Quote: FinsRuleOmaha Beach scratched. Derby in chaos.
So Mike Smith goes horseless for the Derby? Would Baffert really make the switch back to him on Roadster so close to race day?
Quote: ahiromuSo Mike Smith goes horseless for the Derby? Would Baffert really make the switch back to him on Roadster so close to race day?
Wow. The day Mike won on Roadster, Baffert offered him his choice of rides. I thought he would stay on Roadster.
I bet he bumps whoever.
business. I believe they’d have to pay both jockeys if they did that.
I got invalid parameter. Would you check please?Quote: ontariodealerI have these, trying to get drf classic.
http://www.brisnet.com/php/bw_pdf_viewer.php?track=CD&race=12¶m1=4080¶m2=272¶m3=1623276
On a sad note, I won't be able to bet on Limousine Liberal tomorrow, he suffered a career ending injury yesterday.
Quote: ahiromuI understand and agree that there was a foul. You can't do that. At the same time, did it really affect the outcome of the race? I don't think so. I lost either way, so I'm not arguing it from that POV.
I believe it absolutely did.
WOW
War of Will is the most interesting 3yo right now for me out of the race. Tyler G. (jockey on WoW) just needed to wait a couple more strides behind Max Security and the golden rail would have opened up for him down the lane. He had horse left to make a run but he tipped out a little to soon and the decision did not work out. WoW really had the dream trip until the far turn into a slowish pace through 6 furlongs. If you watch the replay (and look at the chart of the race) Code of Honor was gifted the rail after WoW moved outside and Max Security drifted out. Code of Honor shot up the rail opening and actually made the lead in the race (only by a head). WoW could easily have been the winner, maybe... We will never know and the race is over. IMHO, I believe the Stewards made the correct call to DQ Max Security.
In watching the coverage and reading various articles on the race I have a couple of things to point out:
-Maximum Security was not the betting favorite, Improbable was.
-Maximum Security did not lead all the way around the track.
-Why do people say he was "much the best" or "clearly the best" when he actually impeded the nearest 3/4 runners to his outside on the far turn? (BTW, Max Security also bumped Code of Honor on the rail after Saez tried to correct course.
-I was shocked M. Casse and Tyler G. decided not to lodge an objection after the race. But 2 other jockeys did.
-How about Master Fencer's (Japenese horse) race in the Derby? From last (19th) to 7th (6th after DQ), boy was he really closing fast. Game Winner also was closing quickly from 18th to finish 6th (5th after DQ).
Derby Chart:
http://www.equibase.com/premium/chartEmb.cfm?track=CD&raceDate=05/04/2019&cy=USA&rn=12
On to the Preakness.
Casse said WoW will be pointed towards the Preakness. He likely needed the race to build upon after a poor race in the LA Derby and the longish break between races. Country House may not even be the favorite in the Preakness, depending on who actually gets entered.
"The Kentucky Derby decision was a bad one"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/the-kentucky-derby-decision-was-a-bad-one-country-house-never-had-a-chance-of-winning/2019/05/06/59a584b4-701c-11e9-8be0-ca575670e91c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2419476f9bf9
My simple "summary" - There was a foul but it did not really change the outcome.
I disagree with him. He even admits it might have changed the outcome with this part about WoW:
"Without the trouble, he might have finished fifth. He would not have won."
Finishing 5th or 6th is actually very important. Just look at the payouts to the owners (from the chart above) of the top 5 finishers. And of course there is the Super High 5 wager betting pool (for the top 5 finishers). This year the pool paid 1 ticket:
$1.00 Super High Five (20-13-8-5-16) Paid: $544,185.90 (Pool total: $644,420)
http://www.espn.com/horse-racing/story/_/id/26692287/derby-champ-country-house-preakness
No Triple Crown this year, but will Maximum Security's handlers now run him in the Preakness? I would guess no, but we will see.
Quote: KeeneoneBeyer has a piece about the Derby DQ:
"The Kentucky Derby decision was a bad one"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/the-kentucky-derby-decision-was-a-bad-one-country-house-never-had-a-chance-of-winning/2019/05/06/59a584b4-701c-11e9-8be0-ca575670e91c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2419476f9bf9
My simple "summary" - There was a foul but it did not really change the outcome.
I disagree with him. He even admits it might have changed the outcome with this part about WoW:
"Without the trouble, he might have finished fifth. He would not have won."
Finishing 5th or 6th is actually very important. Just look at the payouts to the owners (from the chart above) of the top 5 finishers. And of course there is the Super High 5 wager betting pool (for the top 5 finishers). This year the pool paid 1 ticket:
$1.00 Super High Five (20-13-8-5-16) Paid: $544,185.90 (Pool total: $644,420)
He says it cost WOW a length. I think that’s extremely low.
looks like it was done out of bitterness
if he skips the Belmont too most of the other big races in the rest of the year allow older horses and he'll probably get beat by them
right now, his resume is not strong enough to command the giant stud fees they could command if he won the Preakness and Belmont
big mistake IMO
Apparently Maximum Security's handlers have him @ Monmouth now and are pointing toward the Haskell Stakes (July 20th -new date btw). Maybe plans will change...
It is Improbable this hypothetical will occur, but I am Alwaysmining for a Win Win Win.
Early past performances for the Preakness Stakes:
http://www.brisnet.com/edgeped/2019preakness.pdf
Put anothertwistafate in your trifecta also.
Edit - and Warriors Charge
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sports-jockey-suspended/maximum-security-jockey-suspended-15-days-idUSKCN1SJ1VT
I think it is a bit harse, but all the squawking from Max Security's owners and lawyers surely did not help. A lack of taking some/any responsibility for the ride in the Derby (actually blaming War Of Will's jockey) and showing little respect/deference to the Steward's decision also was not likely helpful.
----------
Preakness post posisiton draw will be Wednesday. Twelve runners are the current estimate for the race.
Improbable, War of Will, Alwaysmining, Bourbon War, Owendale, Anothertwistafate, Win Win Win, Warriors's Charge, Signalman, Laughing Fox, Bodexpress, Market King
http://www.brisnet.com/php/bw_pdf_viewer.php?track=PIM&race=13¶m1=4745¶m2=1314¶m3=2099760
Certainly has the look of a great betting race. Speedsters, pressers, and closers to choose from. I am sticking with the best 3yo IMO, War of Will. The 1 post is fine for this race. Hopefully he sits off the pace and pounces late down the stretch. He needed the Derby and hopefully he is fit and ready to roll. After him I just do not know right now. 4/1 would be great if it stays that high on Saturday.
----------
In other news, The West's have filed a Federal Court case. I guess we will see where it goes...
https://media.bizj.us/view/img/11318611/case.pdf
http://www.brisnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Preakness19.pdf
GLTA
Quote: ontariodealervery weak crop of 3 yr olds this year, both male and female......because I have to, 12/4/2
Weak doesn't mean uncompetitive. This has the makings of a very exciting race.
Quote: KeeneoneI am sticking with the best 3yo IMO, War of Will.
nice call K
it would be great if Country House, War of Will and Maximus Security all showed up for the Belmont
but I doubt it will happen
War had the perfect trip today. Doubt War will get that next time.
My #1 pick went too fast but still held fourth somehow.
$10 to win on War of Will paid for the losses.
Bode's fans lit up Twitter with their praise of him
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/05/19/run-free-bodexpress-peoples-champion-preakness/?utm_term=.a07e9e010808
I think he should have been declared a non starter.
Quote: FinsRuleI had him 3rd in my tri. Only cost me $2.50.
I think he should have been declared a non starter.
Code of Maryland Regulations 09.10.01.02 (26):
"A horse is a "starter" when the stall doors of the starting gate open in front of the horse at the time the starter dispatches the field."
Quote: arethamorcenice one
Bot was a nice one?
Quote: speedycrapAnyone with Belmont PP please?
Isn't it a little early? The Belmont is June 8, not June 1. Remember, it's three weeks after the Preakness.
Thanks. I made a mistake.Quote: ThatDonGuyIsn't it a little early? The Belmont is June 8, not June 1. Remember, it's three weeks after the Preakness.