Trump's Second and Third year in office
Quote: RSQuote: darkozQuote: MaxPen
More like:
THAT POOR LADY SUCKERED OUT OF RESPECTABILITY. OH WELL, SHE OBVIOUSLY MARRIED HIM FOR HIS MONEY. SHE COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE FOUND MARRYING A TRANSGENDER ORANGUTAN ATTRACTIVE
nah, it was right the first time (on the image).
You know the righties realize they are gonna lose the 2020 election when their only barbs are to suggest Obama's wife was a man
Rebuked by the FEC, lol.
Anyone making wagers that Trump will try to get dirt on his opponents from foreign (probably russia) entities for 2020.
This time, if he does it, he wont have that Im too dumb to have known excuse
I don't know whether or not Michelle is really a man.
One thing I do know: they both have bigger c*cks than Donald.
Quote: AxelWolfYa, after you got got caught doing something some people might think is very hypocritical.
LOL.
Axel is upset I'm making fun of Melania and Trump
Whats next, upset that I am a registered Republican that did not vote for Trump
I changed my mind but to lazy to change my registration party status
Are you gonna post another dumb video?
Kind of feel sorry for your side. Nothing new, the same ol same ol
Kind of sad you believe the Michelle BS
We have fun on the left. Dumb Trump provides us with new material to make fun of him every single day
Sorry if that frustrates you
lol
Image circa 1952
Quote: darkozhttps://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/06/13/fec-chair-its-illegal-to-accept-intel-from-foreign-governments-during-us-elections/23749192/
Rebuked by the FEC, lol.
Anyone making wagers that Trump will try to get dirt on his opponents from foreign (probably russia) entities for 2020.
This time, if he does it, he wont have that Im too dumb to have known excuse
Article came from Huff Post. "Fake News" for half this forum.
Quote: tringlomaneArticle came from Huff Post. "Fake News" for half this forum.
Some people just cant deal with reality including our President. lol
Quote: ams288I don't know whether or not Melania is really a man.
I don't know whether or not Michelle is really a man.
One thing I do know: they both have bigger c*cks than Donald.
Barrack is definitely a bigger cuck than Donald, that we can agree on.
Quote: tringlomaneArticle came from Huff Post. "Fake News" for half this forum.
Its on other links. I just chose that particular one
Quote: darkozIts on other links. I just chose that particular one
Oh I know, I just wanted to make a Huff Post joke. Lol
It's posts like this that leads posters to believe you are protected.Quote: ams288I don't know whether or not Melania is really a man.
I don't know whether or not Michelle is really a man.
One thing I do know: they both have bigger c*cks than Donald.
Quote: ams288I don't know whether or not Melania is really a man.
I don't know whether or not Michelle is really a man.
One thing I do know: they both have bigger c*cks than Donald.
Quote: petroglyphIt's posts like this that leads posters to believe you are protected.
Isn't he a self proclaimed expert on c*ck?
Quote: petroglyphIt's posts like this that leads posters to believe you are protected.
Hahaha that’s funny.
After pages and pages of both sides trolling each other about the two First Ladies having penises, what makes my post any worse??
Quote: MaxPenIsn't he a self proclaimed expert on c*ck?
Damn right.
Nice try.Quote: ams288Hahaha that’s funny.
After pages and pages of both sides trolling each other about the two First Ladies having penises, what makes my post any worse??
2020 Democratic debate lineup
Quote: petroglyphNice try.
???
I have no idea what you’re trying to get at here.
119 total judges confirmed
76 District Court judges
41 Circuit Court judges
2 Supreme Court justices
Making the judiciary great again!!
Quote: Fleaswatter7 more judges confirmed by the senate this week.
119 total judges confirmed
76 District Court judges
41 Circuit Court judges
2 Supreme Court justices
Making the judiciary great again!!
Was the judiciary not great before these 119 judges were confirmed?
Quote: Fleaswatter7 more judges confirmed by the senate this week.
119 total judges confirmed
76 District Court judges
41 Circuit Court judges
2 Supreme Court justices
Making the judiciary great again!!
Welcome back! Your time-out ended almost a week ago. Thought you got lost in the woods or something.
Quote: TigerWuWas the judiciary not great before these 119 judges were confirmed?
He believes judges make decisions based on party policies.
He believes the Republican party now has hundreds of judges in their collective pocket.
Otherwise who would care?
The Supreme Court is the only real place where a left or right leaning set of chairs matter
Quote: darkozHe believes judges make decisions based on party policies.
He believes the Republican party now has hundreds of judges in their collective pocket.
Otherwise who would care?
The Supreme Court is the only real place where a left or right leaning set of chairs matter
I mean, I guess I understand his "logic," but it isn't very sound... a lot of the judges that Trump appointed were replacing judges appointed by other Republican Presidents, so the overall "judiciary bias," if there even is one, won't move as much as he thinks it will. Furthermore, Obama appointed over 300 judges during his time in office, Bush 2 appointed over 300, Bill Clinton appointed almost 400, so even if there IS a judiciary bias it just swings back and forth depending on who the President is, so ultimately it evens out.
Quote: darkozHe believes judges make decisions based on party policies.
He believes the Republican party now has hundreds of judges in their collective pocket.
Otherwise who would care?
The Supreme Court is the only real place where a left or right leaning set of chairs matter
Quote: TigerWuI mean, I guess I understand his "logic," but it isn't very sound... a lot of the judges that Trump appointed were replacing judges appointed by other Republican Presidents, so the overall "judiciary bias," if there even is one, won't move as much as he thinks it will. Furthermore, Obama appointed over 300 judges during his time in office, Bush 2 appointed over 300, Bill Clinton appointed almost 400, so even if there IS a judiciary bias it just swings back and forth depending on who the President is, so ultimately it evens out.
It seems both of you are downplaying both the effect and role that these judicial appointments may have.
So I have a question for both of you.
If these appointments are so seemingly unimportant, why are the vast majority of the appointments both opposed by and overwhelmingly voted against by the dems?
Quote: TigerWuWas the judiciary not great before these 119 judges were confirmed?
Who isn't for law enforcement.
The left and the right want the law enforced, especially obstruction of justice. Something Trump may not support lol
Quote: ams288I’m pretty sure when the GOP swept the Presidency, House, and Senate in 2016 the righties had higher expectations for what would be accomplished than appointing a bunch of judges and shrinking their own tax refunds.
Didn't Trump something, day 1, no Obamacare and the wall goes up
LOL
Quote: ams288I’m pretty sure when the GOP swept the Presidency, House, and Senate in 2016 the righties had higher expectations for what would be accomplished than appointing a bunch of judges and shrinking their own tax refunds.
Finally something I can agree with you on.
The first year plus the Republican establishment hated the best President ever just as much as the Dems. He isn't one of "them". Not in their good old boys club. They wanted to let him know they had the power and weren't going to give it up to some interloper.
Sad because some really good and needed things could have been passed.
It doesn't upset or frustrate me that you are making fun of her, do your best, I know its hard since you really don't have much(no good dick pic's like we have on Michael/Michele). We have all kinds of stuff on your girl Hillary. I just remember you being all high and mighty claiming you would never stoop to such lows, blah blah blah. Seems very hypocritical of you.Quote: terapinedLOL.
Axel is upset I'm making fun of Melania and Trump
Whats next, upset that I am a registered Republican that did not vote for Trump
I changed my mind but to lazy to change my registration party status
Are you gonna post another dumb video?
Kind of feel sorry for your side. Nothing new, the same ol same ol
Kind of sad you believe the Michelle BS
We have fun on the left. Dumb Trump provides us with new material to make fun of him every single day
Sorry if that frustrates you
lol
Quote: FleaswatterIt seems both of you are downplaying both the effect and role that these judicial appointments may have.
So I have a question for both of you.
If these appointments are so seemingly unimportant, why are the vast majority of the appointments both opposed by and overwhelmingly voted against by the dems?
No idea. I'm neither a politician nor a Democrat.
I'm assuming that whenever a Democrat President is in office, HIS appointed judges are voted against by Republicans.
Like I said, the balance of power, assuming there is one on the judiciary level, swings back and forth depending on who the President is.
Quote: FleaswatterIt seems both of you are downplaying both the effect and role that these judicial appointments may have.
So I have a question for both of you.
If these appointments are so seemingly unimportant, why are the vast majority of the appointments both opposed by and overwhelmingly voted against by the dems?
Judges are supposed to be impartial and follow the law.
If dems are just voting against anything trump does its probably out of spite or a poisoned well philosophy ie Trump is so horrible anything he does must be bad.
I personally dont agree with that but i am not in office.
You make it sound like appointing judges by republicans is good for Republicans or in essence these judges by Trump will make partial decisions based on party.
How can that be making America great?
You dont want impartial judges on the bench for fairness? America is great when judges dont go by the law but their political parties?
Quote: AxelWolfI know its hard since you really don't have much(no good dick pic's like we have on Michael/Michele). We have all kinds of stuff on your girl Hillary. I just remember you being all high and mighty claiming you would never stoop to such lows, blah blah blah. Seems very hypocritical of you.
I live in reality. I simply was joking around about Melania but my views are grounded in reality. Mel is a woman
You live is some grotesque fantasy world where your hate is so deep, you make disgusting allegations against woman
I joke, you post disgusting false allegations. Big difference.
Quote: ams288I’m pretty sure when the GOP swept the Presidency, House, and Senate in 2016 the righties had higher expectations for what would be accomplished than appointing a bunch of judges and shrinking their own tax refunds.
If you would have told me Nov 1, 2016 we would be sitting here with 2 new Conservative Supreme Court justices, an incredible tax cut and Hillary sitting at home not damaging the country, I would have called you crazy. And been thankful as can be.
It’s not about what hasn’t been accomplished, it’s about delaying the damaged liberals would have done.
Quote: BozIf you would have told me Nov 1, 2016 we would be sitting here with 2 new Conservative Supreme Court justices, an incredible tax cut and Hillary sitting at home not damaging the country, I would have called you crazy. And been thankful as can be.
It’s not about what hasn’t been accomplished, it’s about delaying the damaged liberals would have done.
2 new conservative justices. Yes that was good for your side.
To be fair that was really McConnell not Trump who did the insane move of denying Obama a rightful pick
I am certain when the same situation occurs for the dems all the righties will be upset at their own choice of how justices get placed.
Tax cuts? I think they said an family of four saves $600 per year? So less than $2 a day for 4 people?
Great the whole family can buy an extra can of Mister Pibb (not coke or pepsi) each day
Hillary doing damage is just speculation. We never will know what her presidency would have been like good or bad
Quote: darkoz2 new conservative justices. Yes that was good for your side.
To be fair that was really McConnell not Trump who did the insane move of denying Obama a rightful pick
I am certain when the same situation occurs for the dems all the righties will be upset at their own choice of how justices get placed.
Tax cuts? I think they said an family of four saves $600 per year? So less than $2 a day for 4 people?
Great the whole family can buy an extra can of Mister Pibb (not coke or pepsi) each day
Hillary doing damage is just speculation. We never will know what her presidency would have been like good or bad
She is a Dem, with liberals views. Almost everything they do is against my current best interest, until I early retire. Then I’m all aboard the handout train. My goal is to perfectly calculate my income level each year to legally get every possible benefit available. Dividends from Mutual Fund distributions can make it tough but luckily we don’t have means testing for most handouts, only income level.
Trumps 4 or 8 years put me closer to that day and we all vote our own personal best interests, right?
Quote: darkozJudges are supposed to be impartial and follow the law.
If dems are just voting against anything trump does its probably out of spite or a poisoned well philosophy ie Trump is so horrible anything he does must be bad.
I personally dont agree with that but i am not in office.
You make it sound like appointing judges by republicans is good for Republicans or in essence these judges by Trump will make partial decisions based on party.
How can that be making America great?
Judges for the most part fall into 2 categories, liberal and conservative.
My opinion, and I tend to believe that this opinion about justices is widely held, is that:
-(1) a “liberal judge” is one that believes in their own personal ideologies and when the letter of the law conflicts with their ideologies, they legislate from the bench
-(2) a “conservative judge” is one that understands that a judge’s function is bound by the letter of current law, and that it is expressly not a judge’s job to decide and “legislate” what the laws “should” say and ignore what they DO say.
Democratic presidents nominate liberal judges and republican presidents conservative judges.
So when I make the statement “make the judiciary great again”, I am expressing my belief that the “conservative justices” appointed will rule on the basis of “the letter of the law” and not “interpret the law based upon their personal ideologies and legislate from the bench” as I believe many "liberal" judges do.
Quote:You dont want impartial judges on the bench for fairness?
Of course I desire impartial judges, but unfortunately this is not always the case.
Quote:America is great when judges dont go by the law but their political parties?
See response above
Quote: BozShe is a Dem, with liberals views. Almost everything they do is against my current best interest, until I early retire. Then I’m all aboard the handout train. My goal is to perfectly calculate my income level each year to legally get every possible benefit available. Dividends from Mutual Fund distributions can make it tough but luckily we don’t have means testing for most handouts, only income level.
Trumps 4 or 8 years put me closer to that day and we all vote our own personal best interests, right?
Thats fair enough.
There are other things all Americans should be for (disaster relief, foreign enemies dealt with) etc.
On those bipartisan issues we wont know. She might have been horrible flubbing everything. Or she might have been fantastic. Never will know now
But thats how elections go
Quote: BozIf you would have told me Nov 1, 2016 we would be sitting here with 2 new Conservative Supreme Court justices, an incredible tax cut and Hillary sitting at home not damaging the country, I would have called you crazy. And been thankful as can be.
It’s not about what hasn’t been accomplished, it’s about delaying the damaged liberals would have done.
So instead of liberals damaging the country, we have Trump and conservatives damaging the country.
At least with Hillary the deficit would be a lot lower.
So... MAGA??
Said the guy who claims to be a pot head or whatever you want to call it.Quote: terapinedI live in reality.
Quote: terapinedI simply was joking around about Melania but my views are grounded in reality. Mel is a woman
You live is some grotesque fantasy world where your hate is so deep, you make disgusting allegations against woman
I joke, you post disgusting false allegations. Big difference.
My hate is deep against who???? Please explain. For the record, I make jokes about anyone and everyone including people I like, so there goes your theory out the window. You will have to show me where I was not joking.
Other than the obvious atrocious things and people, there are not many things or people I hate(I hate beets, but I tend to just ignore them). For the most part, unless its something directly affecting me or people I like and care about, I dont really think about it or care that much. So, It's really only in your own fantasy world where my hate runs deep.
This goes without saying but...DUH.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/kyle-kashuv-harvard-pro-second-amendment-parkland
Oops! Bye gurl!
His Twitter account has a picture of him sitting in the Oval Office with Donald. I LOLed
Quote: lilredrooster
Too funny and so true
Thanks
Quote: lilredrooster
Still doesn't beat the picture of Michelle showing her "man parts".
But to each his own, not my right to tell anyone what they should laugh at.
I laughed at a "Ribbed for her pleasure" shirt of a starving African Boy with his thumbs up. Does that make me a bad person?
https://www.tshirthell.com/funny-shirts/ribbed-for-her-pleasure/
By the way, T Shirt Hell has great shirts for those not easily offended.
Quote: BozQuote: lilredrooster
Still doesn't beat the picture of Michelle showing her "man parts".
Years from now as historians rake Trump over the coals
Boz is gonna get so upset, he's gonna insult Michelle. lol
Life is good, the right has no new material and go with the same ol same ol
Life is good. The left has new material every day. The cartoon is funny
Iran probably attacks oil tankers last week. This week it now has claimed it shot down a US drone.
Got any idea what Iran has to gain? Trump's response has been a bit strange, but that's nothing new.
Quote: rxwineAnyone want to take a guess.
Iran probably attacks oil tankers last week. This week it now has claimed it shot down a US drone.
Got any idea what Iran has to gain? Trump's response has been a bit strange, but that's nothing new.
Trying to rationalize the actions of a radical muslim nation is an exercise in futility. I just hope if we respond it is quick and devastating. Should have turned the place into a parking lot of glass back in the 80's.
Quote: rxwineIran probably attacks oil tankers last week.
"Probably" is based on....???
Iran controls the Persian Gulf. It is the key to the entire region's economy. So they "probably" committed an act to hurt global opinion on the safety of commerce on its waterway?
The ship was Japanese. Japan was in Iran at the time of attack. Japan is not pointing the finger. Iran "probably" has them hostage somehow?
America says mine. Japanese owner of vessel claims flying object. Damage is above water line. Iran... "probably" bought bouncing betty marine mines from the Russians?
18 months from an Election. My Maine point is we shouldn't be Tonkin about this as if the American claim doesn't require at least 9/11ths of 2001 grains of salt.
Quote: Face"Probably" is based on....???
Iran controls the Persian Gulf. It is the key to the entire region's economy. So they "probably" committed an act to hurt global opinion on the safety of commerce on its waterway?
The ship was Japanese. Japan was in Iran at the time of attack. Japan is not pointing the finger. Iran "probably" has them hostage somehow?
America says mine. Japanese owner of vessel claims flying object. Damage is above water line. Iran... "probably" bought bouncing betty marine mines from the Russians?
18 months from an Election. My Maine point is we shouldn't be Tonkin about this as if the American claim doesn't require at least 9/11ths of 2001 grains of salt.
We can call it Operation Wag the Dog
Quote: FleaswatterJudges for the most part fall into 2 categories, liberal and conservative.
My opinion, and I tend to believe that this opinion about justices is widely held, is that:
-(1) a “liberal judge” is one that believes in their own personal ideologies and when the letter of the law conflicts with their ideologies, they legislate from the bench
-(2) a “conservative judge” is one that understands that a judge’s function is bound by the letter of current law, and that it is expressly not a judge’s job to decide and “legislate” what the laws “should” say and ignore what they DO say.
I would like for this to be true, but I don’t buy it.
Looking at recent history, all the dissenting opinions in Obergefell v. Hodges (gay marriage) were conservative judges.
How is that a conservative viewpoint?
I thought a large component of conservatism was small government.
Government being involved in marriage at all is big government. The government telling you who you can or cannot marry is bigger government.
