Investing in Cytodyn
TSLA hasn't rebounded yet.
CYDY just hit a 52 week low.
Quote: MDawgAMZN still roaring.
TSLA hasn't rebounded yet.
CYDY just hit a 52 week low.
MDAWG adventures. Permanently hidden!
Quote: SOOPOOThe definition of trolling. Adding nothing to this thread. Just posting like a petulant child. Hijacking as well.
MDawg…. You don’t fear a “long term” downturn of even good companies due to inflation, out of control government borrowing, corporate tax hikes, etc?
So you are calling me a troll?
Personal insult
Quote: SOOPOODark…. You know I like you! But seriously, Mike has acquiesced to the will of the Forum and made it more difficult to access the mathematically challenged threads. It was just rude of you to come to a chatty thread about stocks to gloat over the other thread being hidden.
And as per the warped interpretations here, I didn’t call you a troll, I said the post you made was trolling.
I know
I like you too soopoo.
MDawg keeps posting on Cytodyn, a stock he has no interest in financially. So clearly his interest is only to dig into me.
And he has been rattled by his adventures thread being hidden and that I don't have a problem with it.
So, if he is so interested in Cytodyn I am just as interested in his inability to get his adventures seen.
So, yes both MDawg and I are acting like petulant siblings. We both make money in casinos and apparently both using advantage play which I called him on over a year ago. He is just upset I was right so now he wants to advertise where (at the moment at least) I am wrong.
Yes I have stated from Day One that I believe CYDY is a poor choice for investment, but that is intrinsic to the company and to the stock. I have also mentioned at times that it would be time to sell! sell! sell! CYDY, but again this has to do with the action movement of the stock, and my professional opinion of it. So far, I was right - the time to dump it WAS the few times it hit 6 or 7. Look at it now, it's sadly at a 52 week low. 1.61
Quote: MDawgIf CYDY (or any stock) is mentioned, the discussion should center on the stock.
. Look at it now, it's sadly at a 52 week low. 1.61
So you are saying that this would be a good time to average down and buy more? Lol
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cytodyn-granted-significant-patent-uspto-100000667.html
I took umbrage at his claims to beat the casino sans an advantage. Most of his supporters say he is doing just that
Most of his detractors say he isn't winning at all, it's a farce.
I have been saying for a long time he probably is winning but with an advantage.
He has now admitted he plays with an advantage so why he doesn't view me as at least a partial supporter of him idk. Perhaps because I called it correctly when he was trying to make different claims.
I welcome him to the AP community. I think he should go about bragging a bit differently. But I brag so I am not against bragging overall.
As for Cytodyn, the stock is not a loss to me until I sell but I certainly am not happy with the current place of the SP. But I made my investment based on the science. There seems to be some FDA corruption which may not be overcome, but the science is still strong. Plenty of drugs that go through this process have ups, downs. It a process of discovery. So I am still hopeful my Cytodyn investment pans out.
As far as CYDY, my issue with this stock and others like it is that such stocks should be treated as calculated gambles, and sold off or at least partially sold off when they go up, versus held long term solely as a home run play. By such stocks, I mean - in general - negative -EPS, penny stocks.
Quote: MDawgStepping back, but in a positive light, from the stocks topic of this thread - yes, it's true that DarkOz and I have butted heads at times in the past. However I believe it is also true that we have come to realize that both of us are utilizing various means of Advantage play at the casinos.
As far as CYDY, my issue with this stock and others like it is that such stocks should be treated as calculated gambles, and sold off or at least partially sold off when they go up, versus held long term solely as a home run play. By such stocks, I mean - in general - negative -EPS, penny stocks.
MDawg isn't wrong about penny stocks. A bit of research will show the same argument.
I invested based on my understanding of the science and didn't care about penny stock status.
Will penny stocks status overrule science? I would hope not but I do admit if this were a boxing match in the eleventh round, the judges would be siding with penny stock status.
Hopefully in the end science will rule out. I have a lot invested
At any rate I invested in a second stock about six months ago and am up about forty percent. That stock is also long-term biotech but NOT a penny stock.
I haven't mentioned it because of all the hostility here when I created my Cytodyn thread. Didn't feel like being accused of pumping a stock again. I only ever wanted to discuss my picks, that's all!
Quote: darkoz
At any rate I invested in a second stock about six months ago and am up about forty percent. That stock is also long-term biotech but NOT a penny stock.
PRAY TELL!
Don't worry in the MDawg Investments thread it will simply be viewed as yet another banal stock chat convo.
