Nathan's Corner
Quote: NathanI may be a bit naive at times but even I knew this was serious enough to give serious consideration to getting a Lawyer involved and at the very least, sign up with an account so I could tell the Admins of that board to take that picture down of me as I definitely did not approve it to be shown on that website.
Was it a selfie? or did someone take the photo of you?
MR.V is probably the one who encouraged his accomplice to post it. 😆Quote: BozWe have a lawyer as a member here. You should check with Mr V to get his take on the situation and see if you have a case.
I PM'd admin at the other site about Nathan's request that the doxing pic be removed.
nathan, as to whether you need an attorney: can you afford to retain one?
Otherwise there is no point in asking the question.
Quote: MrVGive it a rest, wolf.
I PM'd admin at the other site about Nathan's request that the doxing pic be removed.
nathan, as to whether you need an attorney: can you afford to retain one?
Otherwise there is no point in asking the question.
I am quite sure that if Axel could not afford one, someone would represent him pro bono
it had better be true that's why. People don't care about what other people are, bring it up though, it should be true. Would you care if there were 48 juicy Jenny's, none of them were authentic, just here for attention?Quote: OnceDearor the 4' 10" was width.
Now seriously folks. Who gives a 5h1t what gender, race, shape or size Nathan is. This is getting beyond silly. If Nathan wants to reveal herself, fine. If not, fine, Plenty of opportunities available, but having apparently posted a selfie elsewhere, it just led to more flack.
just tell him it's the only picture you have of yourself and it's not fair. :-[Quote: NathanYes, it's me. I said I had milk chocolate skin ,
not olive skin, brown eyes, and long black hair. I was very disturbed to see a picture I showed in private to a few people I knew online end up on a public website that I had never even heard of today with a bunch of people I have never heard of or were banned from here before I even joined. I may be a bit naive at times but even I knew this was serious enough to give serious consideration to getting a Lawyer involved and at the very least, sign up with an account so I could tell the Admins of that board to take that picture down of me as I definitely did not approve it to be shown on that website.
Quote: aceofspadesI am quite sure that if Axel could not afford one, someone would represent him pro bono
Pro boner, is that what you said? You TV
lawyers are very odd..
Quote: DRichI have used a female avatar before on poker sites. I don't know if it is creepy, but I think it was an AP move.
I did that too when avatars were supported, for likely the same reasons you did.
Quote: WizardI did that too when avatars were supported, for likely the same reasons you did.
That's the story I'd be sticking with..
Quote: DRichI have used a female avatar before on poker sites. I don't know if it is creepy, but I think it was an AP move.
I have a black female wwii character on the new call o doots for historical accuracy
I find your message signature so (insert adjective of your choice) that I'd like to buy or rent editorial control of it for one month. Say $5 by paypal?
Quote: OnceDearNathan,
I find your message signature so (insert adjective of your choice) that I'd like to buy or rent editorial control of it for one month. Say $5 by paypal?
That is so funny. This seems like an AP move for me.
Ah!Quote: GWAEThat is so funny. This seems like an AP move for me.
I don't think I thought it through enough.
$:o)
I had anticipated a bidding war ( and even a rebuke ) But had never anticipated flagrant copyright abuse and counterfeits.
Nor had I considered the logistics of editing the content,
Still, I'm good for $6. But I really did want Nathan's real estate.
Ever conscious that this does not breach rule 3 or 12
John is in a wheelchair. He tried to roll himself up a hill but it was too tough for him because the hill gained altitude too quickly. He was otherwise easily able to roll up flat streets or ones with a slight grade. He couldn't get up this one because it was very..... Anyone know the answer?
Quote: NathanWhat's the answer to this riddle?
John is in a wheelchair. He tried to roll himself up a hill but it was too tough for him because the hill gained altitude too quickly. He was otherwise easily able to roll up flat streets or ones with a slight grade. He couldn't get up this one because it was very..... Anyone know the answer?
The answer is the response required to verify your humanity when signing up on a certain other Vegas Based Forum. What's up K, can't you gain admission?
You have to pay at least $20.Quote: OnceDearNathan,
I find your message signature so bonerific that I'd like to buy or rent editorial control of it for one month. Say $5 by paypal?
bonerific.... hmmm is that a real adjective?Quote: onenickelmiracle
Might be about right
$:o)
What about it Nathan? $7?
Oi. NON PLAYERS: OFF THE PITCH!Quote: onenickelmiracleYou have to pay at least $20.
Quote: Nathan..He couldn't get up this one because it was very..... Anyone know the answer?
That is a lot more confirmation than many expected. Somehow, though, I imagine that none of her haters are even remotely close to an apology.
Quote: gordonm888Well, we have multiple forum members who have seen a photograph of Nathan on another site. She apparently is a woman, her skin is black, as she has previously claimed, and I am assuming her claimed height and weight were not contradicted by the photo.
That is a lot more confirmation than many expected. Somehow, though, I imagine that none of her haters are even remotely close to an apology.
I bet $20 on female... Yet somehow my PayPal is empty. :-/
Seriously though... 27 pages of posts in less than a week is pretty impressive. Nathan owns this joint.
Quote: OnceDearThe answer is the response required to verify your humanity when signing up on a certain other Vegas Based Forum. What's up K, can't you gain admission?
Okay, you caught me! Apparently, the only way to get my picture off that website is to create an account and directly tell the Admin "I want this picture of me taken off your website." Mr. V himself PM the Admin on my behalf and asked him to remove the picture. I thank Mr. V for going of his way to help me out. :) The Admin posted the reply above on the offending thread. I tried to sign up and got this baffling riddle to answer. I wrote the word "answer," just for kicks and it was incorrect.
Quote: OnceDearAh!
I don't think I thought it through enough.
$:o)
I had anticipated a bidding war ( and even a rebuke ) But had never anticipated flagrant copyright abuse and counterfeits.
Nor had I considered the logistics of editing the content,
Still, I'm good for $6. But I really did want Nathan's real estate.
Ever conscious that this does not breach rule 3 or 12
lol, I thought I had an easy way to score a free taco bell cravings meal.
Quote: gordonm888Well, we have multiple forum members who have seen a photograph of Nathan on another site. She apparently is a woman, her skin is black, as she has previously claimed, and I am assuming her claimed height and weight were not contradicted by the photo.
That is a lot more confirmation than many expected. Somehow, though, I imagine that none of her haters are even remotely close to an apology.
I think the only way to confirm that it is her is to reinstate WON and let him confirm that is who he saw.
Quote: NathanJohn is in a wheelchair. He tried to roll himself up a hill but it was too tough for him because the hill gained altitude too quickly. He was otherwise easily able to roll up flat streets or ones with a slight grade. He couldn't get up this one because it was very..... Anyone know the answer?
This must be a trick question. I won't even put it in spoiler tags because "steep" seems so obvious.
This probably isn't what you're thinking, but an obvious way to get up a hill steeper than your abilities is to traverse it (zig zag up it a reduced incline). So "narrow" is another possibility.
One thing on my bucket list, that I'll probably never accomplish, is to unicycle up Lombard Street in San Francisco.
Quote: NathanQuote: OnceDearThe answer is the response required to verify your humanity when signing up on a certain other Vegas Based Forum. What's up K, can't you gain admission?
Okay, you caught me! Apparently, the only way to get my picture off that website is to create an account and directly tell the Admin "I want this picture of me taken off your website." Mr. V himself PM the Admin on my behalf and asked him to remove the picture. I thank Mr. V for going of his way to help me out. :) The Admin posted the reply above on the offending thread. I tried to sign up and got this baffling riddle to answer. I wrote the word "answer," just for kicks and it was incorrect.
It’s called Pro Bono. It’s obvious Mr V is willing to take your case out of the kindness of his heart. But I believe I am speaking for most members on here in Thanking him for willing to go to bat for you in this case.
Like he always says, it’s not about the money, it’s about doing the right thing.
Once again, thanks V for being above the drama on here.
Quote: NathanMr. V himself PM the Admin on my behalf and asked him to remove the picture. I thank Mr. V for going of his way to help me out. :)
Kudos to Mr. V! Maybe a little legal huff and puff motivated them to take action. I'd like to offer you a free ad on DT, if you're interested.
--- Todd Rundgren
Quote: OnceDearbonerific.... hmmm is that a real adjective?
Might be about right
$:o)
What about it Nathan? $7?
Was watching The Office today. In Season 6, Michael Scott said used the term.
You won't get the spot unless it's Macy's gift cards regardless.
Quote: WizardKudos to Mr. V! Maybe a little legal huff and puff motivated them to take action. I'd like to offer you a free ad on DT, if you're interested.
The picture is still up. Nathan is claiming that she doesn't want it up. All she has to do is contact the site owner herself to have it removed. The longer it stays up the less inclined I am to believe Nathan is legit. I am back on the fence leaning toward the scam side now.
It's official. MaxPen is back on the fence.
Thank you for your attention.
ZCore13
The image is NOT posted on that site: It is posted on imgur.comQuote: MaxPenThe picture is still up. Nathan is claiming that she doesn't want it up. All she has to do is contact the site owner herself to have it removed. The longer it stays up the less inclined I am to believe Nathan is legit. I am back on the fence leaning toward the scam side now.
So all Karen has to do is log into Imgur and delete it from there... Unless it's not her account, in which case how did it get there ( in March 2017 ).
Or just go to the imgur post and click on 'request deletion'.
Not rocket science.
...
Quote: OnceDearThe image is NOT posted on that site: It is posted on imgur.com
So all Karen has to do is log into Imgur and delete it from there... Unless it's not her account, in which case how did it get there ( in March 2017 ).
Or just go to the imgur post and click on 'request deletion'.
Not rocket science.
...
The link to the Imgur picture is what is on the other site. To be fair, I don't remember my Imgur password as it was set up in March 2017 as you mentioned.
To be even more fair. Just request a password reset or delete it from the android phone you connected to your imgur account... Or request its deletion, which they would do if you cried foul to them through their Request Deletion link.Quote: NathanThe link to the Imgur picture is what is on the other site. To be fair, I don't remember my Imgur password as it was set up in March 2017 as you mentioned.
