Quote: beachbumbabsLusciousSweet2 and Blackjackpro have both been suspended as socks of Nathan.
No way.. I cant believe they were. Wow how will I be tricked next ;-)
Quote: beachbumbabsLusciousSweet2 and Blackjackpro have both been suspended as socks of Nathan.
Not even a pair of matching socks :)
Then again, I have no clue why anyone would have ever doubted me.
So SAD DarkOz and whomever else gave me grief regarding this situation.
p.s. SAD doesn't stand for Suck A D*ck, unless of course...
Quote: GWAENo way.. I cant believe they were. Wow how will I be tricked next ;-)
I’m stunned honestly, I mean they way they interacted with each other I never thought they could all be Nathan. 🤣
Nathan’s getting too smart GWAE
Quote: AxelWolfCOMPLETE.....
Then again, I have no clue why anyone would have ever doubted me.
So SAD DarkOz and whomever else gave me grief regarding this situation.
p.s. SAD doesn't stand for Suck A D*ck, unless of course...
I still believe in the innocent till proven guilty ethos.
I didn't find your evidence compelling
Obviously you were right in the end kudos.
Sometimes circumstantial evidence ia correct. Sometimes its not
For the most part when somebody keeps getting the same thing right over, and over, and over again, it's no longer a situation where I just happened to be right in the end. My evidence was solid if one was smart enough to just realize it. The pine street reference thing just could not be coincidental in this situation. That was just one very small piece of the evidence. I didnt need much evidence, it was clear as day to me after a few posts. Your biggest clue should have been the fact that I said so.Quote: darkozQuote: AxelWolfCOMPLETE.....
Then again, I have no clue why anyone would have ever doubted me.
So SAD DarkOz and whomever else gave me grief regarding this situation.
p.s. SAD doesn't stand for Suck A D*ck, unless of course...
I still believe in the innocent till proven guilty ethos.
I didn't find your evidence compelling
Obviously you were right in the end kudos.
Sometimes circumstantial evidence ia correct. Sometimes its not
Quote: AxelWolfFor the most part when somebody keeps getting the same thing right over, and over, and over again, it's no longer a situation where I just happened to be right in the end. My evidence was solid if one was smart enough to just realize it. The pine street reference thing just could not be coincidental in this situation. That was just one very small piece of the evidence. I didnt need much evidence, it was clear as day to me after a few posts. Your biggest clue should have been the fact that I said so.Quote: darkozQuote: AxelWolfCOMPLETE.....
Then again, I have no clue why anyone would have ever doubted me.
So SAD DarkOz and whomever else gave me grief regarding this situation.
p.s. SAD doesn't stand for Suck A D*ck, unless of course...
I still believe in the innocent till proven guilty ethos.
I didn't find your evidence compelling
Obviously you were right in the end kudos.
Sometimes circumstantial evidence ia correct. Sometimes its not
Well lawd sakes, no need for mods or trials anymore.
Prosecutor Axelwolf has 90% track record. Put those murderers in jail without a trial
If he says they guilty, then they's guilty!!!
Quote: ChumpChangeNobody puts Nathan in a corner.
Haha that was excellent.
Quote: beachbumbabsLusciousSweet2 and Blackjackpro have both been suspended as socks of Nathan.
Interesting. Well not really, but what else is there to talk about today in this forum?
Quote: MDawgInteresting. Well not really, but what else is there to talk about today in this forum?
Other current members who are socks of banned folks?
Quote: rdw4potusOther current members who are socks of banned folks?
I wish I had the skills to pick up on who are socks.
I’m only able to detect Nathan and Buzz. The easy ones.
Quote: michael99000I wish I had the skills to pick up on who are socks.
Usually I'm not aware of them either, but as I gain experience reading this and other forums, I'm able to view things from a different anGLE Now.
