Among more than a few Las Vegas area self-described "professional gamblers" going through dumpsters is apparently considered Tuesday, from what I've seen. And Wednesday, and approximately five other days, give or take, depending on pick-up schedules, which some dedicated gamblin' pros seem to know pretty well. Some of them seem to have regular dumpster fishing routes staked out, when not otherwise engaged in some of their expert gambling endeavors that are sure to really payoff real soon.Quote: GWAEI always wondered about that. When going to Detroit I thought about bring 1000 cans for a quick 50. Is that not allowed?
Is taking bottles from garbage considered theft?
I've got no idea about technical legality, but in practice from what I've seen and heard and once upon a time been ultimately accountable for, the kind of response seems to depend a lot on some degree of neatness and efficiency. And not making a big noisy spectacle and creating an unsightly pile of stinking crap that folks responsible for the joint have to re-dumpster, and then re-shower themselves. As it did for us, when I was responsible for a portfolio of residential/commercial properties and the people working at them in some other cities in other states. Many of them in Oregon, which was the original pioneer of mandatory can & bottle "deposits" and most other enviro-smug ideas that were getting cooked up at that time. And of course had all kinds of unforeseen, and sometimes forbidden to even notice, effects.
Working on creative new ways to finance your next vacation? Perhaps a kind of modified nature trip & anthropology expedition of 'living off the land' like the natives? Don't forget to check out plasma (blood purchasing) centers as part of your exploration-research-vacation; they're unofficial community centers for the degenerate gambling genius community when going through one of those little temporary five decade cold streaks that seem to happen.
Quote: GWAEI always wondered about that. When going to Detroit I thought about bring 1000 cans for a quick 50. Is that not allowed?
Is taking bottles from garbage considered theft?
If the cans came from outside of Michigan, or if the cans already had their deposits returned, then it is against the law.
People try from time to time, sometimes they get caught. Here is one from March of this year.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2017/03/22/flint-man-bottle-return-scheme/99483692/
Quote: DrawingDead
Working on creative new ways to finance your next vacation?
Do you remember the Airtran/Wendy's cup promotion. That was a goldmine. I was selling round trip airfare to people for $200-$300. The promotion was to collect 64 Wendy's cups and you would get free round trip airfare on Airtran. You could dumpster dive and get the cups for free or just buy 64 drinks at Wendy's for around $80. Dumpster divers were selling the cups on Ebay for around fifty cents each. I bought many cups on Ebay and eventually just started buying them at Wendys because the demand was so high. I probably made $20,000 on that promotion and gave all my family free airline tickets.
Quote: DRichDo you remember the Airtran/Wendy's cup promotion. That was a goldmine. I was selling round trip airfare to people for $200-$300. The promotion was to collect 64 Wendy's cups and you would get free round trip airfare on Airtran. You could dumpster dive and get the cups for free or just buy 64 drinks at Wendy's for around $80. Dumpster divers were selling the cups on Ebay for around fifty cents each. I bought many cups on Ebay and eventually just started buying them at Wendys because the demand was so high. I probably made $20,000 on that promotion and gave all my family free airline tickets.
I have never heard of that promo. I would have also done the same.
*hangs head in shame*
Quote: DRichDo you remember the Airtran/Wendy's cup promotion. That was a goldmine. I was selling round trip airfare to people for $200-$300. The promotion was to collect 64 Wendy's cups and you would get free round trip airfare on Airtran. You could dumpster dive and get the cups for free or just buy 64 drinks at Wendy's for around $80. Dumpster divers were selling the cups on Ebay for around fifty cents each. I bought many cups on Ebay and eventually just started buying them at Wendys because the demand was so high. I probably made $20,000 on that promotion and gave all my family free airline tickets.
Guess Wendy's was assuming they would sell more hamburgers to cover the cost. Wonder if it was a net loss for them?
