Poll
![]() | 5 votes (38.46%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (7.69%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (7.69%) | ||
No votes (0%) | |||
![]() | 1 vote (7.69%) | ||
![]() | 2 votes (15.38%) | ||
![]() | 7 votes (53.84%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (23.07%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (23.07%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (23.07%) |
13 members have voted
The number of neutrons in the nucleus is not necessarily equal to the number of protons (and, thus, the atomic number). The varying number of neutrons accounts for the isotopes: thus, carbon, with an atomic number of 6, has 6 protons, but it exists in three isotopes: Carbon-12 (with 6 neutrons), Carbon-13 (with 7 neutrons), and Carbon-14 (with 8 neutrons).
Thanks for posting your video!
Dog Hand
Quote: DogHandI got 34 on your test, BBB.
The number of neutrons in the nucleus is not necessarily equal to the number of protons (and, thus, the atomic number). The varying number of neutrons accounts for the isotopes: thus, carbon, with an atomic number of 6, has 6 protons, but it exists in three isotopes: Carbon-12 (with 6 neutrons), Carbon-13 (with 7 neutrons), and Carbon-14 (with 8 neutrons).
Thanks for posting your video!
Dog Hand
Thanks for the lesson, Dog Hand! I googled to get an answer that matched what they must have been looking for on that one. Is there one definitive or simple answer, and that answer is protons, then?
I knew this once, in 11th grade chemistry, but I've dumped the knowledge.
Quote: DogHandThe number of neutrons in the nucleus is not necessarily equal to the number of protons (and, thus, the atomic number). The varying number of neutrons accounts for the isotopes: thus, carbon, with an atomic number of 6, has 6 protons, but it exists in three isotopes: Carbon-12 (with 6 neutrons), Carbon-13 (with 7 neutrons), and Carbon-14 (with 8 neutrons).
As I recall, Barbara correctly answered protons for that one, as I would have too.
At the risk of changing the subject, I've never really understood the purpose of neutrons.
Quote: WizardAs I recall, Barbara correctly answered protons for that one, as I would have too.
At the risk of changing the subject, I've never really understood the purpose of neutrons.
Actually, BBB said neutrons.
The purpose of neutrons is to stabilize the atom's nucleus: if all the nucleus had was protons, their mutual repulsion would shatter the nucleus... though that wouldn't "matter" to us ;-)
Dog Hand
Quote: DogHandActually, BBB said neutrons.
The purpose of neutrons is to stabilize the atom's nucleus: if all the nucleus had was protons, their mutual repulsion would shatter the nucleus... though that wouldn't "matter" to us ;-)
Dog Hand
So, here's what happened on that answer. At 7pm, they showed Jeopardy. They ASKED that question in some form, where the correct answer was neutrons. And then , oh so clever, there it was on their try-out test. So, I was caught in an ah-hah moment, trying to sort out whether they were being smart-asses in running the same question by us, instead of thinking about the actual question. I know the proton and electron count has to balance for the element to be stable, that the electrons circle the nucleus while the protons and neutrons are inside it, but had genuinely not focused on what they count to determine the atomic number. So, gotcha! Out of time - next question. Oh, well.
41 is a good performance, I think. It will be interesting to see if you move forward.
Quote: DogHandThe purpose of neutrons is to stabilize the atom's nucleus: if all the nucleus had was protons, their mutual repulsion would shatter the nucleus... though that wouldn't "matter" to us ;-)
Not to say you're wrong, but I thought the nucleus was held in place via the strong force.
(Simplified) The strong force is a very short-range force. Before you could get the two protons close enough to feel the strong force, they would be repelled by the electromagnetic force. However, the strong force can hold together a proton and a neutron.
Quote: gordonm888A nucleus of two (or more) protons would be unstable and fly apart due to electromagnetic forces.
(Simplified) The strong force is a very short-range force. Before you could get the two protons close enough to feel the strong force, they would be repelled by the electromagnetic force. However, the strong force can hold together a proton and a neutron.
I plead guilty to killing this thread.
Quote: gordonm888I plead guilty to killing this thread.
Lol...it'll wake back up in a few days. Test next week!