betting on streaks
Can you do that with your roulette system please?Quote: EvenBobJust upload it to a Youtrube account,
make it a private video, and give the
link to who you want.
Quote: AxelWolfCan you do that with your roulette system please?
Why. You mock it and say it's
a joke. It's not a system, it's
a method. As I've been saying
for over 13 years.
Quote: tringlomaneBabs will be up against a 13 game winning champ -
That's what I said on Monday, that
the 11 game winner would continue
to prevail. Always be with a streak
and never against it. That way you
will only lose once.
This might be true, however, it won't gain you an advantage or make you money on roulette or any of the other casino games.Quote: EvenBobThat's what I said on Monday, that
the 11 game winner would continue
to prevail. Always be with a streak
and never against it. That way you
will only lose once.
In this situation it's not even close to a random event.
Quote: AxelWolfThis might be true, however, it won't gain you an advantage
Sure it does, it manages losses.
You know a streak is happening,
you see it in front of you. Bet
with it and you can only lose once.
Bet against it and you can lose
many times.
My story of the guy who ran up
to a table hauling his suitcase at
the MGM is one I've told before.
He saw a board of solid red numbers
and bet black till he lost his whole
BR of $1500. Then he started screaming
'Cheat! Cheat!' Very entertaining.
If he'd bet with the streak he could
have only lost his $100 initial bet.
Not playing at all woild be better since it eliminates losses so there's no need to manage them.Quote: EvenBobSure it does, it manages losses.
You know a streak is happening,
you see it in front of you. Bet
with it and you can only lose once.
Bet against it and you can lose
many times.
My story of the guy who ran up
to a table hauling his suitcase at
the MGM is one I've told before.
He saw a board of solid red numbers
and bet black till he lost his whole
BR of $1500. Then he started screaming
'Cheat! Cheat!' Very entertaining.
If he'd bet with the streak he could
have only lost his $100 initial bet.
Since you have no idea when a streak will end or start it's meaningless. You still haven't figured out that past results are independent of future outcomes. Anything you do that makes you be less (managing losses) helps you lose less.
Quote: AxelWolfSince you have no idea when a streak will end
So that's why you bet with it,
to limit your loss to one unit.
Managing loss is a huge part
of gambling that most ignore.
I bet Monday that the 11 game
winner would continue to win.
I'm up 2 units, and after tonight
I'll be up 3 or up 1. Winner.
Quote: EvenBobSure it does, it manages losses.
You know a streak is happening,
you see it in front of you. Bet
with it and you can only lose once.
Bet against it and you can lose
many times.
My story of the guy who ran up
to a table hauling his suitcase at
the MGM is one I've told before.
He saw a board of solid red numbers
and bet black till he lost his whole
BR of $1500. Then he started screaming
'Cheat! Cheat!' Very entertaining.
If he'd bet with the streak he could
have only lost his $100 initial bet.
Please show that your roulette streak betting system is mathematically advantageous. I think the Wiz has a significant prize for such a feat.
Quote: EvenBobSo that's why you bet with it,
to limit your loss to one unit.
Managing loss is a huge part
of gambling that most ignore.
I bet Monday that the 11 game
winner would continue to win.
I'm up 2 units, and after tonight
I'll be up 3 or up 1. Winner.
50% of the time the streak ends at 1 in a row.
Quote: EvenBobSure it does, it manages losses.
You know a streak is happening,
you see it in front of you. Bet
with it and you can only lose once.
Bet against it and you can lose
many times.
You are competing with Nathan.
Back to Jeopardy! 4 hours to go here.
Quote: gamerfreakPlease show that your roulette streak betting system is mathematically advantageous.
If you have to bet streaks, it
limits your loss to one unit per
streak. Move onto the next
one. If you bet against the
streak you have to use a
progression if you lose. No
telling how much that loss
could be. Betting with the
streak you only bet once.
It's a loss limiting plan, not
a winning one.
HUH? I never said this beats anything.
Loss limiting is not winning. Please
change the title or it's blocked by me.
Quote: EvenBobTHE EVENBOB METHOD TO BEATING ROULETTE?
HUH? I never said this beats anything.
Loss limiting is not winning. Please
change the title or it's blocked by me.
I thought you've been claiming you could beat roulette since almost the beginning of this forum. However, maybe I misunderstood. What do you wish me to change the title to?
Quote: WizardI thought you've been claiming you could beat roulette since almost the beginning of this forum. However, maybe I misunderstood. What do you wish me to change the title to?
No!! Leave it.
When people first enter this forum and see a guy with 22,000 posts has beaten roullete , membership will soar
Quote: EvenBobIf you have to bet streaks, it
limits your loss to one unit per
streak. Move onto the next
one. If you bet against the
streak you have to use a
progression if you lose. No
telling how much that loss
could be. Betting with the
streak you only bet once.
It's a loss limiting plan, not
a winning one.
Every streak has a 50% chance of ending on the next spin. So no matter where you begin to call something a streak and jump in, you have a 50% chance of losing your bet.
Quote: AxelWolfThis might be true, however, it won't gain you an advantage
You said it, Bob, now you have to defend it instead of ducking itQuote: EvenBobSure it does
Quote: WizardI thought you've been claiming you could beat roulette
Not by betting on streaks, that would
be ridiculous. Change it to 'Betting
on Streaks'.
Why not just flip a coin until you get 6 on one side. Then take the coin around looking for a chump to bet on/against the streak, not knowing which side is due?
Quote: unJonis the functional equivalent of bet anything you want but always stop after the first loss.
In roulette it's a 'thing' to bet
with a progression that a streak
will end soon. It's based on the
fallacy that after 12 in a row it
just has to end in the next few
spins. And it usually does. Until
the time it doesn't and you lose
all your profits. Betting with the
streak will keep you very close
to even most of the time. And
give you lots of times to quit
when you're ahead.
You can make up more even
chance bets using the streets.
With O/E, R/B/. H/L, and two
made up of streets, that makes
five streams to follow and there
is always a streak going on in
one of them.
Quote: EvenBobWhy. You mock it and say it's a joke. It's not a system, it's a method. As I've been saying for over 13 years.
Are there any details to this method? From what I can tell it's nothing more than go on the internet and claim to win at roulette. What I love methods like that is it's something anyone can do. What some people don't like about that sort of method is it means none of us are winning any money.
Quote: EvenBobIn roulette it's a 'thing' to bet
with a progression that a streak
will end soon. It's based on the
fallacy that after 12 in a row it
just has to end in the next few
spins. And it usually does. Until
the time it doesn't and you lose
all your profits. Betting with the
streak will keep you very close
to even most of the time. And
give you lots of times to quit
when you're ahead.
You can make up more even
chance bets using the streets.
With O/E, R/B/. H/L, and two
made up of streets, that makes
five streams to follow and there
is always a streak going on in
one of them.
Bottom line question for you Bob, about your Roullette method:
If every single time you place a bet on red or black , I go ahead and place a bet on the opposite color for the exact same amount as your bet , do you come out ahead of me as time goes by ?
Quote: EvenBobWhy. You mock it and say it's
a joke. It's not a system, it's
a method. As I've been saying
for over 13 years.
Ahh method. Boy does that bring back memories of MrJ. His exact argument.
In a game of dependent trials like Jeopardy, streaks can be very profitable. Given the choice, betting on the Jeopardy champ to repeat is a fantastic bet, especially if you are given 2:1.
never heard of anyone tracking streaks for evens and streets at the same time.Quote: EvenBobYou can make up more even
chance bets using the streets.
With O/E, R/B/. H/L, and two
made up of streets, that makes
five streams to follow and there
is always a streak going on in
one of them.
the 6 evens is plenty of work by themselves.
photo shows the 'running' streak count for the 6 'evens' in a sample of 0 Roulette spins
this was a BIG money maker as most 20 spin sets do not produce these long streaks
but they do happen and great to be on one... or two...
Quote: TigerWuAlways bet on alternating colors... red, then black, then red, then black.... that way when they stop alternating and go into a streak, you only lose once.
Whatever. The only reason I brought
all of this up was, in roulette it's a
'thing' to bet against streaks. If you're
not a roulette player, you totally
won't get it, as you've made obvious.
Quote: EvenBobWhatever. The only reason I brought
all of this up was, in roulette it's a
'thing' to bet against streaks. If you're
not a roulette player, you totally
won't get it, as you've made obvious.
Naw, what he's saying is a streak, just a different one. You could bet odds, or evens, or odd/even. As long as they've been streaking, they're all streaks, just not red/black.
Quote: EvenBobWhatever. The only reason I brought
all of this up was, in roulette it's a
'thing' to bet against streaks. If you're
not a roulette player, you totally
won't get it, as you've made obvious.
You'll be happy to know I do in fact "get it," because I have a grade school understanding of math and probabilities.
I'm not sure all the main participants in this thread can say the same, though.
Quote: TigerWuYou'll be happy to know I do in fact "get it," because I have a grade school understanding of math and probabilities.
I'm not sure all the main participants in this thread can say the same, though.
I know that the probability of red/black , even/odd is exactly the same on every spin. I also know that basing your bets on what’s happened in prior spins will never change that.
There’s really nothing more you need to know
Quote: michael99000I know that the probability of red/black , even/odd is exactly the same on every spin. I also know that basing your bets on what’s happened in prior spins will never change that.
There’s really nothing more you need to know
Exactly.
Quote: Moscathey're all streaks, just not red/black.
Who said it was just R/B? I named
5 even bets in roulette where
streaks occur.
Quote: michael99000I know that the probability of red/black , even/odd is exactly the same on every spin.
And that's why betting against a
streak is ridiculous. Try telling
that to people do it, though.
Bet with a red streak and it's red,
you win, you're done betting.
Bet black and you lose, having to
bet again. You could stop with one
loss. but that's not the point. You
keep betting because a black is
'due' in your fantasy universe.
Quote: EvenBobAlways be with a streak
and never against it. 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞.
no. it doesn't in any way mean you can't lose 10 times in a row.
you lose your streak bet so you bet the other way or on another even chance streak - you can lose that bet too
all of the even chances could have a "streak" of alternating results
your method didn't gain you anything compared to any other bet selection method
it is better than those who bet against the streak if they are using a martingale - but only because their bets are increasing so they will lose more than a player whose flat bet is the same as their initial bet on their marty
BTW: I've tried your "method" many times on the Wizard's free online games - never believing it was a winner - I just tried it for fun
it never was a winner for any significant length of time
So how do you qualify someone as a roulette player?Quote: EvenBobWhatever. The only reason I brought
all of this up was, in roulette it's a
'thing' to bet against streaks. If you're
not a roulette player, you totally
won't get it, as you've made obvious.
Quote: AxelWolfSo how do you qualify someone as a roulette player?
This thread would be a lot more entertaining, if a bunch of you had conspired to tell EB you discovered how his "method" works, and then come back every day and post how much money you were making with it.
Quote: AxelWolfSo how do you qualify someone as a roulette player?
Anyone who understands that EB wins because he has a method qualifies as a roulette player. Any who doesn’t understand that he can win even when using a method is not a roulette player
Quote: lilredrooster
it never was a winner
ARRGUH!!! I never SAID it was a
winner, I never IMPLIED it was
a winner. In fact I said it was NOT
a winner! Good god!
It's a fricking method to manage
LOSSES. It's a way to make your
money last longer. Get IT? Got IT?
sigh..
Hey Bob, it looks like you're in good company. Great minds think alike, birds of a feather... and all that jazz.Quote: MDawgI can't read most of this thread as blocked, but the title makes perfect sense. This is what we DO in all gambling, including say in Baccarat. I've made MA$$ doing this. Try to tell the two brothers on the top of floor of my hotel, currently up two million in Baccarat, that you don't bet streaks.
Quote: AxelWolfHey Bob, it looks like you're in good company. Great minds think alike, birds of a feather... and all that jazz.
There’s nothing worse on this forum than MDawg endorsing your system
Quote: michael99000There’s nothing worse on this forum than MDawg endorsing your system
You need to lose the small player attitude. Only by playing big with big time players does one gain the ability to win big consistently.
MDawg is a winner because he thinks and plays bigly. Only silly and uninformed small players would mock him. Big players get it.
Just because you are too small to see his fantastic rainment doesn't mean he is naked. His clothes are tremendously fantastical.
Big time big. Bigly, even.
Quote: michael99000There’s nothing worse on this forum than MDawg endorsing your system
I can think of a few worse things/people on this forum....
At least an "endorsement" by MDawg at worst involves a couple people having a good time gambling.
Yeah I know, like when someone what type of thread called "BETTING ON STREAKS" and then attaches Forum name to it.Quote: TigerWuI can think of a few worse things/people on this forum....
At least an "endorsement" by MDawg at worst involves a couple people having a good time gambling.
I request but the mods change the title to... BETTING ON STREAK IS DUMB.
p.s. Bob never said he does it for fun. You can't really think Bob ever has fun doing anything other than confirming his sardine order online. He claims his system(YES ITS A SYSTEM ) is a money maker.
So what is wrong with that. EVERYONE who either invents a system or adopts a system believes in it. Some believe in it quite passionately.Quote: AxelWolfHe claims his system(YES ITS A SYSTEM ) is a money maker.
Even after the croupier (roulette dealer) tells them "you shot your self in the foot", they still believe in their system.
The only system that truly works is the one employed at Rick's Café Americaine in Casablanca. Or the stack pushing system employed in the Movie: The Croupier.
Quote: EvenBobARRGUH!!! I never SAID it was a
winner, I never IMPLIED it was
a winner. In fact I said it was NOT
a winner! Good god!
It's a fricking method to manage
LOSSES. It's a way to make your
money last longer. Get IT? Got IT?
sigh..
So for clarity sake, is this streak betting system different than the AP roulette method you’ve been talking about long time?
Quote: gamerfreakSo for clarity sake, is this streak betting system different than the AP roulette method you’ve been talking about long time?
That one is still a secret.
Quote: gamerfreakSo for clarity sake, is this streak betting system
It's not a system, it's a method.
I never EVER bet streaks, why
would I, you can't win. This
whole thing started because
I bet the champ in Jeopardy
would continue to win because
my advice is always to bet with
streaks if you must bet on them.
