Nathan's Corner
Quote: NathanI am tentatively considering running for First Female President of The United States. The first issue I'd like to tackle is Retirement Funds for every working Adult,/Teen. It broke my heart when I learned a Grandfather who was in his 80's and had worked in a business for over 50 years had no Retirement Plan when the long time business was shut down due to a fire incident. The business had no Retirement Plans. That's inexcusable and unacceptable. This poor man. Job offers are slim pickings for people in their 80's and he should have been able to retire in peace. If I were President, I'd make sure Retirement Plans were there for everybody. You just never know when a disaster will cause a business to shut down.
I thanked the post since you are considering running, but not for the content. Gg
where have you learned about this 80 year old guy?
We already have social security, 15% of income goes in. I'd kick all the people able bodied out of disability. I'd vote for you Nathan, but I'm an illegal alien.Quote: NathanGive me your honest opinion. Does this sound stupid?
You go, girl/___.Quote: NathanI am tentatively considering running for First Female President of The United States.
Will you be running as a democrat, republican or an independent catfish?
Quote: UarTbieHthere must be some reason behind why he could'nt save some money for retirement though,
where have you learned about this 80 year old guy?
He is a semi regular Customer. :)
Hmmm. Welcome new user. Welcome to Nathan's forum Corner.Quote: joaobbphhow much per day?a
Quote: OnceDearHmmm. Welcome new user. Welcome to Nathan's forum Corner.
Nathan's Corner is right. ;)
Whatever the case, I'll take a suspention if this is against the rules so all the members here can get some insight regarding Nathan.
There's probably a little backstory missing, perhaps someone else can fill everyone in if need be.
Dan Druff Dan Druff is offline
Owner
Dan Druff's Avatar Join Date
Mar 2013
Posts
3,266
I am starting to go along with the theory that Tasha/Karen is a phony, and that Kentry is the same person as Tasha/Karen.
The evidence:
- Tasha/Nathan is now avoiding the offer to have a phone call with me.
- Kentry's posts are ridiculous and seem like troll baiting.
- Tasha/Nathan is also known to make posts which are troll baiting, while on WoV (think of the lottery posts)
- Tasha only uses a TMobile cell phone to post, and Kentry uses a business IP to post. Yet both resolve to the same city on the east coast. Interesting coincidence!
My questions:
1) Tasha, when can we have our phone call?
2) Tasha, why do you only come on here from your cell phone?
3) Kentry, can you provide any sort of proof that your ridiculous, sad-sack stories are true?
4) Did you two realize you're from the same city? If so, when and how?
Nor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.Quote: AxelWolfI don't know the rules on posting up information from another site.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is of course his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
Quote: NathanHe is a semi regular Customer. :)
He can't even afford to buy Metamucil on a consistent basis?
Quote: PuckerbuttHe can't even afford to buy Metamucil on a consistent basis?
LMAO! :D
I agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Quote: AxelWolfI agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Are you suggesting some people here take Nathan seriously?
Quote: AxelWolfI agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Axel, I am not Kentry! And I have been deceptive like only 2 times!
Quote: NathanQuote: AxelWolfI agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Axel, I am not Kentry! And I have been deceptive like only 2 times!
LMAO :D
Lol, if only you knew.Quote: billryanAre you suggesting some people here take Nathan seriously?
All IMHO, of course...
Some people DO take Nathan seriously.
Some people care deeply, for and/or against.
Some people really believe that Nathan is Karen, is a sweet and genuine young lady. They vocally leap to her defence and chide the moderators for bullying her.
Some people really believe that Nathan is the creation of a technically savvy troll who's having a great laugh at our expense. Those people vocally criticise the moderators for tolerating her.
Some just take Nathan 'the character' with a pinch of salt and read into her posts whatever they choose, enjoying the soap opera.
And some of us are moderators, who judge and moderate the posts, not the person behind the keyboard.
We impose the forum rules. We are not here to impose morality or statute. If Nathan is a 'character' and that character stays within the rules, then that's pretty much the end of it.
Again, all IMHO. YMMV.
As OD said, we are taking Nathan at face value. Not based on what she does on another forum, or what other people say to or about her on another forum. There is no other way for us to do it at this point.
