LETSWIN
Thread Rating:
Like I did in my previous thread, I am here just to share an experience. I have been playing baccarat for a few years. And have been trying to find a way to beat the game for a long time. I've made over $500k and have lost over $500k (not including recent success). So I have been through the worst with this game. From using progressions, to waiting for triggers, card counting. Nothing has ever worked. Why? Why has always been my cause when you bet player you have less than a total expectancy of 45% win rate and when betting banker, you have less than a total expectancy of 46% win rate. I know my math explanation is lame, but, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that it is a negative expectancy game. Which is not like I'm saying anything new....but I'm just saying.....you are betting into something that has odds against you every single hand. Doesn't matter what count you use, what trigger you use. If you are using any kind of betting pattern? You will lose. Ten players does not mean a banker will come. Ten bankers does not mean a player will come. The win expectancy is totally individual each and every single hand. And it is not effected enough based on what cards came out, or what cards are left, to get any higher percentage than the two I said above. Over infinity? However, banker wins 50% of the time. No one will live that long to see that. And, even if you did, you would STILL be behind, because of the banker commission.
Quote: johnnydepzDOES ANYONE KNOW THIS GUY letswin?!? would love to get in touch with him
Like I did in my previous thread, I am here just to share an experience. I have been playing baccarat for a few years. And have been trying to find a way to beat the game for a long time. I've made over $500k and have lost over $500k (not including recent success). So I have been through the worst with this game. From using progressions, to waiting for triggers, card counting. Nothing has ever worked. Why? Why has always been my cause when you bet player you have less than a total expectancy of 45% win rate and when betting banker, you have less than a total expectancy of 46% win rate. I know my math explanation is lame, but, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that it is a negative expectancy game. Which is not like I'm saying anything new....but I'm just saying.....you are betting into something that has odds against you every single hand. Doesn't matter what count you use, what trigger you use. If you are using any kind of betting pattern? You will lose. Ten players does not mean a banker will come. Ten bankers does not mean a player will come. The win expectancy is totally individual each and every single hand. And it is not effected enough based on what cards came out, or what cards are left, to get any higher percentage than the two I said above. Over infinity? However, banker wins 50% of the time. No one will live that long to see that. And, even if you did, you would STILL be behind, because of the banker commission.
link to original post
Based on Mdawgs "adventures," it is really quite simple.
1. Have a line of credit of at least $250k.
2. Play at a "private table."
3. Make the casino raise the max bet to $50k.
4. Play disciplined so that when you are up say $5-$10k you quit.
If you read his posts from the beginning of this year, you will see that he won approximately $147k. I believe there was one losing session, but all the rest were winners. The high credit limit becomes your bankroll, and the max bet limit becomes a way to play with any type of progressions. The key is discipline and focus.
tuttigym
Tuttigym seems to have forgotten his 'tongue in cheek' emoticon.Quote: tuttigymQuote: johnnydepzDOES ANYONE KNOW THIS GUY letswin?!? would love to get in touch with him
Like I did in my previous thread, I am here just to share an experience. I have been playing baccarat for a few years. And have been trying to find a way to beat the game for a long time. I've made over $500k and have lost over $500k (not including recent success). So I have been through the worst with this game. From using progressions, to waiting for triggers, card counting. Nothing has ever worked. Why? Why has always been my cause when you bet player you have less than a total expectancy of 45% win rate and when betting banker, you have less than a total expectancy of 46% win rate. I know my math explanation is lame, but, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that it is a negative expectancy game. Which is not like I'm saying anything new....but I'm just saying.....you are betting into something that has odds against you every single hand. Doesn't matter what count you use, what trigger you use. If you are using any kind of betting pattern? You will lose. Ten players does not mean a banker will come. Ten bankers does not mean a player will come. The win expectancy is totally individual each and every single hand. And it is not effected enough based on what cards came out, or what cards are left, to get any higher percentage than the two I said above. Over infinity? However, banker wins 50% of the time. No one will live that long to see that. And, even if you did, you would STILL be behind, because of the banker commission.
link to original post
Based on Mdawgs "adventures," it is really quite simple.
1. Have a line of credit of at least $250k.
2. Play at a "private table."
3. Make the casino raise the max bet to $50k.
4. Play disciplined so that when you are up say $5-$10k you quit.
If you read his posts from the beginning of this year, you will see that he won approximately $147k. I believe there was one losing session, but all the rest were winners. The high credit limit becomes your bankroll, and the max bet limit becomes a way to play with any type of progressions. The key is discipline and focus.
tuttigym
link to original post
I've already explained to you how letswin can and will succeed.
Quote: johnnydepzdo you know his stratagy or him i need to talk to him
link to original post
bro i swear on everything a minimum wage job will make you more money than trying to "beat" any game ... any game that has been most likely tested in billions of simulations so that they know someone like you cant come in and just "play perfectly"
what really sucks is that OP will take my statement as a challenge
Quote: OnceDearTuttigym seems to have forgotten his 'tongue in cheek' emoticon.
I've already explained to you how letswin can and will succeed.
link to original post
"emoticon"? What is that, and what is it that I have "forgotten?
Didn't you have a period of 30+ winning sessions in a row? I don't know how much your winnings were, and it is none of my business. The real question is did you lose it all or are you still ahead some? Also, could you refresh my memory, as I am an old, short, fat, dumpy dude, "how .....can and will succeed"? One other thing, can you or anyone else DEFINE "winning"?
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigymQuote: OnceDearTuttigym seems to have forgotten his 'tongue in cheek' emoticon.
I've already explained to you how letswin can and will succeed.
link to original post
"emoticon"? What is that, and what is it that I have "forgotten?
Didn't you have a period of 30+ winning sessions in a row? I don't know how much your winnings were, and it is none of my business. The real question is did you lose it all or are you still ahead some? Also, could you refresh my memory, as I am an old, short, fat, dumpy dude, "how .....can and will succeed"? One other thing, can you or anyone else DEFINE "winning"?
tuttigym
link to original post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon
You hold up MDawg as the winner to emulate. I wouldn't be able to keep a straight face if I did that.
Yes. I had 30+ consecutive winning sessions, where end balance was greater than start balance. But start and end times defining the session were arbitrary. It really was nothing anomalous or useful. For many of my reported winning sessions there were unreported losing sessions at other times. Those sessions were about amusement. Alongside those fun sessions were some advantage plays that were about the profit.
Letswin has a winning game. It's not baccarat. His game is duping his victims into sharing their profits with him, but not their losses..
Define winning? How about achieving a desired outcome whatever the desire. If My objective was to bring traffic to a web page and I achieved that. That might be winning.
