Tomorrow I'm going to be on Oklahoma for sure. Not sure what else.
Looking at he Brazilians on the card where the the round total shows a likely decision and the odds show it as not a terribly lopsided fight, I filter it to: Filho -125 over Carpenter
OK, put some money on thatQuote: unJonUFC card is in Brazil tonight. I’m a believer in home town judge impact not being reflected properly in the lines.
Looking at he Brazilians on the card where the the round total shows a likely decision and the odds show it as not a terribly lopsided fight, I filter it to: Filho -125 over Carpenter
link to original post
and ten cents on a tie at +8000 for a lark
Bottom line is, who knows?
Lost a few parlays including Tigers over 5.5. But hit one juicy parlay that finished including a batter hit in extra innings. The Carpenter HR hit, but right after the starting pitcher was removed! That also hit Tigers winning race to 2! (Correlated!!!).
I’m considering 8 team parlay fading DRick’s picks….
Quote: SOOPOO
I’m considering 8 team parlay fading DRick’s picks….
I wouldn't blame you at all after last weeks picks.
Quote: DRichHere are my college bets this weekend. Hopefully, I do a little better than last week.
Rutgers +11.5
Missouri +3.5
Pittsburgh + 10.5
Iowa State -2.5
Indiana +7.5
Northwestern + 21.5
Louisiana Monroe -2.5
Wisconsin ML +135
link to original post
The Wisconsin line just jumped three points to Iowa -5.5 as apparently Gronowski is starting after being out a couple weeks. The money line is now Wisconsin +175.
Quote: DRichExciting time for college football. Starting tomorrow college football will be on TV Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays for the next four weeks.
link to original post
Wait until the NFL gets that memo!
I can just imagine how high the game quality is for the Tuesday and Wednesday broadcasts. Slippery Blubber Univ vs the Sam Houston Institute of Technology?
Quote: gordonm888Quote: DRichExciting time for college football. Starting tomorrow college football will be on TV Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays for the next four weeks.
link to original post
Wait until the NFL gets that memo!
I can just imagine how high the game quality is for the Tuesday and Wednesday broadcasts. Slippery Blubber Univ vs the Sam Houston Institute of Technology?
link to original post
Clearly college football is dominating the NFL. The NFL only gets three televised days per week and college is getting five. Personally, the broadcast quality isn't important to me as I watch almost all football games with the sound muted. I don't like hearing other peoples opinions when I can draw my own.
Go Slippery Blubber!!!!
I will be watching or recording all three games tonight.
The Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, which prohibited the NFL from being broadcast on Fridays and Saturdays until late December, is still in effect, although it hasn't been enforced in years. Whether it applies to streaming services has not been resolved. That same law said the NFL could blackout games that weren't sold out ahead of time, but the NFL got the FCC to amend that part of the law a few years back. It's been years since the NFL blacked out a game in the local market.
ABC used to broadcast a Monday Night Baseball game when it had the MLB contract. It never really took off but coincidentally broadcast the Yankee- Os game the day of Thurman Munson's funeral, where hours after eulogizing his best friend, Bobby Murcer drove in all five runs in an incredible 5-4 comeback victory.
for today's game -
NMSU + 10.5 over Liberty
.
I think the NFL has had some sense of understanding that their pipeline of players depends upon college and high school football and that Fridays are for high school football and Saturdays are for college football. And that hurting college football and high school football was not in their best interest. So the NFL's expansion into new time slots went first to Monday Night, then to afternoon games on Thanksgiving holiday,to 16 game seasons and most recently to Thursday night and 17 game seasons. And their search for new eyeballs and new revenue has expanded geographically into Europe and Mexico.
It's been the sprawling multi-headed entity of college football that has begun the upsetting of the apple cart. First they expanded into Friday nights that compete with high school football - but only with obscure, low interest colleges. And, for the first week (only) of college football, before the NFL season has started, they have expanded into Sunday, Monday night and Thursday night. CFB has also expanded to 12 game seasons and multiweek playoffs in the winter.
And now, College Football has tiptoed into Wednesday night and finally Tuesday night.
