The Adventures of MDawg II
It’s like they know you’re wearing a Rolex and have a couple dollars (in my case couple hundred thousand dollar chips) in your pocket.
Quote: TigerWuQuote: MDawgDay 18 play.
Baccarat.
Heavy duty action! to the limit at times. More than a few advantage hands almost all of them winners.
+110000
Any questions?
link to original post
How many shoes was this?
link to original post
It was a number of shoes.
The first shoe I almost got killed, from there I got to around +40K and got stuck for some time. I started losing at one point and was down about -90K at one point and then took a mere 10K to $175K on a Player run (not even a really long run, but long enough, and I kept pressing the 10K double double then let the 40K ride for enough hands, then eased off and lost the last hand), and then gradually finished off the win to +$110K. I probably would have bet even more on at least one of those Player hands, but 10K double double equaled 40K so that was the max bet that day.
The Player had an advantage I knew about during at least part of that run, and I just let it ride even though the advantage wasn't known throughout the run, still it kept going long enough anyway.
I was playing with a $100K marker and never had to pull more, once I got to over a double, I quit. I actually hadn't planned to win that much, I would have been okay with less but after a while I decided that I was going to grind it out and try to make a double this time.
One thing I have found about Baccarat is that the big wins rarely happen quickly. More likely is to just get killed fast if you try to win too much in the beginning, OR you bet too small in the beginning anyway, so that no matter what the shoe, you still don't win big fast. And that's just regular Baccarat, advantage or no advantage, just the way it seems to work.
Adventures of MDawg II - 122K views!
Quote: MDawgAdventures of MDawg - 480.5K views!
Adventures of MDwg II - 122K views!
link to original post
Total profit derived from views:. Zero!
Start posting on YouTube for views to matter
Quote: darkozTotal profit derived from views:. Zero!
The MDawg Challenge, $2000. courtesy of DarkOz which means that at least one view, by one person, resulted in a profit.
Quote: darkozStart posting on YouTube for views to matter
Agreed there, in terms of any real profit.
Quote: MDawgQuote: darkozTotal profit derived from views:. Zero!
The MDawg Challenge, $2000. courtesy of DarkOz which means that at least one view, by one person, resulted in a profit.Quote: darkozStart posting on YouTube for views to matter
Agreed there, in terms of any real profit.
link to original post
Meh, I suppose.
I don't count that as profit from views per se.
I will hand you that argument.
As well, being accountable to a public forum about casino session wins and losses drives a person to want to succeed, and not have to post about losses. Now, this accountability may be good, as it makes one want to play until one wins, so as not to have to report failure, but it also may be bad, as it makes one want to push to come back from negative on every session for the same reason. I've always been that way anyway though, not wanting to end any session with a loss - and what casino player is any different? Sometimes though, it is better to take some kind of loss versus a potentially bigger one trying to get back to even.
Baccarat.
Pretty mellow couple of sessions. Before and after dinner.
+23000
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
And this is the MDawg challenge.
Quote: MDawgYesterday's stabbing was just another in a series of recent attacks on the Vegas Strip.
link to original post
This is why I try to not leave the casino anymore when I visit Vegas.
Quote: TigerWuQuote: MDawgYesterday's stabbing was just another in a series of recent attacks on the Vegas Strip.
link to original post
This is why I try to not leave the casino anymore when I visit Vegas.
link to original post
So which table do you sleep on, and which restroom do you shave and shower?
tuttigym
Quote: SOOPOOGood sessions! I must have not read the $200k one earlier! Do you have access to free limo whenever you want no questions asked?
link to original post
It would seem to me that winning 200k would allow one the affordability to buy a used limo and rent a driver. Tax write-off for expenses and offset.
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigym
So which table do you sleep on, and which restroom do you shave and shower?
tuttigym
link to original post
yuk yuk yuk...
Quote: tuttigymQuote: SOOPOOGood sessions! I must have not read the $200k one earlier! Do you have access to free limo whenever you want no questions asked?
link to original post
It would seem to me that winning 200k would allow one the affordability to buy a used limo and rent a driver. Tax write-off for expenses and offset.
tuttigym
link to original post
Duh…. I’m not discussing what MDawg can or can’t afford. I’m trying to figure out what the casino will give him for his level of play. I knew a doc I worked with who was given a limo for his GUESTS while he was at a table. Or even if he wasn’t playing. This is 3 decades ago? Said he was a $400 a hand BJ player.
The only difference between asking for transport for me versus say for my guests, is that at some of the properties they reserve their premium cars only for players and their immediate family, while using their other cars for player's guests. For example at Wynn, the Rolls Royce Phantoms are supposed to be only for the players/players families.
Wynn Las Vegas Rolls Out The Largest Fleet Of Rolls-Royce Phantoms In North America
Fourteen Rolls-Royce Phantoms are at service for guests to be ferried around town by Wynn Las Vegas. The royal fleet includes the Extended Wheel Base model with liberal cabin space that delivers comfort for passengers. The seats are slightly elevated from the driver’s seat giving passengers a superior vantage point. The bespoke Wynn Rolls-Royce are classic black with their eponymous Wynn license plate.
By the way, you don't save any money by taking casino transport, or else I don't. I tip ten dollars to the limo driver for a Strip jaunt, and twenty if going downtown, which is about the same as an Uber or taxi drive. But of course the vehicular is much more luxurious, as is the experience.
I may also have the casino fly us in via their own jet, if we wanted that.
I actually still have a family member whose jet I may use, but that's more for business purposes flying back and forth from Vegas to someplace else and back.
Depending on how far away you live, flying isn't necessarily faster these days, given travel time to the airport, and having to go through security for commercial flights. Really it has to be more than a four hour drive to make flying faster, in many cases.
The new SUV we have has auto pilot and it really is very easy to cruise the highways in it. Driving isn't such a chore these days.
Looks just like Ace’s private jetQuote: MDawg
]
I have heard stories of a female high roller who used to insist that they allow her to defecate while still at the high limit table...the process was once described to me, minimally.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
Are you suggesting that Mdawg is making "ridiculous claims"? My goodness, next thing you know, Ace2 will disavow the craps "math" and embrace 4th grade arithmetic and win 80% of the time.
"Free speech'? How far can we take that statement?
tuttigym
I did not throw 18 yos in a row. I was at a table at Caesars Palace when a random shooter threw 18 yos in a row.
Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
MDawg claiming to have won over sixty hands in a row at Blackjack.
Quote: TigerWuQuote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
MDawg claiming to have won over sixty hands in a row at Blackjack.
link to original post
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
Quite a lot of imprecision here.
1) The direct quote I made was, "I don't bet tie often, but when I do, I hit it at least at a 25% ratio over all."
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/346/#post799590
I'd have to figure out whether my tie win percentage is still at that level. I have played a lot of Bacc since then, that quote was 1 1/2 years ago.
2) It was approximately twenty Players in a row not 60. Followed by one Bank. Followed by another approximately twenty Players in a row.
3) The Blackjack winning hands were clarified here:
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/big-wins/36485-60-winning-hands-in-a-row/#post825213
"This happened some two decades ago. Could I swear it was 60 in a row? No. Which is why I say 'some sixty.'"
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/big-wins/36485-60-winning-hands-in-a-row/#post825226
"Again, could I swear to that I did not lose a single hand along the way? No."
-MDawg
Quote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
Wizard,Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims.
Thank you.
link to original post
I think one thing you need to resolve is how do you get visitors to see that disclaimer?
When one visits the forum, the almost inevitable first page seen is 'Recent Threads'. And towards the top of the recent threads is often a thread trying to discuss a ridiculous claim.... or this one $;o)
I don't know what the answer is to that.
If you do indicate a big emphasis on free speech, won't you need to doubly emphasise that the personal insult rule and bad language rules are still very strictly enforced.
Quote: OnceDearWizard,
I think one thing you need to resolve is how do you get visitors to see that disclaimer?
When one visits the forum, the almost inevitable first page seen is 'Recent Threads'. And towards the top of the recent threads is often a thread trying to discuss a ridiculous claim.... or this one $;o)
link to original post
I agree, a big disclaimer above the Recent Threads section would be nice.
THIS IS A FREE SPEECH WEBSITE. WE'RE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CLAIMS MADE BY THE POSTERS.
Quote: JackSpadeLies and misinformation are far worse than insults or bad words. Facts matter more than feelings.
link to original post
Easy to say when you post under a made up name or no one knows who you are.
Go ahead and insult the Wizard. See if that's worse than writing about bad calculations.
Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
Mike, the only thing I can say is that if you are calling someone out for a ridiculous claim, please get it exactly right. I definitely temper the tie claim but NOT exactly what it was. The BJ claim as well. I think it was less than 60 though? I don’t have any recollection of the 60 consecutive player claim.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
link to original post
Alan, DarkOz and Axel both make claims CONSISTENT with the math that governs the games/offers/promos.
Your claim, all of EvenBob’s, and some of MDawgs, are INCONSISTENT with the math. It’s not my fault you can’t see that crucial distinction.
I will say this about MDawg, recently he has made it clear he plays certain hands with an advantage. Of course he is not spelling it out for us in detail, but it makes his overall long history of winning possible.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: JackSpadeLies and misinformation are far worse than insults or bad words. Facts matter more than feelings.
link to original post
Easy to say when you post under a made up name or no one knows who you are.
Go ahead and insult the Wizard. See if that's worse than writing about bad calculations.
link to original post
I don't intend to hurl insults here regardless of whether I'm allowed to do so. But if Donald Trump posted to express a disagreement with the Wizard, he might call him "Little Mike" or "Shifty Shackleford" or "the fake and phony Wizard." Everyone knows that's just his rhetorical style, like it or not.
If Trump went on to make an implausible or verifiably false claim about how much his real estate holdings were worth to try to trick people into loaning him large amounts of money, then that would be fraud.
So yes, posting bad calculations is worse than insulting the Wizard.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
link to original post
Alan, DarkOz and Axel both make claims CONSISTENT with the math that governs the games/offers/promos.
Your claim, all of EvenBob’s, and some of MDawgs, are INCONSISTENT with the math. It’s not my fault you can’t see that crucial distinction.
I will say this about MDawg, recently he has made it clear he plays certain hands with an advantage. Of course he is not spelling it out for us in detail, but it makes his overall long history of winning possible.
link to original post
Playing with 20 cards UNDETECTED has nothing to do with the math.
Axel doesn't even reveal his plays. How can you say it's what the math expects to happen?
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: SOOPOOQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
link to original post
Alan, DarkOz and Axel both make claims CONSISTENT with the math that governs the games/offers/promos.
Your claim, all of EvenBob’s, and some of MDawgs, are INCONSISTENT with the math. It’s not my fault you can’t see that crucial distinction.
I will say this about MDawg, recently he has made it clear he plays certain hands with an advantage. Of course he is not spelling it out for us in detail, but it makes his overall long history of winning possible.
link to original post
Playing with 20 cards UNDETECTED has nothing to do with the math.
Axel doesn't even reveal his plays. How can you say it's what the math expects to happen?
link to original post
probably because Soopoo knows Axel and Axel has shared some plays with him.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: SOOPOOQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
link to original post
Alan, DarkOz and Axel both make claims CONSISTENT with the math that governs the games/offers/promos.
Your claim, all of EvenBob’s, and some of MDawgs, are INCONSISTENT with the math. It’s not my fault you can’t see that crucial distinction.
I will say this about MDawg, recently he has made it clear he plays certain hands with an advantage. Of course he is not spelling it out for us in detail, but it makes his overall long history of winning possible.
link to original post
Playing with 20 cards UNDETECTED has nothing to do with the math.
Axel doesn't even reveal his plays. How can you say it's what the math expects to happen?
link to original post
DarkOz playing with multiple cards is DIRECTLY related to the math! He has to know how much to bet at what -EV to generate enough free play to be worth it. It’s not rocket science, but it requires work.
Axel has revealed a few plays here, or others have revealed some that Axel participated in. And yes, he has shown me in person some others that I won’t reveal as of course I promised him I wouldn’t.
Each play was supported by the math. And most weren’t very complicated once you were shown.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims. As just a couple examples, Alan's 18 consecutive yo's and EB's 80% success rate on even money bets in roulette.
Can anyone please remind me some of Mdawg's most incredible claims, preferably with links. I seem to recall:
1. 40% success rate on Tie bets in baccarat.
2. 60 consecutive Player wins in baccarat.
3. 60 consecutive wins in blackjack.
Do I have those right? Should I put "approximately" before the 60's?
Any others I'm missing?
Thank you.
link to original post
Mike, the only thing I can say is that if you are calling someone out for a ridiculous claim, please get it exactly right. I definitely temper the tie claim but NOT exactly what it was. The BJ claim as well. I think it was less than 60 though? I don’t have any recollection of the 60 consecutive player claim.
link to original post
I believe one was "60 some" and one was "some 60" and there was considetable discussion about the meaning of the different terms.
I would look at July-September 2021, if I were seeking those posts, or do one of the high power search techniques.
Quote: Dieter
I believe one was "60 some" and one was "some 60" and there was considetable discussion about the meaning of the different terms.
I would look at July-September 2021, if I were seeking those posts, or do one of the high power search techniques.
link to original post
The posts were linked to on the previous page.
MDawg says both "60 some" (meaning a number between 60 and 69) and also "some 60" (meaning approximately 60). But then he also says he probably lost some hands along the way, too, so that immediately negates the concept of winning 60 in a row.
Quote: AlanMendelsonQuote: SOOPOOQuote: AlanMendelsonQuote: tuttigym
I went back and reviewed that post and the others that followed. How come Mdawg did NOT tell us how much he won, you know like +4 gazillion? Seems a little inconsistent, right?
tuttigym
link to original post
Should that be a new rule for all posters here? If you say you won you must include the amount?
I've already posted my results when I was at the table with the shooter who rolled 18 yos. I won ZERO.
How about demanding proof from multi card players?
And APs on their special plays?
Should Darkoz be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his team using 20 cards undetected?
Should Axel be mandated to post his wins? And by the way should there be a warning about his string of winning +EV plays?
And while we're at it, should there be a general warning that nothing here is verified?
link to original post
Alan, DarkOz and Axel both make claims CONSISTENT with the math that governs the games/offers/promos.
Your claim, all of EvenBob’s, and some of MDawgs, are INCONSISTENT with the math. It’s not my fault you can’t see that crucial distinction.
I will say this about MDawg, recently he has made it clear he plays certain hands with an advantage. Of course he is not spelling it out for us in detail, but it makes his overall long history of winning possible.
link to original post
Playing with 20 cards UNDETECTED has nothing to do with the math.
Axel doesn't even reveal his plays. How can you say it's what the math expects to happen?
link to original post
If you would be willing to sign a non disclosure I can prove a net worth north of 8 figures that I have accumulated by using MATH to beat casino promotions and marketing with multiple players over the last 20 years or so. This includes tax records because it’s literally impossible to just not pay tax’s when making this kind of money. After you see the proof you must state publicly how wrong you are, and retract the story of 18 yos in a row. Dm me we can work it out.
Quote: OnceDearWizard,Quote: WizardI'm planning to make a disclaimer for the forum, saying that we put a big emphasis on free speech, even when it is at the cost of allowing ridiculous claims.
Thank you.
link to original post
I think one thing you need to resolve is how do you get visitors to see that disclaimer?
When one visits the forum, the almost inevitable first page seen is 'Recent Threads'. And towards the top of the recent threads is often a thread trying to discuss a ridiculous claim.... or this one $;o)
I don't know what the answer is to that.
If you do indicate a big emphasis on free speech, won't you need to doubly emphasise that the personal insult rule and bad language rules are still very strictly enforced.
link to original post
According to Harvards 40 year study on swearing the most honest and intelligent people swear the most. By eliminating the use of certain cuss words here I would think by default you drive away a portion of the community that has the most to contribute. Personal insults and words mean nothing unless you give power to them.
Quote: SOOPOOMike, the only thing I can say is that if you are calling someone out for a ridiculous claim, please get it exactly right. I definitely temper the tie claim but NOT exactly what it was. The BJ claim as well. I think it was less than 60 though? I don’t have any recollection of the 60 consecutive player claim.
link to original post
I agree. I didn't mean to make these claims, but was asking if they were true.
Also, I will tender an apology/correction for any that I can't substantiate.
Quote: Seedvalue
According to Harvards 40 year study on swearing the most honest and intelligent people swear the most. By eliminating the use of certain cuss words here I would think by default you drive away a portion of the community that has the most to contribute. Personal insults and words mean nothing unless you give power to them.
link to original post
That just makes no sense to me. It is completely opposite of everything that I have experienced.