Of course, if you are unable to do that, it might cast doubt on your assertion that you are the person portrayed in the picture.
Now, about that signature of yours. I'll stretch my offer to $8 for editorial control for 31 days.
_________________________________________________________________________
Embrace the Variance.
Quote: OnceDearThe image is NOT posted on that site: It is posted on imgur.com
So all Karen has to do is log into Imgur and delete it from there... Unless it's not her account, in which case how did it get there ( in March 2017 ).
Or just go to the imgur post and click on 'request deletion'.
Not rocket science.
...
You're being too logical. Some things aren't....how do you say it......some things aren't as "easy" for some people as they are for others. If someone has a history of not seeming like they'd be able to do certain things on their own, can we expect them to do more difficult tasks? IOW: It might be possible that Nathan isn't capable of doing the things you say or be able to figure out those things. If I say "Calculate the optimal kelly bet for that game", Wizard would probably respond, "I figured it out 5 minutes ago in my head, it's 0.58123478135% of your BR" while someone else might say "What the eff does an optimal kelly bet even mean!?" The second person isn't necessarily stupid, just doesn't understand some things that others view as being obvious or easy to do.
Quote: mcallister3200Your signature should have to fit in one max length tweet
Them some fightin' words there.
Quote: prozemaThat web site is interesting. My answer would be steep.
The answer is in fact "steep".
I don't remember which forum it was, but I remember seeing that question. I'm guessing it's one of Dan Druff's forums, either vegascasinotalk.com or pokerfraudalert.com. I'm pretty sure it was on PFA.
Since we have all now seen your picture (at least anyone who cared to) some people are still skeptical.
Can you Send Mike or someone a new Pic with a handwritten hello WOV and put this to rest?
IIRC JJ did that and in fact, it was really her.
We will keep chipping away at this mystery.
It would put the issue to rest. But really, should there really be an issue? If it hadn't been for some of Karen's own conflicting claims, I'd have considered the suggestion that 'evidence' is required to be somewhere between discourtesy and personal attack. But Nathan did bring this on herself/*himselfQuote: AxelWolfNathan.
Since we have all now seen your picture (at least anyone who cared to) some people are still skeptical.
Can you Send Mike or someone a new Pic with a handwritten hello WOV and put this to rest?
IIRC JJ did that and in fact, it was really her.
We will keep chipping away at this mystery.
________________________________________________________________________
*Quote: Nathan I am a 32 year old guy.
Quote: Nathan Remember I was pretending to be a guy. So a guy would be naturally weirded out if the "girl" he was chatting with turned out to be a guy. So I posted like a guy.
Personal attack is a considerable reach, dear sir.Quote: OnceDearIt would put the issue to rest. But really, should there really be an issue? If it hadn't been for some of Karen's own conflicting claims, I'd have considered the suggestion that 'evidence' is required to be somewhere between discourtesy and personal attack. But Nathan did bring this on himself*
________________________________________________________________________
*Quote: Nathan I am a 32 year old guy.
Quote: Nathan Remember I was pretending to be a guy. So a guy would be naturally weirded out if the "girl" he was chatting with turned out to be a guy. So I posted like a guy.
"But Nathan did bring this on himself*"
Members have been suspended for refering to other members the opposite of their chosen gender.
I agree. The 'why' is possibly that some folk don't like being played.Quote: RSWho cares if Nathan is a guy, girl, Kentry, or a bot? I guess a better question is WHY does anyone care?
Noted. I'll edit the post. Nathan chose both genders, didn't she?Quote: AxelWolfMembers have been suspended for refering to other members the opposite of their chosen gender.
Perhaps, but once you make your gender known and official it's considered somewhere between a discourtesy and a personal attack.Quote: OnceDearNoted. I'll edit the post. Nathan chose both genders, didn't she?
I prefer you just suspend yourself for 3 days (-;
I'm not disagreeing.Quote: AxelWolfPerhaps, but once you make your gender known and official it's considered somewhere between a discourtesy and a personal attack.
I prefer you just suspend yourself for 3 days (-;
I'm not questioning or denying Nathan's gender. Either of them. No discourtesy intended. Certainly no personal attack intended.
I observe that Nathan could close the topic, but is under no obligation to do so.
________________________________________________________________________
Quote: Nathan I am a 32 year old guy.
Quote: OnceDearThe image is NOT posted on that site: It is posted on imgur.com
So all Karen has to do is log into Imgur and delete it from there... Unless it's not her account, in which case how did it get there ( in March 2017 ).
Or just go to the imgur post and click on 'request deletion'.
Not rocket science.
...
Who the heck is Karen?
Karen is Sandy.Quote: FinsRuleQuote: OnceDearThe image is NOT posted on that site: It is posted on imgur.com
So all Karen has to do is log into Imgur and delete it from there... Unless it's not her account, in which case how did it get there ( in March 2017 ).
Or just go to the imgur post and click on 'request deletion'.
Not rocket science.
...
Who the heck is Karen?
