Poll
23 votes (69.69%) | |||
3 votes (9.09%) | |||
4 votes (12.12%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
3 votes (9.09%) | |||
2 votes (6.06%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
4 votes (12.12%) |
33 members have voted
Quote: Mission146Cool, now we just need OD to commit to kicking in $50 if:
A. Everyone Shares
Or
B. OnceDear’s team steals
After that, for any of the other six teams to steal will require that they lied.
I see mission just confirmed everyone committed. Thanks for keeping track... I never saw commitments from onm, or djac but it's possible I missed it and I'm not re-reading 20 pages. Axel and missions integrity is good enough for me.
I guess at a minimum we will know who the wizard is 'gently nudging'
Side note... Anyone know anything about the billryan exiting the game so mission could join?
Reminder to all caps... Votes due early tomorrow.
Quote: prozemaI see mission just confirmed everyone committed. Thanks for keeping track... I never saw commitments from jufo81, onm, or djac but it's possible I missed it and I'm not re-reading 20 pages. Axel and missions integrity is good enough for me.
I guess at a minimum we will know who the wizard is 'gently nudging'
Side note... Anyone know anything about the billryan exiting the game so had mission could join?
Reminder to all caps... Votes due early tomorrow.
Axel's integrity is good enough for me, and I'm going off of his communications he said he had with the other five captains. I have no personal knowledge of anything other than what was in the thread, and also, that I told DJATC my choice is to share if it is up for a vote.
I don't think BillRyan exiting the game was directly related to me joining, at least, I hope not. I don't know why he left, but I wasn't asked anything about ujoining the game until after he had.
Quote: Mission146Axel's integrity is good enough for me, and I'm going off of his communications he said he had with the other five captains. I have no personal knowledge of anything other than what was in the thread, and also, that I told DJATC my choice is to share if it is up for a vote.
I don't think BillRyan exiting the game was directly related to me joining, at least, I hope not. I don't know why he left, but I wasn't asked anything about ujoining the game until after he had.
Thanks sir. I think OD would look really bad if committed to pump the pot on an all share then voted steal himself. Let's hope his silence last night is a time zone thing. He should be home from church by now.
Quote: prozemaThanks sir. I think OD would look really bad if committed to pump the pot on an all share then voted steal himself. Let's hope his silence last night is a time zone thing. He should be home from church by now.
It is what it is. I think sharing is the best option everyone has, and if everyone else shares and OD steals, at least a little bit of money still goes out. Further, it wqill increase the perceived trustworthiness of the other six team leaders in this game who will have all shared.
Quote: AyecarumbaHere is my last gasp try to get something out of Mike this round...
If the big pool agrees to guarantee the five members of my team at least 75 cents each this round (some of which will go back into the pool) we will vote share.
That way, at least we all get something instead of ZED. Should a sharing miracle occur and the teams all split the $100, we would not need to receive the sacrificial lamb stipend. I need a guarantee PM by 7:30 p.m. Sunday, Vegas time.
I have nothing to do with any pools. If you want to talk negotiate OD's bribery, talk to him.
Quote: Mission146Cool, now we just need OD to commit to kicking in $50 if:
B. OnceDear’s team steals
If OnceDear's team Steals, then Oncedear will NOT kick in $50. And of course, OnceDear is the one casting his team's vote.
Quote: MaxPenMy share vote has been cast.
Mine as well. SHARE! SHARE! SHARE!
Quote: OnceDearIf OnceDear's team Steals, then Oncedear will NOT kick in $50. And of course, OnceDear is the one casting his team's vote.
That'll make everyone nice and comfortable. Thanks. :-/
Pah! Comfortable is for old fogies.Quote: prozemaThat'll make everyone nice and comfortable. Thanks. :-/
Is it time for me to say.....
...
...
From the instructions given to me by my team members, I could have voted 'Steal' or 'Share' without defying my team's majority. That surprised me, to be trusted with proxies and the casting vote. Cheers guys.
