General Sports Talk

Quote: lilredrooster

.
Koufax threw 4 no hitters including a perfect game in only 12 seasons
Martinez never threw a no hitter in 18 seasons
Randy Johnson had 2 no hitters in 20 seasons
Ron Guidry never pitched a no hitter in 14 seasons

Koufax had 3 out 12 years with an era of under 2.00
Martinez did that in 2 out of 18 years
Johnson did that in 1 out of 20 years (and he only pitched in 11 games that year)
Guidry did that in 1 out of 14 years

of those other 3 pitchers Randy Johnson was the only one to win a World Series MVP
Koufax had two

Koufax had more strikeouts per year than Guidry or Martinez - Randy Johnson had more per year than Koufax

for whatever reason, I'm not sure what it is, Koufax was only mediocre or a little better than mediocre until the 1962 season

from 1962 to the end of his career he was spectacular (the 5 year run that you mentioned)

Koufax didn't retire for murky reasons
he had severe arthritis in his pitching elbow and clearly stated that he worried that if he continued to pitch his body would be degraded to a level unacceptable to him

your point about Koufax not facing designated hitters is a good one

link to original post

The early 1960s were a pitcher's game. The bottom of every lineup was usually a weak-hitting catcher, a weak-hitting shortstop, followed by a pitcher. Circular lineups were a generation away. Pedro and RJ faced better lineups, more Latino players, and certainly more performance-enhanced batters.
It's becoming harder to compare stats from different eras. Koufax was a great pitcher in his era, but his stats can't be compared to modern ones. Four-man rotations translated to more wins and strikeouts per season than modern pitching staffs. I never saw Koufax pitch, but watched Seaver and Koosman duel with Gibson, Marichal, and others.

Quote: lilredrooster

.
so, the question is - can a fastball rise - ?
some say scientists say that is impossible; some say it's an optical illusion; and some say yes it can rise
take a look at these 2 vids -
stop the action when the ball is halfway there and you will see the ball is well below the top of the artificial batter's box
then watch the catcher catch the ball over the top of the batters box
my conclusion : a fastball can definitely rise

in the last vid a submariner throws a fastball that goes way up -
in fairness to the skeptics - they probably wouldn't consider a submariner to be relevant to the question
but his pitch is quite stunning

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lKzap91cxyc

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/pLPq5o0PCgg

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6O4-zyESVpE

.
link to original post

Yes, it can rise. It just rarely does, because of exactly what you noted- most pitchers aren't submariners and the ball is going from a hand 8 feet off the ground to a target 2 feet off the ground. What it's usually doing is rising relative to the parabolic trajectory of a projectile in a gravitational field, which visual processing is very good at compensating for and is what makes it so hard to hit; we have to lose that visual instinct that has been developing in animals since the first bird. So the "illusion" camp is right in a way too. But being we're talking about Newtonian physics where all motion is relative and all directions arbitrary, it does indeed rise, from some reference frame.

.
Steph Curry widely regarded as the best shooter in NBA history fakes Luka Doncic to the floor and then hits a long three

Curry has been close to 60% on his 2 pt. % in a couple of years (one year he was over it at .636) and as high as 45.5% on his 3 pt. % in one year

many players are well under 50% on their 2 point %





.

Quote: lilredrooster

.
so, the question is - can a fastball rise - ?
some say scientists say that is impossible; some say it's an optical illusion; and some say yes it can rise
take a look at these 2 vids -
stop the action when the ball is halfway there and you will see the ball is well below the top of the artificial batter's box
then watch the catcher catch the ball over the top of the batters box
my conclusion : a fastball can definitely rise

in the last vid a submariner throws a fastball that goes way up -
in fairness to the skeptics - they probably wouldn't consider a submariner to be relevant to the question
but his pitch is quite stunning

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lKzap91cxyc

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/pLPq5o0PCgg

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6O4-zyESVpE

.
link to original post

Can a thrown baseball rise? Yes, remember that an aircraft can rise. Greater drag on the underside of the ball can cause the air pressure to rise under the ball which would cause the ball to rise. The spin on the ball would need to be directed in a certain way to cause frictional drag on the underside of the ball to be greater.

.
Aroldis Chapman at 0.32 in the vid gets credit for the fastest pitch ever thrown - officially clocked at 105.8 m.p,h. - really smokin'

Chapman, who is used as a reliever, had a 1.17 era thru 61.1 innings in 2025
he had 1.01 era thru 26.2 innings in 2016
his era has been under 2.00 in 6 of his 16 seasons

from Wikipedia:

"MLB's officially recognized fastest-recorded pitch is 105.8 mph, which Chapman threw on September 24, 2010, against the San Diego Padres"

Lamar Jackson and Baker Mayfield started NFL games at QB, and tied SOOPOO with zero passing yards. Tyler Huntley subbed in for Jackson, and he amassed zero passing yards as well before he left because he stubbed his toe.
At least Baker Mayfield won his game. His offense caught ZERO passes, But his defense at least caught FOUR passes from a befuddled Michael Penix.

There is no team that looks like a lock to beat any other team.

Quote: SOOPOO

Lamar Jackson and Baker Mayfield started NFL games at QB, and tied SOOPOO with zero passing yards. Tyler Huntley subbed in for Jackson, and he amassed zero passing yards as well before he left because he stubbed his toe.
At least Baker Mayfield won his game. His offense caught ZERO passes, But his defense at least caught FOUR passes from a befuddled Michael Penix.

There is no team that looks like a lock to beat any other team.
link to original post

Now I want to see a SooPoo stat line and commentary: can't run or pass, but his patients' O2 sats are the best on the team. First on the depth chart for anesthesiologists.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Now I want to see a SooPoo stat line and commentary: can't run or pass, but his patients' O2 sats are the best on the team. First on the depth chart for anesthesiologists.

Way too much emphasis on stats. To the best of my knowledge SooPoo has never lost a game as starting QB.

I just watched a clip of a very unusual baseball play.
Pete Crow Armstrong is on first, with two outs, and the count is 3-2. Armstrong takes off to steal second, and after some hesitation, the umpire calls him out. But the pitch is called a ball so the batter is awarded first base, and the runner on first automatically advances to second. This play happens dozens of times a year. Only this time, Armstrong is called out. The ump says he briefly lost contact with the base after safely reaching it and was tagged out. I've never seen that called before,

Quote: billryan

I just watched a clip of a very unusual baseball play.
Pete Crow Armstrong is on first, with two outs, and the count is 3-2. Armstrong takes off to steal second, and after some hesitation, the umpire calls him out. But the pitch is called a ball so the batter is awarded first base, and the runner on first automatically advances to second. This play happens dozens of times a year. Only this time, Armstrong is called out. The ump says he briefly lost contact with the base after safely reaching it and was tagged out. I've never seen that called before,
link to original post

That can't be completely right, as once the pitch is released there is no way to steal 2nd base in such a circumstance. Every pitch outcome either ends the inning, advances the runners anyway, or is a do-over due to a foul ball. The unusual part is that the ball would be thrown to 2nd base after a walk. You wouldn't do that because the second baseman or shortstop isn't going to be playing at the base and you are more likely to throw the ball into the outfield than to catch a baserunner in a pickoff. Sounds like the catcher might have lost track of the count.

Quote: DRich

Quote: GenoDRPh

Now I want to see a SooPoo stat line and commentary: can't run or pass, but his patients' O2 sats are the best on the team. First on the depth chart for anesthesiologists.

Way too much emphasis on stats. To the best of my knowledge SooPoo has never lost a game as starting QB.
link to original post

Does anyone have a SooPoo rookie card that they would be willing to sell to me?

Quote: AutomaticMonkey

Quote: billryan

I just watched a clip of a very unusual baseball play.
Pete Crow Armstrong is on first, with two outs, and the count is 3-2. Armstrong takes off to steal second, and after some hesitation, the umpire calls him out. But the pitch is called a ball so the batter is awarded first base, and the runner on first automatically advances to second. This play happens dozens of times a year. Only this time, Armstrong is called out. The ump says he briefly lost contact with the base after safely reaching it and was tagged out. I've never seen that called before,
link to original post

That can't be completely right, as once the pitch is released there is no way to steal 2nd base in such a circumstance. Every pitch outcome either ends the inning, advances the runners anyway, or is a do-over due to a foul ball. The unusual part is that the ball would be thrown to 2nd base after a walk. You wouldn't do that because the second baseman or shortstop isn't going to be playing at the base and you are more likely to throw the ball into the outfield than to catch a baserunner in a pickoff. Sounds like the catcher might have lost track of the count.
link to original post

The ball is not dead when the umpire calls ball four. Had it been a wild pitch, the runners could advance. If the throw had gone into center field, the runners could advance. If it was a strike, the inning still isn't over if the catcher doesn't catch it, but it was a ball, and the play continued. Crow was entitled to second base, but the play was live, and he was out when he lost contact while the Mets' shortstop had his glove on Pete's back. It's a correct call, but incredibly ticky-tack.