Quote: lilredrooster.
for today's game -
NMSU + 10.5 over Liberty
.
link to original post
Give us your analysis! Since I’m sure I’ll have college football offers, I’ll ride with you!
I had a ‘don’t count your chickens til they hatch’ bet last night. Had a hunch Dawson Knox catches a TD with rumors main TE (Kincaid) might not play. Offer required a two leg parlay. So took Knox TD /Allen over 199.5 passing yards. After the first drive it looked like a lock. Allen had 60 ish yards passing, and threw a TD to Knox. I sent text to son gloating. Allen for the next 10 drives had a little over 100 yards….. with the boost was around 7-1….
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: lilredrooster.
for today's game -
NMSU + 10.5 over Liberty
.
link to original post
Give us your analysis! Since I’m sure I’ll have college football offers, I’ll ride with you!
Liberty has trouble scoring points
their last 4 games they've only put up 13, 13, 7 and 19
NMSU crushed in its last game as the underdog and put up 37 points, and won by 27
I read several different predictions about today's game and I liked this one the best
https://herosports.com/fbs-new-mexico-state-liberty-prediction-betting-odds-tv-cpcp/
Quote: gordonm888First they expanded into Friday nights that compete with high school football - but only with obscure, low interest colleges.
That's not the case any more. There are 2 games that feature top-25 schools this Friday, including Miami-Louisville. Miami is ranked #2 and Louisville beat them two years ago. This is a fairly big game.
Ball St. +1.5 over Akron
UNLV +13.5 over Boise State
.
Quote: lilredrooster.
Ball St. +1.5 over Akron
UNLV +13.5 over Boise State
.
link to original post
I am on UNLV also.
Quote: DRichI probably have more college football bets today than I have ever had. I have about 50% of my bankroll on the line today.
link to original post
I never understand ‘bankroll’ for players with means. If you lose 1/2 your bankroll today, do you just replace it with other funds?
Let’s say you find an offer that would give you +200 on a bet that should be +100. Are you actually constrained by what you now call your ‘bankroll’?
I had that opportunity at +300 and -250. That made me ignore what I like to bet/risk, because, I had no risk. The factors were more about not being scrutinized.
I’m in Florida now. When last here I’d say my EV available on HardRock was maybe $10 a day. So no great opportunities compared to NY. Oh well. 80 and sunny has its costs.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichI probably have more college football bets today than I have ever had. I have about 50% of my bankroll on the line today.
link to original post
I never understand ‘bankroll’ for players with means. If you lose 1/2 your bankroll today, do you just replace it with other funds?
Let’s say you find an offer that would give you +200 on a bet that should be +100. Are you actually constrained by what you now call your ‘bankroll’?
I had that opportunity at +300 and -250. That made me ignore what I like to bet/risk, because, I had no risk. The factors were more about not being scrutinized.
I’m in Florida now. When last here I’d say my EV available on HardRock was maybe $10 a day. So no great opportunities compared to NY. Oh well. 80 and sunny has its costs.
link to original post
It’s a good point. For normal gamblers I take it to normally mean the amount of money they have set aside that they are comfortable losing. So I think if an unusual arbitrage opportunity comes along, like your +300 and -250 scenario, then the person wouldn’t be constrained by that “bankroll.”
On the other hand, I do think people recalculate “the amount they are comfortable losing” from time to time as they win or lose over the course of the season, which causes them to change their mental “bankroll.” This is a well known cognitive bias known as “mental accounting.” It makes for interesting (and useful) reading if you want to delve into it.
For Kelly purposes, a “bankroll” is all the money you will ever have that is available to be put at risk, such that if you lost it you could never have the opportunity to play ever again. But most people that use “Kelly” do not use that definition of bankroll. But that’s fine, just means instead of betting, for example, a Half Kelly, they are betting somewhere lower than that.