Quote: billryanWhen Eastern pilots went on strike, the airline bought in some scabs and offered $12 fares. Frequent flyer members got 5,000 miles per segment. My friend and I did a NY- Boston-DC-Boston-NY- DC- NY for $72 one Saturday and got free first class tix to San Juan for Spring Break.
I don't remember that one but I have done many mileage runs. Take a bunch of short cheap flights because they usually offered a minimum number of miles no matter the length of the flight. You would earn miles worth a lot more than you were paying for the flights.
If they knew the trick
Quote: WizardofnothingAnyone that had the Starbucks app prior to the change in policy on earning rewards could earn free coffee for a lifetime
If they knew the trick
Same with the McDonalds app, but they fixed it pretty quickly. Almost free anyway.
Quote: WizardofnothingAnyone that had the Starbucks app prior to the change in policy on earning rewards could earn free coffee for a lifetime
If they knew the trick
That's punishment, not AP. Coffee is disgusting. About as bad as beer.
Quote: WizardofnothingAnyone that had the Starbucks app prior to the change in policy on earning rewards could earn free coffee for a lifetime
If they knew the trick
So since it's over,what was the trick?
explain?Quote: FaceMI redemption?
Tried it. It can't be done.
it's .10 per can in mi, .05 for the same can in nearby states.
so what happened? why cant it be done?
Quote: 100xOddsexplain?
it's .10 per can in mi, .05 for the same can in nearby states.
so what happened? why cant it be done?
I answered earlier. Different bar codes. And going to stores that manually check them, are supposed to look at them carefully.
Quote: IbeatyouracesI answered earlier. Different bar codes. And going to stores that manually check them, are supposed to look at them carefully.
They literally check every can if you bring in trashbags full of them?
Quote: gamerfreakThey literally check every can if you bring in trashbags full of them?
Some do, yes. Especially the places that have been duped before.
Quote: IbeatyouracesSome do, yes. Especially the places that have been duped before.
Those darn soda can counterfeiters, I'll tell ye hwat!
ZCore13
Quote: 100xOddsexplain?
it's .10 per can in mi, .05 for the same can in nearby states.
so what happened? why cant it be done?
You overload your inventory and you blow your margins on gasoline. Trust me, it doesn't work.
Couple things for the record:
My comment was not a personal insult. It was my way of asking if the fellow commenter knew how to google.
I made a comment, and it was replied to less than a half hour later that I needed to supply source materials.
The commenter no more called me a liar than I called him whatever name BBB's brain thinks I called him.
I replied to his comment by asking him if he searched at all (albeit in my own way).
Regardless of the facts above:
BBB has had it out for me ever since my first post about politics. Just because I am a black man does not mean I have to agree with any/all liberal policies. I do not need her to feel sorry me because she feels I am somehow brainwashed by HER PRESIDENT or any other man or woman for that matter. I have the right to choose my own way. I do not need to be picked on and lied about on this site because I don't feel the way she thinks I should feel.
If the above is not true, why was I banned for a "second offense?" A two second search ( I did it just to make sure I didn't miss something) of the banned list would have noticed my name missing. This was tactful in its deceit. She was telling me how to think. That she was the one making the rules, and I need to get lock-step behind her way of thinking.
It is downright disgusting. I know this is the internet, and anyone is a toughgal, but if in real life such absolute filth is beyond acceptable, then it should be the same on the internet.
As Forrest Gump would say, "That's all I have to say about that."
Quote: Maverick17So I guess I was banned for a comment I made.
Couple things for the record:
My comment was not a personal insult. It was my way of asking if the fellow commenter knew how to google.
I made a comment, and it was replied to less than a half hour later that I needed to supply source materials.
The commenter no more called me a liar than I called him whatever name BBB's brain thinks I called him.
I replied to his comment by asking him if he searched at all (albeit in my own way).
Regardless of the facts above:
BBB has had it out for me ever since my first post about politics. Just because I am a black man does not mean I have to agree with any/all liberal policies. I do not need her to feel sorry me because she feels I am somehow brainwashed by HER PRESIDENT or any other man or woman for that matter. I have the right to choose my own way. I do not need to be picked on and lied about on this site because I don't feel the way she thinks I should feel.