Quote: RS#TeamNathan
:) Thanks, RS. :)
All good teams need a bus. Some people might like this one.Quote: RS#TeamNathan
https://www.google.com/search?q=short+bus&client=ms-android-americamovil-us&prmd=ivsn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLnaHK7szcAhWB7Z8KHQ0HDrsQ_AUIESgB&biw=360&bih=560#imgrc=GbmYYo6EPoQw2M:
Quote: AxelWolfAll good teams need a bus. Some people might like this one.
https://www.google.com/search?q=short+bus&client=ms-android-americamovil-us&prmd=ivsn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLnaHK7szcAhWB7Z8KHQ0HDrsQ_AUIESgB&biw=360&bih=560#imgrc=GbmYYo6EPoQw2M:
Oh the irony!
As if you didn't spend a fortune on her lottery picks. I may never recover. To make matters worse, she won't post her picks anymore. So now, I have no chance of getting even. I would have never followed Kentry's picks as I would never trust a guy with a bad haircut.Quote: billryanQuote: AxelWolfI agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Are you suggesting some people here take Nathan seriously?
Quote: AxelWolfAs if you didn't spend a fortune on her lottery picks. I may never recover. To make matters worse, she won't post her picks anymore. So now, I have no chance of getting even. I would have never followed Kentry's picks as I would never trust a guy with a bad haircut.Quote: billryanQuote: AxelWolfI agree, it may not be the original Kentry banned from here. However, the evidence leads me to believe the "new" Kentry is Nathan, and she has been making up many different personas used for trolling for a long time. Not that we haven't allready suspected that anyway, but this looks like the smoking gun.Quote: OnceDearNor me. Unless Dan was banned here, I don't see that you've broken the rules. However, I do believe Wizard is pretty much against such quoting. No action from me on this one.
I have had that post brought to my attention. It did not tell me much that I didn't already know, with regards to what devices and locations, certain members are posting from. I'm amused that he's trying to set up a call.
Just an FYI, It's my opinion that the Kentry on that other forum might not Actually be the real Kentry that was banned from here.
What Dan does on his forum, is, of course, his own business. If he does it in ways that are public knowledge, then I might use, or ignore that knowledge as appropriate.
If you read the "new" kentry's writing style and demeanor, it's as if someone took the time to make sure it's not Nathan like.
We allready know Nathan has a propensity for being deceptive. It seems to me that it's even worse than we thought.
I have no doubt it's all harmless but no one likes being taken for a ride on the bus.
Are you suggesting some people here take Nathan seriously?
I lost $150 on bad Lottery Numbers! $150! Plus people were getting tired of my Lottery posts.
Quote: NathanI lost $150 on bad Lottery Numbers! $150! Plus people were getting tired of my Lottery posts.
Not only were people getting tired of those lottery posts: I saw a couple cockroaches slapping themselves to stay awake.
Quote: MrVNot only were people getting tired of those lottery posts: I saw a couple cockroaches slapping themselves to stay awake.
I admit, I shouldn't have posted so many posts of it. Just for kicks, I did a tally of how many posts I made about it in just this thread, and I made a whopping over 100 posts! That's the equivalent of more than 10 pages! O.O
Quote: AxelWolfI don't know the rules on posting up information from another site. I know relaying information from a banned member is frowned upon. I'm fairly certain Dan has never had an issue here and is well known in the poker community known for helping to expose fraudsters.
Whatever the case, I'll take a suspention if this is against the rules so all the members here can get some insight regarding Nathan.
There's probably a little backstory missing, perhaps someone else can fill everyone in if need be.
Dan Druff Dan Druff is offline
Owner
Dan Druff's Avatar Join Date
Mar 2013
Posts
3,266
I am starting to go along with the theory that Tasha/Karen is a phony, and that Kentry is the same person as Tasha/Karen.
The evidence:
- Tasha/Nathan is now avoiding the offer to have a phone call with me.
- Kentry's posts are ridiculous and seem like troll baiting.
