You might begin here.
He is supposed to self-surrender today to begin a two year fraud conviction sentence.....
Find an inmate.
Locate the whereabouts of a federal inmate incarcerated from 1982 to the present.
Find By NumberFind By Name
Type of Number Number
Search
Result using number 13141-111 clear Clear Form
profile
DAVID RUSSELL FOLEY
Register Number: 13141-111
Age: 49
Race: White
Sex: Male
NOT IN BOP CUSTODY
Release Date: UNKNOWN
Related Links
Call or email
Send mail/package
Send money
Visit
Voice a concern
Because you bought a stock that's traded over the counter for pennies, has no SEC registration, and can be manipulated by one or two big traders or touts? Did you even check their balance sheet?Quote: MrVMy investment in NTEK has not gone well. The stock has tanked. Down over 91%! Good grief. Why the implosion?
I'm nobody's investment guru, but there are certain things you can do to limit your risk. One thing is to NOT TRADE PENNY STOCKS!
My stock screen of 01/17/15 had 10 gainers in excess of 30%, out of 29 total picks. The top pick gaining 113.74% and a second one with a gain of 101.44%.
Am I gloating? Yes! Screw the experts.....LOL.
Summary | S&P $ Invested | $ Gain | % Gain | Stk Screen $ Invested | $ Gain (Loss) | % Gain | Annualized |
Screen Run of 07/19/14: | $1,978.22 | 98.56 | 4.98% | $129.91 | 13.60 | 10.47% | 10.89% |
Screen Run of 08/16/14: | $1,955.06 | 121.72 | 6.23% | $589.45 | 28.56 | 4.85% | 5.48% |
Screen Run of 09/20/14: | $2,010.40 | 66.38 | 3.30% | $231.44 | 70.23 | 30.34% | 38.46% |
Screen Run of 11/09/14: | $2,031.92 | 44.86 | 2.21% | $459.00 | 53.77 | 11.71% | 17.97% |
Screen Run of 12/20/14: | $2,070.65 | 6.13 | 0.30% | $508.35 | (27.13) | -5.34% | -9.89% |
Screen Run of 01/17/15: | $2,019.42 | 57.36 | 2.84% | $546.97 | 61.44 | 11.23% | 24.26% |
Screen Run of 02/17/15: | $2,100.34 | (23.56) | -1.12% | $526.92 | 19.36 | 3.67% | 9.72% |
Screen Run of 03/07/15: | $2,071.26 | 5.52 | 0.27% | $1,170.46 | 48.45 | 4.14% | 12.59% |
Screen Run of 03/28/15: | $2,061.02 | 15.76 | 0.76% | $383.21 | 60.65 | 15.83% | 58.35% |
Screen Run of 04/18/15: | $2,081.18 | (4.40) | -0.21% | $321.57 | 21.77 | 6.77% | 31.68% |
Screen Run of 05/09/15: | $2,116.10 | (39.32) | -1.86% | $660.35 | 5.71 | 0.86% | 5.54% |
Screen Run of 06/07/15: | $2,092.83 | (16.05) | -0.77% | $274.82 | (27.55) | -10.02% | -130.68% |
Total | $24,588.40 | $332.96 | 1.35% | $5,802.45 | $328.86 | 5.67% | |
Symbol | Name | Last Close |
ADEP | ADEPT TECH INC | 7.20 |
ALLT | ALLOT COMM LTD | 7.08 |
CGNT | COGENTIX MEDICL | 1.62 |
NVEE | NV5 HOLDING INC | 25.28 |
ORBK | ORBOTECH LTD | 20.68 |
PEIX | PAC ETHANOL INC | 10.06 |
RNET | RIGNET INC | 30.64 |
RTIX | RTI SURGICAL | 6.29 |
SMCI | SUPER MICRO COM | 29.02 |
STRI | STR HOLDINGS | 1.13 |
UPIP | UNWIRED PLANET | 0.61 |
XCRA | XCERRA CORP | 7.72 |
ARAY -reported earnings yesterday and they were mediocre. Today they announced a deal with one of the larger cancer operators around. Continues to look like a hold. Market Cap at about 1X sales. If the market were a bit better and I had some spare cash, this is one that I would consider adding to.
ALLT - Need to dig a bit deeper on this.
EGHT- Doing OK. Continuing to look like a hold.
FCEL- Need to re-think this one. May exit. Oil has come down to where I expect it to trade for quite a while. FCEL is probably a poor choice with oil pricing where it is.
NVIV- Down off its high, but continues to look like a fantastic hold.
ONVO- Probably jumped the gun on this one, but I continue to like it.
RKUS- Leaning towards a hold.
SSYS- Still a hold.
SVA- Has done very well. I still consider it a future 800 LB. gorilla in China. Definitely holding.
YNDX- This one may be the biggest mystery that I have ever run across. I realize it's Russian, but........wow, it's market cap is ridiculous. It's trading at around 1X's a QUARTER'S earnings. Somewhere around 7% of annual sales. An approximate $4B market cap for a company with around $50-$60B in sales. Not the greatest Balance Sheet, but certainly not worth this type of discount.
Quote: steeldcoSo I'm looking at the portfolio wondering whether there is anything that I should change.
So, steeldco, Aug 21st was your last check-in, before the crash. How are your stocks doing?
Quote: odiousgambitSo, steeldco, Aug 21st was your last check-in, before the crash. How are your stocks doing?
odiousgambit, I initially thought that you were asking about the performance of the stock screens. However, I now note that you had included a 08/21/15 date which would have been when I made comments regarding the portfolio picks. My commentary stands. My performance is below. The S&P 500 over this time frame lost 1%. My portfolio gained just over 1%. See table below.
Symbol | 09/04/15 Price | Shares | 09/04/15 Value | 08/21/15 Price | Shares | 08/21/15 Value | $ Change | % Change | ||
ALLT | $5.00 | 1,000 | $5,000.00 | $5.04 | 1,000 | $5,040.00 | -$40.00 | -0.79% | ||
ARAY | $6.60 | 900 | $5,940.00 | $6.58 | 900 | $5,922.00 | $18.00 | 0.30% | ||
EGHT | $7.78 | 1,000 | $7,780.00 | $8.22 | 1,000 | $8,220.00 | -$440.00 | -5.35% | ||
FCEL | $0.91 | 8,000 | $7,311.20 | $0.74 | 8,000 | $5,920.00 | $1,391.20 | 23.50% | ||
NVIV | $9.85 | 2,000 | $19,700.00 | $9.83 | 2,000 | $19,660.00 | $40.00 | 0.20% | ||
ONVO | $2.53 | 1,500 | $3,795.00 | $2.14 | 1,500 | $3,210.00 | $585.00 | 18.22% | ||
RKUS | $11.22 | 700 | $7,854.00 | $11.28 | 700 | $7,896.00 | -$42.00 | -0.53% | ||
SSYS | $28.38 | 200 | $5,676.00 | $28.27 | 200 | $5,654.00 | $22.00 | 0.39% | ||
SVA | $5.10 | 2,150 | $10,965.00 | $5.50 | 2,150 | $11,825.00 | -$860.00 | -7.27% | ||
YNDX | $11.50 | 500 | $5,750.00 | $11.04 | 500 | $5,520.00 | $230.00 | 4.17% | ||
$79,771.20 | $78,867.00 | $904.20 | 1.15% | |||||||
I'm so heavy into index funds that you can just look at a chart of the S&P 500 to know what happened to mine. I am well prepared for this drop however, plus so far actually it is not that much of a big deal.
the fear factor for me is length of time before they go back up to where they were.
I am always in fear of the general market it seems. The problem is that every blasted time I decide to move to cash or vice versa because the market is concerning, I end up being wrong. I do my best to disregard my general market feelings.
Quote: odiousgambitHow is your portfolio compared to the August date convenient for you to check that is prior to 8-18?
I'm so heavy into index funds that you can just look at a chart of the S&P 500 to know what happened to mine. I am well prepared for this drop however, plus so far actually it is not that much of a big deal.
the fear factor for me is length of time before they go back up to where they were.
The table below is from the opening of the 18th. The S&P 500 over this time period was down 7.20%. The table below shows a loss of 9.59%.
Symbol | 09/04/15 Price | Shares | 09/04/15 Value | 08/18/15 Price | Shares | 08/21/15 Value | $ Change | % Change | ||
ALLT | $5.00 | 1,000 | $5,000.00 | $5.10 | 1,000 | $5,100.00 | -$100.00 | -1.96% | ||
ARAY | $6.60 | 900 | $5,940.00 | $6.16 | 900 | $5,544.00 | $396.00 | 7.14% | ||
EGHT | $7.78 | 1,000 | $7,780.00 | $8.57 | 1,000 | $8,570.00 | -$790.00 | -9.22% | ||
FCEL | $0.91 | 8,000 | $7,311.20 | $0.80 | 8,000 | $6,400.00 | $911.20 | 14.24% | ||
NVIV | $9.85 | 2,000 | $19,700.00 | $12.31 | 2,000 | $24,620.00 | -$4,920.00 | -19.98% | ||
ONVO | $2.53 | 1,500 | $3,795.00 | $2.70 | 1,500 | $4,050.00 | -$255.00 | -6.30% | ||
RKUS | $11.22 | 700 | $7,854.00 | $12.38 | 700 | $8,666.00 | -$812.00 | -9.37% | ||
SSYS | $28.38 | 200 | $5,676.00 | $30.69 | 200 | $6,138.00 | -$462.00 | -7.53% | ||
SVA | $5.10 | 2,150 | $10,965.00 | $6.00 | 2,150 | $12,900.00 | -$1,935.00 | -15.00% | ||
YNDX | $11.50 | 500 | $5,750.00 | $12.49 | 500 | $6,245.00 | -$495.00 | -7.93% | ||
$79,771.20 | $88,233.00 | -$8,461.80 | -9.59% | |||||||
Quote: odiousgambitHow is your portfolio compared to the August date convenient for you to check that is prior to 8-18?
I'm so heavy into index funds that you can just look at a chart of the S&P 500 to know what happened to mine. I am well prepared for this drop however, plus so far actually it is not that much of a big deal.
the fear factor for me is length of time before they go back up to where they were.
Just curious, how did the sum of your index funds do??
Quote: steeldcoThe S&P 500 over this time period was down 7.20%. The table below shows a loss of 9.59%.
Thanks, I was wondering if your particular focus was trending better or worse in a downturn.
Quote: steeldcoJust curious, how did the sum of your index funds do??
From time to time, I take a look at the total value of my assets excluding home equity, including cash and equivalents, but don't separate out equities. Took a hit. Let me get back to you on equities only.
Quote: petroglyphAt one point yesterday there were 207 claims per ounce of deliverable gold, ala John Corzine or Bernie Madoff. If you don't hold it, you may not. Gold has moved from West to East. Where does the 2000 tons of gold China sucks up anually come from?
I don't know what claims per ounce is about. What did you come across? I am out of gold right now but might buy again as it may be heading below $1100 per ounce.
Quote:A question I think worth pondering? If you own stock, do you have in your possession the original stock certificates? If not, do you know who/what the DTCC is, and did it go underwater on 911? Possession is often at least 9/10ths of the law. Of course, IMHO.
I am one of the old duffers that can remember actually holding my stock certificates. I should have kept the ones that became worthless for nostalgia. I was good at picking those as I got a lot of help from the pros in those days. If the DTCC went underwater, somebody is coming up with the cash when I sell. So maybe you are right, they have sucked me in. But I can tell you that real paper can become worthless too.
To me, if you want to worry about the nature of the Capitalist System, just ponder the fact that your deposits at the bank down the street are not really there. If there is a run on the bank, they might have something like 20% of the depositors' money to give out. This is no secret of course. And most of the things in a Capitalist system are like that. I'm pretty sure that's what happened with the Credit Default Swap fiasco.
Quote: odiousgambitLet me get back to you on equities only.
Using statements from 7/31 and comparing to the same from 8/31, and deducting cash [with possible error] the values of equities went down about 6%. Including bond funds, about 4%
Quote: odiousgambitI don't know what claims per ounce is about. I was pointing out if buyers weren't aware, that there is a big difference between physical metals and "paper" metals. I have been stung with both. The first time, I at least held the bullion, during Reagan, and got killed. The second I had what I thought was silver and indeed payed storage fees on what turned out to be "paper silver" which meant what I actually invested in was a silver proxy. Just like "SLV" is today. They may hold 10% of what they sell in proxy's. The sec has passed a law that the Comex, does not have "to settle" in actual metal. If someone were to show up at the door during a crisis [or just about anytime] they can settle in cash or check. They do not have to produce the metal that the certificate claim indicates.
It galls me that they are allowed to charge storage fees on hypothetical metal. The tidbit I put up was to share that for every ounce of gold that is "deliverable" at the Commodity exchange, there are over two hundred people that think they own that ounce. If there were a run on the banks, a lot of people would be very disappointed as the exchanges have sold more than 200 times as much gold as exists. No one to my satisfaction,has come up with a believable theory as to where all the gold that China has purchased [an took delivery] has come from. The last I've seen was they hold more than 9000 tons, which is more than the US claims to hold, in all it's bullion vaults. There hasn't been an audit of Fort Knox in decades, and even that wasn't assayed.Ted Butler probably knows as much as anybody?Ihttp://www.butlerresearch.com/archive-free.aspQuote:What did you come across?
People buy gold [or metals] for different reasons. If buying for an investment, the money is in turning it, so paper is faster. If holding as a hedge against a debasement or gov. confiscation ala https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102,, other ways to store wealth may be something to consider?I wish I would have held onto my confederate money. likewise for nostalgia.Quote:I am one of the old duffers that can remember actually holding my stock certificates. I should have kept the ones that became worthless for nostalgia.
I just like to point out the reality occasionally that those of us who have a portfolio don't actually hold the stock itself, we have "claims" on the stock. I wonder how many fictitious stock certs have been printed up to go along with the fed. res. notes? It's not like anyone is actually going to turn GE, or Monsanto into cash and divvy it up amongst all that have claims on it. I just like a dose of truth to go with my gmo cereal in the morning. : )Quote:If the DTCC went underwater, somebody is coming up with the cash when I sell.
I went down the rabbit hole before when sweeps became legal. After closing, the bank doesn't have to hold 1%. Then along came this whole tier capital, and marc to fantasy accounting. There are over 600 trillion in derivatives floating around in cyber space at any given time. It wouldn't take a 3% fault to collapse the whole fiat central bank system. Ever wonder what happened to Saddam's gold or Khadaffi's gold, [86 tons] or why the guerilla's in Libya formed a central bank during the conflict, or why we haven't returned Germany's AU, after their request last year? Ukraines gold was the first thing apprehended. What about Greece? They "had" around 80 tons. I want to know where the world is coming up with over 2000 tons per year that China is admitting to receiving, at these manipulated prices.Quote:To me, if you want to worry about the nature of the Capitalist System, just ponder the fact that your deposits at the bank down the street are not really there. If there is a run on the bank, they might have something like 20% of the depositors' money
Edited; just went over 228 claims per deliverable ounce
Quote: coachjmAdding my 2 cents YMMV. I've taken my entire retirement portfolio and put it on the sideline for now (bonds and money market). My analysis leads me to believe (for discussion purposes - using S&P) that 2k is the new 2140 and we need at least another revisit of the mid 1800 bottom of a few weeks ago. My lone position is albeit a minor holding, of SLV. I was previously invested in (after a long hiatus, initiated some positions 5-6 months ago) AAPL, STX, HD, SPG, ACN, TJX & IBM and the one stock which I didn't set a limit on, KORS, crushed my returns. I took what little profit I had, just before the correction, and ended down,about 5%. I'm now sitting on the sidelines until we break down, or up, which looks to be coming in 2 weeksish. I just keep looking at the higher lows as we ascend to a tip, last time we broke down, I have a feeling it'll head there again. Really looking forward to a correction, obviously not an emerging bear. But any losses I dodge, are gonna be compounding once we start moving forward again. Cool thread!
Apologies in advance for being harsh ... I am very opinionated in these matters, and to top it off there's no particular reason you should be listening to me. On that matter, though, I can confidently say I am merely echoing what I have gleaned from Ric Edelman and from various newsletters put out by places like Vanguard and T Rowe Price over decades. Yes, there are people who say not to listen to them either.
For what you have said you've done, you lock in your losses this way. Plus bonds can lose their value too. The market actually has done a minor correction is all. That's the good news and the bad news. It's good that you have picked a time when stocks are higher than they were most of 2014 [you say you are down 5% so perhaps you haven't been investing long]. What's bad is this minor correction has seemed to panic you.
That was harsh as promised, but you can redeem yourself and even crow and brag, thumbing your nose at me and all those "experts" ha ha ha.
How? Buy back in at the best time, or even just buy back in when stocks are lower than they are now by some substantial amount.
There have been guys promoting books and such all along over the years predicting financial meltdowns. Like a stopped clock, they are right every now and then, twice a day for a clock and maybe once a decade for financial doomsayers. In the case of the latter, they can take that lucky stroke and try to profit on it. The problem is, almost without exception, they fail to get back in at the right time. So, if you can do it, thumb your nose indeed.
PS: what's the alternative? Learn how to rebalance your portfolio in times of correction. That unfortunately means buying stocks and selling bonds during a downturn, the opposite of what you have described.
You'd be suprised how much of world history revolves around oil prices. Including our current and ongoing mess with Iran. Don't forget our entry into WWII was caused by oil -- not giving the Japanese enough of it precipitated the Pearl Harbor attack.Quote: steeldcoI had said a while ago that I thought that the range for oil would be $44, plus or minus 10%. I am knowing wondering if this is optimistic. But more importantly the cynic in me is thinking "is the killing and fighting in the Middle East actually the work of governments there, who are dependent upon oil, trying to cull the herds"? Or even if not, will lower pricing bring even more violence since the Middle East economies are dependent on oil?
In regards to what are you gonna do? You're absolutely right. I've thought long and hard about alternatives and in the current state, I'm hard pressed to find many. I've tried to see how I could get some uranium exposure, maybe almonds, thought about gold some.. am OK with bonds moving lower, but I'll most likely commit a fair portion (maybe 20% of my outstanding cash) to peer-to-peer lending. I've purchased 15 or so notes via LendingClub and have not had a write off yet (2 fully paid, rest current - about the same time frame, 6-8 months of doing it). It will tie funds up for 18-36 month periods (unless you sell the notes on the market), but I feel like returns of 5-7% are achievable with a relative degree of certainty (currently I'm at 16+% which I'm sure will come down once I've had a few write offs - but by diversifying as with stocks, you can decrease your volatility). LendingClub and Prosper seem to have solid programs. I also have a european mutual fund via FMI International that I have not gotten rid of, along with a few DRIPS that I started a while back in college, a local bank, GE, KO, and recently SWKS. Along with my lone position in silver, which I bought a tad too high, but am sitting on.
If I had to try and be as specific as I can be (which isn't very), I would say I plan to reenter the market under the following conditions:
It will be below where I got out, it will have dipped at minimum to 1870 (not saying I will get in at 1870), it will not be within the next 6 months, probably at least a year. If we zoom past 2140 however, I'll be in and have lost out that 10% I was trying to save, but I'm OK with that. I just need indicators to tell me so, fundamentally. I just can't see it happening any time soon. If it doesn't happen, we'll either break down, or trade in a range.. I'll have multiple opportunities to set up camp for my retirement fund. Again, to reiterate, I'm not trying to call a bottom, I just think we're going down for a brief stint. I'll get in somewhere.. And will most likely sit it out for another 5 years or so. This is the longest I've ever not been invested with my retirement fund (just bonds and g <-- g not for gld - if you know what I mean).
TLDR: I respect your points. I don't care for the sake of ego, whether or not I'm right. Just that I believe in something and plan to follow through. To say with certainty that anything in life will happen is not wise in my eyes. The only thing I hope to clarify (because I respect other's points of view and respect people for offering them openly and truthfully) is that I'm not one of those fanatics calling game over. Hiccup, or long bathroom stint, we're going back to the party at some point.
If I was trying to make a read on you, it seems like you listen to Mo Ansari too. I feel like you think I'm one of those, "gloomers and doomers". I'm not. :) Thanks again for the input, OG. I'm glad I found this thread to get some scoops on things outside my scope of familiarity. Have a great Sunday!
Quote: odiousgambitApologies in advance for being harsh ... I am very opinionated in these matters, and to top it off there's no particular reason you should be listening to me. On that matter, though, I can confidently say I am merely echoing what I have gleaned from Ric Edelman and from various newsletters put out by places like Vanguard and T Rowe Price over decades. Yes, there are people who say not to listen to them either.
For what you have said you've done, you lock in your losses this way. Plus bonds can lose their value too. The market actually has done a minor correction is all. That's the good news and the bad news. It's good that you have picked a time when stocks are higher than they were most of 2014 [you say you are down 5% so perhaps you haven't been investing long]. What's bad is this minor correction has seemed to panic you.
That was harsh as promised, but you can redeem yourself and even crow and brag, thumbing your nose at me and all those "experts" ha ha ha.
How? Buy back in at the best time, or even just buy back in when stocks are lower than they are now by some substantial amount.
There have been guys promoting books and such all along over the years predicting financial meltdowns. Like a stopped clock, they are right every now and then, twice a day for a clock and maybe once a decade for financial doomsayers. In the case of the latter, they can take that lucky stroke and try to profit on it. The problem is, almost without exception, they fail to get back in at the right time. So, if you can do it, thumb your nose indeed.
PS: what's the alternative? Learn how to rebalance your portfolio in times of correction. That unfortunately means buying stocks and selling bonds during a downturn, the opposite of what you have described.
On your prompt I will check out Mo Ansari although it will be a little tough starting out as their was a guy named Ansari [not related surely] who did me ill not so long ago. Haven't forgotten LOL.
As for market timing, no gambler can resist it probably. Me neither, but for years I tried to time my purchases, never selling though. Back then I was a buyer mostly anyway. That probably was useless but I feel not harmful. Now I try to do maintenance by Balance. Just to prove I'm a gambler, though, I keep far more % in stocks than is recommended for someone my age LOL.
Four months ago, Roger, a 55-year-old construction worker from Mooresville, N.C., fell out of a deer stand and was left with a damaged spinal cord and no sensation from the middle of his chest down. Patients with his condition typically have less than a 1-in-20 chance of recovering any feeling in or control over the paralyzed areas. A new kind of implant aims to change that.
At Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, Roger, who doesn’t want to disclose his last name to protect his privacy, allowed doctors to perform an experimental procedure that involved cutting directly into his spinal cord to insert a sort of bridge for surviving nerve cells. Within a month, he regained feeling in his abdomen, some feeling in his legs, and some bladder control. While he’s not walking, he says he’s determined to get there and is getting leg braces so he can move with a walker.
More from Bloomberg.com: Why America's Oil Output Refuses to Collapse
Roger was the third patient to receive the implant, made by InVivo Therapeutics in Cambridge, Mass., and the second with markedly improved bodily function. The chance of that happening was below 1 percent, according to InVivo Chief Executive Officer Mark Perrin, and it’s welcome news for the 8,000 Americans who suffer spinal cord-related paralysis each year.
Conventional treatment focuses on repairing a fractured spine with rods and screws, but it doesn’t address the spinal cord itself, which relays electrical impulses from the brain to the body. Imaging studies show that cell death in the spinal cord generally spreads even as patients recover. InVivo’s device, called the neuro-spinal scaffold, is a tiny cylindrical implant made of biodegradable plastic fibers. It supports nerve cells like a trellis, directing their growth where needed.
More from Bloomberg.com: Amazon to Ban Sale of Apple, Google Video-Streaming Devices
“You’re not just trying to stabilize the spine, but do something helpful directly at the area of the injury,” says Dom Coric, chief of neurosurgery at Carolinas Medical Center, who’s working with InVivo. “If we can preserve those cells, maybe we’ll get some function back.” The implant dissolves over several weeks, he says.
InVivo’s scaffold emerged from the MIT lab of Bob Langer, a biomedical engineering professor who’s founded some two dozen companies. More than a decade ago, Erin Lavik created a prototype scaffold for her MIT graduate thesis. As detailed in a breakthrough study she published with Langer in 2002, Lavik’s device, seeded with stem cells, helped paralyzed rats walk again. Later tests on rodents and monkeys proved similarly encouraging. (So far, human tests haven’t included stem cells.) Lavik is now a biomedical engineering professor at Case Western Reserve University.
More from Bloomberg.com: iPhone Screens Made This Hidden Entrepreneur $7 Billion
InVivo, co-founded by Langer in 2005, licensed the technology from MIT in 2007 to commercialize it. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration initially granted the company permission to treat five patients, tracking each for three months before enrolling another. In October 2014, Jordan Fallis received the implant after a flip on a dirt bike paralyzed him from the waist down, and he regained some motor function. Patient No. 2, Jesi Stracham, has regained some sensation but no motor function in her legs since her motorcycle accident. Following those results, the FDA allowed InVivo to simultaneously enroll its last three patients, including Roger.
Langer, who’s been closely watching the patients’ progress, says he expects even better results when the company seeds the scaffold with stem cells or other growth factors to encourage regrowth of damaged nerves. InVivo has received a humanitarian device exemption, meaning it needs only proof of “probable benefit” to get FDA approval for wider use, according to CEO Perrin. He says he’s still talking with the FDA about what further tests the agency might want and wouldn’t set a target date for commercial approval.
While InVivo negotiates with the FDA, other scientists are working on new materials that could further stimulate cell growth within the spinal cord. Anthony Windebank, a neurologist at the Mayo Clinic’s Regenerative Neurobiology Laboratory, is working to develop biodegradable polymers that mimic the jello-like properties of the spinal cord. “The technology is changing, and what we can do with cells and biomaterial is revolutionary,” he says. It would be immoral, he says, “to not pursue this as hard as we can.”
The bottom line: InVivo’s neuro-spinal scaffold has led to marked improvement in two of its first three patients. FDA approval is pending.
More from Bloomberg.com
I'll run another screen this coming weekend.
Here are the results as of today:
Summary | S&P $ Invested | $ Gain | % Gain | Stk Screen $ Invested | $ Gain (Loss) | % Gain | Annualized |
Screen Run of 07/19/14: | $1,978.22 | 55.44 | 2.80% | $129.91 | 12.05 | 9.28% | 7.39% |
Screen Run of 08/16/14: | $1,955.06 | 78.60 | 4.02% | $589.45 | (12.14) | -2.06% | -1.75% |
Screen Run of 09/20/14: | $2,010.40 | 23.26 | 1.16% | $231.44 | 37.23 | 16.09% | 14.86% |
Screen Run of 11/09/14: | $2,031.92 | 1.74 | 0.09% | $459.00 | 16.36 | 3.56% | 3.77% |
Screen Run of 12/20/14: | $2,070.65 | (36.99) | -1.79% | $508.35 | (68.39) | -13.45% | -16.15% |
Screen Run of 01/17/15: | $2,019.42 | 14.24 | 0.71% | $546.97 | 32.39 | 5.92% | 7.83% |
Screen Run of 02/17/15: | $2,100.34 | (66.68) | -3.17% | $526.92 | (39.88) | -7.57% | -11.28% |
Screen Run of 03/07/15: | $2,071.26 | (37.60) | -1.82% | $1,170.46 | (17.04) | -1.46% | -2.34% |
Screen Run of 03/28/15: | $2,061.02 | (27.36) | -1.33% | $383.21 | 66.47 | 17.35% | 30.73% |
Screen Run of 04/18/15: | $2,081.18 | (47.52) | -2.28% | $321.57 | 25.50 | 7.93% | 15.65% |
Screen Run of 05/09/15: | $2,116.10 | (82.44) | -3.90% | $660.35 | (27.76) | -4.20% | -9.36% |
Screen Run of 06/07/15: | $2,092.83 | (59.17) | -2.83% | $274.82 | (40.00) | -14.55% | -39.35% |
Screen Run of 07/05/15: | $2,076.78 | (43.12) | -2.08% | $147.33 | (14.78) | -10.03% | -34.22% |
Total | $26,665.18 | ($184.48) | -0.69% | $5,802.45 | ($29.99) | -0.52% | |
and bonds, which make me sick [but I feel I have to invest in] are up in price, I'm selling some
Quote: steeldcoAlso, I am starting to get the feeling that civil war in Saudi Arabia is inevitable. Where would oil prices go? If it happens, imagine where we would have been had we not increased domestic reserves and production.
This?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-oualaalou/a-possible-coup-in-saudi_b_8325456.html
btw I do not recall the assassination in 1975
Quote: odiousgambit
This?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-oualaalou/a-possible-coup-in-saudi_b_8325456.html
btw I do not recall the assassination in 1975
Yes. BTW, I didn't recall the assassination either.
Symbol | Name | Last Close |
DSKY | IDREAMSKY ADR | 12.03 |
FIT | FITBIT INC | 37.31 |
NVEE | NV5 HOLDING INC | 23.1 |
CGNT | COGENTIX MEDICL | 1.4 |
SSYS | STRATASYS LTD | 27.22 |
RNET | RIGNET INC | 31.46 |
MTSN | MATTSON TECH | 2.35 |
P | PANDORA MEDIA | 12.19 |
SMCI | SUPER MICRO COM | 29.9 |
RTIX | RTI SURGICAL | 3.88 |
ORBK | ORBOTECH LTD | 16.35 |
QUOT | QUOTIENT TECH | 6.38 |
EXAR | EXAR CORP | 5.91 |
CRUS | CIRRUS LOGIC | 31.37 |
HIVE | AEROHIVE NETWRK | 6.99 |
DDD | 3D SYSTEMS CORP | 10.44 |
SALE | RETAILMENOT INC | 10.53 |
EXAM | EXAMWORKS GROUP | 28.75 |
PRCP | PERCEPTRON INC | 8.11 |
CDNA | CAREDX INC | 4.36 |
STRI | STR HOLDINGS | 0.51 |
PEIX | PAC ETHANOL INC | 6.47 |
ALLT | ALLOT COMM LTD | 5.6 |
XCRA | XCERRA CORP | 7.27 |
HCCI | HERITAGE-CRYSTL | 11.97 |
MCHX | MARCHEX INC | 4.44 |
CHGG | CHEGG INC | 7.83 |
RATE | BANKRATE INC | 12.24 |
Quote: steeldcoTook a while, but I am now a bit more comfortable with the market. Here's a stock screen run as of today. I also decided to rank them from best to worst.
Symbol Name Last Close DSKY IDREAMSKY ADR 12.03 FIT FITBIT INC 37.31 NVEE NV5 HOLDING INC 23.1 CGNT COGENTIX MEDICL 1.4 SSYS STRATASYS LTD 27.22 RNET RIGNET INC 31.46 MTSN MATTSON TECH 2.35 P PANDORA MEDIA 12.19 SMCI SUPER MICRO COM 29.9 RTIX RTI SURGICAL 3.88 ORBK ORBOTECH LTD 16.35 QUOT QUOTIENT TECH 6.38 EXAR EXAR CORP 5.91 CRUS CIRRUS LOGIC 31.37 HIVE AEROHIVE NETWRK 6.99 DDD 3D SYSTEMS CORP 10.44 SALE RETAILMENOT INC 10.53 EXAM EXAMWORKS GROUP 28.75 PRCP PERCEPTRON INC 8.11 CDNA CAREDX INC 4.36 STRI STR HOLDINGS 0.51 PEIX PAC ETHANOL INC 6.47 ALLT ALLOT COMM LTD 5.6 XCRA XCERRA CORP 7.27 HCCI HERITAGE-CRYSTL 11.97 MCHX MARCHEX INC 4.44 CHGG CHEGG INC 7.83 RATE BANKRATE INC 12.24
Way, way too early, but I'm intrigued with the ranking that was applied. During the initial 2 days, while the S&P was down .47%, the top 15 picks averaged a gain of 1.65% with 10 of the 15 showing gains. 2 of them with double digit gains. One of 15% and the other with a gain of 11.68%.
The bottom 13 of the picks averaged a 2.76% loss, with 2 of them being in double digit losses of 21.11% and 10.36%.
Total Picks | Screen Run Date | # of 100% Gains | Symbols | % of Total |
43 | 8/16/2015 | 1 | INFN | 2.33% |
16 | 9/20/2014 | 1 | GIMO | 6.25% |
25 | 11/9/2014 | 1 | CYNI | 4.00% |
26 | 12/20/2014 | 2 | MXL,NPTN | 7.69% |
29 | 1/17/2015 | 2 | BRDR,AAOI | 6.90% |
26 | 2/17/2015 | 1 | GLOB | 3.85% |
67 | 3/7/2015 | 0 | 0.00% | |
17 | 3/28/2015 | 1 | ADEP | 5.88% |
249 | Total | 9 | 3.61% | |
Using this metric, I took a look at the last screen run and chose the 5 best performers. Shown below. Which one of these will be the 100% gainer in the bunch??
Symbols | Screen Run Date | Gain as of 11/28/15 |
CDNA | 11/4/2015 | 44.50% |
MTSN | 11/4/2015 | 29.79% |
ORBK | 11/4/2015 | 23.85% |
RATE | 11/4/2015 | 20.18% |
P | 11/4/2015 | 12.63% |
Open Positions:
Symbol | Price | Price Paid | SHARES | Gain (Loss) | % Gain |
ALLT | 5.35 | 7.86 | 1000 | ($2,525.00) | -32.06% |
ARAY | 7.03 | 8.61 | 900 | ($1,437.00) | -18.51% |
EGHT | 12.15 | 7.28 | 1000 | $4,862.00 | 66.71% |
FCEL | 0.8486 | 1.13 | 8000 | ($2,261.20) | -24.99% |
NVIV | 9.27 | 3.72 | 2000 | $11,092.00 | 148.93% |
ONVO | 3.39 | 5.67 | 1500 | ($3,435.00) | -40.32% |
RKUS | 11.34 | 10.39 | 700 | $657.00 | 9.02% |
SSYS | 24.38 | 36.02 | 200 | ($2,343.00) | -32.46% |
SVA | 5.42 | 3.72 | 2150 | $3,647.00 | 45.55% |
YNDX | 16.57 | 25.815 | 500 | ($4,638.50) | -35.89% |
$3,618.30 | 4.34% | ||||
Closed Positions:
Symbol | Time & Price | Price | Shares | Mkt Value | Price Paid | Cost | $ Gain (Loss) | % Gain |
OPTR | 23-Oct | $12.78 | 571 | $7,297.38 | $14.00 | $7,994.00 | ($696.62) | -8.71% |
CCIH | 6-Dec | $8.74 | 2,025 | $17,698.50 | $3.95 | $7,998.75 | $9,699.75 | 121.27% |
SIMG | 27-Jan | $7.26 | 1,500 | $10,890.00 | $4.61 | $6,915.00 | $3,975.00 | 57.48% |
TRIB | 10-Feb | $17.53 | 500 | $8,765.00 | $16.97 | $8,485.00 | $280.00 | 3.30% |
CKSW | 30-Apr | $12.44 | 1,000 | $12,440.00 | 8.04 | $8,040.00 | $4,400.00 | 54.73% |
BRDR | 6-May | $13.94 | 1,200 | $16,728.00 | 6.03 | $7,236.00 | $9,492.00 | 131.18% |
Total | $46,668.75 | $27,150.13 | 58.18% | |||||
Quote: steeldcoIt's been a while since I posted the performance of the picks made for my personal portfolio here so I thought that I would do it. BTW, one of the previously posted 100% gainers was one of my picks, BRDR. Too bad that I couldn't have selected the others......
Open Positions:
Symbol Price Price Paid SHARES Gain (Loss) % Gain ALLT 5.35 7.86 1000 ($2,525.00) -32.06% ARAY 7.03 8.61 900 ($1,437.00) -18.51% EGHT 12.15 7.28 1000 $4,862.00 66.71% FCEL 0.8486 1.13 8000 ($2,261.20) -24.99% NVIV 9.27 3.72 2000 $11,092.00 148.93% ONVO 3.39 5.67 1500 ($3,435.00) -40.32% RKUS 11.34 10.39 700 $657.00 9.02% SSYS 24.38 36.02 200 ($2,343.00) -32.46% SVA 5.42 3.72 2150 $3,647.00 45.55% YNDX 16.57 25.815 500 ($4,638.50) -35.89% $3,618.30 4.34%
Closed Positions:
Symbol Time & Price Price Shares Mkt Value Price Paid Cost $ Gain (Loss) % Gain OPTR 23-Oct $12.78 571 $7,297.38 $14.00 $7,994.00 ($696.62) -8.71% CCIH 6-Dec $8.74 2,025 $17,698.50 $3.95 $7,998.75 $9,699.75 121.27% SIMG 27-Jan $7.26 1,500 $10,890.00 $4.61 $6,915.00 $3,975.00 57.48% TRIB 10-Feb $17.53 500 $8,765.00 $16.97 $8,485.00 $280.00 3.30% CKSW 30-Apr $12.44 1,000 $12,440.00 8.04 $8,040.00 $4,400.00 54.73% BRDR 6-May $13.94 1,200 $16,728.00 6.03 $7,236.00 $9,492.00 131.18% Total $46,668.75 $27,150.13 58.18%
Just wanted to give you a HUGE Thank You on the 8 by 8. Had never heard of it before your list and did a little research and bought in. Naturally I wish I would have bought more, but greed kills. Thanks again! Boz
Quote: BozQuote: steeldcoJust wanted to give you a HUGE Thank You on the 8 by 8. Had never heard of it before your list and did a little research and bought in. Naturally I wish I would have bought more, but greed kills. Thanks again! Boz
Boz, you're very welcome!DO NOT blindly accept what has been spoken. DO NOT blindly accept what has been written. Think. Assess. Lead. DO NOT blindly follow.
Quote: BozJust wanted to give you a HUGE Thank You on the 8 by 8. Had never heard of it before your list and did a little research and bought in. Naturally I wish I would have bought more, but greed kills. Thanks again! Boz
Insider trading, eh? j/k
Steeldco, I would certainly sell the one up 149% ... knowing nothing else about it than that
Quote: odiousgambitSteeldco, I would certainly sell the one up 149% ... knowing nothing else about it than that
Thank you for the thought. I just can't sell it yet. I believe the potential for NVIV is an additional large multiple from here.
Quote: wrobersonSorry I wasn't around earlier. NXPI is a semiconductor company that puts chips into cell phones that allow customers to buy things. It's a 1st mover. About the time this thread was posted it was 25 bucks. It was 33 the last I checked. At the time is was a buy/hold until 2015. Europe is where the chips were first used as America is usually late on getting in on me technologies.
33% in 1st year is sweet!
Found this posting from wroberson, made on July 24th., 2013. Very nice call! NXPI is currently selling at 88+!
Quote: steeldco
Using this metric, I took a look at the last screen run and chose the 5 best performers. Shown below. Which one of these will be the 100% gainer in the bunch??
Symbols Screen Run Date Gain as of 11/28/15 CDNA 11/4/2015 44.50% MTSN 11/4/2015 29.79% ORBK 11/4/2015 23.85% RATE 11/4/2015 20.18% P 11/4/2015 12.63%
I think my personal favorite of the 5 is MTSN. Despite lagging the leader, I believe it stands the best chance of hitting a 100% gain...........up 4% today.
Quote: odiousgambitInsider trading, eh? j/k
Steeldco, I would certainly sell the one up 149% ... knowing nothing else about it than that
Odiousgambit, this post is not meant to be attacking. It just so happens to have provided me an opportunity to state something that I truly believe in. That is that compounding can have a fabulous impact on one's portfolio (yes, it can also be tremendously negative). The issue (NVIV) that was up around 149%, and who many would say SELL, is now up 185% and (I believe) heading much higher. My investment has gained 36% on a 10% gain in stock price. My point? Sell when it has reached fair value, not when you have a gain. Let the winners run.
Quote: steeldcoQuote: steeldco
Using this metric, I took a look at the last screen run and chose the 5 best performers. Shown below. Which one of these will be the 100% gainer in the bunch??
Symbols Screen Run Date Gain as of 11/28/15 CDNA 11/4/2015 44.50% MTSN 11/4/2015 29.79% ORBK 11/4/2015 23.85% RATE 11/4/2015 20.18% P 11/4/2015 12.63%
I think my personal favorite of the 5 is MTSN. Despite lagging the leader, I believe it stands the best chance of hitting a 100% gain...........up 4% today.
Well, I'm going to be wrong on this one. MTSN announced this morning that it is selling itself at $3.80 per share. The stock screen picked it when it was $2.35. It's only going to be a 61.7% gainer.....LOL. Not gonna make it to 100%. Damn...sucks to be wrong :-)
My any claim to any same such is merely that I am getting a sufficient income out of my investments with an amount a lot of people would blow through in no time. But due to my age, I am taking the advice to take less risk. Having some gambling genes, though, I have resisted some advice, mostly proportion of investment in stocks and also modest attempts at the market timing bugbear. Your success is out of my league too, I failed at anything similar.
But we can discuss it a bit if you want.
Assuming no insider knowledge is in play, and I do assume that with you, I'd say what is going on with that stock is one of 3 things:
*since the value of a stock should reflect at all times all known factors in its price [less a risk-wariness factor], since it was up 149% some new factor has come into play to make it go up 185% now
*the risk wariness is waning extraordinarily quickly
*speculators are working the stock over in a "find a greater fool" phenomenon
two of these things seem just fine to deal with
or what would you say? I too am not trying to be unpleasant btw
Quote: odiousgambitAssuming no insider knowledge is in play, and I do assume that with you, I'd say what is going on with that stock is one of 3 things:
*since the value of a stock should reflect at all times all known factors in its price [less a risk-wariness factor], since it was up 149% some new factor has come into play to make it go up 185% now
*the risk wariness is waning extraordinarily quickly
*speculators are working the stock over in a "find a greater fool" phenomenon
two of these things seem just fine to deal with
or what would you say? I too am not trying to be unpleasant btw
I think that the one statement that is very, very wrong (my opinion at least) is that "the value of a stock should reflect at all times all known factors in its price". I believe this is incorrect because most people can not properly assess the probabilities of success on what are known upcoming events. Known upcoming events that have a value. It is subjective and most investors can't properly assess it and therefore most value it at 0. The large investors, who can, happily ride the selling price since they know that they can buy lower because of this.
Quote: steeldcoI think that the one statement that is very, very wrong (my opinion at least) is that "the value of a stock should reflect at all times all known factors in its price". I believe this is incorrect because most people can not properly assess the probabilities of success on what are known upcoming events. Known upcoming events that have a value. It is subjective and most investors can't properly assess it and therefore most value it at 0. The large investors, who can, happily ride the selling price since they know that they can buy lower because of this.
We can disagree. What you say has some validity, of course.
You did leave out one qualifier I had put in there, that the risk factor weighs down the general assessment of where the price should be. Of course some of those warning about the risk prove to be prophets too.
Quote: odiousgambitWe can disagree. What you say has some validity, of course.
You did leave out one qualifier I had put in there, that the risk factor weighs down the general assessment of where the price should be. Of course some of those warning about the risk prove to be prophets too.
Yep. Disagreement is OK and you're right about risk since we both know that there are no sure things in life, except for the old death and taxes.
"InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp. (NVIV), a company focused on treating traumatic acute spinal cord injuries (SCI), got some good news early this month when the FDA gave a conditional approval to a study protocol amendment that will convert an ongoing pilot study into a pivotal probable benefit study. The "conditional" approval only has to do with a slight change in the informed consent form, which has already been modified and sent to the FDA. Full approval is expected in the next few weeks. The five-patient feasibility pilot study is evaluating the company's Neuro-Spinal Scaffold (NSS) under an Investigational Device Exemption application for the treatment of complete traumatic acute spinal cord injury (SCI).
The NSS is an investigational bioresorbable polymer scaffold designed for implantation at the site of injury within a spinal cord contusion. It provides structural support to the spared spinal tissue and a supportive matrix to facilitate endogenous repair processes as it degrades over several weeks.
InVivo has provided compelling data so far showing NSS to have a positive safety profile and a meaningful effect on spinal cord injuries, injuries that have a long history of being notoriously difficult to treat. One patient in the trial with a high thoracic injury even had an AIS conversion (an improvement in the impairment scale of the American Spinal Injury Association) from AIS-A to AIS-B in one month, an occurrence that happens less than 4 percent of the time in patients with a T4 injury. Another patient has improved from AIS-A to AIS-C in one month, which happens in less than 5 percent of patients with a T10-T12 injury.
The pivotal probable benefit study, dubbed the INSPIRE study, is planned initially to enroll 12 patients, with expectations to be expanded to 20 patients after a review of 6-month safety data of the first five patients. The inclusion criteria are also being widened to a new range of injuries and the age criteria has been significantly expanded to people between the age of 16 and 70. The number of U.S. sites has been increased to 40 and InVivo further intends to initiate the study in Canada and the United Kingdom."
Quote: steeldcoQuote: steeldco
Using this metric, I took a look at the last screen run and chose the 5 best performers. Shown below. Which one of these will be the 100% gainer in the bunch??
Symbols Screen Run Date Gain as of 11/28/15 CDNA 11/4/2015 44.50% MTSN 11/4/2015 29.79% ORBK 11/4/2015 23.85% RATE 11/4/2015 20.18% P 11/4/2015 12.63%
I think my personal favorite of the 5 is MTSN. Despite lagging the leader, I believe it stands the best chance of hitting a 100% gain...........up 4% today.
I thought that I would take another look at this run to 100% gain.......below is the performance since the last update of 11/28. One of the 5, RATE, is down since then but the others are up, and they are up in excess of the S&P which has been a loser since 11/28. I dream of finding a way to further narrow down the stock screens that I run and maybe, just maybe, I have...............
Symbols | Screen Run Date | Gain as of 12/19/15 | Gain since 11/28/15 |
CDNA | 11/4/2015 | 47.48% | 2.98% |
MTSN | 11/4/2015 | 48.94% | 19.15% |
ORBK | 11/4/2015 | 30.58% | 6.73% |
RATE | 11/4/2015 | 9.97% | -10.21% |
P | 11/4/2015 | 15.83% | 3.20% |
S&P 500 since 11/28/15 | -4.04% | ||
Symbol | Name | Last Close |
SGMS | SCIENTIFIC GAME | 9.08 |
CGNT | COGENTIX MEDICL | 1.41 |
SSYS | STRATASYS LTD | 26.79 |
RNET | RIGNET INC | 22.1 |
ENT | GLOBAL EAGL ENT | 10.12 |
SMCI | SUPER MICRO COM | 24.66 |
ABTL | AUTOBYTEL INC | 21.73 |
TEAR | TEARLAB CORP | 1.62 |
RTIX | RTI SURGICAL | 4.16 |
GLW | CORNING INC | 18.56 |
HIVE | AEROHIVE NETWRK | 5.3 |
ATEN | A10 NETWORKS | 6.65 |
SALE | RETAILMENOT INC | 10.36 |
EXAM | EXAMWORKS GROUP | 27.74 |
ELMD | ELECTROMED INC | 1.92 |
ALLT | ALLOT COMM LTD | 6.05 |
VRTU | VIRTUSA CORP | 41.77 |
XCRA | XCERRA CORP | 6.11 |
TTGT | TECHTARGET | 8.13 |
MCHX | MARCHEX INC | 3.85 |
SGNT | SAGENT PHARMA | 16.07 |
EVHC | ENVISION HLTHCR | 25.28 |
SFLY | SHUTTERFLY INC | 44.55 |
FARO | FARO TECH INC | 30.44 |
BVX | BOVIE MEDICAL | 1.96 |
OMCL | OMNICELL INC | 29.3 |
PLAB | PHOTRONICS INC | 12.78 |
IRBT | IROBOT CORP | 36.09 |
LRCX | LAM RESEARCH | 80.39 |
MMSI | MERIT MEDICAL | 18.93 |
MGIC | MAGIC SOFTWARE | 5.57 |
QLGC | QLOGIC CORP | 12.3 |
TNGO | TANGOE INC | 8.8 |
HCSG | HEALTHCARE SERV | 35.74 |
AMRI | ALBANY MOL RSCH | 19.66 |
USNA | USANA HLTH SCI | 133.9 |
COMM | COMMSCOPE HLDG | 26.33 |
MRVL | MARVELL TECH GP | 9.02 |
NPTN | NEOPHOTONICS CP | 10.81 |
PAHC | PHIBRO ANIMAL | 30.92 |
FNSR | FINISAR CORP | 14.9 |
PDCO | PATTERSON COS | 45.07 |
ACET | ACETO CORP | 27.75 |
SONS | SONUS NETWORKS | 7.12 |
CIEN | CIENA CORP | 20.7 |
DGI | DIGITALGLOBE | 15.68 |
NSR | NEUSTAR INC -A | 25.18 |
IRDM | IRIDIUM COMMUN | 8.59 |
TNAV | TELENAV INC | 6.11 |
AEIS | ADV ENERGY INDS | 28.88 |
AMAT | APPLD MATLS INC | 19.11 |
PLT | PLANTRONICS INC | 48.46 |
AFFX | AFFYMETRIX INC | 9.72 |
VSH | VISHAY INTERTEC | 11.96 |
SATS | ECHOSTAR CORP | 38.6 |
CALX | CALIX INC | 7.91 |
EXAC | EXACTECH INC | 18.42 |
GRFS | GRIFOLS SA-ADR | 32.82 |
CASM | CAS MEDICAL SYS | 1.678 |
CRY | CRYOLIFE INC | 10.71 |
FSLR | FIRST SOLAR INC | 66.92 |
BRCD | BROCADE COMM SY | 9.06 |
VSAT | VIASAT INC | 61.33 |
BIO | BIO-RAD LABS -A | 139.11 |
HWCC | HOUSTON WIRE&CB | 5.62 |
TAX | LIBERTY TAX INC | 23.05 |
BCOR | BLUCORA INC | 10.4 |
WIRE | ENCORE WIRE CP | 39.78 |
ANGO | ANGIODYNAMICS | 12.56 |
OFIX | ORTHOFIX INTL | 40.34 |
ACTG | ACACIA RESEARCH | 4.12 |
FTR | FRONTIER COMMUN | 4.86 |