation is 7500 feet. Not only do balls travel further, but curve balls hang and the dimensions of the field aren't exactly MLB like.
Quote: billryan
The games are in Mexico City. The elevation is 7500 feet. Not only do balls travel further, but curve balls hang and the dimensions of the field aren't exactly MLB like.
link to original post
Exactly. The under is probably a suckers bet but there is no way I would be the over either.
Quote: billryanQuote: lilredroosterQuote: SOOPOOGrizzlies have lost their last 16 games when underdogs on the road. The Lakers are -200 favorites. Seems too easy?
Braves pitcher (Fried) has been giving up no runs. Mets pitcher (Peterson) has an ERA over 7! You can get the Braves at -130. Seems too easy?
very, very nice calls
I too am leery of picks that seem too easy - and quite a few times I've tanked on them
but this time you were on the money - congrats
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
the pitchers are bad this year but not previous years and not that bad this year
the highest I've seen this year on an o/u is 12.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't know
.
link to original post
The games are in Mexico City. The elevation is 7500 feet. Not only do balls travel further, but curve balls hang and the dimensions of the field aren't exactly MLB like.
link to original post
LOL. A sucker is born every minute! And that sucker is me! Luckily I don’t bet much.
I made two big bets this morning. I got the Nuggets to win their series at +115. And Suns to beat them at -115. I get around .2% in cash comps so a very small guaranteed win. But helps me a lot in ‘tier credits’ for the two web sites. 5 minutes after I got the bets in you can only get +110 and -120. So I just beat the clock.
Lucky soccer win this morning. Brentford down 1-0 with maybe 15 minutes to play. Dumb Nottingham Forest coach uses all his subs…. Then player gets injured…. Playing with 10…. Brentford comes back to score two goals to win. I’ve always though I would always keep one sub available in case of injury….
Lost my small under bet, but more than made up for it on FanDuel offer of +130 on run to be scored in both first and second inning.
I wonder if any pitchers beg off from playing… ?
Quote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
Quote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
I would take that bet for a small amount. You realize there are 2429 other games this season. There was 49 runs scored in a game in 1922 and I probably had the under in that game.
Quote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
It's the first game of a series so I'll take that bet for one dollar.
Quote: lilredrooster
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't know
Quote: gamerfreak
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
Padres 16 - Giants 11______________________________somebody knew something for sure
the over was a great bet that I didn't make___________________surprise, surprise, surprise
gamerfreak may win that bet but he has to get past today
_____________the o/u for today's game same 2 teams same place is 𝟐𝟎.𝟓
And Yu Davrish has an ERA of 3.00 and that of Alex Cobb is 1.91
.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: lilredrooster
today the Giants/Padres game has an o/u of 15 or 15.5
I don't ever recall seeing an o/u set like that in the MLB
I don't get it - somebody knows something that I don't knowQuote: gamerfreak
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
Padres 16 - Giants 11______________________________somebody knew something for sure
the over was a great bet that I didn't make___________________surprise, surprise, surprise
gamerfreak may win that bet but he has to get past today
_____________the o/u for today's game same 2 teams same place is 𝟐𝟎.𝟓
And Yu Davrish has an ERA of 3.00 and that of Alex Cobb is 1.91
.
link to original post
I’m going with the under! Those are two good pitchers.
MGM lion boost yesterday was winner. Rangers/over 5.5. Paid plus 290. Was slightly +EV. Made up for my ‘best bet’ of Suns +3.5. My bad beat was Durant/Booker combining for 60. They were easily on the way until they were both pulled with over 4 minutes to go as Suns were down 20. I had one 4 leg parlay that had 3 hits and needed Booker over 27.5. He was pulled with 27…..
Quote: billryanQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
It's the first game of a series so I'll take that bet for one dollar.
link to original post
Quote: DRichQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
I would take that bet for a small amount. You realize there are 2429 other games this season. There was 49 runs scored in a game in 1922 and I probably had the under in that game.
link to original post
If either of you, or any other established member, want to take the bet for a silly amount like $1-$5
PM me
Quote: gamerfreakQuote: billryanQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
It's the first game of a series so I'll take that bet for one dollar.
link to original postQuote: DRichQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
I would take that bet for a small amount. You realize there are 2429 other games this season. There was 49 runs scored in a game in 1922 and I probably had the under in that game.
link to original post
If either of you, or any other established member, want to take the bet for a silly amount like $1-$5
PM me
link to original post
I will gladly bet it for up to $5. If I lose you will have to remind me because I will never remember this bet (assuming I lose).