This is a true statement.Quote: darkozQuote: AxelWolfFor the most part when somebody keeps getting the same thing right over, and over, and over again, it's no longer a situation where I just happened to be right in the end. My evidence was solid if one was smart enough to just realize it. The pine street reference thing just could not be coincidental in this situation. That was just one very small piece of the evidence. I didnt need much evidence, it was clear as day to me after a few posts. Your biggest clue should have been the fact that I said so.Quote: darkozQuote: AxelWolfCOMPLETE.....
Then again, I have no clue why anyone would have ever doubted me.
So SAD DarkOz and whomever else gave me grief regarding this situation.
p.s. SAD doesn't stand for Suck A D*ck, unless of course...
I still believe in the innocent till proven guilty ethos.
I didn't find your evidence compelling
Obviously you were right in the end kudos.
Sometimes circumstantial evidence ia correct. Sometimes its not
Well lawd sakes, no need for mods or trials anymore.
Prosecutor Axelwolf has 90% track record. Put those murderers in jail without a trial
If he says they guilty, then they's guilty!!!
For some reason I can't ever pick up on Buzz, but that's probably because I'm not looking. Most of the time he let's me know it's him anyway.Quote: michael99000I wish I had the skills to pick up on who are socks.
I’m only able to detect Nathan and Buzz. The easy ones.
If he is posting now I have no clue who he is. (-;
Go buzz go!!!
Quote: rxwineAms out of jail yet?
Thank you, yes, he is now. My to-do list is massive today and I forgot to check the list, so the timely reminder is much appreciated.
Quote: beachbumbabsThank you, yes, he is now. My to-do list is massive today and I forgot to check the list, so the timely reminder is much appreciated.
Youu could have put that last on the list.🙄
Quote: rxwineAms out of jail yet?
Thanks! I’ve got a live trip report I wanna start.
Quote: ams288Thanks! I’ve got a live trip report I wanna start.
good I like live reports. I have done a few before but didnt get much traction so I stopped. Although mine are boring and with kids and no drinking or gambling.
Quote: rxwineAms out of jail yet?
I would have said nothing for weeks
just see who noticed he was gone.
Quote: RSI hereby put in a motion to decrease MaxPen's suspension to only 5 days, to be unsuspended today. I think his light-hearted joke about an epidemic in Africa (AIDS) shouldn't have this harsh of a penalty. This is only a request from a simple meme farmer. I know....it ain't much, but it's honest work.
He deserved 7.
Any other righties feel like implying I have AIDs and I will make sure they get suspended too.
Quote: RSI hereby put in a motion to decrease MaxPen's suspension to only 5 days, to be unsuspended today. I think his light-hearted joke about an epidemic in Africa (AIDS) shouldn't have this harsh of a penalty. This is only a request from a simple meme farmer. I know....it ain't much, but it's honest work.
Granted. Not for the reason you list, but because 5 is sufficient for the double offense in context of the discussion in which it occurred.
Quote: ams288He deserved 7.
Any other righties feel like implying I have AIDs and I will make sure they get suspended too.
Broke my vow to stay away in support of Max to 2nd RS’s suggestion.
And Thanks for admitting you have and will continue to push for suspensions when you are “offended”
And I don’t think Max was saying YOU personally have AIDS, he was just being a good gambling playing the odds and saying IF a member here did, the odds are you would be a candidate based on your life choices in a historical higher risk group.
Luckily you live in a country where we have spent the research dollars to find a cure or means of controlling this horrible disease. And hopefully you understand the money spent on finding cures will be reduced when you get your “free” HC for everyone.
Quote: BozBroke my vow to stay away in support of Max to 2nd RS’s suggestion.
And Thanks for admitting you have and will continue to push for suspensions when you are “offended”
And I don’t think Max was saying YOU personally have AIDS, he was just being a good gambling playing the odds and saying IF a member here did, the odds are you would be a candidate based on your life choices in a historical higher risk group.
Luckily you live in a country where we have spent the research dollars to find a cure of means of controlling this horrible disease. And hopefully you understand the money spent on finding cures will be reduced when you get your “free” HC for everyone.
