I've seen it reported as dull and not very interesting... Obama sticking to his standard messages and plans, and Romney hardly inspiring anyone, not least the "47%".
Quote: thecesspitI've only seen summaries, but interested on what the real Americans think... what's your general thoughts on the first presidential debate?
I've seen it reported as dull and not very interesting... Obama sticking to his standard messages and plans, and Romney hardly inspiring anyone, not least the "47%".
I didn't watch, but based on my twitter/facebook which leans strongly liberal democrat, Obama tried to stick to facts and reality and was thus pwned by Romney since he lives in la-la land and didn't provide any details or facts about his proposals and ideas (or when he used facts they were false).
Again, this was my perception of my friends' perceptions, not my opinion and certainly not the whole truth, as I mentioned the biases already.
Obama has gone 6 years on the national stage being coddled and never being challenged. Remember Hillary Clinton suggesting he should be asked if he wants a pillow for his chair? Well, last night that changed.
The analogy I have been using is from "Rocky IV" when Rocky cuts the Russian. The Russian is amazed, having been taught he was indestructible. Rocky's (nee Apollo Creed's) trainer uses it as motivation to tell Rocky the Russian in human, nothing more. The Russian's corner is in disbelief this can happen.
Last night, Romney cut Obama with a righ hook.
It was so one-sided that the lamestream media isn't even trying to say "Romeny probably won, but Obama did good by........" Instead we are hearing every excuse imaginable from the moderator to "thin air" in Denver. I am suprised nobody on Obama's team has blamed the guy who invented the TV, for if not for him it would not have been televised.
It will be Monday before all of this settles in the polls. With Ryan a heavy favorite against Biden, at best the Obama Team will be 2-2 in the debates. I look for Obama to overcorrect his style in the next one, similar to Gore in 2000.
Obama: -293
Romney: +259
I admit Romney won, but in my opinion it wasn't he the wipe-out everybody is making it look like. My two cents is that the market is overreacting, and this is a good time to buy Obama.
for president of the US. Obama debated like he was running
for president of his high school chess club. And like he forgot
to use the bathroom before it started. Standing on one leg,
fidgiting, constantly looking down scribbling notes, making it
seem like he didn't want to be there.
I'm sure he'll do better next time. He just has to act like he
wants to be president for 4 more years, which he obviously
doesn't.
Quote: NickyDimRomney was much better prepared, had much better ideas and completely lambasted the president. The most telling were the "fixes" Obama said were needed to the very same problems he said he had fixes for 4 years ago and Romney jumped all over them. One in particular about how Obama said he's done drastic things to reduce the deficit, yet Romney asked him then why has the deficit increased by a trillion each year he's been there, to which the prez had no answer.
Or put another way, Romney did the job the media was supposed to be doing for the last 4 years.
Romney could do so well, and Obama could do
so poorly. But nobody on the Right is surprised
at all. The Left makes up a bunch of lies, and
then believes them! Romney is dull, Romney is
unlikable, Romney can't communicate effectively.
Then they are flummoxed when none of it is true.
The Right knows Obama is totally lost without a
teleprompter, where he can mouth the words somebody
else wrote for him. Letting him speak on his own
about his own policies is a recipe for disaster. He
has no idea whats going on in his own WH, he
delegates all that to somebody else so he can play
golf.
He won, but I don't think he scored any likeability points.
Quote: FinsRuleYou think Romney was likeable in that debate?
He won, but I don't think he scored any likeability points.
In the CNN poll last night, Romney was more likable
than Obama. I never get why the Left says Romney
is unlikable. Obama is smug and arrogant and they
love him.
Quote: FinsRuleYou think Romney was likeable in that debate?
He won, but I don't think he scored any likeability points.
the snap polls after the debate has his likability at 56% which is higher than it has ever been
The air was too thin for Obama. Really? I mean, really?
Obama was so upset at FOX for playing that 2007 video
of him that he couldn't concentrate for fear of being taken
for an angry black man. Even though Obama has said many
times that neither him or Michelle ever watch the cable
news ahows.
That was not the 'real' Romney last night. It was the coached
and fake Romney, not the one who hates poor people, who
killed a man's wife at Bain, who has all his money in the Cayman
islands.
There'll be a lot more excuses coming, just give them time.
Quote: AZDuffmanInstead we are hearing every excuse imaginable from the moderator to "thin air" in Denver.
That Moderator sucked, I've detailed that in another thread. Romney won the Debate soundly and fairly, you Debate with the Moderator you have, but that guy sucked. The Debate was not at all enjoyable to watch because of that clown, and I have no concern with who wins the Debate or not. My vote is already set, unless the individual with whom I vote traded changes his vote.
Quote: vert1276
At least it would have prevented him from looking
down all the time. In debate class in college, looking
down was a big no-no. It means your not engaged
in what the other guy is saying, it looks like you're
not paying attention. But its very hard for Obama
to control his smirks and condecention, so I think
it was a defence mechanism to stop him from looking
like a total narcissistic dweeb. At least he didn't put
his head back and look down his nose at Romney,
thats my fave Obama pose.
Given that very-limited observation position, my impression was that Romney came across better. Obama's voice and sentence structure made it seem that he really wished that he had a teleprompter with his prepared answer in front of him. I have no idea whether Obama's "facts" or Romney's "facts" were more accurate, but the network analyst later covered two points and declared each candidate's claims as "Mostly False." Romney came across as more confident and his message came across as being more convincing, based on a shaky assumption that they were both telling the truth.
Quote: Mission146That Moderator sucked, I've detailed that in another thread. Romney won the Debate soundly and fairly, you Debate with the Moderator you have, but that guy sucked. The Debate was not at all enjoyable to watch because of that clown, and I have no concern with who wins the Debate or not. My vote is already set, unless the individual with whom I vote traded changes his vote.
The point is the Obama people ate blaming the moderator just as a poor football coach blames bad weather. The reply then is "the other team had to play on it too." Romney had the same moderator.
Quote: AZDuffmanThe point is the Obama people ate blaming the moderator just as a poor football coach blames bad weather. The reply then is "the other team had to play on it too." Romney had the same moderator.
You can be a decent football coach and reasonably blame the weather, if you're a pass-heavy team going up against a rush-heavy team in heavy winds, then you will be at a comparative (to fair weather) disadvantage.
Sometimes weather is an explanation, not an excuse.
In this case, however, I agree that the complete and total sucktitude of this Moderator should not have had an impact on either opponent. None that I can think of, anyway.
Quote: s2dbakerThe only people tying Obama's performance to the suckitude of Jim Lehrer are the conservatards. I thought Obama did just fine.
I guess that says it all. Conservatards? Is somebody
upset that the smartest president we've ever had
can't think on his feet? Just wait, there's two more
debates to go. Maybe next time Obama will do a little
better than he did in Clint Eastwood's empty chair. But
I'm not betting on it..
Quote: EvenBob
But its very hard for Obama
to control his smirks and condecention, so I think
it was a defence mechanism to stop him from looking
like a total narcissistic dweeb.
Bob, when you choose to be condescending, and use the word itself in your diatribe, please at least spell the word correctly... http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/condescension
Sensitive much?Quote: EvenBobI guess that says it all. Conservatards?
Like I said above, Obama did just fine.Quote: EvenBobIs somebody upset that the smartest president we've ever had can't think on his feet?
To which I am thoroughly looking forward.Quote: EvenBobJust wait, there's two more debates to go.
Watching Mitt Romney lose a debate to that empty chair was awesome. By the way, the first polling results are out and Mitt Romney has taken the lead!! Okay, not really. Actually it shows that among independent voters, Obama gained support and among the conservatards, Romney gained support. Democrats still support Obama.Quote: EvenBobMaybe next time Obama will do a little better than he did in Clint Eastwood's empty chair. But I'm not betting on it..
Quote: midwestgbplease at least spell the word correctly..
Nope, I don't want to.
Bush in all 3 debates in 2004. Bush was ahead by 11
points before the 1st debate and ahead by only 3 at
the end of the 3rd debate. Obama and Romney were
very close in the polls before the 1st debate, it will
be interesting to see what happens. Thats why Kerry
was Obama's debate coach, he whipped the crap out
of Bush.
The 2nd debate is a town hall meeting, one on one with
the audience, something thats not Obama's strong
suit. He tends to insert his foot in his mouth all the way
up to the knee when he has to talk off the cuff. Romney
is super in these settings, so this will have a lot of
scrutiny from the media. They're already fabricating
excuses for Obama, I'm sure.
IMO, an event that could be much more of a trouble spot for the president could be the job numbers on Friday. Poor Jobs numbers with an unexpected spike in Unemployment could be a game changer. But, it would need to be a spike. 8.1 to 8.3%, while high, and unacceptable to most folks, has already been figured into the equation.
Quote: kewljMr Romney is a long-shot. Not just an underdog, but a long-shot.
For a long shot, the Lib's were sure upset last night
and today. Hysterical and despondent about covers
it. They were coming unglued and its still going on.
Why, if Romney winning is such a 'long shot', as you seem
to think? Why indeed...
Quote: Mission146It is to be expected. Even if we accept as true that Romney is a long-shot, (and I would personally put him as better than a long-shot, but worse than merely an underdog) I think that the Liberals considered him, "No shot," prior to the Debate, so any shot is worse. I don't think that very many people who did not already think Obama was going to lose do so now, it just got upgraded to a remote possibility from, "When Hell freezes over."
That's basically correct. The libs wanted an early knockout. Wanted the race to be over. Wanted to be on the way to a huge Obama win, where coattails would result in not only keeping control of the senate, but the longer odds possibility of taking back the house. That probably was never going to happen. And many folks think this a good thing. They think it best when one chamber remains in each party control.
Now speaking of hell freezing over...in watching the president speak in Colorado today before heading out, I couldn't help but notice everyone bundled in thick coats as if in the dead of winter. Poor saps. It's still summertime here in Vegas. Almost touched 100 yesterday, topping out officially at 99 degrees. They say that will be the last time we approach 100 this year. The forecast is for beautiful 80 degree weather for the next 10 days, so while I don't own a winter coat, no need to think about breaking out even the long pants for a while. :) I feel sad for folks where winter is well under way in early october.
Quote: kewljI feel sad for folks where winter is well under way in early october.
Where's that, Nome AK? You think winter is 'well underway'
on Oct 4th anywhere in the lower 48 because you saw some
people with coats on? Here's the temps for tomorrow across
the nation. And this is winter to you?
Atlanta, GA 76 Los Angeles, CA 72
Boston, MA 59 Miami, FL 84
Chicago, IL 62 New York, NY 73
Dallas, TX 85 Omaha, NE 56
Denver, CO 48 Phoenix, AZ 98
Detroit, MI 71 Pittsburgh, PA 70
Las Vegas, NV 92 Seattle, WA 64
Quote: kewljWhat about, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming....all places with highs in the 40's today. )
High 40's is winter? In Jan, if it hits the high 40's,
people wear shorts and tee shirts to the store. Its
a heat wave. You think I'm joking?
I think this pronouncement of liberal pearl clutching by the conservatives amounts to a lot of wishful self deception. I didn't encounter any liberals that were "hysterical", "despondent" or "coming unglued". I think Obama did just fine. On MSNBC last night, Chris Matthews seems a little disappointed that Obama didn't call Romney out on more of his lies than he did but Matthew's assessment was far from "coming unglued".Quote: EvenBobFor a long shot, the Lib's were sure upset last night
and today. Hysterical and despondent about covers
it. They were coming unglued and its still going on.
Why, if Romney winning is such a 'long shot', as you seem
to think? Why indeed...
If Bob wants to think that liberals are gnashing teeth and rending cloth, I see no harm in it but like most things in conservativeworld, it's just not true.
Quote: s2dbakerI think this is pronouncement of liberal pearl clutching by the conservatives amounts to a lot of wishful self deception..
This from the NYT:
"..Romney's path to victory remains extremely difficult to map.
And if he gains more than three points.. then a lot of
conservatives will start tuning in to MSNBC just for the schadenfreude."
Even some of the Lib pundits are predicting a 5-7
point bump. But not to worry, everybody knows
Romney is a 'long shot' and the Lib's are just
laughing it off and already spending all the money
they bet on Obama.
http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/04/a-rout-and-its-consequences/
Quote: NareedI think it's really cute how people think it makes much of a difference who wins.
You're right, no difference between Carter and Reagan.
No difference between Dole and Clinton. Kerry and
Bush. Why vote, they're all identical. I think its really
cute how clueless some people are when it comes
to politics.
Quote: NareedI think it's really cute how people think it makes much of a difference who wins.
I don't really appreciate the patronizing.
But hey, it's really great to have you back.
Quote: NareedI think it's really cute how people think it makes much of a difference who wins.
It makes a huge difference, there are bets riding on it all over the place!
Quote: Mission146It makes a huge difference, there are bets riding on it all over the place!
It makes a difference, in that sense.
For a huge difference, in that sense, try the Super Bowl :P
Quote: thecesspit. what's your general thoughts on the first presidential debate?
Didn't see it.
Don't plan on watching the others.
Don't much give a damn.
Al Gore blames Obama's poor debate performance on the altitude. I believe that global warming may also have been having an effect on Obama.
Bill Maher's comments said it best, "Obama made a lot of great points tonight, unfortunately most of them were for Romney."
NONE OF THE ABOVE.
Throw out the Socialist, and the Pro-Wealthy, and try again.
No one has yet said increase the SS tax, and level the income tax.