Quote: gordonm888Quote: avianrandyI am very sorry to hear that. I debated whether to ask that,but I figured nothing ventured nothing gained. Thank you for answering
link to original post
No problem at all. I'm impressed that someone was considerate enough to ask. It's not directly traumatizing to me; I didn't know the individual who was a victim. But some family members I'm close to spent 10 years in Nashville in various positions of Christian ministry and they're sad and hurting and angry. I'm surprised at how much second-hand sorrow I feel. The world is what it is and we are who we are and I guess we all just need to do the best that we can.
link to original post
I don’t really understand. If they are in the ‘Christian ministry’, don’t they believe those killed ‘have gone to a better place’ and are now ‘with the Lord’? I am sad for the wasteful loss of life because I don’t believe they are going anywhere.
No one has ever successfully answered that question to me. By the way, this question can apply to most religions….
Not everything, most things in life as a matter of fact, are so binary nor has the religion ever claimed every belief can be explained by logic.
we generally as a society have little feeling or emotion toward shootings anymore - it's so very common
a person has only so much emotion they can deal with
the exception is when it involves children and schools - or involves persons we know
there were 20,200 gun deaths in 2022 in the U.S. - willful, malicious or accidental
995 children age 0 to 11 were killed or injured from a gun
5,157 teens ages 12 to 17 were killed or injured from a gun
647 mass shootings
1,626 unintentional shootings
in 7 years since 2016 the no. of gun deaths willful, malicious or accidental has increased by about 33%
.https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: gordonm888Quote: avianrandyI am very sorry to hear that. I debated whether to ask that,but I figured nothing ventured nothing gained. Thank you for answering
link to original post
No problem at all. I'm impressed that someone was considerate enough to ask. It's not directly traumatizing to me; I didn't know the individual who was a victim. But some family members I'm close to spent 10 years in Nashville in various positions of Christian ministry and they're sad and hurting and angry. I'm surprised at how much second-hand sorrow I feel. The world is what it is and we are who we are and I guess we all just need to do the best that we can.
link to original post
I don’t really understand. If they are in the ‘Christian ministry’, don’t they believe those killed ‘have gone to a better place’ and are now ‘with the Lord’? I am sad for the wasteful loss of life because I don’t believe they are going anywhere.
No one has ever successfully answered that question to me. By the way, this question can apply to most religions….
link to original post
I am not a church-going Christian and have beliefs that are similar to yours, so you won't learn the meaning of life by asking me. And I realize it is hard for people to grasp another person's sorrow especially when it is deep and enduring.
Death is not immediate for most bullet wounds and I imagine my family members are sorrowful because their friend died in pain and horror, pooled in their own blood and bodily organs as they watched children that were in their trust screaming and crying because they were being murdered.
All of us, Christian or otherwise, value the people in our lives, value our relationships and feel loss when they die. Don't we all wish our friends to have a long full life, filled with joy and love? Don't we all feel impoverished, ruined, crushed by the deaths of friends and people we love? How can any sapient sensate human choose this moment to ask the question that you just asked? Do you not understand the nature of sorrow, the exigency of grieving?
The victims of this hate crime were all born into the same world that we were and were targeted for murder simply because they were Christians. They were innocent souls and good human beings who did not deserve to have their lives ended. This victim - the friend of my family members - was not an Advantage Player who hugs the shadows or a dough-faced thug working for casino security or a pill-pushing physician or a lieing politician or an activist who publicly celebrates violence against Christians. This victim was a teacher in a school for children. The friends and family of this victim, and all the victims of this tragedy, are hurting and grieving. Because they are human and they love and they care.
Soopoo, try getting in touch with your humanity. Love and care.
I'm secure in my belief my friend and family are in a better place, but am sad they are not with me, and weren't able to accomplish their dreams.
Quote: billryanI want to go to heaven. I want you to go to heaven. Just not today, or this week.
I'm secure in my belief my friend and family are in a better place, but am sad they are not with me, and weren't able to accomplish their dreams.
link to original post
I am hoping death is a big nothing. The thought of heaven sounds exhausting. I am lazy and want to continue to do nothing for eternity.
Quote: DRichQuote: billryanI want to go to heaven. I want you to go to heaven. Just not today, or this week.
I'm secure in my belief my friend and family are in a better place, but am sad they are not with me, and weren't able to accomplish their dreams.
link to original post
I am hoping death is a big nothing. The thought of heaven sounds exhausting. I am lazy and want to continue to do nothing for eternity.
link to original post
Sounds like paradise.
I don't fear death
I fear being miserable in a nursing home while being "managed" by people pretending to care about my well being
.
Quote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOOQuote: gordonm888Quote: avianrandyI am very sorry to hear that. I debated whether to ask that,but I figured nothing ventured nothing gained. Thank you for answering
link to original post
No problem at all. I'm impressed that someone was considerate enough to ask. It's not directly traumatizing to me; I didn't know the individual who was a victim. But some family members I'm close to spent 10 years in Nashville in various positions of Christian ministry and they're sad and hurting and angry. I'm surprised at how much second-hand sorrow I feel. The world is what it is and we are who we are and I guess we all just need to do the best that we can.
link to original post
I don’t really understand. If they are in the ‘Christian ministry’, don’t they believe those killed ‘have gone to a better place’ and are now ‘with the Lord’? I am sad for the wasteful loss of life because I don’t believe they are going anywhere.
No one has ever successfully answered that question to me. By the way, this question can apply to most religions….
link to original post
I am not a church-going Christian and have beliefs that are similar to yours, so you won't learn the meaning of life by asking me. And I realize it is hard for people to grasp another person's sorrow especially when it is deep and enduring.
Death is not immediate for most bullet wounds and I imagine my family members are sorrowful because their friend died in pain and horror, pooled in their own blood and bodily organs as they watched children that were in their trust screaming and crying because they were being murdered.
All of us, Christian or otherwise, value the people in our lives, value our relationships and feel loss when they die. Don't we all wish our friends to have a long full life, filled with joy and love? Don't we all feel impoverished, ruined, crushed by the deaths of friends and people we love? How can any sapient sensate human choose this moment to ask the question that you just asked? Do you not understand the nature of sorrow, the exigency of grieving?
The victims of this hate crime were all born into the same world that we were and were targeted for murder simply because they were Christians. They were innocent souls and good human beings who did not deserve to have their lives ended. This victim - the friend of my family members - was not an Advantage Player who hugs the shadows or a dough-faced thug working for casino security or a pill-pushing physician or a lieing politician or an activist who publicly celebrates violence against Christians. This victim was a teacher in a school for children. The friends and family of this victim, and all the victims of this tragedy, are hurting and grieving. Because they are human and they love and they care.
Soopoo, try getting in touch with your humanity. Love and care.
link to original post
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
Quote: SOOPOOMy answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
I am as anti-religion as anyone and I would never say that. I doubt there is anything better, or anything ay all, but I have no idea.
I imagine it's exactly the same as when you are put under. Nothingness. However, you just never wake up.Quote: SOOPOOQuote: gordonm888Quote: avianrandyI am very sorry to hear that. I debated whether to ask that,but I figured nothing ventured nothing gained. Thank you for answering
link to original post
No problem at all. I'm impressed that someone was considerate enough to ask. It's not directly traumatizing to me; I didn't know the individual who was a victim. But some family members I'm close to spent 10 years in Nashville in various positions of Christian ministry and they're sad and hurting and angry. I'm surprised at how much second-hand sorrow I feel. The world is what it is and we are who we are and I guess we all just need to do the best that we can.
link to original post
I don’t really understand. If they are in the ‘Christian ministry’, don’t they believe those killed ‘have gone to a better place’ and are now ‘with the Lord’? I am sad for the wasteful loss of life because I don’t believe they are going anywhere.
No one has ever successfully answered that question to me. By the way, this question can apply to most religions….
link to original post
Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
Quote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
If Chump Change or I wrote this, I have no doubt we would be suspended..
Quote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
Apparently, God has a plan and it includes allowing the killing of innocent children, starvation, and various tragedies.
Quote: AxelWolfI just don't understand why God likes messing with us when he could easily just clear things up by simply willing it to be. j
Apparently, God has a plan and it includes allowing the killing of innocent children, starvation, and various tragedies.
link to original post
God does not interfere with the affairs or actions of man, who He made with free will. Furthermore, God also does not protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise.
So praying is mostly useless other than for spiritual reasons. I.E. Pray for our children's safety = uselessQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: AxelWolfI just don't understand why God likes messing with us when he could easily just clear things up by simply willing it to be. j
Apparently, God has a plan and it includes allowing the killing of innocent children, starvation, and various tragedies.
link to original post
God does not interfere with the affairs or actions of man, who He made with free will. Furthermore, God also does not protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise.
link to original post
Almost all religious faiths I'm aware of believe that God can, will, and does protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise. He just chooses not to.
Most religious people take to heart that he won't put any more on use can be can bare. I guess when a loving father's family gets brutally raped and murdered the father can bare that since God has a plan.
I guess it's true god will provide a way out so that you may be able to endure hardships. Apparently, It's called suicide.
I guess all the people committing suicide must not believe in God
What a pal God is.
Quote: rxwineSeems like a supreme being should be funding his own organization, not suggesting donations on a voluntary basis or otherwise. But that's my perspective.
link to original post
I've never heard God ask for anything, let alone money.
Quote: AxelWolfSo praying is mostly useless other than for spiritual reasons. I.E. Pray for our children's safety = uselessQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: AxelWolfI just don't understand why God likes messing with us when he could easily just clear things up by simply willing it to be. j
Apparently, God has a plan and it includes allowing the killing of innocent children, starvation, and various tragedies.
link to original post
God does not interfere with the affairs or actions of man, who He made with free will. Furthermore, God also does not protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise.
link to original post
Almost all religious faiths I'm aware of believe that God can, will, and does protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise. He just chooses not to.
Most religious people take to heart that he won't put any more on use can be can bare. I guess when a loving father's family gets brutally raped and murdered the father can bare that since God has a plan.
I guess it's true god will provide a way out so that you may be able to endure hardships. Apparently, It's called suicide.
I guess all the people committing suicide must not believe in God
What a pal God is.
link to original post
It's a shame you don't seem to know him very well.
Quote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
I don't know Big Foot that well.Quote: billryanQuote: AxelWolfSo praying is mostly useless other than for spiritual reasons. I.E. Pray for our children's safety = uselessQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: AxelWolfI just don't understand why God likes messing with us when he could easily just clear things up by simply willing it to be. j
Apparently, God has a plan and it includes allowing the killing of innocent children, starvation, and various tragedies.
link to original post
God does not interfere with the affairs or actions of man, who He made with free will. Furthermore, God also does not protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise.
link to original post
Almost all religious faiths I'm aware of believe that God can, will, and does protect one against misfortune due to accident or otherwise. He just chooses not to.
Most religious people take to heart that he won't put any more on use can be can bare. I guess when a loving father's family gets brutally raped and murdered the father can bare that since God has a plan.
I guess it's true god will provide a way out so that you may be able to endure hardships. Apparently, It's called suicide.
I guess all the people committing suicide must not believe in God
What a pal God is.
link to original post
It's a shame you don't seem to know him very well.
link to original post
I know God as well as anyone else. Thats what's so wonderful about an imagery being, I can believe whatever I want, and its 100% true.
No one has actually heard God. If you believe in the Bible and that God was responsible for convening his message to us through the people in Bible, then God asked us to give to honor him.Quote: billryanQuote: rxwineSeems like a supreme being should be funding his own organization, not suggesting donations on a voluntary basis or otherwise. But that's my perspective.
link to original post
I've never heard God ask for anything, let alone money.
link to original post
We've all been sent into this muddle; given all these experiences to work with. Maybe we're suppose to figure it out from that. Isn't that enough?
That's all I've got to say on this.
Quote: AxelWolfNo one has actually heard God. If you believe in the Bible and that God was responsible for convening his message to us through the people in Bible, then God asked us to give to honor him.Quote: billryanQuote: rxwineSeems like a supreme being should be funding his own organization, not suggesting donations on a voluntary basis or otherwise. But that's my perspective.
link to original post
I've never heard God ask for anything, let alone money.
link to original post
link to original post
Have you never heard from God? That sounds like a you problem. When was the last time you spoke to him?
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
Quote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
Is this "hate speech" or "objective summary"?
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
Is this "hate speech" or "objective summary"?
link to original post
In todays world, those two are NOT mutually exclusive. I could make a list of easily proven facts about a specific religious group, or ethnic group, and I can assure you I’d be lambasted as using ‘hate speech’.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
Is this "hate speech" or "objective summary"?
link to original post
Whatever you want to call it, you can't say it is permitted here without twisting yourself into a pretzel.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
Is this "hate speech" or "objective summary"?
link to original post
You haven't answered the question, and I asked first.
a very horrible slander of a religion - Islam - has occurred on this thread - and no I'm not a Muslim
many of the words in this thread are way, way, way out of context
some commentary from the Islamic Network Group - see link
"Muslim terrorists use the Koran the same way as Christian extremists such as the Ku Klux Klan and Aryan Nations and Jewish extremists such as Meir Kahane and Baruch Goldstein in Israel use the Bible: by taking phrases out of context and developing interpretations that serve their agenda."
"We believe that Islamic teachings clearly prohibit killing innocent civilians. While there are obviously Muslim extremists who disagree with this stance, the position of the Muslim majority is clear, as demonstrated by repeated condemnations by Muslim scholars and leaders across the world."
"Muslim peacemakers are working throughout the world, building bridges between people of different faith."
"Muslims have consistently and repeatedly denounced terrorism since 9/11."
"Of the world population of about 1.8 billion Muslims, terrorists make up only a tiny minority."
"According to a Pew survey only 15% of Muslims expressed favorable views of Al-Qaeda and only 16% had any confidence in Bin Laden."
from the Old Testament - which is the central book of Judaism and is a base for Christianity:
"an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth" is a Commandment found in the Book of Exodus expressing the principle of reciprocal justice measure for measure.
Psalm 137 from the Book of Psalms - a Prayer for Vengeance - see link - "may the Lord bless everyone who beats your children against the rocks"
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20137&version=CEV
https://ing.org/resources/for-all-groups/answers-to-frequently-asked-questions/answers-to-frequently-asked-questions-about-islam-and-muslims/
.
One rule for thee and thine, another for me and mine.
I can’t see any difference between evidence for a system gambling claim that beats a negative game without evidence than any other claim.
The importance of something to someone doesn’t give it one gram of weight to me to make it true, nor the number of people who endorse it. Nor how long it has been believed.
Quote: rxwineNon-religious post here.
I can’t see any difference between evidence for a system gambling claim that beats a negative game without evidence than any other claim.
The importance of something to someone doesn’t give it one gram of weight to me to make it true, nor the number of people who endorse it. Nor how long it has been believed.
link to original post
The answer to this question probably has to do with the different types of truths, and the differences between them.
Quote: billryan
Whatever you want to call it, you can't say it is permitted here without twisting yourself into a pretzel.
link to original post
You have a point.
More like the Supreme Being failed miserably at sending me instructions all this time.Quote: rxwineSuppose you find out the first test by the Supreme Being was to not believe he's been sending you instructions all this time? You're going to fail that one. Just sayin'.
Quote: AxelWolfMore like the Supreme Being failed miserably at sending me instructions all this time.Quote: rxwineSuppose you find out the first test by the Supreme Being was to not believe he's been sending you instructions all this time? You're going to fail that one. Just sayin'.
link to original post
That's the ticket. The Creator of the Universe is the one failing here.
quote from the movie "The Usual Suspects"_________
"the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing people that he didn't exist"
throughout the New Testament Satan is referred to as a "tempter" (Matthew 4:3) - "the ruler of the demons" (Matthew 12:24)
"the evil one" (1 John 5:18) and "a roaring lion" - (1 Peter 5:8)
the name Satan itself is mentioned 52 times in the Scriptures
.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
But hate speech against Muslims is okay?
link to original post
No.
link to original post
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
Is this "hate speech" or "objective summary"?
link to original post
In todays world, those two are NOT mutually exclusive. I could make a list of easily proven facts about a specific religious group, or ethnic group, and I can assure you I’d be lambasted as using ‘hate speech’.
link to original post
Making such a list should get you suspended or banned, according to the rules of the forum, that evidently don't apply to Gordon.
Quote: gordonm888
I could make a list of easily proven facts about a specific religious group, or ethnic group, and I can assure you I’d be lambasted as using ‘hate speech’.
anybody who wanted to and had the least little bit of knowledge could make a list of easily proven facts about any religious or ethnic group - including the groups that you belong to - and if they so desired - that list could portray any of these groups in a deeply negative way
.
You'll have to define "heard from God"Quote: billryanQuote: AxelWolfNo one has actually heard God. If you believe in the Bible and that God was responsible for convening his message to us through the people in Bible, then God asked us to give to honor him.Quote: billryanQuote: rxwineSeems like a supreme being should be funding his own organization, not suggesting donations on a voluntary basis or otherwise. But that's my perspective.
link to original post
I've never heard God ask for anything, let alone money.
link to original post
link to original post
Have you never heard from God? That sounds like a you problem. When was the last time you spoke to him?
link to original post
One should be very careful of anyone claiming to hear from God himself, that's how cults get started. That could be the devil or aliens you're actually hearing from. Lots of people off their meds hear from God directly, oftentimes they are homeless. I'm sure that guys like David Koresh and Charles Mansion heard from God.
From my understanding of the Bible God doesn't talk to anyone but only through the scriptures and the spirit of Jesus and the church.
Quote: GenoDRPh
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
(trimmed)
Please: can you provide a permalink to the source of this quote? I am having trouble finding this in context.
Quote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOO
You missed my point. I do get sad for the untimely deaths. I’ve seen literally thousands in my lifetime due to the nature of my work.
My question, I guess ill timed; was about why there would be grief if you TRULY believed there was a better place that the departed were going to.
And why don’t you look in the mirror with your not even thinly veiled insult of all the advantage players here? Like casino security people are automatically bad in your eyes? I’m a ‘pill pushing physician’, not a doctor who went to work every day hoping to help out a little?
So I’ll repeat my question….. if the deceased are going to a better place, why should we mourn that passing? My answer is simple, we know there is no better place awaiting us.
link to original post
As I understand Christian Bible teachings, they preach that a person's soul goes to heaven. Christians may comfort each other at times of loss by saying that Aunt Selma is looking down from somewhere above, but Christians do not actually teach that your personality and memories remain intact after death. Christianity is about saving the immortal soul, not the mortal person. In my experience, Christians do not rejoice over deaths, particularly the deaths of children. They teach that life is a precious, sacred gift which is exactly their rationale for mourning death. Surprise, Soopoo! I guess you missed the memo: Christians are literally pro-life! And, IMO, that is the answer to your ill-timed question. The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase.
As I have said, my views on death are about the same as yours. But, in the face of a mass-shooting of innocent children and teachers, to ask someone "Why should we mourn their passing?" is more than ill-timed. It is rude and insensitive. And given the context of the mass shooting, it somehow implies that maybe killing Christians isn't really a tragedy - as some public figures have already said*. If you had posted "Why should we mourn the passing of George Floyd, hasn't he gone to a better place?" after he was killed by the police, then all Holy hell would have broken loose in this forum. Why is this situation different? Why do you have no courtesy to extend to me and to these victims?
*Specifically, we have seen video on television news shows of certain public figures saying about this mass shooting "Christians are haters and are only reaping what they have sown."
You misunderstood my comments about APs "seeking the shadows" and other categories of people -I was trying to contrast the innocence of the victims to the lack of innocence of the adults who are talking about them. It was a literary device, apparently unsuccessful.
If you want to keep posting on this topic, let me invite you to copy and paste this statement into your next post:
It is absolutely unacceptable for anyone to target Christians for violence; it is a hate crime and I denounce anyone who does it.
link to original post
for people that don't believe in God -
well, they're going to have a whole lot of difficulty explaining or understanding the origin of the universe
how something came out of nothing
the "Big Bang Theory" doesn't do it for me - maybe it does for some - maybe geniuses fully understand it
.
Quote: lilredrooster.
for people that don't believe in God -
well, they're going to have a whole lot of difficulty explaining or understanding the origin of the universe
how something came out of nothing
the "Big Bang Theory" doesn't do it for me - maybe it does for some - maybe geniuses fully understand it
.
link to original post
Objective scientific data, discoveries and inventions and religions are not incompatible.
Perhaps not Failing, but a D-.Quote: billryanQuote: AxelWolfMore like the Supreme Being failed miserably at sending me instructions all this time.Quote: rxwineSuppose you find out the first test by the Supreme Being was to not believe he's been sending you instructions all this time? You're going to fail that one. Just sayin'.
link to original post
That's the ticket. The Creator of the Universe is the one failing here.
link to original post
Sure, everything is all roses and A+s if you are all good yourself. Especially, if you can tune out and ignore all the horrible stuff going on in the world while living in a bubble. I know I can, and oftentimes do, but I'm not blind to the reality of all the suffering around the world. Whenever I or my wife get upset about something trivial Ill remind us just how fortunate we are.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
I call your attention to the following from Gordon:
"The only religion that selectively rejoices at the death of believers is Islam, in which martyrdom - when Islamics die while striking a blow against infidels and non-believers - is celebrated as a glorious thing. Of course, some Islamic countries are also putting to death people who commit homosexual acts - so maybe you should direct your religion-phobic questioning towards the Islamic faith, where your hostility may find more righteous purchase"
Muslim hate speech. If not, then what is it?
link to original post
(trimmed)
Please: can you provide a permalink to the source of this quote? I am having trouble finding this in context.
link to original post
I don't know how to permalink, but I refer you to Gordon's post on this thread originally posted April 7th, 2023 at 6:42:05 PM with the post quoted verbatim in full several times on this thread since then, most recently 4 posts above this response.