Thread Rating:

AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 11:07:04 AM permalink
It would be cool to be able to see the "Top Contributors" past just the top 5. I don't know if this was intentionally left off or just an oversight. But when you click on the "Top Contributors" link above the top 5 listing, it just takes you to the alphabetical list of users.

Not important, of course, but I'd like to see where I fall in the list :)
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 11:11:55 AM permalink
" Not important, of course, but I'd like to see where I fall in the list :) "

You have been nominated for the Hall of Shame anyway,
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
strictlyAP
strictlyAP
  • Threads: 116
  • Posts: 983
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 11:21:16 AM permalink
aces I ran the numbers you are 39th
The bet will not be paid- not now not ever
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 11:30:28 AM permalink
Quote: strictlyAP

aces I ran the numbers you are 39th


Nice, did you just crawl the website or are you joking?

If you are joking, maybe I'll work on that...while I'm at work...not working...
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 89
  • Posts: 12454
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 1:40:42 PM permalink
I think that is a terrible idea. Why give people an incentive to just post more without regard to quality. I think the whole idea of showing how many posts users have is counter-productive.
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
GH
GH
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 272
Joined: Oct 21, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 1:44:12 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

I think that is a terrible idea. Why give people an incentive to just post more without regard to quality. I think the whole idea of showing how many posts users have is counter-productive.


I don't know what forum software Mike uses, but I noticed some sites use software that allows members to "vote" on the quality of a person's posts; which affects their ranking.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 442
  • Posts: 29360
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 2:01:44 PM permalink
I vote for getting rid of that function altogether.
Who cares who the top contributors are, it has
nothing to do with anything.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6284
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 2:02:12 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

I think that is a terrible idea. Why give people an incentive to just post more without regard to quality. I think the whole idea of showing how many posts users have is counter-productive.



What's the incentive? Prove to others that wouldn't care anyway that you are "King of the Internet"?

On my private poker forum, I was the 3rd most verbose in my posts I think, so I am never making high post quantity.
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 2:12:28 PM permalink
Quote: GH

I don't know what forum software Mike uses, but I noticed some sites use software that allows members to "vote" on the quality of a person's posts; which affects their ranking.


This forum software is custom written by JB.

I understand the opposition to the idea, although I don't agree. I think it's harmless, people are going to run their mouth off on the internet regardless of anything. So without further ado, I present to you: The ranking of members!

Took me about an hour or so to hack it together in perl. Note this list is not auto-updating, it is a snapshot

Quote: strictlyAP

aces I ran the numbers you are 39th


So either you were joking, or you did the same thing I did and confused me with aceofspades :). If so, props for hacking it together in 14 minutes, a paltry amount of time compared to me.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
thecesspit
thecesspit
  • Threads: 53
  • Posts: 5936
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 2:13:16 PM permalink
Typical computer guy, counting from 0 :)
"Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept, thought nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
January 11th, 2013 at 2:14:22 PM permalink
Quote: EvenBob

I vote for getting rid of that function altogether.
Who cares who the top contributors are, it has
nothing to do with anything.



I couldn't agree more but let's not stop there. How about removing the thread and post count that are there every time we post? If it's that important to someone they can keep track of it themselves.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 11th, 2013 at 2:15:23 PM permalink
I changed my sign from Buzzpaff to Buzzard to not show up on the top 5. Just to shut Josie up. LOL
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
RaleighCraps
RaleighCraps
  • Threads: 79
  • Posts: 2501
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 2:51:51 PM permalink
I've been posting drivel for months now, and I still can't catch up, even with a 2 year head start.
Always borrow money from a pessimist; They don't expect to get paid back ! Be yourself and speak your thoughts. Those who matter won't mind, and those that mind, don't matter!
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 442
  • Posts: 29360
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 3:13:10 PM permalink
Quote: 1BB

I couldn't agree more but let's not stop there. How about removing the thread and post count that are there every time we post? If it's that important to someone they can keep track of it themselves.



Yup, that should go to. It serves no purpose. I prefer
rankings, like with numbers of stars, that tells how
long a person has been a member.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
winmonkeyspit3
winmonkeyspit3
  • Threads: 26
  • Posts: 451
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
January 11th, 2013 at 3:24:23 PM permalink
Quote: EvenBob

Yup, that should go to. It serves no purpose. I prefer
rankings, like with numbers of stars, that tells how
long a person has been a member.



I for one like seeing how many posts and threads a user has created. Here's an example:

Some person makes their first post telling some story. I'm less likely to find it credible and spend time thinking about it/helping them with math etc. if they aren't an established member and are instead just a troll looking for attention.