Quote: DRichQuote: gamerfreakQuote: billryanQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
It's the first game of a series so I'll take that bet for one dollar.
link to original postQuote: DRichQuote: gamerfreakQuote: DRichThe Padres lead 10 to 8 in the fifth inning.
link to original post
I would take a wager with anyone that it will be the highest scoring game of the MLB season.
link to original post
I would take that bet for a small amount. You realize there are 2429 other games this season. There was 49 runs scored in a game in 1922 and I probably had the under in that game.
link to original post
If either of you, or any other established member, want to take the bet for a silly amount like $1-$5
PM me
link to original post
I will gladly bet it for up to $5. If I lose you will have to remind me because I will never remember this bet (assuming I lose).
link to original post
Sounds good. The bet is that no 2023 regular season MLB game will have more than 27 runs. The bet will resolve Oct 1st I believe.
Quote: PenguinsOfPitI took the under 210 Heat/Knicks game. I won but never again. Tom Thibodeau doing late fouls when the Knicks were zero percent to win was incredibly suspicious. That shit happens so often it’s unbelievable
link to original post
Since you know it happens so often then why don’t you take advantage of that knowledge? If I see a game is going to be close but one team seems to be in control by 5-10 points I go over because of the stupid fouling. If it’s a runaway of over 15 the leading team slows it down so go under. Betting pre game is just a guess of course.
Dismal day yesterday for me! I liked Avs, Bruins, over in the Avs game. Was going to win big bet of the day, 4 team parlay, until BJ’s blew 4 run lead.
I do have Leafs to win the Cup and that’s looking a little better with Bruins on the sidelines. First goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
Quote: SOOPOOFirst goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
I know Vezina had been "struggling" a little bit but I really thought in a game 7 you had to go with the guy that got you there.
With the Bruins and Avs both out I think the likely Stanley Cup winner will be the winner of the Oilers-Knights series.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOFirst goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
I know Vezina had been "struggling" a little bit but I really thought in a game 7 you had to go with the guy that got you there.
With the Bruins and Avs both out I think the likely Stanley Cup winner will be the winner of the Oilers-Knights series.
link to original post
I have NOT looked at any odds. But I’ll bet you ANY amount of money the winner of the Vegas/Edmonton series does not win the Cup. That team would have to beat both the Kraken and Maple Leafs. (Guessssss…). Probably fair odds is +230.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOFirst goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
I know Vezina had been "struggling" a little bit but I really thought in a game 7 you had to go with the guy that got you there.
With the Bruins and Avs both out I think the likely Stanley Cup winner will be the winner of the Oilers-Knights series.
link to original post
I have NOT looked at any odds. But I’ll bet you ANY amount of money the winner of the Vegas/Edmonton series does not win the Cup. That team would have to beat both the Kraken and Maple Leafs. (Guessssss…). Probably fair odds is +230.
link to original post
The Oilers are the second favorite to win the cup and the Knights are fourth. If you want to bet I will give you both the Kraken and the Leafs against Oilers and Knights for another coffee. Probably a pretty fair bet. I personally don't think the Kraken have much of a chance but the Leafs are the favorite.
Ullmark' stats in the 6 games were 3.33 goals against av, with 0.896 save percent. If that was the regular season record for a goalie he wouldn't be guaranteed a job next season. Funny thing is, I'm not sure there was a goal he allowed where you would have said he should have had a save. [not that I watched them all]Quote: SOOPOOI do have Leafs to win the Cup and that’s looking a little better with Bruins on the sidelines. First goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
link to original post
Bobrovsky's stats were even worse in 5 games, so it's hard to say Bruins got run over by a hot goalie
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: PenguinsOfPitI took the under 210 Heat/Knicks game. I won but never again. Tom Thibodeau doing late fouls when the Knicks were zero percent to win was incredibly suspicious. That shit happens so often it’s unbelievable
link to original post
Since you know it happens so often then why don’t you take advantage of that knowledge? If I see a game is going to be close but one team seems to be in control by 5-10 points I go over because of the stupid fouling. If it’s a runaway of over 15 the leading team slows it down so go under. Betting pre game is just a guess of course.
Dismal day yesterday for me! I liked Avs, Bruins, over in the Avs game. Was going to win big bet of the day, 4 team parlay, until BJ’s blew 4 run lead.
I do have Leafs to win the Cup and that’s looking a little better with Bruins on the sidelines. First goal Swayman gave up made you wonder why Vezina winning goalie is on the bench!
link to original post
I sometimes do live lines but they usually up the juice on those. -115 seems to be more the standard on those. I also thought it would start pretty slow
My (probably -EV) bet of the night is Gabe Vincent over 14.5 points. He must get more time/more looks with Butler out. I got him over 13.5 in parlays before the Butler announcement.
Needed a long shot hockey bet. Stars ML under 3.5 total goals parlay. Probably 2-2 after 1st period……
Quote: SOOPOOBetMGM had Knicks/Yankees parlay at +160. Allowed me around $67. I can never figure out how they decide to cap me. This is very +EV. Announcement Butler not playing. New odds they are offering is +115. That may still be +EV.
My (probably -EV) bet of the night is Gabe Vincent over 14.5 points. He must get more time/more looks with Butler out. I got him over 13.5 in parlays before the Butler announcement.
Needed a long shot hockey bet. Stars ML under 3.5 total goals parlay. Probably 2-2 after 1st period……
link to original post
Knicks Yanks both win.
Vincent scores 21.
Stars Kraken were 2-2….. but ended 1st period 4-2.
I’m also going the other side on MGM with Tatum over 29.5 parlayed with Celtics ML at + 145. I think Harden’s ridiculous game was an aberration.
So…. High scoring Celtics win by 9 points or less…..
Quote: DRichHow about Pavelski scoring four goals for the Stars last night? Probably pretty rare for one guy to score four goals and the rest of the team did not score at all in a 5-4 loss.
link to original post
I guess it is not as rare as I thought as it happened again last night. Leon Draisaitl scored four goals last night for the Oilers and it was the only goals scored by the team and the team lost. Two days in a row.
Quote: DRichQuote: DRichHow about Pavelski scoring four goals for the Stars last night? Probably pretty rare for one guy to score four goals and the rest of the team did not score at all in a 5-4 loss.
link to original post
I guess it is not as rare as I thought as it happened again last night. Leon Draisaitl scored four goals last night for the Oilers and it was the only goals scored by the team and the team lost. Two days in a row.
link to original post
My ‘Pavelski and Draisaitl to score 4 in losing effort’ parlay paid me $1,000,000,000 on my $1 bet.
I was 2 for 24 last night. Most bets were 2 or 3 leg parlays, and most were with favorites! I think I was a few standard deviations to the negative…..
Lost two separate parlays with teams blowing 9th inning leads.
For the smart ones on here who make $$ by fading me, I have Lakers +6. The teams look even to me. I like that Coach Ham is not afraid to play his stars (Davis mostly) big minutes, way more than he’d play him in a regular season game.
I also (recency bias?) love the Celtics over the 76ers next game. Celts only a point favorite. I would have thought 3 or 4.
I occasionally make VERY SMALL bets on the Caesars boosts just for interest in some afternoon games, often soccer. I know they tend to be -EV. They give you a better payout than if you just parlay the outcomes, but not enough to overcome the multiplied juice. Today on soccer they had one that was +1100…. I did the math and I think it was +EV…. Went to bet it …. And it ‘locked’ as I tried…. I guess someone beat me to the punch…. It’s now available for +900….
Quote: SOOPOO
My ‘Pavelski and Draisaitl to score 4 in losing effort’ parlay paid me $1,000,000,000 on my $1 bet.
I still think you may have taken a bad number on that bet.
I can't imagine what it takes to get fired.
Quote: billryanStrange times at 'Bama. Some strange bets caused several books to suspend betting on the baseball team and a few days later the coach was fired. A basketball player was allowed to keep playing after bringing a gun to a club that ended up being used in a homicide.
I can't imagine what it takes to get fired.
link to original post
Sounds like the baseball coach committed a crime.
He was an employee of the university. It was a no brainer.
The basketball player incident was fully investigated, right? And no charges, right? It sounds silly, but technically the player is no more than a student participating in a university sanctioned after school activity. You want to summarily deny the young man his chance to get an education? (I wonder if he actually ever set foot in a classroom….)
The baseball coach incident is in the early stages of the investigation but it sounds like they have damning evidence.
I think I bet $1 once on an ‘SEC baseball parlay’. I know I lost, but don’t remember which team lost for me. I ‘think’ it was Alabama! I should sue for the $10 or so I’m out…..
another one that looks too easy - Warriors/Lakers
Warriors are a miserable 13-33 on the road - Lakers have won all 4 playoff games at home and overall are 28-18 at home
I'll pick the Lakers 3 times the usual bet size at -160 on the money line__________betting $150 will get $93.75 in profit if win
.