If the above is not true, why was I banned for a "second offense?" A two second search ( I did it just to make sure I didn't miss something) of the banned list would have noticed my name missing. This was tactful in its deceit. She was telling me how to think. That she was the one making the rules, and I need to get lock-step behind her way of thinking.
It is downright disgusting. I know this is the internet, and anyone is a toughgal, but if in real life such absolute filth is beyond acceptable, then it should be the same on the internet.
As Forrest Gump would say, "That's all I have to say about that."
Maverick,
I don't know where the entry went, but I had referenced your previous suspension via the list when I noted "2nd offense ". Below are the post, and my previous suspension. I will be re-adding this to the Suspension List, for the record.
You are far from the first to be suspended for inferring a member is stupid/an idiot/some other similar insult. Check some of the other links in the SL for very similar bannings.
As to the rest, that's your opinion. I didn't / don't know you're black or white, male or female, anything else. I just call them as I see them.
It's rare here that someone agrees with why they got a suspension, though if they're being honest with themselves, it's usually obvious.So I heard what you said above. But I stand by my decision.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/169/#post605353
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/182/#post606084
Quote: mcallister3200Race card being played for no apparent reason on an anonymous Internet forum. Lmfao. Have you considered a career as a writer, you seem gifted? Fictional narrative could be a good choice.
Maverick17 isn't "playing the race card", if anything, it's the exact opposite of that. Playing the race card is when you basically say "pitty me because I'm _____" or "You're racist (against me or my views) because I'm _____". In this case, it's the opposite, where Maverick17 is saying he doesn't need BBB to feel sorry for him because he's black.
I don't know about BBB (she's republican, apparently?), but there is truth to what Maverick is saying about how the democrats and liberals push minorities and women into what they should think. When Obama was running for office for 2008 / 20012, you'd sometimes see a black guy or some other minority saying he's voting for <not Obama> because X, Y, and Z....then the other person would be like, "Well, why don't you vote for Obama, you're black!" And during this last election, it was the same way for women and Clinton, where a women would be supporting Trump and the interviewer or whoever would say, "But you're a woman! Clinton's a woman! <complete confusion>" But of course, you're racist if you supported McCain, Romney, or Trump because they're white...or a misogynist because you support Trump because he's a man. So who knows??
EDIT: Apparently this isn't the "plz impeach trump now thread"....but, meh.
Ya, best not to argue with fellow AP's, or the crazy biased(but lovable) mods (-;Quote: mcallister3200Deleted, dropping it.
Quote: beachbumbabsMaverick,
I don't know where the entry went, but I had referenced your previous suspension via the list when I noted "2nd offense ". Below are the post, and my previous suspension. I will be re-adding this to the Suspension List, for the record.
You are far from the first to be suspended for inferring a member is stupid/an idiot/some other similar insult. Check some of the other links in the SL for very similar bannings.
As to the rest, that's your opinion. I didn't / don't know you're black or white, male or female, anything else. I just call them as I see them.
It's rare here that someone agrees with why they got a suspension, though if they're being honest with themselves, it's usually obvious.So I heard what you said above. But I stand by my decision.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/169/#post605353
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/182/#post606084
So you continue to bully?
You cannot "re-add" a suspension to a list if it was never there in the first place.
I am no forum expert, but virtually all, if not every time, a ban happened there is a post in the thread from the green name who issued the ban.
There was no post. Any guess why? Because there was no prior ban!
This is more of BBB continuing to harass me online, only now she is creating facts to suit her purported dominance rather than just with words.
BBB, I do not need to you tell me how to think. I do not need you to discredit my reputation on this tiny corner of the internet world. I do not need you lying and conning your way through prior misdealing's with me. One lie does not cover other lies, especially when there is a recording of facts.
I said you have had it in for me since I first posted about politics. You claim to have no idea what I am talking about, but remember (or frantically searched for) a post I made 4 months ago, (that violated the no curse words rule, when there were no curse words in the post).