That's a lot of BS spin, Boz. He wrote 1 word, directed at ams288. Fact. Rude and personal. Deliberate provocation. I investigated it with him, so it's not me guessing. Don't gaslight us with this kind of nonsense.
A shout out to Boz for acknowledging the double standard and engaging in an act of solidarity. Thank you.
Quote: ams288
Any other righties feel like implying I have AIDs
Now why would anybody ever do
that. Oh, I remember. Never mind..
Quote: billryanI certainly hope you return the favor when he is next suspended.
Panties in a bunch?
Quote: BozAnd I don’t think Max was saying YOU personally have AIDS, he was just being a good gambling playing the odds and saying IF a member here did, the odds are you would be a candidate based on your life choices in a historical higher risk group.
There is so much ignorance in this statement.........
Quote: ams288He deserved 7.
Any other righties feel like implying I have AIDs and I will make sure they get suspended too.
I am not a rightie, but would this also apply if someone accuses you of being HIV positive?
Quote: DRichI am not a rightie, but would this also apply if someone accuses you of being HIV positive?
I suspect anyone who would make such an accusation on this board would be doing it out of ignorance and malice, so yeah, I'd say so.
But I've said it before: I'm on PrEP. The odds of me getting HIV are extremely low to nonexistent. So anyone who wants to try to take swipes at me over that is wasting their time.
Quote: ams288I suspect anyone who would make such an accusation on this board would be doing it out of ignorance and malice, so yeah, I'd say so.
But I've said it before: I'm on PrEP. The odds of me getting HIV are extremely low to nonexistent. So anyone who wants to try to take swipes at me over that is wasting their time.
I never heard of PrEP until just now. Good for you for taking precautions.
Quote: DRichI am not a rightie, but would this also apply if someone accuses you of being HIV positive?
I remember when there was no AIDS,
in the 70's. The Gays I knew would
have sex with anybody every day.
Then around 81, there was a rumor
of some 'Gay disease' going around.
The guys who came in my bar laughed
and joked about it constantly, it
didn't slow them down one bit. I left
in 82 and never saw them after their
buddies started dropping dead. I bet
they quit laughing..
Quote: EvenBobI remember when there was no AIDS, in the 70's.
There was AIDS in the 70s. And 60s. And 50s. And 40s.......
nor have I, I was thinking that might have something to do with being a top or bottom.Quote: DRichI never heard of PrEP until just now. Good for you for taking precautions.
Quote: rsactuaryThere was AIDS in the 70s. And 60s. And 50s. And 40s.......
Not really. The virus was traced to the mid-1970s and it did not jump to developed nations in the early 1980s.
Quote: rsactuaryThere was AIDS in the 70s. And 60s. And 50s. And 40s.......
Yeah, not really.
"While sporadic cases of AIDS were documented prior to 1970, available data suggests that the current epidemic started in the mid- to late 1970s. By 1980, HIV may have already spread to five continents (North America, South America, Europe, Africa and Australia)"
Quote: rsactuaryThere was AIDS in the 70s. And 60s. And 50s. And 40s.......
You're right.
Quote: WikipediaThe earliest well-documented case of HIV in a human dates back to 1959 in the Congo.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS.
It also says, "Specific proposed high-risk transmission channels, allowing the virus to adapt to humans and spread throughout the society, depend on the proposed timing of the animal-to-human crossing. Genetic studies of the virus suggest that the most recent common ancestor of the HIV-1 M group dates back to circa 1910."
AIDS has been in non-human primates for much longer, who are immune to it.
Quote: WizardYou're right.
We're talking about in public
consciousness, not how long
the disease has been around.
Before the early 80's almost
nobody had heard of it. So it's
been in the world for a thousand
years, who cared.
I motion to have you BANNED considering the fact that I think you ARE Tasha / Nathan.Quote: blackjack4everFollowing in RS_ footsteps, if we are motioning to shorten "prison sentences", I motion to shorten KewlJ's sentence to 1245 days. :)