ZCore13
Quote: AxelWolfI think any bet made on a slot or video poker game should at least allow the player a chance to win sometimes... even if its 1 in a million times you win $1. even in roulette betting red and black you have a chance to break even. The fact that a casino offers a bet that you can only lose is upsetting. The casinos should just offer a heads I win tails you lose game.
I'm not aware of any single bet you can make that can never win. You used roulette as an example, and of course if you cover all 38 numbers in roulette with $1 each you're guaranteed to lose $2, but that's 38 mutually exclusive bets, not one. What game can never win?
Frankly, though, if it is as bad as you're making it sound, I don't think it's disreputable at all. Anyone stupid enough to take a bet like that, the casino will put their money to better use than they could.
Quote: sodawaterThis happens in casinos every day by people who, for some reason, bet pass and don't pass for the same amount, or red and black in roulette. They might be doing it for comps, but the fact remains they cannot win and can only lose.
Bad example. The reason players bet both pass and don't pass is because they want the option of where to be their odds. You're right, there is no reason to make just doey-dont flat bets, but when the point is established you have your option about where to bet the odds.
But I have a better example for you to consider: penny slots.
edited to add: I think that in Nevada, for example, slots must return a minimum of 75%.
Quote: AxelWolfYour on the right track, however the bet has zero chances to win more or = to your original bet. What you're saying you could occasionally win more if you get lucky. No chance to get lucky on this bet its absolutely impossible excluding a mistake. I Just think that no bet should be allowed that they authenticity just take a significant percent and hand you back a guaranteed loss each and every time i'm not talking 1 or 2 percent I'm talking 10% .
So what are you waiting for? You wouldn't be putting it off this long if there really weren't some angle, which I expect you'll vociferously defend as "not an angle" when you finally get around to it.
Quote: AlanMendelsonI think that in Nevada, for example, slots must return a minimum of 75%.
Yes, and in Jan. 2013 penny slots on the Strip returned 86.13% (the lowest I have ever seen), but this isn't an example of a bet that always loses you money. The key word is ALWAYS.
Quote: onenickelmiracleChange machine??
Youre not supposed to lose on the change machine either. But it occasionally happens with malfunctions I guess...lol
Quote: AxelWolfI assured you already its a legit game a slot, its not a trick or riddle.
Does the player know in advance that he can't get back at least as much as he bet?
I am assuming there's no "gimmick" involved other than the players' inability to notice that the maximum payout amount is less than what it costs to play - for example, it's not a "high roller" machine that requires $1000 to play and has two outcomes, lose and $1200 (which becomes "less than $1000" because they cut a W-2G on it).
Quote: AxelWolfAs I said I was really asking what people thought about a bet offered like that. I wanted opinions on that part. I't has nothing to do with W2G's and it's NO ANGLE.
You must be able to see why none of us are believing you. Typically this device of trying to get others' opinions with partial information concealed is to get someone to agree to something they wouldn't normally agree to, to try to pick apart their reasons for not agreeing. The fact that you've stretched it out this long, long after all that can be said sight unseen has been said, is difficult to see any other way.
Quote: AxelWolfThe average person probably would not be able to or take the time however one would assume its money back or a loss and most likely know you cant win. Its just the 10% GUARANTEED loss each time I'm amazed about. A rush of curiosity killed this cat....-%10 DOH!
That is interesting, and I would be very interested to hear how it is being implemented. Especially if by "slot" you really do mean slot, rather than some virtual game.
So what is the bet?
I gave you a definitive answer, now it's your turn.
Quote: FinsRuleWhen is a door not a door?
When it is a blue pill
Quote: FinsRuleWhen is a door not a door?
When it's neither blocking nor allowing entry into a room?
Quote: AxelWolfNo doubt no one would normally want to make that bet. I'm sure Under proper conditions it would be a smart bet. I really wanted more of a ethical debate on having such a bet. I wanted to know what the more influential people thought. Perhaps I'm wrong for thinking its predatory. I was hoping people like wizard would chime in.
And if you tell us things like...
(a) the name of this game;
(b) where you saw it;
(c) what it costs to play, and what is the most that it pays out
then maybe Wizard just might.
Quote: AxelWolfYes I just wanted to wait for more comments to see if I'm way off base thinking a reputable place should absolutely not be offering a bet like this.Quote: MathExtremistAre you actually going to tell us what game this is?
Quote: FinsRuleWhen is a door not a door?