This forum is either pro free speech, or pro "her site, her rules." If one claims to be pro free speech, but seeks to destroy those who do not think the way they think they should think, the site is simply a "her site, her rules" website with a hypocritical opening premise.
I am fine with either of the first two, but make it clear, don't backdoor tyranny while attempting to rub bellies and tell me to get in line with all the other evil-doers you have had to punish in the past.
Quote: Maverick17So you continue to bully?
You cannot "re-add" a suspension to a list if it was never there in the first place.
I am no forum expert, but virtually all, if not every time, a ban happened there is a post in the thread from the green name who issued the ban.
There was no post. Any guess why? Because there was no prior ban!
This is more of BBB continuing to harass me online, only now she is creating facts to suit her purported dominance rather than just with words.
BBB, I do not need to you tell me how to think. I do not need you to discredit my reputation on this tiny corner of the internet world. I do not need you lying and conning your way through prior misdealing's with me. One lie does not cover other lies, especially when there is a recording of facts.
I said you have had it in for me since I first posted about politics. You claim to have no idea what I am talking about, but remember (or frantically searched for) a post I made 4 months ago, (that violated the no curse words rule, when there were no curse words in the post).
This forum is either pro free speech, or pro "her site, her rules." If one claims to be pro free speech, but seeks to destroy those who do not think the way they think they should think, the site is simply a "her site, her rules" website with a hypocritical opening premise.
I am fine with either of the first two, but make it clear, don't backdoor tyranny while attempting to rub bellies and tell me to get in line with all the other evil-doers you have had to punish in the past.
The time stamps on your post and mine can't be added by me. Maybe a superadmin (site designer) has that power, but I don't. The website stamps them, and they can't be removed or changed in either "edit" or "quote".
There IS a "green" post - mine - quoting yours. It's the 2nd link in my post above.
The insertion of posts within a thread can't be done either. They fall to the end of a thread, no matter how far back you're quoting. My suspension of you was later than usual (at several days) but both your and my posts are in thread line from when they happened, many, many pages back.
If I had edited either what you said or what I said at that time, the edit would be noted in italics, but there is no editing note. And I can't remove that note if there had been one. No stealth changing of anybody's post is possible.
Your offense was violating the "keep it PG rule", not cursing. There's more to it than cursing, and you crossed that line.
The Suspension List is hand-edited each time it's updated. It involves some very picky heading and data entries, so we have to be especially careful when updating it. I don't know why the entry went away, but I referred to it when I noted the second offense. I have replaced the entry for your first offense in its proper chronology.
As to the rest, since you dispute very clear facts, there's really not much point in trying to discuss your opinions.
Or meltdown, speak what's REALLY on your mind, and be nuked.
I've been suspended a few times: bit of a learning curve.
Quote: Maverick17So you continue to bully?
You cannot "re-add" a suspension to a list if it was never there in the first place.
I am no forum expert, but virtually all, if not every time, a ban happened there is a post in the thread from the green name who issued the ban.
There was no post. Any guess why? Because there was no prior ban!
This is more of BBB continuing to harass me online, only now she is creating facts to suit her purported dominance rather than just with words.
BBB, I do not need to you tell me how to think. I do not need you to discredit my reputation on this tiny corner of the internet world. I do not need you lying and conning your way through prior misdealing's with me. One lie does not cover other lies, especially when there is a recording of facts.
I said you have had it in for me since I first posted about politics. You claim to have no idea what I am talking about, but remember (or frantically searched for) a post I made 4 months ago, (that violated the no curse words rule, when there were no curse words in the post).
This forum is either pro free speech, or pro "her site, her rules." If one claims to be pro free speech, but seeks to destroy those who do not think the way they think they should think, the site is simply a "her site, her rules" website with a hypocritical opening premise.
I am fine with either of the first two, but make it clear, don't backdoor tyranny while attempting to rub bellies and tell me to get in line with all the other evil-doers you have had to punish in the past.
If we're voting on this incident between you and how the Mod handled it, you are the weakest link. Goodbye.
ZCore13
Quote: Zcore13If we're voting on this incident between you and how the Mod handled it, you are the weakest link. Goodbye.
ZCore13
No, I promised I wouldn’t use that anymore!!!
Quote: terapinedQuote: SanchoPanzaJust pointing out that many politicians, as well as many more voters, who defended Kennedy and Clinton are raking Moore over the coals.
Hypocrite on the right complaining about hypocrites on the left?
ROTFL
Just pointing out that many politicians as well as many voters who defend Trump and Moore were raking Bill Clinton over the coals.
If you defend Bill Clinton but attack Donald Trump over being a sexual predator. You are a hypocrite.
If you defend Trump but attack Bill Clinton over being a sexual predator, you are a hypocrite
I will never ever defend ANY sexual predator
Roy Moore is a sicko
How about you Sanchopaza? Are you a hypocrite
Are you against ALL sexual predators?
or
Do you give some sexual predators a pass because of politics?
Bill Clinton is a disgusting sexual predator
Donald Trump is a disgusting sexual predator
Do you agree Sancho?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/261/#post614080
Yo, terapined still ain't in red...? Thought insults were against the rules?
"Are you a hypocrite?" is boarderline, imo.
Quote: Maverick17So you continue to bully?...
Okay, you've said your piece, multiple times. I advise you to get over it or find another forum. I will not put with one more post attacking another mod.
Quote: RSQuote: terapined
Hypocrite on the right complaining about hypocrites on the left?
ROTFL
Just pointing out that many politicians as well as many voters who defend Trump and Moore were raking Bill Clinton over the coals.
If you defend Bill Clinton but attack Donald Trump over being a sexual predator. You are a hypocrite.
If you defend Trump but attack Bill Clinton over being a sexual predator, you are a hypocrite
I will never ever defend ANY sexual predator
Roy Moore is a sicko
How about you Sanchopaza? Are you a hypocrite
Are you against ALL sexual predators?
or
Do you give some sexual predators a pass because of politics?
Bill Clinton is a disgusting sexual predator
Donald Trump is a disgusting sexual predator
Do you agree Sancho?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/28871-trumps-final-100-days/261/#post614080
Yo, terapined still ain't in red...? Thought insults were against the rules?Idk why the font size is all wonky, didn't mean to do that. The bbcode looks fine to me.
Did Sancho ever answer?
:-)
Quote: terapinedDid Sancho ever answer?
:-)
The posing of that question by itself exemplifies the futility and uselessness of even trying to have a dialogue here.
With eye for an eye, we're all blind.same principle. We're useless, we just don't know it yet. They say dictatorships don't work, but we're proving them wrong here, all the executions are justified and there isn't a shadow website where people really discuss the suspension lists.Quote: GWAEWhat's the deal wit WON as permanent resignation? Is that so his original screen name isn't outted?
Quote: GWAEWhat's the deal wit WON as permanent resignation? Is that so his original screen name isn't outted?
what?
WoN is an alt acct??
link to thread?
Quote: 100xOddswhat?
WoN is an alt acct??
link to thread?
Strictly thinking about it, I don't want to out him
how was he discovered?Quote: GWAEStrictly thinking about it, I don't want to out him
Was his alt acct banned?
Quote: 100xOddshow was he discovered?
Was his alt acct banned?
A generic answer...... Buzz comes back repeatedly as a new member, and the topics he posts on and his writing style makes it clear that it is him. But as you can imagine, the administrators have other things to do, and are not reading every post hunting for banned members returning. If their ears are turned up, there is an IP address match they can check, but apparently computer savvy folk can fool that technique.
Quote: 100xOddshow was he discovered?
Was his alt acct banned?
as soopoo says there are many ways to tell. Even if they Strictly wanted to ban APs it would be a tough task.
Quote: MaxPenTrue that......
I see what you did there too ;-)