On the other hand, the guy who yesterday asked questions about his dealer audition, I took time to respond to that because while I didn't recognize his username, I noticed that he had over 100 posts and had contributed to the forum over the years.

There are people who made accounts in 2010 but never post, so I would take opposition to them having several stars next to their name while someone who joined in 2012 but is very active and helpful is made to look like a newbie.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11333
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34:21 PM permalink
aces and eights-----

I would like you to add a separate section for all capitals top poster----

Who would that be??????
RaleighCraps
RaleighCraps
  • Threads: 79
  • Posts: 2501
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 4:15:02 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

aces and eights-----

I would like you to add a separate section for all capitals top poster----

Who would that be??????



That would be the all YELL team?
Always borrow money from a pessimist; They don't expect to get paid back ! Be yourself and speak your thoughts. Those who matter won't mind, and those that mind, don't matter!
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11333
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
January 11th, 2013 at 4:16:32 PM permalink
Quote: RaleighCraps

That would be the all YELL team?



no... i meant SOOPOO......
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
January 25th, 2013 at 11:52:31 AM permalink
Damn, just realized my script has a bug of not counting admins, due to their green color and the regex I'm using to scrape page data. Whoops! Ran into the same problem with blocked members and fixed it, but there are a lot more blocked members than admins.

Since I'm SURE everyone is super excited about watching this list and where they fall, I'll try to fix it :p

Also, strictlyAP, you never answered my question as to whether you were just joking, are or WAY more efficient than me at hacking :).
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 2nd, 2013 at 12:52:22 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

Damn, just realized my script has a bug of not counting admins, due to their green color and the regex I'm using to scrape page data. Whoops! Ran into the same problem with blocked members and fixed it, but there are a lot more blocked members than admins.

Since I'm SURE everyone is super excited about watching this list and where they fall, I'll try to fix it :p

Also, strictlyAP, you never answered my question as to whether you were just joking, are or WAY more efficient than me at hacking :).


Finally fixed the admin problem, list has been updated today! One thing I noticed from adding this fix is that either the Wizard specifically (or more likely all admins) don't show up in the "Top Contributors" list! I'm guessing this is by design, but it is interesting to note that the Wiz would be between Nareed and pacomartin in the top 5 were he included.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
Doc
Doc
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 7287
Joined: Feb 27, 2010
February 2nd, 2013 at 1:08:35 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

... list has been updated today!


Not being a comp sci type, I still don't really understand starting the rankings with the number zero, unless that is some kind of snipe at the person holding that position.
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 2nd, 2013 at 5:14:48 PM permalink
Quote: Doc

Not being a comp sci type, I still don't really understand starting the rankings with the number zero, unless that is some kind of snipe at the person holding that position.


It is absolutely not that (a snipe at Nareed), it is just a computer science thing. Everything is indexed starting at 0. I could, of course, change it, but I'd rather not :).
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
Doc
Doc
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 7287
Joined: Feb 27, 2010
February 2nd, 2013 at 5:19:43 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

It is absolutely not that (a snipe at Nareed), ...


We must be looking at different lists.
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 4th, 2013 at 2:43:38 PM permalink
Quote: Doc

We must be looking at different lists.


Haha, whoops. Nope, I just didn't look at the list directly while responding to that comment, and I thought Nareed was #0. Was not a snipe at EvenBob either.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 25th, 2014 at 9:26:23 AM permalink
I decided to put this member-post-ranking thingamajigger on a schedule, so it updates now every morning at 1am PST (4am EST).
WOV members by post count
DT members by post count
If JB or the Wizard ask me to remove this, for any reason, I will do so. If they don't like having the list available on philosophical grounds, I disagree but completely understand. If they don't want me scraping all 148 pages of member listings once per day, then I would suggest they add the feature to the website directly using an appropriate DB query :).

Also, because of a mistake I made in the crontab, the thing actually ran every minute between 1am and 2am PST (d'oh) this morning. While I doubt it caused any problems as this site gets a fair bit of traffic, I apologize for the extra load.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
RonC
RonC
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
February 25th, 2014 at 9:45:44 AM permalink
Not that I would rank high in either category because I don't post a ton and sometimes go off on a tangent, I'd rather see "Top Contributors" be the ones who actually contribute the most, not that make the most posts. The list could be different under those standards...
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
February 25th, 2014 at 9:57:42 AM permalink
Yes, I could see all positions, except the top one, changing under those standards.
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 25th, 2014 at 10:00:03 AM permalink
Quote: RonC

Not that I would rank high in either category because I don't post a ton and sometimes go off on a tangent, I'd rather see "Top Contributors" be the ones who actually contribute the most, not that make the most posts. The list could be different under those standards...


Right, that would involve some subjectivity. My natural language processing software skills are pretty lacking (read: nonexistent :) ). So, feel free to do that one yourself.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 25th, 2014 at 1:08:15 PM permalink
How about listing who has the most posts in the least amount of time?
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 25th, 2014 at 2:15:40 PM permalink
Quote: 1BB

How about listing who has the most posts in the least amount of time?


Now that request is feasible. I could add a "average posts/day" metric or somesuch to the table. I'll put it on my backlog.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
kubikulann
kubikulann
  • Threads: 27
  • Posts: 905
Joined: Jun 28, 2011
February 26th, 2014 at 7:44:32 AM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

Now that request is feasible. I could add a "average posts/day" metric or somesuch to the table. I'll put it on my backlog.

A&8: I think 1BB was kidding you!

I also find these features totally ridiculous and useless. Now if that makes you smile, OK. But remember, we in Europe are writing while it is night in the USA, so if your thing slows down traffic it definitely bothers us...
Reperiet qui quaesiverit
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 26th, 2014 at 8:25:25 AM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

Now that request is feasible. I could add a "average posts/day" metric or somesuch to the table. I'll put it on my backlog.



I'd like to see it. The now defunct BlackjackInfo has it right in the members' profiles. It makes you wonder where some people find the time. Admittedly it doesn't speak to the quality of the posts or to the posters expertise. Anyone can have a high post count if they barrage us with one or two word posts or silly one liners of which I would have to plead guilty to on occasion. Others who feel compelled to comment on every single subject can also have high post counts.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1508
  • Posts: 26882
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
February 26th, 2014 at 8:52:37 AM permalink
I've read through this thread and am considering the issue. A question to be addressed is if I get rid of the "top posters" list, what do I replace it with.

I also don't think we need the list of the "newest members." Personally, I've never paid any attention to it.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 9:15:30 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I've read through this thread and am considering the issue. A question to be addressed is if I get rid of the "top posters" list, what do I replace it with.

I also don't think we need the list of the "newest members." Personally, I've never paid any attention to it.



*Maybe some sort of highest rated threads (possibly with a bit of karma decay).
*Admins' choice (like editor selections)
*Maybe some FAQ threads? Although anyone who doesn't do a standard search on the current threads is probably a lower probability candidate for looking through that.

Edited for format
Doc
Doc
  • Threads: 46
  • Posts: 7287
Joined: Feb 27, 2010
February 26th, 2014 at 9:42:46 AM permalink
Quote: endermike

Maybe some sort of highest rated threads (possibly with a bit of karma decay).


I'm not at all sure that the current thread rating system is all that valuable. I initiated the Casino Chip of the Day thread that now has 4,198 posts and a 5-Star rating. However, that rating is based on a total of six votes. After 375,697 views, only six people have bothered to vote on what they think of the thread. Most threads have no votes at all. With that small degree of voting, I think that every vote is over-valued when the stars are posted next to the thread title.
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 10:45:42 AM permalink
Quote: Doc

I'm not at all sure that the current thread rating system is all that valuable. I initiated the Casino Chip of the Day thread that now has 4,198 posts and a 5-Star rating. However, that rating is based on a total of six votes. After 375,697 views, only six people have bothered to vote on what they think of the thread. Most threads have no votes at all. With that small degree of voting, I think that every vote is over-valued when the stars are posted next to the thread title.



I agree. However if the voting was somehow material to how the site shows threads people would be more likely to rate them. I know for me the ratings have little meaning and I ignore them. However if there was greater participation in the rating, they might become useful.
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 10:49:41 AM permalink
I would appreciate a cash award for a "must post by" with a minor and major amount.
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 129
  • Posts: 3918
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
February 26th, 2014 at 10:50:59 AM permalink
So should I start posting this:

<deleted>

I would like to get into the top 40...
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 11:24:21 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I've read through this thread and am considering the issue. A question to be addressed is if I get rid of the "top posters" list, what do I replace it with.

I also don't think we need the list of the "newest members." Personally, I've never paid any attention to it.



It is really a good idea to encourage people to post for the sake of posting?
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 11:32:34 AM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

It is really a good idea to encourage people to post for the sake of posting?



it makes sense for wizard because every post and every view of that post generates ad views
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 11:34:04 AM permalink
Quote: sodawater

it makes sense for wizard because every post and every view of that post generates ad views



Unless the noise starts to drown out the signal and people never come back.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 11:36:23 AM permalink
Quote: sodawater

it makes sense for wizard because every post and every view of that post generates ad views



Then he should not have banned juicie jennie :) (this is a JOKE! Just pointing out that her threads were well-viewed)

I am actually not sure how his advertising agreement with Bovada works. Does he really get paid for views? Or only clicks? Or only new sign-ups as a result of the click?
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 26th, 2014 at 11:44:04 AM permalink
Does anyone want to take a guess how many WOV members there are with no posts or only one or two posts?
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
Face
Administrator
Face
  • Threads: 49
  • Posts: 4448
Joined: Dec 27, 2010
February 26th, 2014 at 11:56:07 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I've read through this thread and am considering the issue. A question to be addressed is if I get rid of the "top posters" list, what do I replace it with.

I also don't think we need the list of the "newest members." Personally, I've never paid any attention to it.



I've thought of this a few times... still got nothin'.

The Top Threads I use seldom, usually if I'm just looking for something interesting to read as long threads are usually long for a reason.

The New Member list I only look at to confirm if a spam post I nuked was indeed someone new. I can accomplish the same just by looking at the post in question, since everyone's post count is visible in the page.

Top Contributors, for those who care, would be better off with Aces version. As of now, it's the same unchanging 5 people, and clicking the header just takes you to a list sorted alphabetically. That being said, I do use the alphabetical list for other reasons, and if you ditch both the New Member and Top Poster threads, I'm unsure how I'd access it.

My only suggestion is I wish that the Blog bolded the way the Recent Threads does, to notify you when a blog has been read or when a post has been added since your last viewing.
The opinions of this moderator are for entertainment purposes only.
wudged
wudged
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 998
Joined: Aug 7, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 11:57:04 AM permalink
North of 75%
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 12:01:46 PM permalink
Originally I did the full list because I was curious where I ranked. Other people were curious, so I made it public. In no way am I encouraging people to post just for the sake of posting, or to incite a post-count-war. It should be considered for informational purposes only. If anyone is "inspired" by my list to artificially inflate their post count, then they have some serious problems.

If you think having a full list of posters sorted by post count is some way detrimental to the forum, well then I've got something for you right here. <points to crotch>
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
February 26th, 2014 at 12:21:03 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

If you think having a full list of posters sorted by post count is some way detrimental to the forum, well then I've got something for you right here. <points to crotch>



Oh, no, not my point at all. I just don't know that I'd put it up on the front page of the site.
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 14268
Joined: May 21, 2013
February 26th, 2014 at 12:39:03 PM permalink
The New Members I find very useful in adminning and I'd like to keep it. I do wish it defaulted (when clicking the header) to members sorted by join date rather than to the generic member list (which does not have a tab for some reason), but since I'm neither a programmer nor paying the one you have, I'm not going to make the request. Also would like the Top Posters to link to a list sorted by post number, since I'm not making requests. ;->

When I want to search for someone, I click on any member's name, even my own. In the tree view above what opens, it says, Forum...Members..beachbumbabs and I just click on the member part and it brings up the member list alphabetically.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
February 26th, 2014 at 12:40:44 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

Originally I did the full list because I was curious where I ranked. Other people were curious, so I made it public. In no way am I encouraging people to post just for the sake of posting, or to incite a post-count-war. It should be considered for informational purposes only. If anyone is "inspired" by my list to artificially inflate their post count, then they have some serious problems.

If you think having a full list of posters sorted by post count is some way detrimental to the forum, well then I've got something for you right here. <points to crotch>



Careful there. You meant the crotch in the tree outside your window, right? There are always going to be those who post for the sake of posting and all too often the post has nothing to do with the subject of the thread. Some are actually funny but many are repetitious. If you must post "that's what she said" for the umpteenth time, at least accompany it with a comment on the discussion.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
RaleighCraps
RaleighCraps
  • Threads: 79
  • Posts: 2501
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
February 26th, 2014 at 12:52:40 PM permalink
Since rating the quality of a post is at best subjective, it is improbable to think any kind of ranking can be developed.

So, I suggest a set of three tests be developed for each member to take.
Test One would be an IQ test
Test Two would be a Common Sense type of test.
Test Three would be a test of gambling knowledge (anything gaming related).

Each member would then receive a 3 digit rating, for Test One-Test Two-Test Three

So, someone rated 914 would be a High IQ brain, with little common sense, who has average gaming knowledge.

Or, the rating would be the percentile ranking against other forum members
In this case, a 271 rating would mean this person ranks in the bottom 20% in member IQ, is in the top 70% of member common sense, and must be a Big 6 Wheel player <G>.

That should drive away some current members, and most of any new, perspective members.
Always borrow money from a pessimist; They don't expect to get paid back ! Be yourself and speak your thoughts. Those who matter won't mind, and those that mind, don't matter!
  • Jump to: