Poll
5 votes (14.7%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
13 votes (38.23%) | |||
5 votes (14.7%) | |||
1 vote (2.94%) | |||
11 votes (32.35%) | |||
6 votes (17.64%) | |||
3 votes (8.82%) | |||
1 vote (2.94%) | |||
5 votes (14.7%) |
34 members have voted
unless it was full pay or some other anomaly.....Quote: rsactuaryI assure you they did not lose money on that. You don't understand how progressives work.
I used to frequent the showboat often I don't remember a Joker poker prog (not that there wasn't one)
Quote: terapinedI got to the scenic drive
There is a sign that said reservations required
Oh no
Another sign said don't back up due to spikes
I pull up to the station and tell them I have no reservation.
They said 17 bucks
Woohoo
It was magnificent
Took a lot of pics
Stopped at all the parking spots
Disappointed how short it was.
Buffet
75,533.03
All seats filled
Smoker I noticed earlier before my drive still there
The reservation thing is a bunch of crap. My friend has a gold card that he paid for many moons ago for free entry into parks....but the government website for reservations into Red Rock has no option to use it. You have to pay the $15 PLUS the $2 service charge. Gimme a break.
He wants to go....I told him we will simply do what you did. Drive in and wing it. No reason he should have to pay.
Of course the house knows this, and also knows that the size of the jackpot attracts attention and players. They know how to run a casino, where some of the contributors to this thread obviously do not.
Quote: TDVegasThe reservation thing is a bunch of crap. My friend has a gold card that he paid for many moons ago for free entry into parks....but the government website for reservations into Red Rock has no option to use it. You have to pay the $15 PLUS the $2 service charge. Gimme a break.
He wants to go....I told him we will simply do what you did. Drive in and wing it. No reason he should have to pay.
They asked me if I had a National Park Pass
I said no
Paid 17
Asked how much for the pass
They said 80
I'm thinking I should have bought it
Quote: WizardLet me know if they demand a reservation to do the scenic drive.
Check out the cake by T-Bones.
What cake
The scale model of the casino hotel?
That's edible?
Buffet machines empty
75,549.20
Going in to see if I can strike ligjtning
so with the $12k/person standard tax deduction, you can have $21,875 in taxable income and still be in the 10% bracket.Quote: MentalThe minimum US tax rate is actually negative for those with an earned income credit. When I was a graduate student, I asked my professor to give me a taxable job instead a a tax-free job because my tax rate was negative. https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-income-tax-credit
For people not eligible for the EIC, the minimum tax US rate is 0% and tens of millions of people pay at this 0% federal rate.
Here are some non-zero tax brackets:2020 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Rates
Rate For Single Individuals For Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns
10% Up to $9,875 Up to $19,750
12% $9,876 to $40,125 $19,751 to $80,250
22% $40,126 to $85,525 $80,251 to $171,050
24% $85,526 to $163,300 $171,051 to $326,600
ie: Roth conversions
yes, if under $12k/yr income then you can do a Roth conversion up to $12k to be tax free.
but i'm on Obamacare and to get subsides you need a minimum of $17,750 income. if less than that, then you go on medicaid.
with max subsidies, i pay $40/month with $100 deductible for great insurance. ($5 co-pay for doctors and physical therapy but 50% co-pay for hospitals and xrays/mri.)
But out of pocket max is like $1000/yr so i dont care financially if i break my leg skiing.
so if i need to artificially inflate my income to $17,750 by Roth conversions then i might as well inflate it to around $21k.
edit:
medicaid in my state is free but i'm assuming it sucks/very restrictive/lots of hoops to jump through.
yes, it's a big assumption on my part but for $40/month ($480/yr), i can afford to pay it for piece of mind. it works just like regular insurance when i worked in the corporate world.
i played a +EV game for 8hrs till i hit.Quote: terapinedPlayed about 30min
Won 6 bucks
Tired of playing, want to be outside, not inside.
Onto the scenic drive
made $700. (note: You need 4 figures in cash and LOTS of time)
felt like work but work doesnt pay $87.50/hr.
Quote: 100xOddsso with the $12k/person standard tax deduction, you can have $21,875 in taxable income and still be in the 10% bracket.Quote: MentalThe minimum US tax rate is actually negative for those with an earned income credit. When I was a graduate student, I asked my professor to give me a taxable job instead a a tax-free job because my tax rate was negative. https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-income-tax-credit
For people not eligible for the EIC, the minimum tax US rate is 0% and tens of millions of people pay at this 0% federal rate.
Here are some non-zero tax brackets:2020 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Rates
Rate For Single Individuals For Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns
10% Up to $9,875 Up to $19,750
12% $9,876 to $40,125 $19,751 to $80,250
22% $40,126 to $85,525 $80,251 to $171,050
24% $85,526 to $163,300 $171,051 to $326,600
ie: Roth conversions
yes, if under $12k/yr income then you can do a Roth conversion up to $12k to be tax free.
but i'm on Obamacare and to get subsides you need a minimum of $17,750 income. if less than that, then you go on medicaid.
with max subsidies, i pay $40/month with $100 deductible for great insurance. ($5 co-pay for doctors and physical therapy but 50% co-pay for hospitals and xrays/mri.)
But out of packet max is like $1000/yr so i dont care financially if i break my leg skiing.
so if i need to artificially inflate my income to $17,750 by Roth conversions then i might as well inflate it to around $21k.
WTF type of racket is that. I have to pay like 400/month for the worst possible plans on the obummacare marketplace with 5k deductible and I’m in my mid 30’s with no pre-existing or smoking..or 100ish month for the stuff on the temp market for the type that you don’t know if they’ll actually ever cover stuff when you need it which is what I’ve done since mandate ended without ever trying to use it.
if you make less than $50k (single), then you're doing it wrong.Quote: mcallister3200Quote: 100xOddsso with the $12k/person standard tax deduction, you can have $21,875 in taxable income and still be in the 10% bracket.Quote: MentalThe minimum US tax rate is actually negative for those with an earned income credit. When I was a graduate student, I asked my professor to give me a taxable job instead a a tax-free job because my tax rate was negative. https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-income-tax-credit
For people not eligible for the EIC, the minimum tax US rate is 0% and tens of millions of people pay at this 0% federal rate.
Here are some non-zero tax brackets:2020 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Rates
Rate For Single Individuals For Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns
10% Up to $9,875 Up to $19,750
12% $9,876 to $40,125 $19,751 to $80,250
22% $40,126 to $85,525 $80,251 to $171,050
24% $85,526 to $163,300 $171,051 to $326,600
ie: Roth conversions
yes, if under $12k/yr income then you can do a Roth conversion up to $12k to be tax free.
but i'm on Obamacare and to get subsides you need a minimum of $17,750 income. if less than that, then you go on medicaid.
with max subsidies, i pay $40/month with $100 deductible for great insurance. ($5 co-pay for doctors and physical therapy but 50% co-pay for hospitals and xrays/mri.)
But out of packet max is like $1000/yr so i dont care financially if i break my leg skiing.
so if i need to artificially inflate my income to $17,750 by Roth conversions then i might as well inflate it to around $21k.
WTF type of racket is that. I have to pay like 400/month for the worst possible plans on the obummacare marketplace with 5k deductible and I’m in my mid 30’s with no pre-existing or smoking..
select silver plan because silver is the only tier that has subsidies and the max income to get some subsidies is $50k (single).
note: to get max subsidies, you have to be $1 above poverty levels. ie: ~$17,750
i dont know what the min/max is for married or with kids
Quote: terapinedThey asked me if I had a National Park Pass
I said no
Paid 17
Asked how much for the pass
They said 80
I'm thinking I should have bought it
It’s $80 lifetime if you’re a senior citizen, not sure the age break for that. 80 annual otherwise yeah I’d think well worth it if you’re retired I do it every year and it’s worth it for me. Good for all National Parks/forests/monuments but doesn’t include special fees like camping or whatever.
no. the insurance companies charge market price no matter which plan.Quote: mcallister3200Yeah I don’t make under 50k. Sounds like it’s basically a self employed.
people (who don’t get through employer) who make over 50k subsidize everyone else marketplace.
the govt subsidies is from EVERYONE who pays taxes. (ie: those who make less than $50k/yr but get company health insurance.)
govt subsidizes us through general tax revenue. (or nowadays, debt deficit)
maybe so but there are probably lots of people making slightly above poverty levels that would love to trade positions with you.Quote: mcallister3200Well, it’s an utter trash product when you pay full market when you were required to have a qualifying plan. I’ll just leave it at that.
ie: have crappy insurance and make over $50k
Quote: WizardI paid a visit to the Red Rock today, in part to check on the Reversible Royal jackpots. Here is an update:
Bank by Starbucks:
Oct 19: $40,389
Dec 2: $40,741
Bank by buffet:
Oct 19: $73,860
Dec 2: $75,489
Here is my original article about these 105%+ games.
I didn't see any mention of variance in your article.
The 5-nickel game has a variance of 15,820. ROI = 105.43% for 6/5 BP
The 10-nickel game has a variance of 18,485. ROI = 105.60% for 9/6/4 DB
These variances are 800-900 times higher than for 9/6 jacks or better.
This means the standard deviations will be about 30 times greater than you would experience for JOB. Skew in the distribution will be horrible until you have played an equivalent game for quite a few cycles or many millions of hands.
Quote: terapinedWhat cake
The scale model of the casino hotel?
That's edible?
I think it's a cake.
For the most part are right, however, there have been many 100%+ VP games (at reset) with a progressive on top of that. For example, full pay deuces wild with a progressive on the deuces and the Royal, 10/7 double bonus poker with a multi way prog. They might have those for a number of reasons, it could be a loss leader, they could know that the average person won't play a good enough strategy to gain an advantage, it could just be something they overlooked.Quote: gordonm888When a progressive jackpot builds to a large amount, it is because no one has hit it for a long time. The money in the progressive jackpot is (mostly) an accumulation of a small fraction of previous wagers that were lost by previous customers. When the jackpot progresses to a high value it may be instantaneously +EV for players but as averaged over the cycle length of the progressive jackpot it is +EV for the house.
Of course the house knows this, and also knows that the size of the jackpot attracts attention and players. They know how to run a casino, where some of the contributors to this thread obviously do not.
Quote: AxelWolfFor the most part are right, however, there have been many 100%+ VP games (at reset) with a progressive on top of that. For example, full pay deuces wild with a progressive on the deuces and the Royal, 10/7 double bonus poker with a multi way prog. They might have those for a number of reasons, it could be a loss leader, they could know that the average person won't play a good enough strategy to gain an advantage, it could just be something they overlooked.
An example of the overlooked variety,: A KOB JW game where the progressive was set to the five-of-a-kind. The slot director can set the pay table and separately choose to make the progressive apply to the RF or 5OAK. If you choose 5OAK and a good pay table, you get a progressive that resets to 100%+ ROI. I was playing a 10-machine bank like this by myself in the early hours of the morning. Suits came around with a clipboard and started auditing the machines. The machines on either side of me had a return-to-player of over 100%., even with player mistakes. After some discussion, they blue-screened all of the other machines and said to me "Sir, when you are done playing, we are going to have to shut that game down." I did not leave until I hit the 5OAK progressive. This was after six weeks of 'AP Fest'. I was annoyed that certain APs took exactly the same seats and worked a 10-hour shift during the same day-time hours every day.
A panicked shutdown also occurred around me on a non-progressive $5 All American bank, but it only took a week for the casino to notice. I eventually had to take a bathroom break and it was over.
What version?Quote: Mental
A panicked shutdown also occurred around me on a non-progressive $5 All American bank.
The only place I have ever seen a good $5 denomination was in KC.
Quote: AxelWolfWhat version?
$5 Full Pay All American at Trump Marina. Obviously, not recently.
Hand Name | Payout | Probability | Cycle | Variance | Return % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Royal | 800 | 0.000023015 | 43450.1 | 14.69 | 1.8412% |
Str_Flush | 200 | 0.000141786 | 7052.86 | 5.61 | 2.8357% |
Quads | 40 | 0.002251772 | 444.094 | 3.42 | 9.0071% |
Full_House | 8 | 0.010981573 | 91.0616 | 0.54 | 8.7853% |
Flush | 8 | 0.015713038 | 63.6414 | 0.77 | 12.5704% |
Straight | 8 | 0.018426400 | 54.2699 | 0.90 | 14.7411% |
Trips | 3 | 0.068836822 | 14.5271 | 0.27 | 20.6510% |
Two_Pair | 1 | 0.119602446 | 8.36103 | 0.00 | 11.9602% |
JOB | 1 | 0.183299746 | 5.45554 | 0.00 | 18.3300% |
Nada | 0 | 0.580723403 | 1.72199 | 0.59 | 0.0000% |
-- | -- | 1.000000000 | -- | 26.80 | 100.7221% |
Quote: WizardI think it's a cake.
Originally I thought it was all gingerbread....but now I don’t think so. Took 500 man hours.
They had a 50/250 coin 4oak version that was 103%Quote: Mental$5 Full Pay All American at Trump Marina. Obviously, not recently.
Hand Name Payout Probability Cycle Variance Return % Royal 800 0.000023015 43450.1 14.69 1.8412% Str_Flush 200 0.000141786 7052.86 5.61 2.8357% Quads 40 0.002251772 444.094 3.42 9.0071% Full_House 8 0.010981573 91.0616 0.54 8.7853% Flush 8 0.015713038 63.6414 0.77 12.5704% Straight 8 0.018426400 54.2699 0.90 14.7411% Trips 3 0.068836822 14.5271 0.27 20.6510% Two_Pair 1 0.119602446 8.36103 0.00 11.9602% JOB 1 0.183299746 5.45554 0.00 18.3300% Nada 0 0.580723403 1.72199 0.59 0.0000% -- -- 1.000000000 -- 26.80 100.7221%
Quote: AxelWolfThey had a 50/250 coin 4oak version that was 103%
Yikes! How long ago was that?
I really enjoyed playing the strategy for the 100.7% version of AA, Sadly, all the games were uprights and $1 denomination or less, so I rarely played. I finally got to play a $5 console AA game, and it was gone within days.
In All American, you almost never hold zero cards, so you get a redraw RF only once in 69,764,912 hands. For NSUD, it is once in 4,159,463 hands. Here is a chart with probabilities of getting a RF holding N cards while playing optimum strategy.
# Held | Probability | % of RF | RF Cycle | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.00000001433 | 0.06% | 69764912 | |
1 | 0.00000054196 | 2.35% | 1845161 | |
2 | 0.00000290759 | 12.63% | 343928 | |
3 | 0.00001034926 | 44.97% | 96625 | |
4 | 0.00000766264 | 33.29% | 130503 | |
5 | 0.00000153908 | 6.69% | 649740 | |
Any | 0.00002301486 | 100.00% | 43450 |
Also, the version of AA paying 200 coins for quads has a common redundancy. If you are dealt a hand like Ac 2d 6h Th Qh, holding Th Qh or 6h Th Qh has the same ROI. Therefore, the royal cycle is not uniquely determined. JB's calculator and WinPoker say the royal cycle is 43,402, while I get 43,450.
Quote: SOOPOOThat is the whole point of this thread! Duh....
So just spent a couple of minutes reviewing the thread and Shackleford has the ROI's of each payout listed in the 1st comment. The payouts clearly are all equal to or better than the odds with optimal play strategy. Only if Shackleford is wrong about his probabilities can the jackpot be the only positive ROI payout since he totals all the figures and none of them are negative.
Quote: WizardI paid a visit to the Red Rock today, in part to check on the Reversible Royal jackpots. Here is an update:
Bank by Starbucks:
Oct 19: $40,389
Dec 2: $40,741
Bank by buffet:
Oct 19: $73,860
Dec 2: $75,489
I had just assumed that these were progressive games with fast meters. However, in the 44 days between reports, the first one has only moved 32 bets/day and the second one moved 74 bets/day. I was used to 2% progressives in the old days, and I guess that 0.5% might be considered a good rate these days. Another report suggested there are 6 machines per bank. If the meter moves 32 bets in a day, this rate must be more like 0.2%. That is, just 16K hands per day at 0.2% would move the meter 32 bets or $8 on the first game. The second game would be averaging 37K hands per day.
From another angle, if I assume both machines are overdue and 5M hands were played since last reset and the meter is 0.2%, then the first game only moved $2500 and the second only moved $5000. This would mean the reset levels are very high and very +EV at reset.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that the meters are much faster than 0,2%, but the games are hardly being played at all. I once played 17K hands in a single day all by myself. This implies that the machines are generally available, especially in off hours.
Quote: Mental
The only thing that makes sense to me is that the meters are much faster than 0,2%, but the games are hardly being played at all. I once played 17K hands in a single day all by myself. This implies that the machines are generally available, especially in off hours.
I was thinking they may have dumped a bunch of progressive money from closed/removed games into it after Covid shutdown. Bartop quarter progressive there was over 7500 when bars reopened, would have to have been over 15 cycles with normal meter if extra wasn’t moved into it.
This was pre 2000. They would pop up infrequently and not last very long, since they would get locked up for the most part. KC has some that lasted for some years in the .25 denomination since they were never locked up and few pros knew about them. That was one of the first things I know of that got killed because someone posted up all about it on Skip's page(now VPFree2)Quote: MentalYikes! How long ago was that?
I really enjoyed playing the strategy for the 100.7% version of AA, Sadly, all the games were uprights and $1 denomination or less, so I rarely played. I finally got to play a $5 console AA game, and it was gone within days.
In All American, you almost never hold zero cards, so you get a redraw RF only once in 69,764,912 hands. For NSUD, it is once in 4,159,463 hands. Here is a chart with probabilities of getting a RF holding N cards while playing optimum strategy.
# Held Probability % of RF RF Cycle 0 0.00000001433 0.06% 69764912 1 0.00000054196 2.35% 1845161 2 0.00000290759 12.63% 343928 3 0.00001034926 44.97% 96625 4 0.00000766264 33.29% 130503 5 0.00000153908 6.69% 649740 Any 0.00002301486 100.00% 43450
Also, the version of AA paying 200 coins for quads has a common redundancy. If you are dealt a hand like Ac 2d 6h Th Qh, holding Th Qh or 6h Th Qh has the same ROI. Therefore, the royal cycle is not uniquely determined. JB's calculator and WinPoker say the royal cycle is 43,402, while I get 43,450.
That was the most difficult strategy I ever had to learn. I only had a few hours on a plane to learn it, I didn't learn it prefect, but it was good enough for for the promotion I went there for. Anything bigger than 4oak was doubled... That didn't last too long and it was difficult to get money into the casino since they had a $300 daily buy in limit back then.
Quote: mcallister3200I was thinking they may have dumped a bunch of progressive money from closed/removed games into it after Covid shutdown. Bartop quarter progressive there was over 7500 when bars reopened, would have to have been over 15 cycles with normal meter if extra wasn’t moved into it.
Your theory makes more sense than any combination of reset levels or meter rates. This is a lot better for the casino than dumping it into a progressive that hits quickly. More time for the players to drain away 5% waiting for the SRF. Red Rock also paid out a $150,850 Sequential RF for a $1.25 wager in September. This also made no sense.
CZR once dumped over $10K into the fifth level progressive on a Fireball machine. I don't know how they picked the fifth of eight progressives. I was stuck over $7K when I hit it for about 235,000 nickels. It reset to 10,000 nickels.
Quote: MentalI had just assumed that these were progressive games with fast meters. However, in the 44 days between reports, the first one has only moved 32 bets/day and the second one moved 74 bets/day. I was used to 2% progressives in the old days, and I guess that 0.5% might be considered a good rate these days. Another report suggested there are 6 machines per bank. If the meter moves 32 bets in a day, this rate must be more like 0.2%. That is, just 16K hands per day at 0.2% would move the meter 32 bets or $8 on the first game. The second game would be averaging 37K hands per day.
From another angle, if I assume both machines are overdue and 5M hands were played since last reset and the meter is 0.2%, then the first game only moved $2500 and the second only moved $5000. This would mean the reset levels are very high and very +EV at reset.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that the meters are much faster than 0,2%, but the games are hardly being played at all. I once played 17K hands in a single day all by myself. This implies that the machines are generally available, especially in off hours.
Many meters I see move 0.25% and 0.5% today. :( As McAllister said, it's likely a progressive dump.
Quote: AxelWolfThis was pre 2000. They would pop up infrequently and not last very long, since they would get locked up for the most part. KC has some that lasted for some years in the .25 denomination since they were never locked up and few pros knew about them. That was one of the first things I know of that got killed because someone posted up all about it on Skip's page(now VPFree2)Quote: MentalYikes! How long ago was that?
I really enjoyed playing the strategy for the 100.7% version of AA, Sadly, all the games were uprights and $1 denomination or less, so I rarely played. I finally got to play a $5 console AA game, and it was gone within days.
In All American, you almost never hold zero cards, so you get a redraw RF only once in 69,764,912 hands. For NSUD, it is once in 4,159,463 hands. Here is a chart with probabilities of getting a RF holding N cards while playing optimum strategy.
# Held Probability % of RF RF Cycle 0 0.00000001433 0.06% 69764912 1 0.00000054196 2.35% 1845161 2 0.00000290759 12.63% 343928 3 0.00001034926 44.97% 96625 4 0.00000766264 33.29% 130503 5 0.00000153908 6.69% 649740 Any 0.00002301486 100.00% 43450
Also, the version of AA paying 200 coins for quads has a common redundancy. If you are dealt a hand like Ac 2d 6h Th Qh, holding Th Qh or 6h Th Qh has the same ROI. Therefore, the royal cycle is not uniquely determined. JB's calculator and WinPoker say the royal cycle is 43,402, while I get 43,450.
That was the most difficult strategy I ever had to learn. I only had a few hours on a plane to learn it, I didn't learn it prefect, but it was good enough for for the promotion I went there for. Anything bigger than 4oak was doubled... That didn't last too long and it was difficult to get money into the casino since they had a $300 daily buy in limit back then.
You mean $500 loss per 2 hours? Missouri was restrictive, but not THAT restrictive. But if $5 VP existed, you surely could blow thru $500 quick. Even at dollars. Last time I played the game was 2004 in Boonville. But I heard KC held onto 100.7% quarters for longer.
Quote: MentalThis is a lot better for the casino than dumping it into a progressive that hits quickly.
I believe it is law that you have to put the progressive money into something that has about a similar probability of hitting ( +/- 5% range if I recall correctly).
Quote: rsactuaryI believe it is law that you have to put the progressive money into something that has about a similar probability of hitting ( +/- 5% range if I recall correctly).
That's big news to me. I've never heard/read of such a thing. And that is a tolerance that's very tight. It might be difficult to find an appropriate place to dump the jackpot with that standard. Nevada gaming regulation 5.110 says nothing of the sort, fwiw.
Quote: Nevada Gaming Commission
5.110 In-house progressive payoff schedules.
As used in this section:
“Base amount” means the amount of a progressive payoff schedule initially offered before it
increases.
“Chair” means the Chair of the Nevada Gaming Control Board or the Chair’s designee.
“Incremental amount’’ means the difference between the amount of a progressive payoff schedule
and its base amount.
“Progressive payoff schedule” means a game or machine payoff schedule, including those
associated with contests, tournaments or promotions, that increases automatically over time or as the
game(s) or machine(s) are played.
The amount of a progressive payoff schedule shall be conspicuously displayed at or near the
games or machines to which the payoff schedule applies. Each licensee shall record the base amount of
each progressive payoff schedule when first exposed for play and subsequent to each payoff. At least once
a day each licensee shall log the amount of each progressive payoff schedule at the licensee’s
establishment except for those that can be paid directly from a slot machine’s hopper or those offered in
conjunction with an inter-casino linked system. Explanations for reading decreases shall be maintained with
the progressive logs. When the reduction is attributable to a payoff, the licensee shall record the payoff
form number on the log or have the number reasonably available.
A licensee may change the rate of progression of any progressive payoff schedule provided that
records of such changes are created.
A licensee may limit a progressive payoff schedule to an amount that is equal to or greater than
the amount of the payoff schedule when the limit is imposed. The licensee shall post a conspicuous notice
of the limit at or near the games(s) or machine(s) to which the limit applies.
A licensee shall not reduce the amount of a progressive payoff schedule or otherwise eliminate a
progressive payoff schedule unless:
A player wins the progressive payoff schedule;
The licensee adjusts the progressive payoff schedule to correct a malfunction or to prevent the
display of an amount greater than a limit imposed pursuant to subsection 4, and the licensee documents
the adjustment and the reasons for it;
The licensee distributes the entire incremental amount to another single progressive payoff
schedule on similar game(s) or machine(s) at the licensee’s establishment and:
The licensee documents the distribution;
Any game or slot machine offering the payoff schedule to which the licensee distributes the
incremental amount does not require that more money be played on a single play to win the payoff schedule
than the game or slot machine from which the incremental amount is distributed unless the incremental
amount distributed is increased in proportion to the increase in the amount of the wager required to win the
payoff schedule;
If from a slot machine, any slot machine offering the payoff schedule to which the incremental
amount is distributed complies with the minimum theoretical payout requirement of Regulation 14.040(1);
and
The distribution is completed within 30 days after the progressive payoff schedule is removed from
play or within such longer period as the Chair may for good cause approve;
For games other than slot machines, the incremental amount may be distributed within 90 days of
removal through a concluding contest, tournament or promotion and the contest, tournament or promotion
is conducted with a game(s) similar to the game(s) from which the amounts are distributed; or
The Chair, upon a showing of exceptional circumstances, approves a reduction, elimination,
distribution, or procedure not otherwise described in this subsection, which approval is confirmed in writing.
A progressive payoff schedule may be temporarily removed for a period of up to 30 days to allow
for the remodeling of the licensed gaming establishment, or for such longer period or other good cause as
the Chair may approve.
Except as otherwise provided by this section, the incremental amount of a progressive payoff
schedule is an obligation to the licensee’s patrons, and it shall be the responsibility of the licensee if the licensee ceases operation of the progressive game or slot machine for any reason, including a transfer of
ownership of the licensed gaming establishment, to arrange for satisfaction of that obligation in a manner
approved by the Chair.
Licensees shall maintain the records required by this section for at least five years after they are
made unless the Chair approves otherwise in writing.
Quote: rsactuaryI believe it is law that you have to put the progressive money into something that has about a similar probability of hitting ( +/- 5% range if I recall correctly).
I would like to think this would be required. Otherwise, casinos employees could dump big progressives into a quad progressive or similar quick-hitting progressive and let a confederate steal the dumped money within a short amount of play.
Quote: tringlomaneThat's big news to me. I've never heard/read of such a thing. And that is a tolerance that's very tight. It might be difficult to find an appropriate place to dump the jackpot with that standard. Nevada gaming regulation 5.110 says nothing of the sort, fwiw.
..................
The licensee distributes the entire incremental amount to another single progressive payoff schedule on similar game(s) or machine(s) at the licensee’s establishment and:
The licensee documents the distribution;
Any game or slot machine offering the payoff schedule to which the licensee distributes the incremental amount does not require that more money be played on a single play to win the payoff schedule than the game or slot machine from which the incremental amount is distributed ...
Thanks for posting this. Unless I missed something, nothing here prevents casinos from dumping the progressive to a confederate. The requirement that the new bet be less than or equal to the old bet just makes it cheaper for the confederate to take down the new jackpot. Do you see anything that makes it harder for casino employees to steal jackpots via confederates? A regulation like the one that rsactuary mentions would be helpful.
NJ recently changed the rules to make it easier for casinos to pocket progressives for themselves.
"The licensee distributes the entire incremental amount to another single progressive payoff schedule on similar game(s) or machine(s) at the licensee’s establishment"
This one is located near the circle bar in the middle of the casino.
Here is the return table, based on the best base pay table, 6-5 Bonus Poker.
Outcome | Prize | Probability | Return |
---|---|---|---|
Reversible Royal Flush | 478,568 | 0.000001 | 0.058465 |
Royal Flush | 4,000 | 0.000025 | 0.020137 |
Straight Flush | 250 | 0.000105 | 0.005259 |
Four Aces | 400 | 0.000203 | 0.016221 |
Four 2s, 3s, 4s | 200 | 0.000525 | 0.020999 |
Four 5s thru Ks | 125 | 0.001633 | 0.040819 |
Full House | 30 | 0.011385 | 0.068309 |
Flush | 25 | 0.010671 | 0.053356 |
Straight | 20 | 0.011111 | 0.044446 |
Three of a Kind | 15 | 0.074324 | 0.222972 |
Two Pair | 10 | 0.129041 | 0.258081 |
Jacks or Better | 5 | 0.214397 | 0.214397 |
All Other | 0 | 0.546579 | 0.000000 |
Totals | 1.000000 | 1.023461 |
While the return at 102.35% is not as high as the nickel games, the hourly expected win is higher!
Based on 1,000 hands per hour, the expected win per hour is $29.33.
On the buffet bank, it is $23.63.
How has nobody noticed this before (shut up Wiz!)?
Here are the ROI boosts that I calculate for different games with a 95,713 bet reversible SRF jackpot (478,568 credits):
Game | ROI Boost from SRF |
7/5 Bdlx | 5.484% |
7/5 JB | 5.498% |
6/5 BP | 5.510% |
8/5 DDB | 5.541% |
8/5 TDB | 5.574% |
I am just guessing at available pay tables. TDB is boosted by 0.09% more than Bonus Deluxe. The boost depends on the structure of the pay table and the level of the SRF jackpot.
The game with the better base ROI is not necessarily the best game at any particular SRF jackpot level. It depends when the strategy changes turn on and how much this hurts the drain of the game. I don't know if this will ever flip the best game on a given progressive, but it might be enough to make the ROIs close enough that you will switch to a game that you prefer playing.
Quote: MentalYou did not give the entire list of available games.
Here are all the games on the 25-cent game. Returns do not count the progressive value above 800 per coin bet.
Base game | pay table | Return |
---|---|---|
bonus poker deluxe | 7-5 | 96.25% |
bonus poker | 6-5 | 96.87% |
double bonus | 9-6-4 | 96.38% |
double double bonus | 8-5 | 96.79% |
jacks or better | 7-5 | 96.15% |
triple double bonus | 8-5 | 95.97% |
if going for the srf, i would play the game with low variance.Quote: MentalYou did not give the entire list of available games. It appears they have at least 1% better ROI than the nickel games, considering how much better the BP pay table is compared to the 94.1829% return for the nickel game.
Here are the ROI boosts that I calculate for different games with a 95,713 bet reversible SRF jackpot (478,568 credits):
Game ROI Boost from SRF 7/5 Bdlx 5.484% 7/5 JB 5.498% 6/5 BP 5.510% 8/5 DDB 5.541% 8/5 TDB 5.574%
I am just guessing at available pay tables. TDB is boosted by 0.09% more than Bonus Deluxe. The boost depends on the structure of the pay table and the level of the SRF jackpot.
The game with the better base ROI is not necessarily the best game at any particular SRF jackpot level. It depends when the strategy changes turn on and how much this hurts the drain of the game. I don't know if this will ever flip the best game on a given progressive, but it might be enough to make the ROIs close enough that you will switch to a game that you prefer playing.
ie: JoB or BP
BP is the no brainer here.Quote: WizardHere are all the games on the 25-cent game. Returns do not count the progressive value above 800 per coin bet.
Base game pay table Return bonus poker deluxe 7-5 96.25% bonus poker 6-5 96.87% double bonus 9-6-4 96.38% double double bonus 8-5 96.79% jacks or better 7-5 96.15% triple double bonus 8-5 95.97%
low variance and highest return.
whats the bankroll needed to hit the .25 srf?
how about the nickel srf?
Pay Table / Game | Rev SRF ROI | ROI w/o SRF | Delta ROI |
7-5 Bonus Poker Deluxe | 101.736% | 96.253% | 5.484% |
6-5 Bonus Poker | 102.379% | 96.869% | 5.510% |
9-6-4 Double Bonus | 101.883% | 96.375% | 5.508% |
8-5 Double Double Bonus | 102.315% | 96.786% | 5.528% |
7-5 Jacks or Better | 101.645% | 96.147% | 5.498% |
8-5 Triple Double Bonus | 101.543% | 95.969% | 5.574% |
Variance ranges from 5643 to 6058. This leads to significantly increased risk compared to the nickel games, but I would accept the variance in return for higher hourly expected value. Of course, I will probably never play at Red Rock.
Quote: 100xOddswhats the bankroll needed to hit the .25 srf?
how about the nickel srf?
Variance ranges from 5643 to 6058. for the available game, so basically the same for every game. In comparison, the variance for the base TDB game is five times higher the variance for the base BP game. The quad ace's with kicker paying 4000 coins in TDB hardly makes a difference to variance.
You will have smaller daily swings with BP. This matters in deciding whether you have enough of you bankroll in your pocket to not tap out during the session. The variance is a long-term concept, so daily swings are not the same as variance.
You only need $1.25 to play one hand. You need more bankroll if you are going to play until someone hits the SRF. How much depends on how much competition you have. You need even more if you are going to bankroll a team to lock up all the seats and play until you hit with low risk of ruin.
The drain is 3.5% for BP. The SRF cycle is 1.6M hands. If you go 4 cycles without hitting, you will lose 6.4M * 3.5% = $224K before you hit. Have fun!
“At about 12:28 a.m. on Nov. 30, a local guest playing a Double Double Bonus Progressive Reversible Royals machine at Red Rock Casino hit a sequential royal flush for a $278,318 payday.
The guest, who asked to remain anonymous, bet $2 denomination x 5, making the total bet of $10 to win the huge jackpot.”
Quote: GreasyjohnI didn’t read this entire thread but came upon this while checking out Vegas on the web:
“At about 12:28 a.m. on Nov. 30, a local guest playing a Double Double Bonus Progressive Reversible Royals machine at Red Rock Casino hit a sequential royal flush for a $278,318 payday.
The guest, who asked to remain anonymous, bet $2 denomination x 5, making the total bet of $10 to win the huge jackpot.”
Did he have a really scraggly beard, kind of looking like a homeless man? Was he asking the waitresses weird questions?
What does the progressive re set to?
The kiosk in the center of the casino appeared several months ago when Red Rock overhauled their casino floor.
Quote: SOOPOODid he have a really scraggly beard, kind of looking like a homeless man? Was he asking the waitresses weird questions?
What does the progressive re set to?
I don’t really know anything more about this other than it was a 52-year-old woman I believe.
Quote: WizardBesides the two 5-cent 105%+ reversible royal games at the Red Rock, there is another positive 25-cent game.
This one is located near the circle bar in the middle of the casino.
Here is the return table, based on the best base pay table, 6-5 Bonus Poker.
Outcome Prize Probability Return Reversible Royal Flush 478,568 0.000001 0.058465 Royal Flush 4,000 0.000025 0.020137 Straight Flush 250 0.000105 0.005259 Four Aces 400 0.000203 0.016221 Four 2s, 3s, 4s 200 0.000525 0.020999 Four 5s thru Ks 125 0.001633 0.040819 Full House 30 0.011385 0.068309 Flush 25 0.010671 0.053356 Straight 20 0.011111 0.044446 Three of a Kind 15 0.074324 0.222972 Two Pair 10 0.129041 0.258081 Jacks or Better 5 0.214397 0.214397 All Other 0 0.546579 0.000000 Totals 1.000000 1.023461
While the return at 102.35% is not as high as the nickel games, the hourly expected win is higher!
Based on 1,000 hands per hour, the expected win per hour is $29.33.
On the buffet bank, it is $23.63.
How has nobody noticed this before (shut up Wiz!)?
Up to 125,311.87
Looks like the 5 cent machine by buffet entrance hit, progressive in the 5k range
5 cent by food court at 40,933.34
Playing the 125,318.02 machine Bonus poker 25c
Hit
10H JH 9H KH QH
Quote: terapinedLooks like the 5 cent machine by buffet entrance hit, progressive in the 5k range
According to the Wiz:
Bank by buffet:
Oct 19: $73,860
Dec 2: $75,489
This was a 10-coin game, so $5K reset would be a 10,000 to one jackpot payoff on a 50 cent bet.
It seems pretty clear that other jackpots were moved to these sequential RF jackpots to get them so high. Once they are hit, they are unlikely to ever get near 105% ROI again.
Quote: terapinedLooks like the 5 cent machine by buffet entrance hit, progressive in the 5k range
5 cent by food court at 40,933.34
Shoot. Thanks for letting us know.
Do you want to come to my boot camp tomorrow? PM me if interested. 8:00 AM.