$;o)
" Ya, I will share if everyone does, but I'm probably just going to vote steal, because I don't think it's even possible"
I'm going to leave it up the rest of you to get a firm commitment from him. I don't think he's paying much attention to this thread/game as it becomes more of a chore.
Who are you worried about? Feel free to tell me in private if you wish.Quote: PokerGrinderI fully believe that OD is voting share, he is just having some fun messing with the group by saying he could go either way. OD is not the one that I’m worried about not sharing.
Quote: AxelWolfAs per my conversation with Djatc, he sounded a little shaky, as if he never thought we could get the entire group to share.
" Ya, I will share if everyone does, but I'm probably just going to vote steal, because I don't think it's even possible"
I'm going to leave it up the rest of you to get a firm commitment from him. I don't think he's paying much attention to this thread/game as it becomes more of a chore.
I sent him a PM this morning but he's not read it yet.
I might not be the best person to follow up thought... I'm an a-hole sometimes.
Do you know something we don't? If Djteddybear isn't in the bag then I don't know who it would be. No one likes OD enough to be in his bag (-;Quote: Mission146OD is either stealing or has someone in the bag to steal. Just everyone do your jobs and share and then we'll see who the rat is, if not OnceDear. I'm firmly convinced he's in the bag for himself or someone else is in the bag for he and Wizard. The question is who. Everyone share and we'll find out.
Quote: AxelWolfDo you know something we don't? If Djteddybear isn't in the bag then I don't know who it would be. No one likes OD enough to be in his bag (-;
I don't know anything, I just find it odd that OnceDear would kick in an extra $50 for no reason. Maybe he was personally curious just to see if everyone would share given enough incentive and he felt Wizard's incentive was inadequate.
So, I guess that's one thing, my base assumption is OD doesn't want to part with his $50. If that assumption is wrong, then everything is above board, which is why I'm advocating for everyone to go ahead and share.
If you mean in terms of DJATC, I expressed to him my desire to share and have no reason to believe he won't. Quite frankly, I hope he does and I will be a little p***** if he is the one to steal. I will say that if DJATC is the only one to steal, then I abdicate my right to my part of the prize and will randomly select a player who:
A.) Is not in the main pool.
B.) Is not in my side pool.
AND:
C.) Who was not on my team.
And, my cut of this round if DJATC does steal will go to the person that I randomly select, instead.
I will resist the temptation to joke and say, only Somtimes? and disagree with your last statement.Quote: prozemaI sent him a PM this morning but he's not read it yet.
I might not be the best person to follow up thought... I'm an a-hole sometimes.
TBH, Assuming me and Mike agree to let me pick team Captains, you were on my list.
Quote: AxelWolfI will resist the temptation to joke and say, only Somtimes? and disagree with your last statement.
TBH, Assuming me and Mike agree to let me pick team Captains, you were on my list.
I'm guessing I'm on the list of three that you cannot choose.
Quote: Mission146I don't know anything, I just find it odd that OnceDear would kick in an extra $50 for no reason. ... So, I guess that's one thing, my base assumption is OD doesn't want to part with his $50.
FYI
$50 = £38.07 Pounds sterling
£32 would buy me a Litre of JD. I Like JD.
£40 would buy me a 1 hour Thai massage* ( I have £1.93 in loose change.)
Why TF would I kick in an extra $50 for no reason? I wouldn't. LOL!
Sorry. LMAO.
*Yes. that's good value, isn't it.
Quote: Mission146I don't know anything, I just find it odd that OnceDear would kick in an extra $50 for no reason. Maybe he was personally curious just to see if everyone would share given enough incentive and he felt Wizard's incentive was inadequate.
So, I guess that's one thing, my base assumption is OD doesn't want to part with his $50. If that assumption is wrong, then everything is above board, which is why I'm advocating for everyone to go ahead and share.
If you mean in terms of DJATC, I expressed to him my desire to share and have no reason to believe he won't. Quite frankly, I hope he does and I will be a little p***** if he is the one to steal. I will say that if DJATC is the only one to steal, then I abdicate my right to my part of the prize and will randomly select a player who:
A.) Is not in the main pool.
B.) Is not in my side pool.
AND:
C.) Who was not on my team.
And, my cut of this round if DJATC does steal will go to the person that I randomly select, instead.
I know where he parks
Quote: AxelWolfI will resist the temptation to joke and say, only Somtimes? and disagree with your last statement.
TBH, Assuming me and Mike agree to let me pick team Captains, you were on my list.
Thanks... I just love being captian.
Quote: WizardI've received six of the seven votes. Anyone object if we close voting whenever the last vote arrives?
I do, sort of, since I don't know.what's going on. We might have all the ducks in a row now, and that last vote will seal.the deal. OTOH, there seems to be some last minute maneuvering going on behind the scenes. Maybe someone is being talked into changing from steal to share. OTTH, if I had one, maybe someone else is tempted to steal, having already shared, thinking there's an evil.last-minute opportunity.
So, sort of. Could break either way.
Quote: WizardI've received six of the seven votes. Anyone object if we close voting whenever the last vote arrives?
I object on partially the same grounds as BBB. My contention is that someone who has stolen already may change the vote to share.
LOL.Quote: WizardI've received six of the seven votes. Anyone object if we close voting whenever the last vote arrives?
We don't mind if they are all a share votes.
If there's a steal vote then yes, we mind.
I have a feeling someone already put in their steal vote but hasn't yet read wwhat's hat's happening.
Quote: AxelWolfLOL.
We don't mind if they are all a share votes.
If there's a steal vote then yes, we mind.
I have a feeling someone already put in their steal vote but hasn't yet read wwhat's hat's happening.
Indeed. And, if that person changes the vote, OnceDear will have to steal, or Wizard shells out $100 this round. both Wizard and OnceDear pay out $50 apiece.
Do you want to PM all the captains except DJTeddyBear again and make sure they put in the share vote?
I think if any captain steals this round what we should do is use the, “Block Feature,” to block his/her posts for a period of no fewer than 120 days. That’s OneNickel’s original idea, he suggested a few days, I suggested 120.
Every player not on that team should block that captain.
Quote: Mission146I have permission to reveal I just called OneNickel and he promised he is sharing.
I think if any captain steals this round what we should do is use the, “Block Feature,” to block his/her posts for a period of no fewer than 120 days. That’s OneNickel’s original idea, he suggested a few days, I suggested 120.
Every player not on that team should block that captain.
...
I'll say this one more time.
I voted share.
Quote: prozemaI'll say this one more time.
I voted share.
Prozema gives me permission to affirm he told me he’ll share on PM.
Quote: Mission146Prozema gives me permission to affirm he told me he’ll share on PM.
As I said trying to run the show when you are not a leader. To bad you did not put this effort in when you were a leader
This is a freakin' game. Such threats go way beyond the mild mischief of the game. IMHO.Quote: Mission146I have permission to reveal I just called OneNickel and he promised he is sharing.
I think if any captain steals this round what we should do is use the, “Block Feature,” to block his/her posts for a period of no fewer than 120 days. That’s OneNickel’s original idea, he suggested a few days, I suggested 120.
Every player not on that team should block that captain.
So is wizard liking this bickering?
Quote: OnceDearThis is a freakin' game. Such threats go way beyond the mild mischief of the game. IMHO.
The rules are that there are no rules!
Giv'em hell mission.
Quote: OnceDearThis is a freakin' game. Such threats go way beyond the mild mischief of the game. IMHO.
You’re the only exception. If you steal, I will suggest you NOT be blocked.
Quote: troopscottAs I said trying to run the show when you are not a leader. To bad you did not put this effort in when you were a leader
Last round should have been easy, but I had to deal with you as a co-captain. Nothing I can do when I know you’re 100% determined to steal.
Apparently, the obvious is not as easy as I thought, ergo, more effort.
Where does it say that? rhetorical.Quote: prozemaThe rules are that there are no rules!
IMHO, the rules of the forum do exist and over-rule any rules or non-rules of the game.
Bickering and mischief are pretty obviously to be expected and are implicitly accepted.
But what's been suggested above would seem like bullying of the worst kind. It's shocking to see it even suggested.
I disagree to ***** out. Dat *** gets blocked 120 days. We're already past the point of practicality. Stick to the plans, everyone votes share, don't give into fear and paranoia. Wizard might even just be be trying to cause fear by saying he wanted to count the votes early, when the votes could be all share, hoping to cause a change. I'm understanding the lack of trust in OD, why would he care if someone gets blocked, unless it's him. I'm not giving him an out. If OD or someone else wants to be the worm, let them, you cannot control it.Quote: Mission146You’re the only exception. If you steal, I will suggest you NOT be blocked.
Quote: OnceDearWhere does it say that? rhetorical.
IMHO, the rules of the forum do exist and over-rule any rules or non-rules of the game.
Bickering and mischief are pretty obviously to be expected and are implicitly accepted.
But what's been suggested above would seem like bullying of the worst kind. It's shocking to see it even suggested.
+1
The fear is real you feel. If people feel they can lie, the others can make them fear the others really are telling the truth.Quote: OnceDearWhere does it say that? rhetorical.
IMHO, the rules of the forum do exist and over-rule any rules or non-rules of the game.
Bickering and mischief are pretty obviously to be expected and are implicitly accepted.
But what's been suggested above would seem like bullying of the worst kind. It's shocking to see it even suggested.
Sorry, Mike.Quote: WizardI've received six of the seven votes. Anyone object if we close voting whenever the last vote arrives?
I would object to that, unless all captains individually and clearly assert that they will not change their vote before the original deadline. Can't see that happening.
I make no such assertion at the moment.
[edit] Though, I acknowledge Wizard's right to reject vote change requests.
I think this is just manipulation either way. Either the vote is all share or not. Can be either. I'm not tempted. You can assume he wants to cash in with a steal, or assume he is unhappy with the results and trying to spur a change of vote. Wizard is the enemy in this game.Quote: WizardI've received six of the seven votes. Anyone object if we close voting whenever the last vote arrives?
So, you want me to steal?Quote: Mission146You’re the only exception. If you steal, I will suggest you NOT be blocked.
Why encourage me?
I'm really disappointed by your offer to suggest I not be blocked and I reject your kind offer.
I'm more disappointed that you encouraged bullying.
You might have just swung a vote and saved me [edit and Wizard] $50. Nice one!
Quote: OnceDearWhere does it say that? rhetorical.
IMHO, the rules of the forum do exist and over-rule any rules or non-rules of the game.
Bickering and mischief are pretty obviously to be expected and are implicitly accepted.
But what's been suggested above would seem like bullying of the worst kind. It's shocking to see it even suggested.
I’m allowed to lie. Maybe I’m lying. Maybe I’m not.
I’m not bullying anyone. I said, “Suggest.” I’m not making anyone do anything. I should like to think I can block whoever I want to, though it would violate a Forum Rule to say I have blocked them after I do.
I think you’re just upset because you’ll either have to steal and prove the game rigged, or $100 is going out this round.
Quote: onenickelmiracleI disagree to ***** out. Dat *** gets blocked 120 days. We're already past the point of practicality. Stick to the plans, everyone votes share, don't give into fear and paranoia. Wizard might even just be be trying to cause fear by saying he wanted to count the votes early, when the votes could be all share, hoping to cause a change. I'm understanding the lack of trust in OD, why would he care if someone gets blocked, unless it's him. I'm not giving him an out. If OD or someone else wants to be the worm, let them, you cannot control it.
I have been weak, my friend, forgive me. Lol