Face up vs Face Down Pai Gow
Quote: flgamblerI would love to hear everyone’s thoughts on Face Up Pai Gow vs Face Down Pai Gow. I’ve never played face down but I’m assuming it has a lower house edge because of the A high Push? Or is it just lower because face up has the side bet. Thoughts?
link to original post
Very similar. I can’t remember which is higher!
But I’m SURE there are many more player strategy errors on face down, which will add to the casino’s take.
For players like me, I’ve made $$$ on dealer’s errors . There are numerous threads here discussing the ethics of such.
Not impossible, but certainly fewer player and dealer errors on face up.
If you don’t want to think at all, baccarat has a lower house edge than face up.
I like the occasional strategy decision in face down, especially when seeing other cards changes the necessary strategy.
Quote: acesideI also played a commission-free pai gow poker, in which a dealer queen high hand is a push. The house edge is higher than face-up Pai Gow poker.
link to original post
Invented by a deceased member, lovingly known as PaiGowDan.
Quote: acesideIn all these versions of Pai Gow poker, the joker card is partially wild, meaning it can be used as an Ace or a wild card to complete a straight or flush. I want a version in which the joker is fully wild.
link to original post
The main game would only be trivially affected with regards to house edge. Since house and player get the joker equally. But the bonus bet paytables would need to be totally changed.
Quote: acesideIn all the versions I played, side bets are based on all player seven cards. This is too simple. I want the side bets be based on the high hand five cards only.
link to original post
That would eliminate the really big jackpot type hands like 7 card straight flush, royal flush with royal match, perfect low, etc…
Some of the side bet players don’t want to give up that dream.
Quote: acesideTo renovate this game even further, I propose they get ride of this peculiar rule: a dealer Ace high hand is an automatic push, instead, make it mandatory for the 5-card poker hand side bet.
link to original post
The ace high push rule is what gives the casino its small house edge. It counteracts the huge edge the player would have when seeing the dealer’s hand before setting his own hand.
I don’t think ‘regular’ face down Pai Gow poker needs any renovating at all.
Quote: acesideIn all the versions I played, side bets are based on all player seven cards. This is too simple. I want the side bets be based on the high hand five cards only.
link to original post
Look up "Jackpot Pai Gow". In Jackpot, you have to keep your bonus in the high hand. The tradeoff is if you have a bonus in the high hand with a pair in the low hand, it doubles the payout. The biggest hand was I think a Royal Flush with Aces up.
Remarkably low house edge on that side bet, but I imagine everyone hated it because they couldn't set their hand to win.
Quote: DeucekiesQuote: acesideIn all the versions I played, side bets are based on all player seven cards. This is too simple. I want the side bets be based on the high hand five cards only.
link to original post
Look up "Jackpot Pai Gow". In Jackpot, you have to keep your bonus in the high hand. The tradeoff is if you have a bonus in the high hand with a pair in the low hand, it doubles the payout. The biggest hand was I think a Royal Flush with Aces up.
Remarkably low house edge on that side bet, but I imagine everyone hated it because they couldn't set their hand to win.
link to original post
If you play the main game optimally, the house edge on the side bet is usurious. I played it decades ago. (I didn’t play the side bet, but others did). I remember feeling bad for players keeping a flush when having two high pair, or keeping a full house together. Abysmal game when you need to hurt your main hand to win a bonus.
I imagine the house edge at Four Queens is higher with the 2+ rule, than with the A-high rule elsewhere (1.80% edge (found at WoO)).
My question: is there any place where this house edge has been documented? Very curious. Thanks,
Quote: IndyJeffreyAt Four Queens, there is a version where player loses when the dealer has 2+ Jacks. This replaces the "push with dealer A high"
I imagine the house edge at Four Queens is higher with the 2+ rule, than with the A-high rule elsewhere (1.80% edge (found at WoO)).
My question: is there any place where this house edge has been documented? Very curious. Thanks,
link to original post
Although WoO lists a house edge of 1.8% for face-up Pai Gow, I'm still not so confident about this number. When I played this game, I felt the house edge was higher than 1.8% when dealer used its electronic house way.
Quote: harrisAre Jackpot Pai Gow and Pot of Gold the only side bets that encourage sub-optimal basic strategy?
link to original post
Apparently not.
Quote: acesideI felt the house edge was higher than 1.8% when dealer used its electronic house way.
While this could have just been a streak of bad luck, do you think it's possible that the dealer was using a house way that's more advanced than the initial one they had dealers using before the electronic assistance? There is basically nothing stopping the casino from using a 100-page hyper-complex House Way to reach exact optimal strategy. In some other thread I was lamenting how House Ways aren't always public, and I see how your experience illustrates how the status quo regarding the legality of secret House Ways can create distrust in players.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong (very unlikely) but I don't think the dealer using an even more optimal house way could change the house edge by more than 1%.
