Same goes for ZC and anyone else doing the same
Quote: WellbushThe above post was meant for Sg and ZC. I will respond to CP next
When you hit the reply button, no one knows who you are replying too. You have to hit the quote button if you want to be understood as responding to a particular post.
Quote: WellbushI am happy to respond to most posts. You haven't sincerely apologised for your stated opinions about me in the above post and in previous ones, so why should I respond?
Same goes for ZC and anyone else doing the same
Hahahaha. Apologize for me being right and you being wrong? You don't have a winning betting system. Nobody has a winning betting system. Under no surcumstance does betting alone overcome a house edge in a casino. Ever.
ZCore13
Quote: charliepatrickFirstly this was Punto Banco- I said that up front.
Please explain the difference between you taking a break where (a) the dealer just stops dealing and waits for your return and (b) the dealer continues to deal for other players and as you arrive back they're just starting a new hand but wait for you to sit down. You need to explain the difference.
You have to state what your rules are, there was no rule that you could "drop your bet" should any bets get too large. The only requirement I stated was you must stop if you cannot afford the next bet. If you wanted me to bet the remaining balance then you needed to state that. You did explain when you would drop to the $15 minimum but no other mention of not following the series.
You stated the bankroll so cannot complain whether it doesn't fits the "everyday gambler variation" or the colour of their shirt or any other excuse.
In short, apart from it not being Blackjack, you stated all the rules of your system and the betting limits and these were followed. Since you now know the results have not provided any sound mathematical argument why my results are incorrect.
Let me be clear CP, in case there's any misunderstanding. I don't have any problem with statistics, and I'm grateful for your efforts in response to the info I provided. I currently don't have the time to tease out everything in our discourse, however I will do so soon. Stay tuned
any dweeb knows gambling can work by itself winning 200-300 units is not proof do it 10x and you got our attention! i have a winning system but i would never divulge it on here people like zcore will always always talk down to you until proven otherwise its not his fault or your fualt just the way it is anyway will you kindly explain your system deeper detail? i am not close minded or narrow minded like the people on this forum yet i wish to know more of what you speak of. any work a day slob would luv your system, could just blast away at the casinos making X an hour instead doing a crap job no one wants so yea tell me more mr wellysbush
Quote: dawinnaatlozinsim luvin your opinion on gambling mathematics! its truly mind blowing how you crawled out of no where and say hey guys i have a winning system!!!
any dweeb knows gambling can work by itself winning 200-300 units is not proof do it 10x and you got our attention! i have a winning system but i would never divulge it on here people like zcore will always always talk down to you until proven otherwise its not his fault or your fualt just the way it is anyway will you kindly explain your system deeper detail? i am not close minded or narrow minded like the people on this forum yet i wish to know more of what you speak of. any work a day slob would luv your system, could just blast away at the casinos making X an hour instead doing a crap job no one wants so yea tell me more mr wellysbush