- Tasha/Nathan is also known to make posts which are troll baiting, while on WoV (think of the lottery posts)
- Tasha only uses a TMobile cell phone to post, and Kentry uses a business IP to post. Yet both resolve to the same city on the east coast. Interesting coincidence!
My questions:
1) Tasha, when can we have our phone call?
2) Tasha, why do you only come on here from your cell phone?
3) Kentry, can you provide any sort of proof that your ridiculous, sad-sack stories are true?
4) Did you two realize you're from the same city? If so, when and how?
Ah crap, I have t mobile. Maybe I am nathan.btw, a nice perknof tmobile is free MLB package and free wifi on planes with go go.
Quote: GWAEI try to stay away and then I get PMS saying I need to come back. Sigh.. nathan just loves this attention. It is so funny that we all know that if we ignored this thread nathan would move on to another forum yet no one can do that. I think I have to stop there before I get my first suspension
I stopped posting so many Lottery posts, what more do you want from me?
Great minds think alike.Quote: GWAEAh crap, I have t mobile.
Quote: joaobbphhow much per day?a
Welcome to WOV! :D What do you mean by your post? :/
So, I paid $32 for two sets of Fantasy 5 for 15 days with EZ Match. I bought a $5 Grouper, $4 in scratch off tickets, $16 in Pick 3/Pick 4, $2 in Pick 2. I will budget $20 for Casino gambling. :)
Quote: GWAEI try to stay away and then I get PMS saying I need to come back.
I'm told that one should use an apostrophe to make a plural only if it is of a number. For example, "Her ice skating scores were all 10's." So, the sentence above is in proper English, according to my understanding, except perhaps the s should should have been lower case. Either way on the s, I think you can see why not using an apostrophe may cause some confusion. What do the wizards of English sayeth?
Somehow the term "yos" just doesn't look right.
'in proper English' is the opposite of 'improper English'. :o)Quote: WizpardSo, the sentence above is in proper English. . . What do the wizards of English sayeth?
I found it very clear: GWAE said that his premenstrual syndrome keeps dragging him back here. I think I'll avoid him for a couple of weeks.
I'm not sure about that rule. I understand that an apostrophe is used when making a plurality with an abbreviation or acronym. But I could be wrong. Definitely lower case 's'
Quote: OnceDear
I found it very clear: GWAE said that his Premenstrual syndrome keeps dragging him back here. I think I'll avoid him for a couple of weeks.
I read that the exact same way you did.
Quote: NathanI stopped posting so many Lottery posts, what more do you want from me?
boy if that isn't baiting
Quote: GWAEboy if that isn't baiting
Master baiting if I ever saw it.
Quote: WizardMaster baiting if I ever saw it.
Oy Mike, just oy.
Quote: WizardMaster baiting if I ever saw it.
Oh come now.
Quote: GWAEboy if that isn't baiting
How is that "Baiting,"? People said they were getting tired of the Lottery posts, so I stopped talking about that so much.
Quote: PokerGrinderOy Mike, just oy.
I laughed in shocked laughter when Mike made that risque joke. LMAO! :D O.O
Quote: GWAEI try to stay away and then I get PMS saying I need to come back. Sigh.. nathan just loves this attention. It is so funny that we all know that if we ignored this thread nathan would move on to another forum yet no one can do that. I think I have to stop there before I get my first suspension
What are you doing with your diet to get PMS? Damn son
Quote: NathanSo listening to the Delilah Show on the radio recently, a caller said she felt she and this guy were soulmates, but he had another obligation he was tied to. Delilah asked something like,"Married obligated or dating obligation?" The caller replied,"He is dating another woman." Delilah lightheartedly said,"Okay, a married obligation is off limits, but if he's just dating, than it's fair game." What horrible advice. "He already has a girlfriend, leave him alone," (But in a nicer way, ;) "Or at least wait for them to break up," Should have been the answer IMHO.
I can't believe that crap is still on the radio. Used to be here but no more, or maybe it is I dont know. Deelllliiilllaaahhhhhh
I do miss love line though. That was fun
Quote: NathanHow is that "Baiting,"? People said they were getting tired of the Lottery posts, so I stopped talking about that so much.
Because you asked what else I wanted.. if any of us answered that then we would probably be suspended.
