Poll
![]() | 23 votes (69.69%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (9.09%) | ||
![]() | 4 votes (12.12%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (9.09%) | ||
![]() | 2 votes (6.06%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
No votes (0%) | |||
![]() | 4 votes (12.12%) |
33 members have voted
Come on Forum, who doesn't love a FREE-ROLL ? Let's win as much as we can and have ROMES parlay it into an even bigger payday for us. OR the WIZ for that matter, counting and betting until he gets a talking to.Quote: WizardI would like to get this to around 40 people, preferably long-standing members we all know. More peer pressure that way.
Apparently, some people were not paying attention last time.Quote: JohnnyQCome on Forum, who doesn't love a FREE-ROLL ? Let's win as much as we can and have ROMES parlay it into an even bigger payday for us. OR the WIZ for that matter, counting and betting until he gets a talking to.
Quote: AxelWolfApparently, some people were not paying attention last time.
I'm so poor that I can't afford to pay attention.
The requirement to keep PM' s strictly confidential makes sharing votes problematic. If votes are shared, colluding becomes more difficult. Some clarification about what can be made public from PM' s will be required.
What happened to "Golden Balls"?
I can't quite remember exactly how it happened but this is how I remember it.Quote: IbeatyouracesI'm so poor that I can't afford to pay attention.
I offered to pump it up and perhaps double it given a few weeks. I was fairly confident I could since I had a few people who would help do some of the various new member's promotions and whatnot around town, including some good little bar gigs.
We were also doing the 1/2 parlays and I assumed we would could get down on that as well, especially with some help from all the people who were in town during that time.
I guess people wanted somthing different and went with Romes. IIRC Romes missed one of the best weeks ever for the 1/2 parlays. We certainly crushed it that week.
Basically, Romes FKED everyone in the___ that weekend (including a couple...OH, NVM).
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Quote: AyecarumbaThe requirement to keep PM' s strictly confidential makes sharing votes problematic. If votes are shared, colluding becomes more difficult. Some clarification about what can be made public from PM' s will be required.
I feel like votes would have to be made via PM, then revealed publicially in the thread at the end of each round.
If it was 100% public voting in the thread, it would take forever to get everyone to vote because the final voters would get a huge advantage.
Quote: OnceDearCount me in.
Quote: AxelWolfI can't quite remember exactly how it happened but this is how I remember it.
I offered to pump it up and perhaps double it given a few weeks. I was fairly confident I could since I had a few people who would help do some of the various new member's promotions and whatnot around town, including some good little bar gigs.
We were also doing the 1/2 parlays and I assumed we would could get down on that as well, especially with some help from all the people who were in town during that time. IIRC Romes missed one of the best weeks ever for the 1/2 parlays. We certainly crushed it that week.
Basically, Romes FKED everyone in the___ that weekend (including a couple...OH, NVM).
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yup, it was week 7, 2016 season. We would have been 6 for six and would have had a few 4, 5 and 6 team cards.......... (Scroll half way down the page of the thread linked and you'll see the picks in my post)
It was one hell of a "what could have been" situations.
I think some people still don't know the difference between the actual cooperation game team vs the Romes parlay card team.........................................
I'm unfortunately going to be traveling a lot over the next month or so, so will not opt in to this game :(