Cooperation Game II
Poll
 | 23 votes (69.69%) | ||
| | 3 votes (9.09%) | ||
| | 4 votes (12.12%) | ||
| | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
| | 3 votes (9.09%) | ||
| | 2 votes (6.06%) | ||
| | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
| | 1 vote (3.03%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 4 votes (12.12%) |
33 members have voted
Quote: WizardLet it be known that I'm accepting names for Cooperation Game II. As you may recall, the original Cooperation Game was a big success, with 97 pages of posts. The first post in that thread explained the rules the first game. Again, I must commend the group on developing a strategy to nearly optimize winnings, despite some selfish people who picked $2 every time.
This time I am going to change the rules up a bit. A couple changes I'm considering are:
1. Make votes public.
2. Put people in groups, with the majority in the group deciding the group vote. Like the Electoral College, but with every state having one vote. I will reserve the right to mix up the groups, as I wish.
At this time, I'm accepting suggestions on the rules as well as names.
Please only volunteer if you can commit to actively playing and put in a vote each round.
As before, this is a 100% free-roll.
Add a $100 jackpot option such that if one person selects it, he gets paid, but if more than one selects it, no one gets anything including the smaller prizes.
Quote: AxelWolfobviously, I'm in.
Same
gamerfreak
RS
JohnnyQ
Romes
OnceDear*
AxelWolf
onenickelmiracle
SOOPOO
Boz
Dalex64
GWAE*
DJTeddyBear
sodawater*
* Commented in thread but never specifically said "in."
I would like to get this to around 40 people, preferably long-standing members we all know. More peer pressure that way.
