Quote: tuttigymLast Memorial Day I went to Harrah's Casino in Cherokee, NC, about 2 hrs. drive from home, for some gambling action. To my dismay, the table minimums were $25. I immediately turned away, played some slots, and left very disappointed. Time passed and I thought out a plan, which I have NOT tried yet, on how to defeat the $25 casino imposed minimum with legal small bets ($3-15), still use the $25 minimum when necessary, play for an hour or more without going bankrupt on a "cold" or "choppy" table, and possibly walking away winning. So to those of you forum player/participants, using your creative juices, tell us how one would attack those greedy casinos and the $25 table minimum using those small table legal bets in conjunction with the $25 minimum as required. Your buy-in should be $500. Your plan can be point specific. After a week of answers, I will reveal my plan or "system."
Please don’t tell us you will bet $40 on the pass line and $25 on the don’t pass, thus in your mind really betting $15 on the pass line? And just ignore when a 12 is rolled? Assuming you were talking about craps?
Unless you're an AP or other reasons, casinos offer entertainment at a cost. The original aim of WoO was to reduce this cost by pointing out better ways to play games. If you feel the perceived cost is too high then leave it for others.
Last week I walked into a pub and seeing their range of beers only liked one. When the bar staff said they'd run out of that one, I gave my excuses and walked out. That particular pub used to have a range of good beers but their choice has gone down. However there are enough people who enjoy that type of beer.
It's the same with 6/5 BJ!
If you don't cover at least two numbers you are playing with 1/10 or more of your session stake on each hand. Most players don't have
the discipline to avoid betting more when they "feel" a hot roll is happening. If their feeling is wrong, they've shot even more of their stake
in lickety-split.
If you need to have more than a couple numbers in action, go to LAS or somewhere that has casinos with a lower rent.
So you must be clairvoyant as to the internal workings of my "system." That "gift" would be of more productive use at the roulette table.
tuttigym
Bet a buck each on hard six and eight.
Yeah, horrible HA...anyway, keep making the bet, every shooter.
When it hits increase the bet on each a couple units, and regress to a buck each if the profit is lost.
If you get a hit at the higher level then you should have enough money to make a few $25 bets.
tuttigym
tuttigym
tuttigym
tuttigym
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigym... The inflated table minimum was because of Memorial Day. It was not permanent although I am confident that weekend evenings will send those minimums back to $25.
Sunday and Monday a week prior to your visit, I was at Harrah's Cherokee and met up with our fellow member odiousgambit. (He made a blog post about our experiences.) While I was there, the crap table minimum was $25 at some tables and $15 at others. Even that is pricier than I like, but I was winning, so I tolerated the tariff for a while. On Monday we spent a little time at their "Roll-to-Win" craps table with a $5 minimum. That is discussed some in OG's blog entry.
tuttigym
Quote: MrVIf the only available craps table has a $25 minimum, and if you are bound and determined to play craps and want a system that might give you a chance to bet at the $25 level, then I suggest the following:
Bet a buck each on hard six and eight.
Yeah, horrible HA...anyway, keep making the bet, every shooter.
When it hits increase the bet on each a couple units, and regress to a buck each if the profit is lost.
If you get a hit at the higher level then you should have enough money to make a few $25 bets.
I think the hardway minimums are $5 on a $25 table.
Since a $39 (+$1 vig) Lay 5 or 9 pays $26, maybe that's the minimum for those lay bets, otherwise I'd go for a $30 (+$1 vig) lay bet on the 5 or 9 that pays $20. Play the Lays on the Come-outs when people are rolling 7's and maybe for 2 rolls after that when they still roll 7's. Just one bet at a time.
You can call that "The No Chance of Winning System". When you play roulette, do you bet red and black at the same time?Quote: tuttigymThat being said, I would start any hand with $25 PL; $25 DP + $1 on the 12. I have now created, for me, table options based on the point established, and I basically break even with the come-out roll.
What do you mean you basically break even on the come out roll?
Whenever I play, regardless of the table limit, I use the "Doey/Don't on the come out simply because winning a table minimum bet at come out is not important to my over-all strategy. What that does is allows me to play Don't odds when the table is cold or the HA on the point is so great, i.e. 10 or 4, Now, I do not have to pay a vig on a lay which does the same thing. Also, I can play both sides of the table and use the Don't odds as a hedge on a "choppy" table. Does it work all the time? Of course not, but I can get more bang for my gambling buck so that when a hot shooter appears, I can take down the Don't odds during the hand. Flexibility!!
tuttigym
tuttigym
tuttigym
Probably $5 on a $25 table. But when it does hit, it wipes out the the only time you get a loss doing the doey-don't. Hmmm.Quote: ChumpChangeI sometimes have 5 to 10 come-out rolls before the first point gets established. That $1 midnight bet would get crushed, unless it hit.
But the student of the game will know instantly it won't work in the long run because it is a combination of negative expectaion bets; the overall EV is always a sum of the EV of each bet. The HE against the '12' bet is quite heavy, but interestingly it still wouldn't work to beat the house long-run if it was small edge or even a fair bet with no edge. Note Tuttigym concedes " Does it work all the time? Of course not"
tuttigym
p.s. I am talking about a $10 or $15 table minimum here.
tuttigym
tuttigym
In that you are not alone.
The first gambling author I read was John Patrick, and in his two books on craps, esp. "Advanced Craps" he lays out a variety of plays on both the right and the dark side, which you might enjoy looking at.
No, his methods are not "math approved" but it seems you and he think alike.
well, you told me that you've experienced uncivil pushback in the past, so I'll try to not 'go there' ... but there's a 'but' alright. It sounds good *but* you've only listed -EV bets... you qualified your remarks so let's say you know that but are hoping for short term good results. The problem is you're going down the road marked 'hedging' , and honestly you should really think that hedging favors the house in the sense that it takes away variance, your only hope at -EV betting.Quote: tuttigym...some SIMPLE craps math such as: point is 8; play DP odds at $18; play the Hard 8 for $9.
!!! ... I refer back to 'just knowing' you have an error without doing the work to show it because you've only listed -EV bets. So, it takes time for me to find it, if I can do it, certainly others can. I'll see what I can come up with.Quote:I now have 7 ways to win and 4 ways to lose. I have a mathematical advantage of winning over the house.
this I've seen before. The problem with this kind of 'math' is that it doesn't weigh in the probabilities. You're not doing the right math unless the probability is factored.Quote:If I win by 7 out, it is small, $6; if I win by the Hard 8: $72, really good. If I lose with a easy 8 which happens; -$18 no big deal but fun and not "crushing"...
tuttigym
I appreciate your dedication to trying to research the EV bets, but really it is diving into the weeds that I am not willing to chase.
tuttigym
Thanks. As you know, there is nothing easier than to go on the internet and exercise the demon that makes you want to troll. It seems to be in everybody.Quote: tuttigymMr O: Your responses and posts are NOT uncivil to me.
OK. Unfortunately I put some time and effort into it. So don't click on the box marked 'examination'. Lots of edits.Quote:I appreciate your dedication to trying to research the EV bets, but really it is diving into the weeds that I am not willing to chase.
I assume we got here with the doey-don't or we couldn't do the DP odds. The 12s that get rolled on the come-out aside, reaching this point is where I think you evaluate the situation as " I now have 7 ways to win and 4 ways to lose". I'll try to check that out.Quote:[if the] point is 8; play DP odds at $18; play the Hard 8 for $9
so there's 6/36 prob of 7 which would result in losing the Hard 8 for $9 and winning the odds bet for $15, $6 to the positive. Winning/losing the line bet is offset.
there's 1/36 chance of rolling a hard 8 winning $81 and losing $18 odds bet. Winning/losing the line bet is offset.
there's 4/36 chance of rolling a different 8 losing $9 + $18. Winning/losing the line bet is offset.
all other rolls are meaningless, so it resets every roll.
[6/36*6]+[1/36*63]+[4/36*-27]= -0.25 ... I concede that my math is often in error, but I think I got that right
As for 7 ways to win and 4 ways to lose, you are correct there are 11 outcomes . Your error was in failing to subtract all the losses for rolling a 7 and a hard eight from the winning amounts, but check my work someone. [edit] I did make some mistakes I just caught. if you roll the hard 8 it comes out just fine for you, rolling a 7 is to the positive as well. Losing the hard 8 is the killer
Quote: tuttigymLast Memorial Day I went to Harrah's Casino in Cherokee, NC, about 2 hrs. drive from home, for some gambling action. To my dismay, the table minimums were $25. I immediately turned away, played some slots, and left very disappointed. Time passed and I thought out a plan, which I have NOT tried yet, on how to defeat the $25 casino imposed minimum with legal small bets ($3-15), still use the $25 minimum when necessary, play for an hour or more without going bankrupt on a "cold" or "choppy" table, and possibly walking away winning. So to those of you forum player/participants, using your creative juices, tell us how one would attack those greedy casinos and the $25 table minimum using those small table legal bets in conjunction with the $25 minimum as required. Your buy-in should be $500. Your plan can be point specific. After a week of answers, I will reveal my plan or "system."
The only way to really do what you suggest is to make a hedge play. The only thing a hedge does is drive up the house edge and limit the variance.
I’m sure there limitless hedge plays.
I will wait on you to tell me to hit the "examination" switch when you are ready. We are having fun, right?
tuttigym
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigymMr TDVegas: Thanks for jumping in and getting me back to the original intent of this thread. Actually in my vision to defeat the $25 table, there is some hedge betting, however, my outside the box thinking uses a number of really small wagers (from $1 - $15) that offer reasonable returns as some risk, but allows one to extend their buy-in for a much longer period than if one were to just play as an "establishment" player or even with $25 minimum hedge bets to satisfy the table "marshals." Try and think about it some more if you have some free time. Get creative. When I explain my plan next week, you will probably want to slap me silly and roll your eyes. I actually think it could work to win some.
tuttigym
You mentioned ‘the50’s’ I believe somewhere upthread so you I assume are at least in your 70’s? You have not reinvented the wheel here. Your doey/don’t with boxcar bet will cost you $5-10 an hour to be able to play the bets you want. If that is worth it to you, go for it. Overall, if there are no tables less than $25 it gets you a seat at the table for a small price. Trust me, you are not ‘fooling’ them. They will be happy to take a guaranteed $5-10 an hour plus an expected few more $ per hour on your -EV bets. If your only additional bets are ‘free odds’ bets then your expected loss is only the initial $5-10 an hour. You are less likely to win than a ‘regular’ bettor, but you are correct that you are likely to have a defined bankroll last longer. Any reply you make, or any further replies to you are just blather. Go to the casino and tell us how it worked out!
When I read all the posts from veteran players who espouse their savant math HA/HE/variance/SD/'SD2 ad nauseum, the novice/newby/susceptible/easily led/easily swayed folks out there who desperately want to play and win probably believe that those "savants" have ALL the answers and never ever lose. They believe you guys are "Rain Man."
As far as "less likely to win than a "regular bettor' "? You don't know that; you are just guessing much like the way you play. "Blather?" Really?
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigymMr. SOOPOO: I am 80 yrs. old, and I am not trying to "reinvent the wheel." The casinos can not exist on patrons losing $10/hr. BTW, I am not trying to "fool them." I can use their rules and limits along with my "creativity" to play. If it does not work, which most plans do not including the so-called "regular bettor," so be it.
When I read all the posts from veteran players who espouse their savant math HA/HE/variance/SD/'SD2 ad nauseum, the novice/newby/susceptible/easily led/easily swayed folks out there who desperately want to play and win probably believe that those "savants" have ALL the answers and never ever lose. They believe you guys are "Rain Man."
As far as "less likely to win than a "regular bettor' "? You don't know that; you are just guessing much like the way you play. "Blather?" Really?
tuttigym
I haven’t lost at Craps in about three years. I played one session in that amount of time and won.
The only answer that I claim to have when it comes to Craps is which bets have the lowest edge, but for me, I think players should do whatever they like…my interest is exclusively in them understanding the expected loss (cost) of each bet.
I only play $5 tables and hedge my Pass Line CO with a $1 Crap Check. Terrible bet, but I know what it costs me in the long run and I almost never play Craps.
I don’t know why this perception exists that math guys, APs, or both, look down on ALL -EV play, but that’s simply not the case with most of us. I just want people to know what the expected loss of their action is.
You can hit it anytime. But I wanted you to be able to decline to do so, since you said you don't want to get into the weeds.Quote: tuttigymI will wait on you to tell me to hit the "examination" switch when you are ready. We are having fun, right?
I felt compelled to follow the formula that goes, "the amount won or lost in gambling is the amount won times the probability of winning minus the amount loss times the prob. of losing" . Simple as that.
I get those heebie-jeebies when I see an evaluation that does not take probability into account.
yeah, it's nice to get rid of the heebie-jeebies, just want to see if I can do it. I just hope you aren't one of the guys I've seen who really did think the doey-don't cancelled out the bets perfectly. I've run into those players and they are definitely not having fun. They are still losing on the line bets and they are betting twice as much , each bet against an edge.Quote:We are having fun, right?
The "expected loss of their action" has mostly to with ego, lack of discipline, and the simple arithmetic associated with any gambling endeavor.
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigym
The "expected loss of their action" has mostly to with ego, lack of discipline, and the simple arithmetic associated with any gambling endeavor.
One out of three ain't bad.
tuttigym
Are there still $5 dollar tables downtown? In Vegas a few weeks ago it was sometimes difficult finding a table under $50 at Cosmo/Aria
Let's say someone who didn't know it before finally accepts the idea that no combination of bets that have a house edge can result in player advantage *or* even reduce the amount of negative average expected loss... even in the case of hedging bets.Quote: tuttigym... I do not know what you mean by "cancelling out the bets perfectly." Can you explain?
When it comes to the doey-don't, though, this same person might feel that "here is an exception", clearly the Pass bet cancels out the Don't Pass bet! Except for that pesky come-out 12, which is no big deal. Well, if it isn't, then the lamented $25 minimum is no big deal either.
But OK, you can bet on the 12 as well, and if it comes up on the come-out that bet will cancel out that problem too, right? Well, it sure would if it would quit losing on the come-out when the roll is the other 35 possibilities.
I won't take you into the weeds and show the math, but when you come up with the idea of adding one -EV to another -EV bet, you are increasing the amount of loss to be expected on average. That's easy to see when your wife places a bet on her game at the same time you place your bet on your different game. But it seems hard to see for some very smart people when it comes to hedging. In the case of the doey-don't, at a $25 table, you have decided to change from putting $25 up against the house edge to now putting $50 up against it for the benefit of never being able to win. OK, you add some other bets so you can win maybe; all the bets being offered by the casino are -EV too*, and you are making it worse. Without going into the weeds that's the best I can explain it.
I too once thought the doey-don't was brilliant. About 16 years ago I emailed the Wizard about it [you could do that then and he would email you back!]. I was quite shocked to find out what he said and it took me a year or two to really believe I was so wrong.
*except the free odds, which are available all along without doing all these somersaults
Quote: tuttigymWhenever I play, regardless of the table limit, I use the "Doey/Don't on the come out simply because winning a table minimum bet at come out is not important to my over-all strategy. What that does is allows me to play Don't odds when the table is cold or the HA on the point is so great, i.e. 10 or 4, Now, I do not have to pay a vig on a lay which does the same thing. Also, I can play both sides of the table and use the Don't odds as a hedge on a "choppy" table.
Try running that on your WinCraps, and you will quickly find it either loses more, or does not win as much, vs betting the DP or PL alone. You are taking the important 7 and the 11 out of play. Eight winning dice combinations on the come out, canceled by the DP bet.
Whatever you might win with your DP odds bets, will be more than offset by the lost come out roll win opportunities on the PL.
You are also betting twice as much on the come out, where you are expected to lose 1.36% of the total bet on the DP, and 1.41% of the total bet on the PL. Doubling your potential loss on those combined bets. Hedging with a bet on the 12, would only make it worse.
tuttigym