ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 4837
June 28th, 2019 at 3:50:03 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Ok fellas I explain the system is nothing to hide because I don't have the tools to test it.

As we know the baccarat game always something is upfront player of banker.
Before we enter to play the game we waiting for one side to be upfront something like 3 games because in 3 games one side is upfront. Ok that's good banker is with 2 player 1 or whatever has 2 games out or even 3 same out.
All this I call into a balance one side will grow then will drop back on perfect balance and switching the other side.
Now the catch is to use flat bet and we apply antimartingale when is dropping back on the perfect balance and trying to switch the side
But this antimartingale needs to reset when on profit cannot be left to keep go up till will lose.

Please let me know what you think about it.


This is usually referred to as the "Gamblers' Fallacy." There are any number of problems with this.

First, even if you could depend on balance, you don't know what happened before you arrived. Even if the game is +3 banker since you got there, what if it was +10 player before you did? Now it's "really" +7 player, not +3 banker.

Second, I have run simulations on 50/50 games to see how long they take to balance out, and in some cases, it takes literally trillions of plays before it finally gets there.

Third, there are no true 50/50 games (unless you can find someone dealing Faro), so there's no guarantee of balance. Baccarat is not 50/50 because the probability of the player winning (if you ignore ties) is less than 50%, and while the bank wins more than 50% of the time, the 5% commission more than makes up for it.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 28th, 2019 at 4:58:25 PM permalink
I know exactly what you said.
But no matter was was before.. I believe we start our system on this occasion. Past and future are same all are repeated and repeats are getting longer and delays goes same way.
Past and future is repeated on infinity level.

The only thing will make us lose is when switching the balance on the other side. But this when accour we apply antimartingale till we are on + then reset progression back on flat bet and follow the upfront winner
And if banker is paid less than 1:1 we increase bet on player for what we lost on banker

Should work this ... am very positive about it 😎
Where there's a will, there is a way
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 4837
June 28th, 2019 at 5:08:05 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

I know exactly what you said.
But no matter was was before.. I believe we start our system on this occasion. Past and future are same all are repeated and repeats are getting longer and delays goes same way.


Obviously "past and future are same all repeated" is not true - otherwise the game would go player win, banker win, player win, banker win,...
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Past and future is repeated on infinity level.


But you don't have either "infinity money" or "infinity time" - you can't make up losses with money you don't have because you lost it all.
Quote: Anunnaki1202

And if banker is paid less than 1:1 we increase bet on player for what we lost on banker


And when player keeps losing because player loses more than half the time, what do you do then?
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Should work this ... am very positive about it 😎


Has a very good chance of not working, and wiping you out when it happens - am more positive about it.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 28th, 2019 at 5:20:55 PM permalink
What am trying to say is past and future is same but is scrambled.. we don't know the location when will arrive.
We don't need infinity money because when we enter into game is flat bets most of the losing will happen on antimartingale trying to lift up the bankroll back on when start losing on perfect balance switching.
All we need is like to have to play 1000 flat bet hands to start with.
Where there's a will, there is a way
beachbumbabs
Administrator
beachbumbabs
Joined: May 21, 2013
  • Threads: 99
  • Posts: 14232
June 28th, 2019 at 7:46:31 PM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

What am trying to say is past and future is same but is scrambled.. we don't know the location when will arrive.
We don't need infinity money because when we enter into game is flat bets most of the losing will happen on antimartingale trying to lift up the bankroll back on when start losing on perfect balance switching.
All we need is like to have to play 1000 flat bet hands to start with.



The cards have no memory that will help you. There is no balance they owe you. Baccarat is like flipping a coin.

Let me ask you: if it gave you an edge to know what happened in the past, or what patterns appear, would the casino help you with that? Would they put it on the board, or give you printed cards and pencils to track it yourself, like they do?

No, they wouldn't.

If you try to do the same thing in blackjack, tracking the progress of the shoe, they will get rid of you. They consider it cheating them somehow, because in blackjack, it does matter what cards are used up.

But baccarat or roulette? They know it doesn't matter, and you will fool yourself into seeing meaningless patterns, and spend more money, so they help you do that.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 28th, 2019 at 10:14:21 PM permalink
The balance I call is for example we have seen the game rolling of 5000 turns and we got something like 2300 player and 2700 banker now is a distance between them of 200 which banker is upfront.
But over time if playing more could player to take the lead of the balance.
This is what I call balance is the overall plays altogether which give us the statistics of plays between them two.
Where there's a will, there is a way
MDawg
MDawg
Joined: Sep 27, 2018
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 2744
June 29th, 2019 at 6:55:45 AM permalink
There is no per se "system" that works at Baccarat, but I have won at this game consistently. I've posted before about why, and few here seem to buy it, but then - I'm not selling anything anyway.
Last edited by: MDawg on Jun 29, 2019
I tell you itís wonderful to be here, man. I donít give a damn who wins or loses. Itís just wonderful to be here with you people.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 2400
June 29th, 2019 at 7:17:20 AM permalink
The idea that everything "balances out in the long term" needs a word of caution. Mathematically It is correct that the percentage of each outcome gets closer to the expected value as the number of trials (hands, spins, rolls) increases. However the absolute numbers (standard deviation) increases. For instance if you toss a coin twice, it is 50% that you are H=1, T=1 after two tosses. As the numbers grow it becomes increasingly unlikely to be exactly equal. It is one of the well-known gambler's falacy that "things even out".

In baccarat, even if you thought there was interdependence during a shoe, each new shoe comes from a freshly shuffled set of decks thus must be truly independent (assuming good shuffling) of any other shoe. Therefore you are looking at a series of shoes each with their own result. Therefore previous shoes' results can have no influence on this or other shoes.

Where the house has an advantage on any game, where each outcome is independent of previous ones and there's no floored processes or bias, then no system can (in the long run) overcome that House Edge. If you had a billion playing then some would come out ahead and, from their viewpoint, could validly claim "their system" works. This is how some tricks, like Derren Brown's horse racing predicitions, work - he only shows the time he gave six consecutive winners (or whatever) and doesn't show any of the others (yes he needed 7776 people!).

Most people here believe in the mathematics behind House Edge and, while there are some times when people can win (c.f. edge sorting), for most scenarios "no system works".
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 29th, 2019 at 7:37:01 AM permalink
In baccarat if put all shoes together will get a continuous set of plays which are not independent.
The plays will balancing out very quickly believe it or not I saw it many times and can go up to be out balanced like 900 then drop back on perfect balance and passing on other side.
We have to not give importance to a shoes and another unless the casino has tempered with the cards then is nothing we can do.
Where there's a will, there is a way
7craps
7craps
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 1977
June 29th, 2019 at 8:05:23 AM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

In baccarat if put all shoes together will get a continuous set of plays which are not independent.
The plays will balancing out very quickly believe it or not I saw it many times and can go up to be out balanced like 900 then drop back on perfect balance and passing on other side.

you are expressing 'confirmation bias' with NO proof of any of your statements.

the rules of the game of Baccarat favor the BANKER winning.

the more hands played the LESS chance the PLAYER has of equalling (or exceeding) the BANKER number of wins.
the more hands played the GREATER the chance the BANKER has of exceeding forever the PLAYER number of wins.

Many Chinese Baccarat syndicates have already proven this to be true.
winsome johnny (not Win some johnny)

  • Jump to: