Perhaps I miss understand..
Your post im quoting is worded funny.
Are you laying 5 to 1 saying he will go over 70% in this contest?
The Week 15 Lines are as follows:
Dolphins (+7.5) @ Vikings (-7.5) O/U 44.5
Raiders (+3) @ Bengals (-3) O/U 46
Buccaneers (+7.5) @ Ravens (-7.5) O/U 46.5
Cowboys (+3) @ Colts (-3) O/U 47
Lions (+2) @ Bills (-2) O/U 39.5
Packers (+6) @ Bears (-6) O/U 45
Titans (+2) @ Giants (-2) O/U 43.5
Redskins (+7.5) @ Jaguars (-7.5) O/U 36
Cardinals (+9.5) @ Falcons (-9.5) O/U 44
Seahawks (-3.5) @ 49ers (+3.5) O/U 44
Patriots (-2.5) @ Steelers (+2.5) O/U 52
Eagles (+11) @ Rams (-11) O/U 52.5
Saints (-6) @ Panthers (+6) O/U 51.5
Should have waited until there was a bet with Djatc before you put up stale lines.Quote: Mission146Greetings!
The Week 15 Lines are as follows:
Dolphins (+7.5) @ Vikings (-7.5) O/U 44.5
Raiders (+3) @ Bengals (-3) O/U 46
Buccaneers (+7.5) @ Ravens (-7.5) O/U 46.5
Cowboys (+3) @ Colts (-3) O/U 47
Lions (+2) @ Bills (-2) O/U 39.5
Packers (+6) @ Bears (-6) O/U 45
Titans (+2) @ Giants (-2) O/U 43.5
Redskins (+7.5) @ Jaguars (-7.5) O/U 36
Cardinals (+9.5) @ Falcons (-9.5) O/U 44
Seahawks (-3.5) @ 49ers (+3.5) O/U 44
Patriots (-2.5) @ Steelers (+2.5) O/U 52
Eagles (+11) @ Rams (-11) O/U 52.5
Saints (-6) @ Panthers (+6) O/U 51.5
Should have waited until there was a bet with Djatc before you put up stale lines.Quote: Mission146Greetings!
The Week 15 Lines are as follows:
Dolphins (+7.5) @ Vikings (-7.5) O/U 44.5
Raiders (+3) @ Bengals (-3) O/U 46
Buccaneers (+7.5) @ Ravens (-7.5) O/U 46.5
Cowboys (+3) @ Colts (-3) O/U 47
Lions (+2) @ Bills (-2) O/U 39.5
Packers (+6) @ Bears (-6) O/U 45
Titans (+2) @ Giants (-2) O/U 43.5
Redskins (+7.5) @ Jaguars (-7.5) O/U 36
Cardinals (+9.5) @ Falcons (-9.5) O/U 44
Seahawks (-3.5) @ 49ers (+3.5) O/U 44
Patriots (-2.5) @ Steelers (+2.5) O/U 52
Eagles (+11) @ Rams (-11) O/U 52.5
Saints (-6) @ Panthers (+6) O/U 51.5
Here is what I would like to know.
Without stale lines, what percentage would DJ have gotten?
I have no doubt he would have still done well, however, I would love to know what would happen with non stale lines.
To anyone else makeing picks based on stale lines. Assuming that's not possible.
Let me ask you a question. What side do you pick and why?
Impoasible to say. He wasn’t tested against current lines.Quote: AxelWolfShould have waited until there was a bet with Djatc before you put up stale lines.
Here is what I would like to know.
Without stale lines, what percentage would DJ have gotten?
I have no doubt he would have still done well, however, I would love to know what would happen with non stale lines.
Quote: AxelWolfShould have waited until there was a bet with Djatc before you put up stale lines.
Here is what I would like to know.
Without stale lines, what percentage would DJ have gotten..
I have no doubt he would have still done well, however I would love to know what would happen with non stale lines.
I can't wait, I'm already fully expecting someone to yell at me for being 28 minutes and sixteen seconds late.
As far as how he would have done against fresh lines, it's not material to this game. Just about every game of this nature is played with fixed lines, if not, I'd have to verify the Lines for every single Pick as of the time each player submitted the Picks. That would take forever!
Would have snap bet the Rams -9.5 but news got out that the Eagles QB is out so it moved to 11 :(
The Week 15 Picks are as follows:
Bruce1:
Buccaneers UNDER 46.5
Packers OVER 45
Patriots OVER 52 CONFIDENCE
Rams (-11)
Saints OVER 51.5
MaxPen:
Vikings -7.5
Ravens -7.5
Jaguars -7.5
Falcons -9.5 - CONFIDENCE
Rams -11
DJATC:
Bills -2
Packers OVER45
Patriots OVER52 - CONFIDENCE
Rams -11
Saints UNDER51.5
JohnZimbo:
Colts -3 confidence
Packers +6
Titans +2
Vikings -7.5
Rams -11
MidwestAP:
Buccaneers +7.5
Packers +6 - Confidence
Cardinals +9.5
49ers +3.5
Eagles +11
unJon:
Ravens -7.5
Bears OVER 45
Titans +2
Falcons -9.5
Steelers OVER 52-confidence
Gwae:
Cowboys (+3)
49ers (+3.5)
Steelers (+2.5)
Steelers under 52
Eagles (+11) confidence
RisingDough:
Raiders+3
Bears-6
Titans+2
Seahawks-3.5
Panthers+6
miplet:
Ravens -7.5
Bills -2
Packers +6
Titans +2-confidence
Rams -11
Sparty10k:
Raiders under 46
Cowboys +3
Bills-2– confidence
Titans +2
Seahawks -3.5
BeachBumBabs:
Saints -6 - confidence
Patriots -2.5
Lions +2
Packers +6
Rams -11
EdCollins:
Cowboys +3
49ers +3.5
Giants -2
Lions +2
Bengals -3
Gordonm888:
Bengals -3
Ravens -7.5
Colts -3
Patriots -2.5
Saints -6
scolist:
Bills -2
Bears -6
Seahawks -3.5
Saints -6
Patriots -2.5
PlayYourCardsRight:
Dolphins +7.5
Titans +2
Patriots -2.5
Colts -3
Bengals -3
Prozema:
Packers +6
Titans +2
Falcons -9.5 Confidence
Patriots Over 52
Rams -11
FourFiveFace:
Dolphins +7.5
Buccaneers +7.5
Redskins +7.5
Cardinals +9.5
Eagles +11-Confidence
SOOPOO:
Dolphins +7.5 Confidence
Lions +2
Eagles +11
Panthers +6
Bucs +7.5
JohnnyQ:
Bengals (-3)
Bills (-2)
Giants (-2)
Patriots (-2.5) confidence
Eagles (+11)
Terapined:
Bucs +7.5
Jags -7.5
Eagles +11
Cards +9.5
Bucs under
GenWyzgy:
Cowboys +3
Falcons -9.5
Steelers OVER 52
Lions +2
Bears -6
AyeCarumba:
Colts -3
Redskins UNDER 36
49ers +3.5 - Confidence
Patriots OVER 52
Panthers +6
Onenickelmiracle:
Eagles +11
Bills -2
Dolphins +7.5 confidence
Jaguars -7.5
Titans +2
Michael99000:
Dolphins UNDER 44.5
Raiders OVER 46
Buccaneers OVER 46.5
Cowboys OVER 47
Lions OVER 39.5 CONFIDENCE
Romes:
Falcons -9.5
Rams -11
Vikings -7.5
Ravens -7.5
Patriots UNDER 52 CONFIDENCE
Joeman:
Jaguars UNDER 36
Bears -6
Ravens -7.5
Redskins +7.5
Seahawks -3.5 -Confidence
IndyJeffrey:
Cowboys +3
Titans +2
Steelers +2.5
Steelers OVER 52-CONFIDENCE
Rams -11
Odiousgambit:
Titans +2
Vikings over 44.5
Bengals under 46
49ers +3.5
Panthers +6
Troopscott:
Vikings OVER 44.5
Bengals OVER 46
Ravens OVER 46.5
Colts OVER 47
Bills OVER 39.5
Wizard:
Dolphins +7.5-CONFIDENCE
Raiders +3
Buccaneers +7.5
Cowboys +3
Packers +6
Rigondeaux:
Dolphins +7.5
Colts -3
Bills -2
Bengals -3
Bears -6
Missing are Kuma, Fleastiff and JW17. A cursory search for Default Picks turned up nothing, (whereas three other missing players did have Default Picks) but if any of them say they have Default Picks, I'll look for them more thoroughly.
Should be fun. Will definitely have a big effect on the group no matter which way it goes. 9 Rams 8 Eagles incl. confidence.
Quote: beachbumbabsI don't know how anyone could stay away from that Eagles/Rams line. I certainly couldn't resist.
Should be fun. Will definitely have a big effect on the group no matter which way it goes. 9 Rams 8 Eagles incl. confidence.
You know the its gonna finish 31 - 20
Greetings!
I want to let everyone know, at the conclusion of this season, I will be putting up a voting thread with proposed changes to the game for next year. I assume that I am going to go ahead and run it again since only one player expresses any real discontentment with the whole thing.
Suggestions to move any aspect of this game off-site will not be entertained or voted upon, so please have some mercy on your fingertips by not wasting your time typing anything to that effect.
Aside from that, please make any proposal you like with respect to this game and it will likely be considered for voting.
Default Picks
The one thing that I will say is that Default Picks, such as they have been, are over after this season. I am considering replacing Default Picks with one of the following three things:
1.) No Default Picks, but players will get TWO Skip Weeks per season.
2.) No Default Picks and only ONE Skip Week per season, but I must send PM reminders every Saturday all season long.
3.) Default Picks shall consist of the OVER in the first five games listed for all players and at all times. Players will still have one Skip Week, but a player must specifically send a PM stating that he/she is using that Skip Week, otherwise, Default Picks will be used.
NOTE---If we go with either of the first two options, in my capacity as Commissioner, I will consider allowing Default Picks for a player for a finite amount of time in the event of an extenuating circumstance, such as leaving the country. These Defaut Picks, if granted, will consist of making Picks ahead of time specific to the weeks being played. In other words, one couldn't say, "First five favorites," one would just have to make Picks as if the Lines had already been posted.
Anyway, that is one item that will be put to a vote. One way or another, Default Picks are gone such as they are now, but everyone will have the chance to vote on one of those three options in the separate thread at the end of the season.
THE PERFECT BOUNTY
Players have expressed interest in a Perfect Week bounty earlier in this thread and I think that is an excellent idea. It would give people a reason to continue playing throughout the season even if it looks like they are out of the main prizes and/or Consolation prizes.
The way I understand the suggestion is like this:
-If a player solely has a Perfect Week, then that player is paid the bounty for that week as well as any accumulated bounty to that point. For these purposes, a 6-0 record will be considered superior to a 5-0 record.
-If two players share a Perfect Week with the same number of wins, then the Perfect Week bounty for that week and any accumulated bounties shall be awarded to those players and split by the number of players.
-If there is no Perfect Week bounty winner for Week 17 as well as any weeks prior to Week 17, all accumulated Perfect Week bounty will be divided evenly amongst 1st/2nd/3rd Place finishers.
Perfect Week Bounty Question
What we will want to put to a vote is whether the Perfect Week Bounty should be an add-on optional type of thing, or whether it should be cut out of the Entry Fee for the game. What I was thinking is we could do either of the following:
1.) Take $5 of the existing $25 Entry Fee for the game and apply it to the Perfect Week Bounty, applying the remaining Entry Fees to 1st/2nd/3rd Places as normal.
Whatever is decided, there will be NO CHANGE to the base Entry Fee of one Green chip. That's about as high as I ever want it to get.
OR:
2.) Make the Perfect Week Bounty an optional $10 add-on with the only players concerned with it being those who contributed the $10. This $10 would be in addition to the $25 Entry Fee, so a player wanting to do it would pay $35. In the event of no Perfect Week in Week 17 and any weeks leading up to that, the Perfect Week Bounty player with the best overall record would automatically be rewarded any accumulated bounty.
***For the purpose of simplicity, as with other prizes, the Perfect Week Bounty winnings would not be paid out until the end of the season.
Please submit any other proposals you may have.
I have always thought the DEFAULTS should be easy for the COMMISH to manage. This sounds like it would be.Quote: mission146
3.) Default Picks shall consist of the OVER in the first five games listed for all players and at all times. Players will still have one Skip Week, but a player must specifically send a PM stating that he/she is using that Skip Week, otherwise, Default Picks will be used.
I like this concept too. Wouldn't it be easier to administer if it applied to everyone and was not an optional add-on ?Quote: mission146THE PERFECT BOUNTY
Players have expressed interest in a Perfect Week bounty earlier in this thread and I think that is an excellent idea. It would give people a reason to continue playing throughout the season even if it looks like they are out of the main prizes and/or Consolation prizes.
Quote: JohnnyQHue Jackson Cleveland Browns Award percentage for 6-7-1 is currently at 0.464
It will be a fundamental failing of ownership if Gregg Williams is not named HC at the end of this season.
Quote: JohnnyQI have always thought the DEFAULTS should be easy for the COMMISH to manage. This sounds like it would be.
Thanks! It would be very easy to do.
Quote:I like this concept too. Wouldn't it be easier to administer if it applied to everyone and was not an optional add-on ?
It would be, but an add-on wouldn't be terribly hard to manage, either. I would just maintain a list of qualifying players for the bounty and then it's just a matter of looking and seeing if any of them had a perfect week.
Quote: Mission146VOTING
Greetings!
I want to let everyone know, at the conclusion of this season, I will be putting up a voting thread with proposed changes to the game for next year. I assume that I am going to go ahead and run it again since only one player expresses any real discontentment with the whole thing.
Suggestions to move any aspect of this game off-site will not be entertained or voted upon, so please have some mercy on your fingertips by not wasting your time typing anything to that effect.
Aside from that, please make any proposal you like with respect to this game and it will likely be considered for voting.
Default Picks
The one thing that I will say is that Default Picks, such as they have been, are over after this season. I am considering replacing Default Picks with one of the following three things:
1.) No Default Picks, but players will get TWO Skip Weeks per season.
2.) No Default Picks and only ONE Skip Week per season, but I must send PM reminders every Saturday all season long.
3.) Default Picks shall consist of the OVER in the first five games listed for all players and at all times. Players will still have one Skip Week, but a player must specifically send a PM stating that he/she is using that Skip Week, otherwise, Default Picks will be used.
NOTE---If we go with either of the first two options, in my capacity as Commissioner, I will consider allowing Default Picks for a player for a finite amount of time in the event of an extenuating circumstance, such as leaving the country. These Defaut Picks, if granted, will consist of making Picks ahead of time specific to the weeks being played. In other words, one couldn't say, "First five favorites," one would just have to make Picks as if the Lines had already been posted.
Anyway, that is one item that will be put to a vote. One way or another, Default Picks are gone such as they are now, but everyone will have the chance to vote on one of those three options in the separate thread at the end of the season.
THE PERFECT BOUNTY
Players have expressed interest in a Perfect Week bounty earlier in this thread and I think that is an excellent idea. It would give people a reason to continue playing throughout the season even if it looks like they are out of the main prizes and/or Consolation prizes.
The way I understand the suggestion is like this:
-If a player solely has a Perfect Week, then that player is paid the bounty for that week as well as any accumulated bounty to that point. For these purposes, a 6-0 record will be considered superior to a 5-0 record.
-If two players share a Perfect Week with the same number of wins, then the Perfect Week bounty for that week and any accumulated bounties shall be awarded to those players and split by the number of players.
-If there is no Perfect Week bounty winner for Week 17 as well as any weeks prior to Week 17, all accumulated Perfect Week bounty will be divided evenly amongst 1st/2nd/3rd Place finishers.
Perfect Week Bounty Question
What we will want to put to a vote is whether the Perfect Week Bounty should be an add-on optional type of thing, or whether it should be cut out of the Entry Fee for the game. What I was thinking is we could do either of the following:
1.) Take $5 of the existing $25 Entry Fee for the game and apply it to the Perfect Week Bounty, applying the remaining Entry Fees to 1st/2nd/3rd Places as normal.
Whatever is decided, there will be NO CHANGE to the base Entry Fee of one Green chip. That's about as high as I ever want it to get.
OR:
2.) Make the Perfect Week Bounty an optional $10 add-on with the only players concerned with it being those who contributed the $10. This $10 would be in addition to the $25 Entry Fee, so a player wanting to do it would pay $35. In the event of no Perfect Week in Week 17 and any weeks leading up to that, the Perfect Week Bounty player with the best overall record would automatically be rewarded any accumulated bounty.
***For the purpose of simplicity, as with other prizes, the Perfect Week Bounty winnings would not be paid out until the end of the season.
Please submit any other proposals you may have.
I make a motion the commissioner from hereon be referred to as the McFuhrer and put it to a vote.
I make a motion the commissioner from hereon be referred to as the Supreme Chancellor and put it to a vote.
Quote: Mission146It will be a fundamental failing of ownership if Gregg Williams is not named HC at the end of this season.
His gametime decisions about going for it on 4th down, punting, etc., were so pathetic in his short tenure as Bills head coach, it directly led to his short tenure as Bills head coach! He has been a fine defensive coordinator in the league. His picture is in the dictionary next to the words "Peter Principle". But I could easily see an organization like the Browns picking him as permanent head coach. But the NFL retreads 17-31 head coaches all the time.
Edit.... his ridiculous poorly timed and useless timeout almost cost them the game. You weren't watching?
I like this methodology as it keeps interest going all season long.
Quote: AyecarumbaI propose the BOUNTY be an add on, but run it like a “skins” game, where a prize is available each week, but if no one hits the perfecto, or if there is a tie, the accumulation carries over to the next week.
I like this methodology as it keeps interest going all season long.
I would vote for this as an add-on, too. I like that 6-0 beats 5-0 in your proposal. Greater risk, greater gain.
Quote: AyecarumbaI propose the BOUNTY be an add on, but run it like a “skins” game, where a prize is available each week, but if no one hits the perfecto, or if there is a tie, the accumulation carries over to the next week.
I like this methodology as it keeps interest going all season long.
Agree. Maybe make the add-on $17 (which is only a buck a week) so if 15 players do the add-on then there is $15 in the pot week 1, and if nobody hits it then there would be $30 in week 2.
Quote: SOOPOOHis gametime decisions about going for it on 4th down, punting, etc., were so pathetic in his short tenure as Bills head coach, it directly led to his short tenure as Bills head coach! He has been a fine defensive coordinator in the league. His picture is in the dictionary next to the words "Peter Principle". But I could easily see an organization like the Browns picking him as permanent head coach. But the NFL retreads 17-31 head coaches all the time.
Edit.... his ridiculous poorly timed and useless timeout almost cost them the game. You weren't watching?
The only thing I need to know is that he has one more win in six weeks with the team than Hue Jackson could pull off in 41 weeks with the team.
I didn’t watch the game, but I do know there is some controversy over a 4th-and-1 decision. Based on what I read, I like the decision to go for it. Get the first, and the game’s over.
I realize he didn’t do so well as coach of the Bills, but a person can learn a lot over several years.
Quote: AyecarumbaI propose the BOUNTY be an add on, but run it like a “skins” game, where a prize is available each week, but if no one hits the perfecto, or if there is a tie, the accumulation carries over to the next week.
I like this methodology as it keeps interest going all season long.
That’s how we’re going to do it either way, the only question being whether it’s an optional add on or part of the Entry Fee that gets cut out. I’m not doing it as an add on unless it’s optional as I believe $25 is a sufficient mandatory fee for the game.
As far as ties go, I think they should be awarded whatever has accumulated. It just seems far too likely that we could have a season in which nobody alone has a perfect week.
Quote: Mission146That’s how we’re going to do it either way, the only question being whether it’s an optional add on or part of the Entry Fee that gets cut out. I’m not doing it as an add on unless it’s optional as I believe $25 is a sufficient mandatory fee for the game.
As far as ties go, I think they should be awarded whatever has accumulated. It just seems far too likely that we could have a season in which nobody alone has a perfect week.
I say add on, either $1 week or if people think it makes it too much ir could be. 50. I agree on splitting it if multiple perfexrs but 6-0 should beat 5-0 imo.
Quote: Mission146That’s how we’re going to do it either way, the only question being whether it’s an optional add on or part of the Entry Fee that gets cut out. I’m not doing it as an add on unless it’s optional as I believe $25 is a sufficient mandatory fee for the game.
As far as ties go, I think they should be awarded whatever has accumulated. It just seems far too likely that we could have a season in which nobody alone has a perfect week.
If it were run as skins this season, would someone have won yet?
The accumulation could be awarded to the player(s) with the most perfect weeks, or carried over to next season, if no one wins outright.
I vote yes to both. A vote of yes to McFuhrer and a vote of yes to Supreme Chancellor.Quote: onenickelmiracleQuote: Mission146VOTING
Greetings!
I want to let everyone know, at the conclusion of this season, I will be putting up a voting thread with proposed changes to the game for next year. I assume that I am going to go ahead and run it again since only one player expresses any real discontentment with the whole thing.
Suggestions to move any aspect of this game off-site will not be entertained or voted upon, so please have some mercy on your fingertips by not wasting your time typing anything to that effect.
Aside from that, please make any proposal you like with respect to this game and it will likely be considered for voting.
Default Picks
The one thing that I will say is that Default Picks, such as they have been, are over after this season. I am considering replacing Default Picks with one of the following three things:
1.) No Default Picks, but players will get TWO Skip Weeks per season.
2.) No Default Picks and only ONE Skip Week per season, but I must send PM reminders every Saturday all season long.
3.) Default Picks shall consist of the OVER in the first five games listed for all players and at all times. Players will still have one Skip Week, but a player must specifically send a PM stating that he/she is using that Skip Week, otherwise, Default Picks will be used.
NOTE---If we go with either of the first two options, in my capacity as Commissioner, I will consider allowing Default Picks for a player for a finite amount of time in the event of an extenuating circumstance, such as leaving the country. These Defaut Picks, if granted, will consist of making Picks ahead of time specific to the weeks being played. In other words, one couldn't say, "First five favorites," one would just have to make Picks as if the Lines had already been posted.
Anyway, that is one item that will be put to a vote. One way or another, Default Picks are gone such as they are now, but everyone will have the chance to vote on one of those three options in the separate thread at the end of the season.
THE PERFECT BOUNTY
Players have expressed interest in a Perfect Week bounty earlier in this thread and I think that is an excellent idea. It would give people a reason to continue playing throughout the season even if it looks like they are out of the main prizes and/or Consolation prizes.
The way I understand the suggestion is like this:
-If a player solely has a Perfect Week, then that player is paid the bounty for that week as well as any accumulated bounty to that point. For these purposes, a 6-0 record will be considered superior to a 5-0 record.
-If two players share a Perfect Week with the same number of wins, then the Perfect Week bounty for that week and any accumulated bounties shall be awarded to those players and split by the number of players.
-If there is no Perfect Week bounty winner for Week 17 as well as any weeks prior to Week 17, all accumulated Perfect Week bounty will be divided evenly amongst 1st/2nd/3rd Place finishers.
Perfect Week Bounty Question
What we will want to put to a vote is whether the Perfect Week Bounty should be an add-on optional type of thing, or whether it should be cut out of the Entry Fee for the game. What I was thinking is we could do either of the following:
1.) Take $5 of the existing $25 Entry Fee for the game and apply it to the Perfect Week Bounty, applying the remaining Entry Fees to 1st/2nd/3rd Places as normal.
Whatever is decided, there will be NO CHANGE to the base Entry Fee of one Green chip. That's about as high as I ever want it to get.
OR:
2.) Make the Perfect Week Bounty an optional $10 add-on with the only players concerned with it being those who contributed the $10. This $10 would be in addition to the $25 Entry Fee, so a player wanting to do it would pay $35. In the event of no Perfect Week in Week 17 and any weeks leading up to that, the Perfect Week Bounty player with the best overall record would automatically be rewarded any accumulated bounty.
***For the purpose of simplicity, as with other prizes, the Perfect Week Bounty winnings would not be paid out until the end of the season.
Please submit any other proposals you may have.
I make a motion the commissioner from hereon be referred to as the McFuhrer and put it to a vote.
I make a motion the commissioner from hereon be referred to as the Supreme Chancellor and put it to a vote.
Quote: AyecarumbaIf it were run as skins this season, would someone have won yet?
The accumulation could be awarded to the player(s) with the most perfect weeks, or carried over to next season, if no one wins outright.
The first one isn’t a bad idea in theory, or you could just use best overall record of those who did the add on. It’s quite conceivable that two players could have the same number of perfect weeks, so then you’d need a second tiebreaker and so on.
I must admit I don’t like the idea of carrying anything over to the next season, though we could carry over to the Playoffs game.
This is fine, but I don't see any reason why each person would NOT want to pick a Confidence game, each and every week. (If there is an advantage in not picking a Confidence Game, please point it out to me.)Quote: Mission146VOTING
For these purposes, a 6-0 record will be considered superior to a 5-0 record.
Right there with you. I went 3-2 and I was hoping to go 2-3 or even 1-4.Quote: unJonUgh. This stinks. I’m pulling away from the middle!
Quote: EdCollinsQuote: Mission146VOTING
...(If there is an advantage in not picking a Confidence Game, please point it out to me.)
Maybe your level of “confidence” is only 50.001%? Plus there is still the main game to consider. 2 losses instead of 1 is tough to make up.Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
I never suspected it would be you posting anal innuendo. Looks like you're busy.Quote: beachbumbabsHeading for the basement...checking out the root cellar. 1-3 today, 2 tomorrow. Make room!
Quote: EdCollinsThis is fine, but I don't see any reason why each person would NOT want to pick a Confidence game, each and every week. (If there is an advantage in not picking a Confidence Game, please point it out to me.)Quote: Mission146VOTING
For these purposes, a 6-0 record will be considered superior to a 5-0 record.
If it’s week 17, you’re in 1st place , and the only way you can be caught is if you go 0-6 and the person in 2nd goes 6-0.
And vice versa if you’re in dead last going into week 17
Or if you’re exactly 5 games over or 5 games under 50% going into week 17.
That's not considered an "advantage."With the proposed idea, the is now an additional reward for picking a Confidence game.Quote: AyecarumbaMaybe your level of “confidence” is only 50.001%? Plus there is still the main game to consider. 2 losses instead of 1 is tough to make up.
If a person picked five winners with one of them a Confidence Pick, there score of 6-0 is better than someone else who also picked five winners, but did not designate a Confidence Game. That's fine. But this concept/idea gives you an additional reward with no additional penalty. I disagree that going 0-6 would put you that much further back than 0-5 (assuming you picked terribly), no matter what your score.
I still can think of no "advantage" in NOT picking a Confidence Pick each time. The possible reward for the Bounty Prize justifies always picking a Confidence Pick.
Quote: michael99000If it’s week 17, you’re in 1st place , and the only way you can be caught is if you go 0-6 and the person in 2nd goes 6-0.
Yes, I agree with this rare scenario. Good work. But for the other 16 Weeks you would want to pick a Confidence Pick.
Quote: EdCollinsYes, I agree with this rare scenario. Good work. But for the other 16 Weeks you would want to pick a Confidence Pick.
Ok well let’s say you make your 5 picks , and you have a rating system for how much you like each pick. And for a particular week you happen to like all 5 games pretty much equally .. what would be the reasoning or advantage to arbitratily making one of them count as double ?
The only way the Confidence pick would be an advantage would be if the pool was based on # of wins. We do it by best %.
Yes. 1-5 or 0-6 depending upon tomorrow's game.Quote: GWAElooks like we have a game now for the top. DJ finally came back to the pack alittle.
Sharing the bounty prize justifies it. You don't want to lose out to someone else who also picked five games and went 6-0.Quote: michael99000Ok well let’s say you make your 5 picks , and you have a rating system for how much you like each pick. And for a particular week you happen to like all 5 games pretty much equally .. what would be the reasoning or advantage to arbitrarily making one of them count as double ?
Quote: EdCollinsSharing the bounty prize justifies it. You don't want to lose out to someone else who also picked five games and went 6-0.
I thought you were referring to the current season
Each week I post the results and current standings within minutes of the conclusion of the Monday Night game. (Sometimes I've posted them a few minutes before the game has ended.) However, I expect I won't be able to post tonight's results until a bit later, since I will be attending a Christmas party in the evening - I'm not sure what time I'll be home.
Quote: EdCollinsfyi...
Each week I post the results and current standings within minutes of the conclusion of the Monday Night game. (Sometimes I've posted them a few minutes before the game has ended.) However, I expect I won't be able to post tonight's results until a bit later, since I will be attending a Christmas party in the evening - I'm not sure what time I'll be home.
Wow, you are assigning a higher level of importance to a celebration of Christ's birth than to an internet forum football pool? How dare you.
Quote: onenickelmiracleI never suspected it would be you posting anal innuendo. Looks like you're busy.
I'm from the Midwest. We have root cellars there, for keeping things cool year-round.
Where are YOU from? Geez...lol.
I was getting ahead of myself this week. I went in one game under .500 and was thinking there was only one week left in the season after this, so when I went 3-2 and hit .500 exactly, I figured I'd be able to use my skip week and be guaranteed at least a tie for most average! Unfortunately, there are two weeks left, so I guess I have to make a confidence pick next week and hope to go 3-3.
I have never used default picks and I don't like them much. When I have needed to, I simply picked in advance of the spread being posted - heck, we all know what games will be played each Sunday and Monday. But anything is better than allowing two Skip Weeks - I definitely vote NO on two skip weeks.