Quote: PenguinsOfPitThat 13-33 is irrelevant. Wiggins is back and playing well plus they did win games 5 and 7 in Sacramento. If any team can “flip the switch” it’s GS
link to original post
To me the relevant factors are how the Lakers are playing WITH THE PLAYERS THEY HAVE NOW. The majority of their dismal play was before the trade deadline. After the trade deadline they’ve been about the best team in the league. You can almost say the same thing about the Warriors. Now that I think about it, the Suns as well.
Lilred…. Not sure what Sportsbook you use. I see -130 on mine.
I’m having fun making a dollar here or a quarter there. Two different EPL games. Both with 3 goal deficits in second half. Laid 80-1 and 100-1. The shorter odds one only had 7 minutes plus stoppage time left. I was stunned they even had a market.
I guess I’ll get caught at some point like all ‘bridge jumpers’ do….
during the regular season the Warriors were 33-8 at home and 11-30 away
they won 80.4% of their games at home and lost 73% of their games away
I don't know of any NBA team ever that has showed such an extreme difference between home and away
it might have happened - but not that I'm aware of
.
Quote: lilredrooster.
during the regular season the Warriors were 33-8 at home and 11-30 away
they won 80.4% of their games at home and lost 73% of their games away
I don't know of any NBA team ever that has showed such an extreme difference between home and away
it might have happened - but not that I'm aware of
.
link to original post
It sounds like they have worked out a formula for success. The only thing that matters about the NBA regular season is that you survive and get to the playoff tournament healthy.
Quote: billryanQuote: lilredrooster.
during the regular season the Warriors were 33-8 at home and 11-30 away
they won 80.4% of their games at home and lost 73% of their games away
I don't know of any NBA team ever that has showed such an extreme difference between home and away
it might have happened - but not that I'm aware of
.
link to original post
The only thing that matters about the NBA regular season is that you survive and get to the playoff tournament healthy.
so very wrong
Warriors - current - 53.7% wins regular season
2022 Champs - Warriors - 64.6% wins regular season
2021 Champs - Suns - 70.8% wins regular season
2020 Champs - Lakers - 73.2% wins regular season
2019 Champs - Warriors - 69.5% wins regular season
2018 Champs Warriors - 70.7% wins regular season
2017 Champs - Warriors - 81.7% wins regular season
if you're not a monster during the regular season you're not going to become a monster in the Playoffs
.
It’s fair to point out that the Warriors take as many or more “rest forfeits” on the road than other NBA teams, frequently sitting two out of the three of their 33 year old stars all of whom have significant injury histories. Toronto specifically has been gifted a number of these wins. Doesn’t entirely explain the road record this year but it’s a factor, like if it’s a short road trip with.
Whatever narratives we want to make about how this year is different, what lilred pointed out is correct historically, and most likely will be this year.
The home court advantage matters more late imo due to the compounding fatigue factor, lower seeded teams generally having faced a tougher road to get there.
Title winner is almost always the healthiest of the contenders at that point in the playoffs, the title is determined at least as much by who isn’t on the court that theoretically could have been than who is.
Quote: lilredroosterQuote: billryanQuote: lilredrooster.
during the regular season the Warriors were 33-8 at home and 11-30 away
they won 80.4% of their games at home and lost 73% of their games away
I don't know of any NBA team ever that has showed such an extreme difference between home and away
it might have happened - but not that I'm aware of
.
link to original post
The only thing that matters about the NBA regular season is that you survive and get to the playoff tournament healthy.
so very wrong
Warriors - current - 53.7% wins regular season
2022 Champs - Warriors - 64.6% wins regular season
2021 Champs - Suns - 70.8% wins regular season
2020 Champs - Lakers - 73.2% wins regular season
2019 Champs - Warriors - 69.5% wins regular season
2018 Champs Warriors - 70.7% wins regular season
2017 Champs - Warriors - 81.7% wins regular season
if you're not a monster during the regular season you're not going to become a monster in the Playoffs
.
link to original post
Typo suns for bucks up there.
Counterpoint is whether it’s an outlier or the new normal, there are few monsters in the NBA currently, no “great teams.”
There were ZERO 60 win teams and 2!!! 55 win teams this season, 3 hit 52 win threshold and highest win total Milwaukee is gone.
Denver, Boston, Philly only teams left with credible regular season contender resumes. 52 wins (prorated for 82 gm season) is the historical seperation of pretenders from contenders, 42 of last 43 champions have done so.
Quote: mcallister3200Quote: lilredroosterQuote: billryanQuote: lilredrooster.
during the regular season the Warriors were 33-8 at home and 11-30 away
they won 80.4% of their games at home and lost 73% of their games away
I don't know of any NBA team ever that has showed such an extreme difference between home and away
it might have happened - but not that I'm aware of
.
link to original post
The only thing that matters about the NBA regular season is that you survive and get to the playoff tournament healthy.
so very wrong
Warriors - current - 53.7% wins regular season
2022 Champs - Warriors - 64.6% wins regular season
2021 Champs - Suns - 70.8% wins regular season
2020 Champs - Lakers - 73.2% wins regular season
2019 Champs - Warriors - 69.5% wins regular season
2018 Champs Warriors - 70.7% wins regular season
2017 Champs - Warriors - 81.7% wins regular season
if you're not a monster during the regular season you're not going to become a monster in the Playoffs
.
link to original post
Typo suns for bucks up there.
Counterpoint is whether it’s an outlier or the new normal, there are few monsters in the NBA currently, no “great teams.”
There were ZERO 60 win teams and 2!!! 55 win teams this season, 3 hit 52 win threshold and highest win total Milwaukee is gone.
Denver, Boston, Philly only teams left with credible regular season contender resumes. 52 wins (prorated for 82 gm season) is the historical seperation of pretenders from contenders, 42 of last 43 champions have done so.
link to original post
Load Management kills the argument about great teams needing a large amount of wins. You can make a case that these great teams may never get to show it sometimes because they take it easy in the regular season and a key guy or two gets hurt in the post season. This happened to the Bucks but with the addition of Coach Bud being garbage
Quote: mcallister320052 wins (prorated for 82 gm season) is the historical seperation of pretenders from contenders, 42 of last 43 champions have done so.
Warriors - 44 wins this season
.
Looks like the oddsmakers forgot Carolina was ahead in this series and got excited over how bad the Devils beat them this one game they won last time. I'm sure the betting was heavy too but I don't see it making the line move that much.
You know what though? One thing I've learned is the oddsmakers are eerily right on these things most of the time. Caught them wrong for once.
And I'm watching and the first thing that happens is a bad turnover and a Devils goal. Those eerily good oddsmakers were looming large for me in that moment LOL!
Rays/Orioles over 9.5 - even money - DraftKings right now - looks like a great bet to me
2 weak pitchers and the 2 teams average 11.5 runs per game when you add them together
I guess they set this total considering that on Monday and Tuesday they played each other and scored only 9 runs total in both games
.
I put down $400.Quote: lilredrooster.
Rays/Orioles over 9.5 - even money - DraftKings right now - looks like a great bet to me
2 weak pitchers and the 2 teams average 11.5 runs per game when you add them together
I guess they set this total considering that on Monday and Tuesday they played each other and scored only 9 runs total in both games
.
link to original post
Quote: AxelWolfI put down $400.Quote: lilredrooster.
Rays/Orioles over 9.5 - even money - DraftKings right now - looks like a great bet to me
2 weak pitchers and the 2 teams average 11.5 runs per game when you add them together
I guess they set this total considering that on Monday and Tuesday they played each other and scored only 9 runs total in both games
.
whoa
I'm going to have to ghost if it doesn't score _____________(~:\________________-but on 2nd thought - Axel's got a phat wallet - everybody knows that - so $400 is not much to him for sure______________________________________________________________(~:\
.
I would've bet more but I only need $400 in action to finish up some WR at one place to cash out. But I'm golden since you indicated this was a LOCK!!Quote: lilredroosterQuote: AxelWolfI put down $400.Quote: lilredrooster.
Rays/Orioles over 9.5 - even money - DraftKings right now - looks like a great bet to me
2 weak pitchers and the 2 teams average 11.5 runs per game when you add them together
I guess they set this total considering that on Monday and Tuesday they played each other and scored only 9 runs total in both games
.
whoa
I'm going to have to ghost if it doesn't score _____________(~:\________________-but on 2nd thought - Axel's got a phat wallet - everybody knows that - so $400 is not much to him for sure______________________________________________________________(~:\
.
link to original post
Phat wallet, not sure about that. Perhaps a phat crypto wallet all loaded up with....
CumRocket
NEO
Bitcoin Gold
IOTA
Cardano
Flow
DOGE
Algorand
Solana
😂