Thread Rating:

Poll

21 votes (45.65%)
14 votes (30.43%)
6 votes (13.04%)
3 votes (6.52%)
12 votes (26.08%)
3 votes (6.52%)
6 votes (13.04%)
5 votes (10.86%)
12 votes (26.08%)
10 votes (21.73%)

46 members have voted

Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 17th, 2020 at 5:22:25 PM permalink
Quote: ThatDonGuy

Dice where 2s and 5s "don't count" remind me of Scarney Dice (created by John Scarne), where the 2s and 5s actually say "Dead".


Hopefully I avoided any idiot math errors this time; the number appears to be confirmed by simulation.

Let E(n) be the expected score with N dice remaining
E(0) = 0

E(1) = 2/3 (E(1) + 7/2)
= 7

E(2) = 4/9 (E(2) + 7) + 4/9 E(1)
= 4/9 E(2) + 56/9
= 56/5

E(3) = 8/27 (E(3) + 21/2) + 12/27 E(2) + 6/27 E(1)
= 8/27 E(3) + 84/27 + 12/27 x 56/5 + 6/27 x 7
19 E(3) = 84 + 12 x 56/5 + 42
E(3) = (126 + 12 x 56/5) / 19
= (126 x 5 + 12 x 56) / 95
= 1302 / 95

E(4) = 16/81 (E(4) + 14) + 32/81 E(3) + 24/81 E(2) + 8/81 E(1)
= 16/81 E(4) + 224/81 + 32/81 x 1302/95 + 24/81 x 56/5 + 8/81 x 7
65 E(4) = 224 + 32 x 1302 / 95 + 24 x 56 / 5 + 56
E(4) = (280 x 475 + 41,664 x 5 + 1344 x 95) / (95 x 5 x 65)
= (280 x 95 + 41,664 + 1344 x 19) / (95 x 65)
= 3752 / 247

E(5) = 32/243 (E(5) + 35/2) + 80/243 E(4) + 80/243 E(3) + 40/243 E(2) + 10/243 E(1)
243 E(5) = 32 E(5) + 560 + 80 x 3752 / (19 x 13) + 80 x 1302 / (19 x 5) + 448 + 70
211 E(5) = 1078 + 80 x 3752 / (19 x 13) + 80 x 1302 / (19 x 5)
(211 x 19 x 65) E(5) = 1078 x 19 x 65 + 80 x 3752 x 5 + 80 x 1302 x 13
E(5) = 837,242 / 52,117, or about 16.065


Correct!

Very impressive.

Note that playing with more than 5 dice does not increase the expected score by very much at all.

-------------------------------

A pun walks into a bar and 10 people drop dead.

Pun in, ten dead.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
November 18th, 2020 at 5:33:24 AM permalink
RE: Much easier problem.

I agree with the answer as provided.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 8:00:37 AM permalink


On his TV show in 2007, comedian David Letterman made the following quip...

"In 1626, we bought Manhattan from the Indians for $24. Today, it would be worth 730 trillion dollars."

At what interest rate would you have to invest $24 in 1626 so that it would be worth $730 trillion in 2007?


Assume that the rate stays constant and that it is compounded annually.

Give your answer as a percent correct to two decimal places (e.g., like 3.74%).
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
ChesterDog
ChesterDog
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 1504
Joined: Jul 26, 2010
November 18th, 2020 at 8:26:31 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

...
On his TV show in 2007, comedian David Letterman made the following quip...

"In 1626, we bought Manhattan from the Indians for $24. Today, it would be worth 730 trillion dollars."

At what interest rate would you have to invest $24 in 1626 so that it would be worth $730 trillion in 2007?


Assume that the rate stays constant and that it is compounded annually.

Give your answer as a percent correct to two decimal places (e.g., like 3.74%).



8.20%

Solved this equation for x:
$24(1+x)2020-1626=$730 trillion

Edit: Reading Joeman's post, I see my equation should have been:
$24(1+x)2007-1626=$730 trillion for Joeman's correct answer 8.49%.

