These are the two paytables approved in Washington State, where I grabbed this data. If the straight is 1 to 1, then it's even worse than the second set of numbers here, which already has a house edge of 7.4%! Horrible for a game where people are likely making errors.
http://www.wsgc.wa.gov/activities/game-rules/double-draw-poker.pdf
Five Aces 500 500
Natural Royal Flush 100 100
Wlid Royal Flush 50 50
Straight Flush 50 50
4 of a Kind 20 20
Full House 5 5
Flush 3 3
Straight 2 2
3 of a Kind 1 Push
Two Pair Push Push
House Edge 3.37% 7.40%
Quote: IbeatyouracesCorrect. Two pair and trips are a push based on the bonus paytable. The table was quite desolate today also.
Good for gamblers not wanting to play a game with 7.4% edge and an unclear strategy! Table 1 is okay...but 2 is too much. They should have cut one of the higher payouts down instead, imo.
Quote: tringlomaneOh jeez stay away then.
These are the two paytables approved in Washington State, where I grabbed this data. If the straight is 1 to 1, then it's even worse than the second set of numbers here, which already has a house edge of 7.4%! Horrible for a game where people are likely making errors.
http://www.wsgc.wa.gov/activities/game-rules/double-draw-poker.pdf
Five Aces 500 500
Natural Royal Flush 100 100
Wlid Royal Flush 50 50
Straight Flush 50 50
4 of a Kind 20 20
Full House 5 5
Flush 3 3
Straight 2 2
3 of a Kind 1 Push
Two Pair Push Push
House Edge 3.37% 7.40%
I did a full CA analysis of this game a while back. I got a HE of 3.915% with the first pay table. My software also played about 98% of hands, which is different than the 97% quoted earlier, so maybe it is a little off. It IS generally correct to play 3 to a SF instead of folding. The strategy can get very complicated though.
Quote: jopkeQuote: tringlomaneOh jeez stay away then.
These are the two paytables approved in Washington State, where I grabbed this data. If the straight is 1 to 1, then it's even worse than the second set of numbers here, which already has a house edge of 7.4%! Horrible for a game where people are likely making errors.
http://www.wsgc.wa.gov/activities/game-rules/double-draw-poker.pdf
Five Aces 500 500
Natural Royal Flush 100 100
Wlid Royal Flush 50 50
Straight Flush 50 50
4 of a Kind 20 20
Full House 5 5
Flush 3 3
Straight 2 2
3 of a Kind 1 Push
Two Pair Push Push
House Edge 3.37% 7.40%
I did a full CA analysis of this game a while back. I got a HE of 3.915% with the first pay table. My software also played about 98% of hands, which is different than the 97% quoted earlier, so maybe it is a little off. It IS generally correct to play 3 to a SF instead of folding. The strategy can get very complicated though.
Thanks, jobke! That's all good to know.
If you're sitting at a table with say.. 2 other people. And you can see the other peoples cards.. Wouldn't that slide the advantage in the players favor? Because you have knowledge of 10-16 other cards in the deck. You'd be able to know, with greater knowledge, your chances of hitting anything.
Let me know what you think!
Thanks.
A simpler strategy could give up a lot while still being quite complex. I don't know any published information on this.
The fact that you can make money, and the game itself is a blast to play, makes this one of my favorite games when I make the trip to Biloxi.
Quote: uwf9990Yeah that's what I was thinking. It would definitely help with your EV of your hands and it would make your decisions easier. This game has been pulled from multiple casinos, and I think that might be one of the reasons.. If you have 3 people working together, I think you can make money at the game. There's only one of these tables in Biloxi and I hit for $1200 a couple months back by playing with 1 other person. The dealer didn't really mind us sharing our hand info because we started playing nickels on the board for her.
The fact that you can make money, and the game itself is a blast to play, makes this one of my favorite games when I make the trip to Biloxi.
I love this game, too. I'd like to know where it is in Biloxi; I didn't see it, but I only got to a couple of casinos last October. Thanks!
Quote: beachbumbabsI'd like to know where it is in Biloxi
They have it at Treasure Bay :)
The only place I’ve seen it otherwise a single table at the Seminole Hard Rock Hollywood casino - it wasn’t that popular.
I wonder if this game is going extinct - does anyone have any insight?
There used to be 4 tables at Seminole Hard Rock Hollywood but when I was there in November, yes, it was down to one table. Disturbing, for someone like me who is a big fan of the game. Vegas doesn't have it.

Thanks for the information - I just saw this comment on Instagram and figured that someone wouldn't say that if they didn't have a reason to believe it. I don't want to reveal this stranger's personal information but I'll reply asking where she heard that.
Do you know if the "Atlantic City Pay Table" is used anywhere (seen in the Wizard of Odds article)? I assume that that pay table must have gone extinct for its extremely high house edge. Even the regular game has a high house edge, especially considering how complex the optimal strategy is.
Regardless, I think it's a cool idea for a game, maybe it should be revised with a different pay table to regain popularity. I just never played it... I almost did in Florida but the two old women playing warned me against it, and said it was an expensive game. I have a near optimal strategy printed out on paper but I don't think that I will be playing it when I go to Florida next week :)
I have never seen the AC paytable used anywhere. But, it's been a long time since I've seen this game anywhere other than Mohegan and Hard Rock Hollywood. I'm hoping when the Hard Rock opens in Vegas they'll try it out.
It's a fun game because of the complicated strategy and all the decision making. And the hit rate is high enough. But, much of the return is in the Straight Flush; if you don't hit them, it's very hard to win. I once went 0-for-22 SF draws, which are typically 8-1 to 15-1 to hit. Another time I went 3 for 7. Hit 5 Aces once (for $50k at the Hard Rock) and I'd really like to hit another before the game goes extinct!
Quote: harrisI don't want to reveal this stranger's personal information but I'll reply asking where she heard that
"Where did you hear that about double draw poker?"
"mohegan sun"
Thanks for asking.
It's so silly for a few reasons. The game has a high house edge and I can't imagine there's enough constant collusion to swing the game to the player's advantage especially given how bad people are at it. Doesn't the casino make enough money on everything else, they can't keep one table that may not retain the theoretical hold? And, there's a simple way around the collusion that I think the fans of the game would accept: just have the players make their discard decisions one at a time, before the remaining players even touch their cards. Yes, it would slow the game down, but better slow than dead. And you'd just have to do it on the first draw, not the second, where your hand plays itself the vast majority of the time. Is anyone at Mohegan listening?
Thanks Harris for posting the rumor, because had I not seen it I wouldn't have made an emergency trip out there and may never have had a chance to play it again. I enjoy playing at Mohegan a great deal more than Seminole b/c there's no max bet so when I get on a run (as I did once on this trip) I can raise my starting $100 bet to $200, $300, and I even had it at $500 and $600 for a couple of hands (and there's 4 bets, for those who don't know the game). I think I've lost more on some trips in the past than collusion by $10 players could win back in a year!
Quote: AbleDangerThanks Harris for posting the rumor, because had I not seen it I wouldn't have made an emergency trip out there and may never have had a chance to play it again.
Going across the country because someone on a gambling forum claims they saw an Instagram comment?
Thanks for having more faith in me than most forum members (and perhaps my own family). Anyways I'm glad I was right because otherwise that would have been a little embarrassing considering you went all the way to CT to find out, though I am sad on your behalf since you and others seem to be big fans.
I understand why they are removing the game... as far as I can tell, this is the only table game that involves the player drawing cards (the only exception I can think of is this mysterious Indian game called "5 Card Poker" that I found online last week - and that one involves drawing less cards. I think this mechanic naturally lends itself to collusion which is why we do not see it more, even though I think it makes games fun and interesting.
Quote: acesideI just tried this game. It’s a more complicated version of video poker. Is this a table game in Mohegan Sun? This should not work well on a real table, because I think it’s too slow. May work a lot better on VP machines.
link to original post
I agree that it could be extended to a cool video poker concept (maybe even triple draw and letting you draw 5 cards).
Slowing it down even more in real life would just further its demise.
Quote: AbleDangerI don't know why casino management wouldn't tell my host the truth if it is in fact being shut down. If anything, I'd think they'd advertise that fact to get people to visit sooner!link to original post
I've been thinking about this all morning.
The host does not want to be the harbinger of bad news, especially it would make it seem like their casino is becoming worse. Telling people that Double Draw Poker is leaving would artificially create an increase in play - but the fact that this casino is removing the game should tell you what you need to know about how profitable it is for the casino normally.
My assumption is that they don't notify you when new games are being tested, partly because they don't want make the mistake of having VIPs try games that aren't actually rewarding to play.
Yes they have to give that money back to the players.So they either keep the game until it hits or move it on to another game or have some kind of promotion ie. Blackjack pays double etc.Quote: harrisSorry to keep commenting, but is it a common practice for casinos to keep a game until the jackpot bonus pays out? Is that a legal requirement?
link to original post
This happens on slot machines also.
Yes, collusion is possible, but why spread the game at all or not remove it years earlier? It must have been showing a profit to have 3-4 tables all those years.
They could also remove the payout for 3-of-a-kind on the bonus bet and make it a push -- that schedule is also on the Wizard's page -- to increase the house edge to a point where collusion won't be as harmful.
Quote: AbleDangerThey could also remove the payout for 3-of-a-kind on the bonus bet and make it a push -- that schedule is also on the Wizard's page -- to increase the house edge to a point where collusion won't be as harmful.
link to original post
It would have a higher edge than any table game I have ever heard of. So it would just make it less popular