* withdrawing money gets noticed. I probably would still have a good deal going with betMGM except I kept withdrawing my winnings. Big mistake. Realize though that the sportsbooks are state regulated and I know now that they want no trouble and get the money to you fast as long as they know you are legit
I really miss betting on the 4 sites I use in NY. HardRock is ok, but it’s just one site. I’m 1 for 1 on jai alai.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichI probably have more college football bets today than I have ever had. I have about 50% of my bankroll on the line today.
link to original post
I never understand ‘bankroll’ for players with means. If you lose 1/2 your bankroll today, do you just replace it with other funds?
Let’s say you find an offer that would give you +200 on a bet that should be +100. Are you actually constrained by what you now call your ‘bankroll’?
I had that opportunity at +300 and -250. That made me ignore what I like to bet/risk, because, I had no risk. The factors were more about not being scrutinized.
I’m in Florida now. When last here I’d say my EV available on HardRock was maybe $10 a day. So no great opportunities compared to NY. Oh well. 80 and sunny has its costs.
link to original post
I do set a bankroll each year for my sports gambling, this year it is about equal to my annual take home pay, just to make sure I don't do anything stupid. I do admit, if I find the right advantage I will get a payday loan, car title loan, bank loan, and prostitute my wife.
Quote: SOOPOO
I’m in Florida now. When last here I’d say my EV available on HardRock was maybe $10 a day. So no great opportunities compared to NY. Oh well. 80 and sunny has its costs.
link to original post
I have received exactly zero boosts from Hard Rock since college football season started. I hope you get a lot more than me.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOO
I’m in Florida now. When last here I’d say my EV available on HardRock was maybe $10 a day. So no great opportunities compared to NY. Oh well. 80 and sunny has its costs.
link to original post
I have received exactly zero boosts from Hard Rock since college football season started. I hope you get a lot more than me.
link to original post
A couple of 30% boosts at $50 max. With the constraints only slightly +EV. Some 10% that still are -EV. ‘Risk free’ bets definitely +EV, but was limited to $10.
Just guessing, but feels like around $10 a day in EV.
Quote: SOOPOOStill perfect (7-0) in my $1,000,000 survivor pool. Chiefs today. Eagles next weekend. Since I’m not in NY and am not sure if I can make picks from out of state, I put in all my picks until week 18.
I really miss betting on the 4 sites I use in NY. HardRock is ok, but it’s just one site. I’m 1 for 1 on jai alai.
link to original post
I am also 7-0 in the free online ESPN eliminator contest. Only 12.4% of players have survived this far. With over 1 Million participants, that means there are 135,390 players remaining. I picked Detroit in Week7, probably going with Atlanta in Week 8.
Quote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOOStill perfect (7-0) in my $1,000,000 survivor pool. Chiefs today. Eagles next weekend. Since I’m not in NY and am not sure if I can make picks from out of state, I put in all my picks until week 18.
I really miss betting on the 4 sites I use in NY. HardRock is ok, but it’s just one site. I’m 1 for 1 on jai alai.
link to original post
I am also 7-0 in the free online ESPN eliminator contest. Only 12.4% of players have survived this far. With over 1 Million participants, that means there are 135,390 players remaining. I picked Detroit in Week7, probably going with Atlanta in Week 8.
link to original post
A good friend of mine is still alive in a Survivor contest that was $1000 entry. They had 78 participants and only 6 left for the $78,000 first prize. They have a stupid rule that when your team loses you are immediately out. I explained to him to try and pick Sunday night and Monday night games because it is likely others will go out on Sunday and he would win.
Quote: DRichQuote: gordonm888Quote: SOOPOOStill perfect (7-0) in my $1,000,000 survivor pool. Chiefs today. Eagles next weekend. Since I’m not in NY and am not sure if I can make picks from out of state, I put in all my picks until week 18.
I really miss betting on the 4 sites I use in NY. HardRock is ok, but it’s just one site. I’m 1 for 1 on jai alai.
link to original post
I am also 7-0 in the free online ESPN eliminator contest. Only 12.4% of players have survived this far. With over 1 Million participants, that means there are 135,390 players remaining. I picked Detroit in Week7, probably going with Atlanta in Week 8.
link to original post
A good friend of mine is still alive in a Survivor contest that was $1000 entry. They had 78 participants and only 6 left for the $78,000 first prize. They have a stupid rule that when your team loses you are immediately out. I explained to him to try and pick Sunday night and Monday night games because it is likely others will go out on Sunday and he would win.
link to original post
I lost a playoff pool one year because of those rules. I lost a one o'clock game and was eliminated, so the guy who picked the 4 PM game was the last survivor. When he lost, I complained loudly, to no avail. We did agree to change the rules for the next year. I forget if it was a $5 or a $20 pool, but it wasn't any more than that. It helped that the guy who won bought a couple of rounds For The Boys.
Quote: avianrandyWho do you like in the pacers game tonight with the pacers being underdog at home?
link to original post
Without Halliburton I expect the Pacers to be a below average team. The Thunder are close to the same team as last year. Thunder 128. Pacrrs111.
As a reminder, I am correct on nearly 49 % of my even money selections.
Quote: SOOPOO
As a reminder, I am correct on nearly 49 % of my even money selections.
Quit bragging.
Western Michigan/Miami of Ohio - over 40.5
.
Quote: lilredrooster.
Western Michigan/Miami of Ohio - over 40.5
.
link to original post
Good work lilred. That’s $5 extra in my account! Makes a dent in my dismal college football selections.
Patriots - 7 over Browns
Quote: lilredrooster.
Patriots - 7 over Browns
link to original post
Lilred on a heater!
I’m still alive after 8 weeks in the $1 million suicide pool.
Eagles cruised today. Got Chargers next week.
The only thing good about my NFL bets was how little I bet!
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: lilredrooster.
Patriots - 7 over Browns
link to original post
Lilred on a heater!
I’m still alive after 8 weeks in the $1 million suicide pool.
Eagles cruised today. Got Chargers next week.
The only thing good about my NFL bets was how little I bet!
link to original post
I was eliminated in my Survivor competition today in the 8th week. I had picked Falcons over Dolphins this week.. I had identified about 5 good reasons to make that pick and now I can't remember any of them.
Chiefs
Brashard Smith over 15.5 receiving yards - I've seen -110, -118 and -140 quoted from different books
.
What I'm looking for is a halftime lead that is just about insurmountable. Does a team winning by 14 points at the half win 95% of the games? Is that too small a lead? Does a three-touchdown halftime lead produce a win 95% of the time? I'm thinking the number is somewhere in between
The Giants were up by over 20 in the fourth quarter but lost. It's pretty rare but i'm curious what halftime lead produces a victory 95% of the time?
.Quote: billryanIs there a drop dead numer in the NFL?
What I'm looking for is a halftime lead that is just about insurmountable. Does a team winning by 14 points at the half win 95% of the games? Is that too small a lead? Does a three-touchdown halftime lead produce a win 95% of the time? I'm thinking the number is somewhere in between
The Giants were up by over 20 in the fourth quarter but lost. It's pretty rare but i'm curious what halftime lead produces a victory 95% of the time?
link to original post
Of course there is! I just don’t know it. I’ll guess 18 point lead at halftime wins 19/20 times. 14 seems a bit low. But just guessing.
Quote: billryanIs there a drop dead numer in the NFL?
What I'm looking for is a halftime lead that is just about insurmountable. Does a team winning by 14 points at the half win 95% of the games? Is that too small a lead? Does a three-touchdown halftime lead produce a win 95% of the time? I'm thinking the number is somewhere in between
The Giants were up by over 20 in the fourth quarter but lost. It's pretty rare but i'm curious what halftime lead produces a victory 95% of the time?
link to original post
I had a bet this weekend on the Miami vs Stanford game. It was 7-7 at halftime and I had Stanford +30.5. I am guessing that you can infer what happened.
Miami was up 35-7 with 30 seconds left and could have taken a knee to end the game. Instead, they ran it in for a touchdown for a score of 42-7 and a loss for me.
Quote: SOOPOO.Quote: billryanIs there a drop dead numer in the NFL?
What I'm looking for is a halftime lead that is just about insurmountable. Does a team winning by 14 points at the half win 95% of the games? Is that too small a lead? Does a three-touchdown halftime lead produce a win 95% of the time? I'm thinking the number is somewhere in between
The Giants were up by over 20 in the fourth quarter but lost. It's pretty rare but i'm curious what halftime lead produces a victory 95% of the time?
link to original post
Of course there is! I just don’t know it. I’ll guess 18 point lead at halftime wins 19/20 times. 14 seems a bit low. But just guessing.
link to original post
This feels right to me. It’s certainly under 25 points as number 10 on the list of biggest comebacks ever was a 25 point halftime deficit.
Quote: unJonQuote: SOOPOO.Quote: billryanIs there a drop dead numer in the NFL?
What I'm looking for is a halftime lead that is just about insurmountable. Does a team winning by 14 points at the half win 95% of the games? Is that too small a lead? Does a three-touchdown halftime lead produce a win 95% of the time? I'm thinking the number is somewhere in between
The Giants were up by over 20 in the fourth quarter but lost. It's pretty rare but i'm curious what halftime lead produces a victory 95% of the time?
link to original post
Of course there is! I just don’t know it. I’ll guess 18 point lead at halftime wins 19/20 times. 14 seems a bit low. But just guessing.
link to original post
This feels right to me. It’s certainly under 25 points as number 10 on the list of biggest comebacks ever was a 25 point halftime deficit.
link to original post
Remember that most NFL games are close, so while these comebacks are fairly rare, so are halftime leads of that size.
Anyway I have data back 25 years or so, I can pull the numbers and check
Note that this is not split by home/away or favorite/underdog, which definitely is going to have an effect. I would not use these numbers to bet; they have less information than the market does. Blindly betting these numbers will almost certainly lose at a fairly large clip due to adverse selection and high vig in live bets.
Halftime Lead: 1 W: 144 L: 105 T: 0 pct: 0.578
Halftime Lead: 2 W: 70 L: 64 T: 0 pct: 0.522
Halftime Lead: 3 W: 452 L: 308 T: 3 pct: 0.594
Halftime Lead: 4 W: 396 L: 227 T: 0 pct: 0.636
Halftime Lead: 5 W: 67 L: 27 T: 0 pct: 0.713
Halftime Lead: 6 W: 251 L: 96 T: 1 pct: 0.723
Halftime Lead: 7 W: 587 L: 200 T: 5 pct: 0.744
Halftime Lead: 8 W: 135 L: 34 T: 0 pct: 0.799
Halftime Lead: 9 W: 80 L: 13 T: 0 pct: 0.860
Halftime Lead: 10 W: 489 L: 99 T: 2 pct: 0.831
Halftime Lead: 11 W: 266 L: 48 T: 0 pct: 0.847
Halftime Lead: 12 W: 38 L: 7 T: 0 pct: 0.844
Halftime Lead: 13 W: 205 L: 20 T: 0 pct: 0.911
Halftime Lead: 14 W: 374 L: 33 T: 1 pct: 0.918
Halftime Lead: 15 W: 52 L: 5 T: 0 pct: 0.912
Halftime Lead: 16 W: 50 L: 6 T: 0 pct: 0.893
Halftime Lead: 17 W: 261 L: 21 T: 0 pct: 0.926
Halftime Lead: 18 W: 120 L: 10 T: 0 pct: 0.923
Halftime Lead: 19 W: 23 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.958
Halftime Lead: 20 W: 89 L: 5 T: 0 pct: 0.947
Halftime Lead: 21 W: 152 L: 8 T: 0 pct: 0.950
Halftime Lead: 22 W: 17 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 23 W: 24 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.960
Halftime Lead: 24 W: 100 L: 2 T: 0 pct: 0.980
Halftime Lead: 25 W: 24 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 26 W: 9 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 27 W: 23 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 28 W: 38 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 29 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 30 W: 5 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 31 W: 13 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 32 W: 12 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 33 W: 2 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.667
Halftime Lead: 34 W: 7 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 35 W: 10 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 38 W: 3 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 40 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 41 W: 2 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 42 W: 2 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 45 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
This data does back to 2000 and does not include this year's data. And it is specifically for halftime leads, teams may have had bigger leads before halftime or at other times.
Quote: SkinnyTonyOk, I was a bit surprised by the reults. 8 pts is enough to win over 75% of the time (7 pts just barely misses) and 19pts will get you over 95%.
Note that this is not split by home/away or favorite/underdog, which definitely is going to have an effect. I would not use these numbers to bet; they have less information than the market does. Blindly betting these numbers will almost certainly lose at a fairly large clip due to adverse selection and high vig in live bets.Halftime Lead: 1 W: 144 L: 105 T: 0 pct: 0.578
Halftime Lead: 2 W: 70 L: 64 T: 0 pct: 0.522
Halftime Lead: 3 W: 452 L: 308 T: 3 pct: 0.594
Halftime Lead: 4 W: 396 L: 227 T: 0 pct: 0.636
Halftime Lead: 5 W: 67 L: 27 T: 0 pct: 0.713
Halftime Lead: 6 W: 251 L: 96 T: 1 pct: 0.723
Halftime Lead: 7 W: 587 L: 200 T: 5 pct: 0.744
Halftime Lead: 8 W: 135 L: 34 T: 0 pct: 0.799
Halftime Lead: 9 W: 80 L: 13 T: 0 pct: 0.860
Halftime Lead: 10 W: 489 L: 99 T: 2 pct: 0.831
Halftime Lead: 11 W: 266 L: 48 T: 0 pct: 0.847
Halftime Lead: 12 W: 38 L: 7 T: 0 pct: 0.844
Halftime Lead: 13 W: 205 L: 20 T: 0 pct: 0.911
Halftime Lead: 14 W: 374 L: 33 T: 1 pct: 0.918
Halftime Lead: 15 W: 52 L: 5 T: 0 pct: 0.912
Halftime Lead: 16 W: 50 L: 6 T: 0 pct: 0.893
Halftime Lead: 17 W: 261 L: 21 T: 0 pct: 0.926
Halftime Lead: 18 W: 120 L: 10 T: 0 pct: 0.923
Halftime Lead: 19 W: 23 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.958
Halftime Lead: 20 W: 89 L: 5 T: 0 pct: 0.947
Halftime Lead: 21 W: 152 L: 8 T: 0 pct: 0.950
Halftime Lead: 22 W: 17 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 23 W: 24 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.960
Halftime Lead: 24 W: 100 L: 2 T: 0 pct: 0.980
Halftime Lead: 25 W: 24 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 26 W: 9 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 27 W: 23 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 28 W: 38 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 29 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 30 W: 5 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 31 W: 13 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 32 W: 12 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 33 W: 2 L: 1 T: 0 pct: 0.667
Halftime Lead: 34 W: 7 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 35 W: 10 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 38 W: 3 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 40 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 41 W: 2 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 42 W: 2 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
Halftime Lead: 45 W: 1 L: 0 T: 0 pct: 1.000
This data does back to 2000 and does not include this year's data. And it is specifically for halftime leads, teams may have had bigger leads before halftime or at other times.
link to original post
Is this regular season only? I don’t see the Chargers epic collapse vs Jags (27-0 at half) or Falcons collapse in the Super Bowl (28-3 at half).
Quote:Is this regular season only? I don’t see the Chargers epic collapse vs Jags (27-0 at half) or Falcons collapse in the Super Bowl (28-3 at half).
link to original post
Yup, regular season only.
Actually, it also excludes neutral site games. This is the data that I use for my betting model and I intentionally exclude that since it didn't take for what I'm trying to do.
Although now that I look closer, neutral site games may not be excluded after all... I may have a bug or my source data may not be marking those correctly.
EDIT: There's an issue with my raw data. I'll correct it. Neutral site games aren't properly marked as such for 2022 and 2023 (only) So it includes neutral site games for those seasons. I'm glad I went through this exercise or I never would have caught that! Not that it will make a huge difference in my results, but it's still good to fix it.