Last edited by: ChesterDog on Nov 18, 2020
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2414
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Thanked by
Gialmere
November 18th, 2020 at 8:34:34 AM permalink
8.49%

For annual compounding...
Today's value = Initial principal * (1 + rate) ^ years

--or--

$730 Trillion = $24(1+rate) ^ 381

Dividing both sides by the initial principal and then taking the 381st root, you get:

1 + rate = 1.0849

So the rate = 0.0849 or 8.49%


"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
November 18th, 2020 at 9:40:49 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere



On his TV show in 2007, comedian David Letterman made the following quip...

"In 1626, we bought Manhattan from the Indians for $24. Today, it would be worth 730 trillion dollars."



At the risk of making a political comment, that makes the national debt seem not so bad.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 9:46:36 AM permalink
Quote: Joeman

8.49%

For annual compounding...
Today's value = Initial principal * (1 + rate) ^ years

--or--

$730 Trillion = $24(1+rate) ^ 381

Dividing both sides by the initial principal and then taking the 381st root, you get:

1 + rate = 1.0849

So the rate = 0.0849 or 8.49%




I get the other answer. Think you subtracted wrong. 394 years not 381.

8.20%


Extra credit, what’s the interest rate if there is continuous compounding?
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2414
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
November 18th, 2020 at 10:13:43 AM permalink
Quote: unJon

I get the other answer. Think you subtracted wrong. 394 years not 381.

I read the question as asking about the value in 2007 when the statement was made, not today's value.
"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2414
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
November 18th, 2020 at 10:21:03 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

At the risk of making a political comment, that makes the national debt seem not so bad.

If the US were to sell Manhattan at that valuation, the government could pay off all its debts and have enough left over to make each US citizen a millionaire twice over!
"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 11:05:49 AM permalink
Quote: Joeman

I read the question as asking about the value in 2007 when the statement was made, not today's value.



Ah. Then I agree with you and see your powers of reading comprehension exceed mine.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5049
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
November 18th, 2020 at 11:51:37 AM permalink
Here's a problem that is simple, game-related and IMO fun.

True statement! A recreational poker site has the following weird Texas hold-em poker variant.

The deck is 10 to Ace, 4 suits; 20 cards.

1. What is the lowest possible 5-card poker hand that a player can make with his two hole cards and five common cards?

2. Given that hand categories are: Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Quads, etc., which hand category is the most probable and with what probability?
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
Joeman
November 18th, 2020 at 11:58:03 AM permalink
Quote: Joeman

If the US were to sell Manhattan at that valuation, the government could pay off all its debts and have enough left over to make each US citizen a millionaire twice over!



Let's confirm that. The valuation is $730 trillion.
The national debt is $27 trillion (source = debt clock).
That leaves $703 trillion.
The US population is 330 million. (source = census.gov).
If we sold Manhattan that would be:
703,000,000,000,000
----------------------
330,000,000

Dividing each side by 1,000,000:

703,000,000/330 = $2,130,303.

BTW, Bloomberg.com puts the total valuation of Manhattan at $1.74 trillion.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
November 18th, 2020 at 12:59:49 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

...weird Texas hold-em poker...The deck is 10 to Ace, 4 suits; 20 cards.

1. What is the lowest possible 5-card poker hand that a player can make with his two hole cards and five common cards?

2. Given that hand categories are: Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Quads, etc., which hand category is the most probable and with what probability?

The lowest hand is Two Pairs, because if before the river you only had one pair then you would have all five ranks making a straight. Similarly Trips makes a straight.
RF
420
Quads
2800
FH
29280
Straight
27740
Two Pairs
17280
So Full House is most likely 29280/77520 ~= 37.77%
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5049
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
November 18th, 2020 at 2:12:49 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

Quote: gordonm888

...weird Texas hold-em poker...The deck is 10 to Ace, 4 suits; 20 cards.

1. What is the lowest possible 5-card poker hand that a player can make with his two hole cards and five common cards?

2. Given that hand categories are: Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Quads, etc., which hand category is the most probable and with what probability?

The lowest hand is Two Pairs, because if before the river you only had one pair then you would have all five ranks making a straight. Similarly Trips makes a straight.
RF
420
Quads
2800
FH
29280
Straight
27740
Two Pairs
17280
So Full House is most likely 29280/77520 ~= 37.77%



For question #1, your answer was a hand category and not the lowest possible hand. In normal Texas holdem, the lowest possible 5 card poker hand is 9-8-7-5-4, not "No Pair."

For question#2, I calculate a different number.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 2:16:02 PM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Quote: charliepatrick

Quote: gordonm888

...weird Texas hold-em poker...The deck is 10 to Ace, 4 suits; 20 cards.

1. What is the lowest possible 5-card poker hand that a player can make with his two hole cards and five common cards?

2. Given that hand categories are: Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Quads, etc., which hand category is the most probable and with what probability?

The lowest hand is Two Pairs, because if before the river you only had one pair then you would have all five ranks making a straight. Similarly Trips makes a straight.
RF
420
Quads
2800
FH
29280
Straight
27740
Two Pairs
17280
So Full House is most likely 29280/77520 ~= 37.77%



For question #1, your answer was a hand category and not the lowest possible hand. In normal Texas holdem, the lowest possible 5 card poker hand is 9-8-7-5-4, not "No Pair."

For question#2, I calculate a different number.



Should be jacks and tens with an ace kicker.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2414
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
November 18th, 2020 at 2:42:08 PM permalink
Two Pair: Queens & Jacks with a King kicker. The combination of hand + board would be: T, T, J, J, Q, Q, K

If there are only two pair among the 7 cards, there must also be a straight. So, to get a 5-card hand of two pair, there must be three pair among the 7 cards.
"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 5:50:57 PM permalink
Quote: Joeman

8.49%

For annual compounding...
Today's value = Initial principal * (1 + rate) ^ years

--or--

$730 Trillion = $24(1+rate) ^ 381

Dividing both sides by the initial principal and then taking the 381st root, you get:

1 + rate = 1.0849

So the rate = 0.0849 or 8.49%



Correct!

With bonus points for the spoiler joke.
----------------------------------

Did you hear about the banker who's also learning chemistry?

He's got a lot of compound interest.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5049
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
November 18th, 2020 at 5:58:37 PM permalink
Quote: Joeman

Two Pair: Queens & Jacks with a King kicker. The combination of hand + board would be: T, T, J, J, Q, Q, K

If there are only two pair among the 7 cards, there must also be a straight. So, to get a 5-card hand of two pair, there must be three pair among the 7 cards.



CORRECT for question#1
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 18th, 2020 at 6:22:41 PM permalink
Quote: Joeman

Two Pair: Queens & Jacks with a King kicker. The combination of hand + board would be: T, T, J, J, Q, Q, K

If there are only two pair among the 7 cards, there must also be a straight. So, to get a 5-card hand of two pair, there must be three pair among the 7 cards.



Oops. Right.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
November 19th, 2020 at 12:46:14 AM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

...For question#2, I calculate a different number.

I've tried a different method as the distribution of cards leads to a unique category (except Straights may be SFs and there are 420 of those 4*15*14/2).
C1C2C3C4C5CombinsWaysQuadsFullHouseStraight/SFTwoPairs
4
3
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
1
5
4
1
80
80
0
0
0
4
2
1
0
0
1
6
4
1
1
5
4
3
1 440
1 440
0
0
0
4
1
1
1
0
1
4
4
4
1
5
4
1
1 280
1 280
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
4
4
4
1
1
10
3
1
1 920
0
1 920
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
4
6
6
1
1
5
6
1
4 320
0
4 320
0
0
3
2
1
1
0
4
6
4
4
1
5
4
3
23 040
0
23 040
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
5
1
1
5 120
0
0
5 120
0
2
2
2
1
0
6
6
6
4
1
10
2
1
17 280
0
0
0
17 280
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
4
4
4
10
1
1
23 040
0
0
23 040
0
77 520
2 800
29 280
28 160
17 280
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5049
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
November 19th, 2020 at 5:19:52 AM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

I've tried a different method as the distribution of cards leads to a unique category (except Straights may be SFs and there are 420 of those 4*15*14/2).
C1C2C3C4C5CombinsWaysQuadsFullHouseStraight/SFTwoPairs
4
3
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
1
5
4
1
80
80
0
0
0
4
2
1
0
0
1
6
4
1
1
5
4
3
1 440
1 440
0
0
0
4
1
1
1
0
1
4
4
4
1
5
4
1
1 280
1 280
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
4
4
4
1
1
10
3
1
1 920
0
1 920
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
4
6
6
1
1
5
6
1
4 320
0
4 320
0
0
3
2
1
1
0
4
6
4
4
1
5
4
3
23 040
0
23 040
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
5
1
1
5 120
0
0
5 120
0
2
2
2
1
0
6
6
6
4
1
10
2
1
17 280
0
0
0
17 280
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
4
4
4
10
1
1
23 040
0
0
23 040
0
77 520
2 800
29 280
28 160
17 280



CORRECT



I see now I made a mistake when calculating Full Houses. I did separate out the "Two 3oaks + singleton" (3+3+1) correctly, but lumped together the 3+2+1+1 with the 3+2+2 and thus ultimately doublecounted some of the 3+2+2 hands.

The reason I shared this game with everyone (as a math puzzle) is because it is such an extreme example of a short-deck game. It has only five possible categories of 5-card poker hands:

Royal Flush
Quads
Full House
Straight
Two Pair (and only as 3-pair within the 7 card hand)

And because the lowest possible 5 card poker hand is so high: QQ-JJ-K.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
Thanked by
IndyJeffrey
November 19th, 2020 at 8:22:10 AM permalink
[As promised in the World Cup puzzle.]



The high school newspaper seems to be having trouble both with its printer and its editing. The box score for the district hockey league is a confusing mess.

Using the information that was printed, can you fill in the empty boxes and make sense of the current standings?




Hockey standings are based on points -- each WIN is 2 points, each LOSS is 0 points, and each TIE is 1 point.

In this local high school league, each team plays each other once, but they have not finished the season.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
Thanked by
Gialmere
November 19th, 2020 at 11:07:50 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

...can you fill in the empty boxes...

(a) C Played 3, 3 pts with no losses -> all draws and For=Against
(b) Sum(For)=Sum(Against)
(c) 0 pts -> WA lost all games
(d) J and WI have played everyone, so E has played >1game. Sum(Played) must be even (two teams per game), E = 3
(e) Sum(Points)=Sum(Played), Points€=5
(f) J and WI played everyone, so WA has played them but not played C or E
(g) C's ties are with J WI and E
(h) So WI won 1 and J won 2
8 games: J=C WI=C E=C E>WI W>J J<WA WI>WA J>WI

P W L T F A Points
4 2 1 1 7 1 5
2 0 2 0 2 6 0
4 1 2 1 5 10 3
3 0 0 3 4 4 3
3 2 0 1 5 2 5

Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
Thanked by
charliepatrick
November 19th, 2020 at 7:03:00 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

(a) C Played 3, 3 pts with no losses -> all draws and For=Against
(b) Sum(For)=Sum(Against)
(c) 0 pts -> WA lost all games
(d) J and WI have played everyone, so E has played >1game. Sum(Played) must be even (two teams per game), E = 3
(e) Sum(Points)=Sum(Played), Points€=5
(f) J and WI played everyone, so WA has played them but not played C or E
(g) C's ties are with J WI and E
(h) So WI won 1 and J won 2
8 games: J=C WI=C E=C E>WI W>J J<WA WI>WA J>WI

P W L T F A Points
4 2 1 1 7 1 5
2 0 2 0 2 6 0
4 1 2 1 5 10 3
3 0 0 3 4 4 3
3 2 0 1 5 2 5


Correct!
-----------------------------

My local hockey rink just reported their Zamboni driver has gone missing...

They hope he resurfaces soon.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 23rd, 2020 at 8:20:49 AM permalink
It's easy Monday...



Four honest and hard-working computer engineers were having lunch together when the topic of salaries came up.

They decided they wanted to compute the average of all four of their annual incomes. None of the engineers, however, were willing to disclose how much money they actually made in a year.

How were they able to make the correct calculation?
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
Thanked by
Gialmere
November 23rd, 2020 at 9:37:27 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

...How were they able to make the correct calculation?...

Just an idea that seems to work. Using two pieces of paper A writes down the same large value, known to exceed the value of the four salaries, and (can show them to B) and put one in the "original numbers" box and passes the other piece of paper to C. C subtracts their salary, writes the total on another piece of paper and hands it to D. D does the same and now puts their piece of paper in the "less two salaries" box. B, C and D similarly repeat the process. (It is even fairer if they all come up with their initial numbers at the same time and then randomise who gets which one. Another method is for people to come up with two initial random numbers each. Another method is only to use A and C to initiate the process, so divide by 1.)

Then calculate the difference between the total of "original numbers" and "less two salaries" and divide by 2.
ChesterDog
ChesterDog
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 1504
Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Thanked by
Gialmere
November 23rd, 2020 at 10:07:40 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

It's easy Monday...

...

Four honest and hard-working computer engineers were having lunch together when the topic of salaries came up.

They decided they wanted to compute the average of all four of their annual incomes. None of the engineers, however, were willing to disclose how much money they actually made in a year.

How were they able to make the correct calculation?




Four playing cards will be prepared, each with a different number on it. For example, the four numbers might be: 5,000; 10,000; 15,000; and 20,000.

The four cards are shuffled and dealt face down to the four engineers. Each adds his salary to the number on his card and announces the sum.

They add the four announced numbers, subtract 50,000 and divide by four to find their average salary.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 23rd, 2020 at 5:17:05 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

Just an idea that seems to work. Using two pieces of paper A writes down the same large value, known to exceed the value of the four salaries, and (can show them to B) and put one in the "original numbers" box and passes the other piece of paper to C. C subtracts their salary, writes the total on another piece of paper and hands it to D. D does the same and now puts their piece of paper in the "less two salaries" box. B, C and D similarly repeat the process. (It is even fairer if they all come up with their initial numbers at the same time and then randomise who gets which one. Another method is for people to come up with two initial random numbers each. Another method is only to use A and C to initiate the process, so divide by 1.)

Then calculate the difference between the total of "original numbers" and "less two salaries" and divide by 2.


Quote: ChesterDog


Four playing cards will be prepared, each with a different number on it. For example, the four numbers might be: 5,000; 10,000; 15,000; and 20,000.

The four cards are shuffled and dealt face down to the four engineers. Each adds his salary to the number on his card and announces the sum.

They add the four announced numbers, subtract 50,000 and divide by four to find their average salary.


All Correct!

As you can see, there are actually several ways to solve this puzzle that a clever person might think up. The "official" solve uses probably the simplest technique...

Engineer #1 secretly generates a large (say, seven figure) random number and adds his salary to the amount. He writes down the new number and gives it to engineer #2. She, in turn, secretly adds her salary to the number, writes down the new sum and passes it to engineer #3, and so on. When the final number returns to engineer #1, he subtracts from it the original random number and divides the difference by 4.

The engineers can now see how underpaid they are as a group.

-----------------------------

Reaching the end of a job interview, the interviewer asked a young engineer, "What starting salary were you thinking about?"

The Engineer said, "In the neighborhood of $125,000 a year, depending on the benefits package."

The interviewer said, "Well, what would you say to a package of 5 weeks vacation, 14 paid holidays, full medical and dental, company matching retirement fund to 50% of salary, and a company car leased every 2 years - say, a red Corvette?"

The Engineer sat up straight and said, "Wow! Are you kidding?"

The interviewer replied, "Yeah, but you started it."
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 2946
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
November 23rd, 2020 at 8:08:13 PM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

....

As you can see, there are actually several ways to solve this puzzle that a clever person might think up. The "official" solve uses probably the simplest technique...

Engineer #1 secretly generates a large (say, seven figure) random number and adds his salary to the amount. He writes down the new number and gives it to engineer #2. She, in turn, secretly adds her salary to the number, writes down the new sum and passes it to engineer #3, and so on. When the final number returns to engineer #1, he subtracts from it the original random number and divides the difference by 4.

The engineers can now see how underpaid they are as a group.
...

This was the first way I thought but the issue is that the second person gets to see enough information to work out the first person's salary. #2 sees (a) the random number plus #1's salary (i.e. the number passed = R+A), the final number (R+A+B+C+D) and the average (A+B+C+D)/4. Thus #2 can calculate R, and hence A. Of course if the four engineers all trust each other then they will trust the process and allow #1 to make the calculations at the end.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 24th, 2020 at 8:02:56 AM permalink
It's toughie Tuesday. Oh @!#?@! He's back!...



An a × b × c cuboid is constructed out of abc identical unit cubes -- a la Rubik's Cube. Divide the cubes into two mutually exclusive types. External cubes are those that constitute the faces of the cuboid; internal cubes are completely enclosed. For example, the cuboid below has 74 external and 10 internal cubes.



Find all cuboids such that the number of external cubes equals the number of internal cubes.


(That is, give the dimensions of all such cuboids.)
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
November 24th, 2020 at 9:34:48 AM permalink

8,10,12.

I think any solution must have and odd number of even numbers (either 1 or 3).

It's easy to say that if the sides are x, y, and z, then 4*(xy+xz+yz) +16 = xyz + 8*(x+y+z)
Last edited by: Wizard on Nov 24, 2020
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 24th, 2020 at 9:55:08 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard


8,10,12.

I think any solution must have and odd number of even numbers (either 1 or 3).

It's easy to say that if the sides are x, y, and z, then 4*(xy+xz+yz) = xyz + 8*(x+y+z)



Not an answer but two other formulae.

Can also say that:

(x-2)*(y-2)*(z-2) = xyz/2
That is the number of interior cubes equals half the cubes.

Or

xy + 2y(z-2) + 2(x-2)(z-2) = xyz/2
That is the number of exterior cubes equals half the cubes.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 117
  • Posts: 6272
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Thanked by
CrystalMathGialmeregordonm888
November 24th, 2020 at 10:30:02 AM permalink
EDIT: My earlier list had answers that were incorrect because of 32-bit integer overflows


12 x 10 x 8
14 x 9 x 8
16 x 10 x 7
16 x 14 x 6
18 x 8 x 8
20 x 9 x 7
20 x 12 x 6
24 x 11 x 6
24 x 22 x 5
27 x 20 x 5
30 x 8 x 7
32 x 10 x 6
32 x 18 x 5
36 x 17 x 5
42 x 16 x 5
52 x 15 x 5
56 x 9 x 6
72 x 14 x 5
100 x 7 x 7
132 x 13 x 5

Note that, if the dimensions are L x W x H, then LWH = 2 (L - 2) (W - 2) (H - 2)

Last edited by: ThatDonGuy on Nov 24, 2020
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 24th, 2020 at 11:25:05 AM permalink
Quote: ThatDonGuy


Here are the ones I could find where all of the dimensions < 5000:
12 x 10 x 8
14 x 9 x 8
16 x 10 x 7
16 x 14 x 6
18 x 8 x 8
20 x 9 x 7
20 x 12 x 6
24 x 11 x 6
24 x 22 x 5
27 x 20 x 5
30 x 8 x 7
32 x 10 x 6
32 x 18 x 5
36 x 17 x 5
42 x 16 x 5
52 x 15 x 5
56 x 9 x 6
72 x 14 x 5
100 x 7 x 7
132 x 13 x 5
2581 x 2580 x 651
2836 x 2744 x 2218
2951 x 2176 x 1346
2988 x 2550 x 1700
3554 x 3216 x 2264
3570 x 3040 x 2781
4233 x 3222 x 3160
4479 x 2648 x 2182
4580 x 4501 x 1465
4700 x 3586 x 1536
4770 x 4279 x 2112
4831 x 3621 x 1972
4838 x 3606 x 2224
4858 x 4060 x 2840
4866 x 3840 x 3228
4962 x 4736 x 2750

Note that, if the dimensions are L x W x H, then LWH = 2 (L - 2) (W - 2) (H - 2)

I have a feeling there is no maximum solution, but I am still working on the proof (one way or the other)



My gut feeling was that there would be a maximum solution because
Crudely speaking the sum of all the blocks is a measure of volume and the sum of all the exterior blocks is a measure of surface area. Volume should increase as a cubic function and surface area as a square function. So eventually the interior cubes would always be > half of all cubes
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
Gialmere
November 24th, 2020 at 12:31:30 PM permalink
Here are my answers thus far. I don't think there are more and can't find any connection to them, other than a circular reference to the problem at hand.


5,13,132
5,14,72
5,15,52
5,16,42
5,17,36
5,18,32
5,20,27
6,9,56
6,10,32
6,11,24
6,12,20
6,14,16
7,7,100
7,8,30
7,9,20
7,10,16
8,8,18
8,9,14
8,10,12
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 117
  • Posts: 6272
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
November 24th, 2020 at 1:01:45 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Here are my answers thus far



5, 22, 24

unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4597
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
November 24th, 2020 at 1:07:42 PM permalink
I can see a path to proving that no solutions above a threshold exist based on adding a row to, eg, the X row will add Y*Z blocks and Y*Z - 2Y - 2Z + 4 internal blocks. But am getting pulled away from work so will try to sketch out later.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 24th, 2020 at 7:16:06 PM permalink
Quote: ThatDonGuy

EDIT: My earlier list had answers that were incorrect because of 32-bit integer overflows


12 x 10 x 8
14 x 9 x 8
16 x 10 x 7
16 x 14 x 6
18 x 8 x 8
20 x 9 x 7
20 x 12 x 6
24 x 11 x 6
24 x 22 x 5
27 x 20 x 5
30 x 8 x 7
32 x 10 x 6
32 x 18 x 5
36 x 17 x 5
42 x 16 x 5
52 x 15 x 5
56 x 9 x 6
72 x 14 x 5
100 x 7 x 7
132 x 13 x 5

Note that, if the dimensions are L x W x H, then LWH = 2 (L - 2) (W - 2) (H - 2)


Quote: Wizard

Here are my answers thus far. I don't think there are more and can't find any connection to them, other than a circular reference to the problem at hand.


5,13,132
5,14,72
5,15,52
5,16,42
5,17,36
5,18,32
5,20,27
6,9,56
6,10,32
6,11,24
6,12,20
6,14,16
7,7,100
7,8,30
7,9,20
7,10,16
8,8,18
8,9,14
8,10,12


Correct!

In an unusual joint solve, kind of, sort of.




--------------------------------

Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
November 25th, 2020 at 3:59:12 AM permalink
Here is the math puzzle from the November 2020 Mensa Bulletin.

You have a 1x4 rectangular piece of paper. You fold it so that two opposite corners overlap, making a pentagon shape. What is the ratio of the area of that pentagon where the paper overlaps to the entire pentagon?



In other words, what is the ratio of the blue area to the total area?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
chevy
chevy
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 146
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
November 25th, 2020 at 9:00:35 AM permalink

***I "think" the red/blue diagram is not to scale. It makes blue appear as right angle. I "think" the line from A,D to the center of opposite side is the perpendicular.***

Call the center of the rectangle Y. Call the ends of the fold (X,Z). So side of blue triangle opposite A,D is XYZ with Y at midpoint and (A,D) to Y is perpendicular to XZ.

Area of Blue = .5 * XZ * AY = XY * AY
Area of rectangle = 2*Area of Blue + 2* Area of Red = 4
Area of Pentagon = Area of rectangle - Area of Blue = 4-Area of Blue

Ratio = Area of Blue / (4-Area of Blue)


From Trig using the rectangle diagram with XYZ added accordingly....
AD = sqrt(4^2+1^2)=sqrt(17)
AY = AD/2 = sqrt(17)/2

Call theta angle given by CAD, then
tan(theta) = DC/AC = 1/4

Theta is also angle for XAY, so
tan(theta) = XY/AY
XY = AY * tan(theta) = sqrt(17)/2 * (1/4) = sqrt(17)/8

Thus Area of Blue = XY * AY = [sqrt(17)/8] * sqrt(17)/2 = 17/16

And
ratio = Area of Blue / (4-Area of Blue)
= (17/16) / (4 - 17/16)
=17/47
chevy
chevy
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 146
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
November 25th, 2020 at 9:39:09 AM permalink
Follow up question:

For arbitrary rectangle with Height=H, Width=W......(oriented with H>=W), What range can the area ratio (Blue/Total) of the folded result have? And for what H,W is the Blue area 50%?
DogHand
DogHand
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 1521
Joined: Sep 24, 2011
November 25th, 2020 at 10:22:48 AM permalink
Wiz,

Your second set disproves your earlier statement about the permissible number of evens.

Dog Hand
CrystalMath
CrystalMath
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 1911
Joined: May 10, 2011
November 25th, 2020 at 4:45:14 PM permalink
Quote: chevy

Follow up question:

For arbitrary rectangle with Height=H, Width=W......(oriented with H>=W), What range can the area ratio (Blue/Total) of the folded result have? And for what H,W is the Blue area 50%?




I get a general equation for the ratio of H/W = sqrt((ratio+1)/(3ratio -1)) .
For a ratio of 0.5, H/W = sqrt(3)

If H=W, ratio = 1 (same as folding a square in half).
If H >> W, the ratio approaches 1/3.
I heart Crystal Math.
chevy
chevy
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 146
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
November 25th, 2020 at 7:14:55 PM permalink
Quote: CrystalMath


I get a general equation for the ratio of H/W = sqrt((ratio+1)/(3ratio -1)) .
For a ratio of 0.5, H/W = sqrt(3)

If H=W, ratio = 1 (same as folding a square in half).
If H >> W, the ratio approaches 1/3.



I agree!
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 60
  • Posts: 5049
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
November 26th, 2020 at 7:40:24 AM permalink


The ratio of the area of that pentagon where the paper overlaps to the entire pentagon is 1/3



Sorry, didn't notice that the problem was a day old.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 26th, 2020 at 11:01:07 AM permalink
Happy (US) Thanksgiving!



Turkey = ?
Cornucopia = ?
Native American = ?
Mayflower = ?
Pilgrim = ?

Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 117
  • Posts: 6272
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
November 26th, 2020 at 1:17:31 PM permalink
Quote: Gialmere


Turkey = ?
Cornucopia = ?
Native American = ?
Mayflower = ?
Pilgrim = ?



Just the numbers this time...

Turkey = 6
Cornucopia = 8
Native American = 7
Mayflower = 11
Pilgrim = 29

Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1493
  • Posts: 26497
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
November 26th, 2020 at 4:21:01 PM permalink
Quote: chevy


***I "think" the red/blue diagram is not to scale. It makes blue appear as right angle. I "think" the line from A,D to the center of opposite side is the perpendicular.***

Call the center of the rectangle Y. Call the ends of the fold (X,Z). So side of blue triangle opposite A,D is XYZ with Y at midpoint and (A,D) to Y is perpendicular to XZ.

Area of Blue = .5 * XZ * AY = XY * AY
Area of rectangle = 2*Area of Blue + 2* Area of Red = 4
Area of Pentagon = Area of rectangle - Area of Blue = 4-Area of Blue

Ratio = Area of Blue / (4-Area of Blue)


From Trig using the rectangle diagram with XYZ added accordingly....
AD = sqrt(4^2+1^2)=sqrt(17)
AY = AD/2 = sqrt(17)/2

Call theta angle given by CAD, then
tan(theta) = DC/AC = 1/4

Theta is also angle for XAY, so
tan(theta) = XY/AY
XY = AY * tan(theta) = sqrt(17)/2 * (1/4) = sqrt(17)/8

Thus Area of Blue = XY * AY = [sqrt(17)/8] * sqrt(17)/2 = 17/16

And
ratio = Area of Blue / (4-Area of Blue)
= (17/16) / (4 - 17/16)
=17/47



I agree!

Welcome to the WoV forum, by the way.

That was a tough problem and only one member answered it correctly (you), so please consider yourself invited to the prestigious "Beer Club." This means I owe you a beer should we ever meet.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 44
  • Posts: 2939
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
November 26th, 2020 at 8:02:17 PM permalink
Quote: ThatDonGuy



Just the numbers this time...

Turkey = 6
Cornucopia = 8
Native American = 7
Mayflower = 11
Pilgrim = 29


Correct!
-----------------------

Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
chevy
chevy
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 146
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
November 26th, 2020 at 10:31:01 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard



I agree!

Welcome to the WoV forum, by the way.

That was a tough problem and only one member answered it correctly (you), so please consider yourself invited to the prestigious "Beer Club." This means I owe you a beer should we ever meet.



Thanks for the "Beer Club" honor.

In fairness, CrystalMath answered my followup about the general HxW rectangle with a formula I agree with, so I assume he too had the original problem solved, just never posted.

Hopefully that doesn't preclude my membership in said club.
  • Jump to: