Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
February 20th, 2019 at 9:18:36 AM permalink
Hello to everyone reading this lines .. I have a question is anyone managed to break the games on 1:1 payout?
Where there's a will, there is a way
TigerWu
TigerWu
Joined: May 23, 2016
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 4022
Thanks for this post from:
Anunnaki1202
February 20th, 2019 at 9:24:35 AM permalink
Counting cards at blackjack is the only way as far as 1:1 games goes.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
February 20th, 2019 at 9:27:24 AM permalink
Only this ? but online playing they can count as well ?
How about the other way I mean the random itself someone did anything ?
Where there's a will, there is a way
OnceDear
Administrator
OnceDear
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 5353
Thanks for this post from:
Anunnaki1202
February 20th, 2019 at 11:22:32 AM permalink
Quote: Anunnaki1202

Only this ? but online playing they can count as well ?
How about the other way I mean the random itself someone did anything ?

It's just a matter of using a pre-random predictor.
Beware. The earth is NOT flat. Hit and run is not a winning strategy: Pressing into trends IS not a winning strategy: Progressives are not a winning strategy: Don't Buy It! .Don't even take it for free.
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 24th, 2019 at 6:25:25 PM permalink
Is anyone here that can make a simulation on 1:1 payouts ? Which I believe will be always with +1 upfront on player side
The system is very simple I'll explain if any coder is available and want to do it. I've done couples of millions of plays and always ending up on + balance not very much on plus but was on positive banking
Where there's a will, there is a way
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 24th, 2019 at 6:41:58 PM permalink
I forgot to mention the progression is with +1, +2, +3, ... etc. Progression is resetting only when on + before starting to lose and the whole bankroll is with +1
Ex. Bankroll started with 1000 progression reset at 1001

Now what to bet and what to follow I need a coder who can put all this into a script
Where there's a will, there is a way
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 28th, 2019 at 9:46:49 AM permalink
I do apologise for my bad English as is not my first language.
If don't understand what I tried to say please ask me.
I made hundreds of millions of simulations with the +1 progression but is the second key what to bet and what to bet.
All this I will say to someone can put this into a simulation.
A martingale progression will activate at so.e point only then the +1 is played or can be flat bet only and activate martingale at certain point only

Thanks.
And am open to any suggestions.
Where there's a will, there is a way
gordonm888
gordonm888
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 2974
Thanks for this post from:
Anunnaki1202
June 28th, 2019 at 12:09:09 PM permalink
Varying the size of your bets according to some algorithm or schedule will not change the fact that the house has an edge.

In a 1:1 BJ simulation of "hundreds of millions" trials, we expect with very high confidence that you will calculate a significant loss for player - unless you are making unrealistic assumptions about maximum bet size with a Martingale-type system.

Most of us on this forum are weary of explaining to newcomers that systems based on "bet size variation" cannot enable you to beat a casino in the long run. This is a very basic fact about gambling.

I suggest that you do more research on the internet on analysis/limitations of betting systems that use progressions of bet sizes. Perhaps a moderator can supply you with a link to an article on the WOO site.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
GWAE
GWAE
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Thanks for this post from:
Anunnaki1202
June 28th, 2019 at 2:21:02 PM permalink
You are saying 1 to 1 payout but is it on a 50/50 game? A lot of games pay 1 to 1 but the odds of winning the 1 to 1 are only 95%.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
Anunnaki1202
Anunnaki1202
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 36
June 28th, 2019 at 3:02:20 PM permalink
Ok fellas I explain the system is nothing to hide because I don't have the tools to test it.

As we know the baccarat game always something is upfront player of banker.
Before we enter to play the game we waiting for one side to be upfront something like 3 games because in 3 games one side is upfront. Ok that's good banker is with 2 player 1 or whatever has 2 games out or even 3 same out.
All this I call into a balance one side will grow then will drop back on perfect balance and switching the other side.
Now the catch is to use flat bet and we apply antimartingale when is dropping back on the perfect balance and trying to switch the side
But this antimartingale needs to reset when on profit cannot be left to keep go up till will lose.

Please let me know what you think about it.
Where there's a will, there is a way

  • Jump to: