Slotlady Channel
Quote: rxwine(clipped)Quote: ChallengedMillyUnless she has some weird niche fetish thing she can pull off, I don't see this working out that well.
link to original post
Should have figured out how to gamble and do porn at the same time. Wonder what casino would go for that? I suppose anything is possible at an online casino.
I don't think they can make enough to support Vic's level of losses.
link to original post
Is there gambling-themed adult content? Is it a thing? If not, they could create a niche all their own. "Cute slot attendant gives winner a rewarding hand pay." "Can Sarah bust the dealer to help end Vic's skid?" "Slotlady's machine is down and Vic the slot tech is ready to service her." And other euphemisms related to gambling.
If they could not find a casino that closes overnight to let them shoot, making a casino set would be pretty easy. A table and a few slot machines is all they would need. They would not need that many subs and buyers to make a decent amount of cash. They apparently have other partners they could bring in as well. This may turn out well for them.
Quote: itsmejeffQuote: rxwine(clipped)Quote: ChallengedMillyUnless she has some weird niche fetish thing she can pull off, I don't see this working out that well.
link to original post
Should have figured out how to gamble and do porn at the same time. Wonder what casino would go for that? I suppose anything is possible at an online casino.
I don't think they can make enough to support Vic's level of losses.
link to original post
Is there gambling-themed adult content? Is it a thing? If not, they could create a niche all their own. "Cute slot attendant gives winner a rewarding hand pay." "Can Sarah bust the dealer to help end Vic's skid?" "Slotlady's machine is down and Vic the slot tech is ready to service her." And other euphemisms related to gambling.
If they could not find a casino that closes overnight to let them shoot, making a casino set would be pretty easy. A table and a few slot machines is all they would need. They would not need that many subs and buyers to make a decent amount of cash. They apparently have other partners they could bring in as well. This may turn out well for them.
link to original post
Sure, I was even asked to review Pornhub Casino once:
https://wizardofvegas.com/articles/pornhub-casino/
I think it was a practical joke as I am known as a bit of a prude, but the people who pay me asked me to review it, so I reviewed it.
There's some other stuff out there I've stumbled across mostly on accident, but it's typically not a for-profit casino. It's a for profit site, but not actual gambling.
Quote: itsmejeffQuote: rxwine(clipped)Quote: ChallengedMillyUnless she has some weird niche fetish thing she can pull off, I don't see this working out that well.
link to original post
Should have figured out how to gamble and do porn at the same time. Wonder what casino would go for that? I suppose anything is possible at an online casino.
I don't think they can make enough to support Vic's level of losses.
link to original post
Is there gambling-themed adult content? Is it a thing? If not, they could create a niche all their own. "Cute slot attendant gives winner a rewarding hand pay." "Can Sarah bust the dealer to help end Vic's skid?" "Slotlady's machine is down and Vic the slot tech is ready to service her." And other euphemisms related to gambling.
If they could not find a casino that closes overnight to let them shoot, making a casino set would be pretty easy. A table and a few slot machines is all they would need. They would not need that many subs and buyers to make a decent amount of cash. They apparently have other partners they could bring in as well. This may turn out well for them.
link to original post
Heh, there's all sorts of fantasy casino scenarios based on (well based loosely) on real life experiences. Waitress delivers drinks and more. Player distracted by someone under the machine or table, makes wrong plays. The Hot Dealer. Kama Sutra playing cards appearing at the poker table. Taken into the back room to be "roughed up" by security. etc., etc., limited only by imagination.
Quote: rxwine
Heh, there's all sorts of fantasy casino scenarios based on (well based loosely) on real life experiences. Waitress delivers drinks and more. Player distracted by someone under the machine or table, makes wrong plays. The Hot Dealer. Kama Sutra playing cards appearing at the poker table. Taken into the back room to be "roughed up" by security. etc., etc., limited only by imagination.
link to original post
One of these things is not like the rest?
Quote: Mission146Quote: rxwine
Heh, there's all sorts of fantasy casino scenarios based on (well based loosely) on real life experiences. Waitress delivers drinks and more. Player distracted by someone under the machine or table, makes wrong plays. The Hot Dealer. Kama Sutra playing cards appearing at the poker table. Taken into the back room to be "roughed up" by security. etc., etc., limited only by imagination.
link to original post
One of these things is not like the rest?
link to original post
Don't underestimate the width of the spectrum. I barely tapped it.
That 7 sec bj video doesnt look like her?Quote: ChallengedMillySarah is cute for 'gambling' niche but she's not that attractive compared to the top OF models. Unless she has some weird niche fetish thing she can pull off, I don't see this working out that well. If its true she escorted for a while, I'm guessing its because she's got that door-next-girl innocence look down pat.
Redditers grabbed the videos. Apparently she literally gave these videos and photos to someone she's involved with on the side. What a ditz.
link to original post
Or is there another video?
Hey Mods,Quote: Mission146Quote: itsmejeffIs there gambling-themed adult content? Is it a thing? If not, they could create a niche all their own. "Cute slot attendant gives winner a rewarding hand pay." "Can Sarah bust the dealer to help end Vic's skid?" "Slotlady's machine is down and Vic the slot tech is ready to service her." And other euphemisms related to gambling.
If they could not find a casino that closes overnight to let them shoot, making a casino set would be pretty easy. A table and a few slot machines is all they would need. They would not need that many subs and buyers to make a decent amount of cash. They apparently have other partners they could bring in as well. This may turn out well for them.
link to original post
Sure, I was even asked to review Pornhub Casino once:
https://wizardofvegas.com/articles/pornhub-casino/
I think it was a practical joke as I am known as a bit of a prude, but the people who pay me asked me to review it, so I reviewed it.
There's some other stuff out there I've stumbled across mostly on accident, but it's typically not a for-profit casino. It's a for profit site, but not actual gambling.
link to original post
From Mission's article, can you nuke user Veronika?
https://wizardofvegas.com/member/veronika/
read her comment in Mis's article and her posts in her profile.
Quote: 100xOddsHey Mods,Quote: Mission146Quote: itsmejeffIs there gambling-themed adult content? Is it a thing? If not, they could create a niche all their own. "Cute slot attendant gives winner a rewarding hand pay." "Can Sarah bust the dealer to help end Vic's skid?" "Slotlady's machine is down and Vic the slot tech is ready to service her." And other euphemisms related to gambling.
If they could not find a casino that closes overnight to let them shoot, making a casino set would be pretty easy. A table and a few slot machines is all they would need. They would not need that many subs and buyers to make a decent amount of cash. They apparently have other partners they could bring in as well. This may turn out well for them.
link to original post
Sure, I was even asked to review Pornhub Casino once:
https://wizardofvegas.com/articles/pornhub-casino/
I think it was a practical joke as I am known as a bit of a prude, but the people who pay me asked me to review it, so I reviewed it.
There's some other stuff out there I've stumbled across mostly on accident, but it's typically not a for-profit casino. It's a for profit site, but not actual gambling.
link to original post
From Mission's article, can you nuke user Veronika?
https://wizardofvegas.com/member/veronika/
read her comment in Mis's article and her posts in her profile.
link to original post
... a bit late to the party.
Quote: Roberto21This whole thing is just weird. They should just do one or the other, not both, in my opinion..
link to original post
Are you referring to do one or the other of OnlyFans or Youtube? The impression that I get is they are trying to branch out into more revenue streams. Besides, early indications are that the Youtube might do better than the OF anyway.
Quote: ChumpChangeCan I just say Victor is a degenerate gambler who has Victor Luck?
link to original post
They are losers at life. What are they, early 30's, doing only fans and a gambling channel as a source of income.... have to admit kind of excited to see how life treats them over time, as in they are going to fail miserably at life.
We've got an entire generation of social media stars making big money by their 20's and what comes after their stardom fades? People get cancelled on social media. There's an adpocalypse and everybody's revenue is down 90% suddenly. People have to choose a political side and dig in for better or worse. Social media sites that were once favored fade away and new ones spring up and people have to start all over. People get too big to get canceled and they start grudge wars with the little people.
But some of these social media stars are hitting middle age now, maybe they have enough to retire on and they can fill their days with endless joy with the money they've banked away. For the others, we never hear about them. They've stopped posting long ago.
Quote: LCK2000Quote: ChumpChangeCan I just say Victor is a degenerate gambler who has Victor Luck?
link to original post
They are losers at life. What are they, early 30's, doing only fans and a gambling channel as a source of income.... have to admit kind of excited to see how life treats them over time, as in they are going to fail miserably at life.
link to original post
No way is Vic in his early 30s.
Quote: LCK2000Quote: ChumpChangeCan I just say Victor is a degenerate gambler who has Victor Luck?
link to original post
They are losers at life. What are they, early 30's, doing only fans and a gambling channel as a source of income.... have to admit kind of excited to see how life treats them over time, as in they are going to fail miserably at life.
link to original post
Meh.
The Youtube channel was doing well-enough and the positive income flow is decent. OnlyFans is making some money. If they bailed now and got traditional jobs, they'd probably make enough in residuals that they could conservatively invest and do pretty well for themselves. Especially the recurring stuff; people always forget to cancel shizz. lol
Besides, you're getting some enjoyment out of it, so why complain? Excluding posts that have been critical, sometimes extremely harshly, of ACA---well, you would never have had any posts here. What on Earth would we do if we had an insufficient amount of posters who get excited by people who (I presume) they don't know failing and having miserable lives? I appreciate you helping us maintain our quota for that. It almost makes one wonder what, specifically, they did to have garnered your ire. Most people who don't like something simply avoid that thing rather than spend 1.5+ years specifically reading a thread about it on a message board cheering for that thing to fail.
But, hey, like you said-to each their own.
Positive income flow? Are you sure? Any idea as to how much they were spending and losing vs how much they were taking in? If it was a positive income flow why all the changes etc.Quote: Mission146Quote: LCK2000Quote: ChumpChangeCan I just say Victor is a degenerate gambler who has Victor Luck?
link to original post
They are losers at life. What are they, early 30's, doing only fans and a gambling channel as a source of income.... have to admit kind of excited to see how life treats them over time, as in they are going to fail miserably at life.
link to original post
Meh.
The Youtube channel was doing well-enough and the positive income flow is decent. OnlyFans is making some money. If they bailed now and got traditional jobs, they'd probably make enough in residuals that they could conservatively invest and do pretty well for themselves. Especially the recurring stuff; people always forget to cancel shizz. lol
Besides, you're getting some enjoyment out of it, so why complain? Excluding posts that have been critical, sometimes extremely harshly, of ACA---well, you would never have had any posts here. What on Earth would we do if we had an insufficient amount of posters who get excited by people who (I presume) they don't know failing and having miserable lives? I appreciate you helping us maintain our quota for that. It almost makes one wonder what, specifically, they did to have garnered your ire. Most people who don't like something simply avoid that thing rather than spend 1.5+ years specifically reading a thread about it on a message board cheering for that thing to fail.
But, hey, like you said-to each their own.
link to original post
Quote: AxelWolf
Positive income flow? Are you sure? Any idea as to how much they were spending and losing vs how much they were taking in? If it was a positive income flow why all the changes etc.
link to original post
(Quote clipped, Quote-in-Quote removed)
Positive income flow in the context of the rest of that first paragraph. (EDIT: I see where I could have phrased that better) In other words, they could quit now and would have substantial positive income flow just by way of residuals. I don't know if Youtube Revenues > Gambling Losses, but it wouldn't surprise me if they weren't with not only the way we have seen Victor gamble, but also, the gambling that some have alleged takes place off-camera, as well.
It's pretty clear Victor is playing very suboptimally and he is picking the worst games to do it on (carnival games). Short of penny slots, I don't think one could do worse - the Victor Luck is real, but the negative attitude only attracts hate watchers, which is a choice. I think El Cortez only keeps him around because he loses quickly and so occupies a spot for a short period of time. Kelly from Beyond Blackjack and VegasLowRoller are much more positive. I think I mentioned upstream how other channels have significant others who are working day jobs, or are retirees from another profession. Victor probably has a trust fund or family money, no one who worked for it would be that reckless. Even Vegas Matt, who is a self made millionaire through multi level marketing, has brought in partners on some of the higher level rolls - they are careful to not show whose card is in the machine, or if it accidentally shows to blur it out.
So embarrassing for them.
Quote:OnlyFans Users Spent $5.6 Billion on Porn-Friendly Creator Site in Fiscal 2022, up 16%
Quote: LCK2000Quote: ChallengedMillyWow they've really fallen into a new low. Super sad to see problem gamblers slink down to this.
link to original post
Real talk. Wonder what/if the long term plan is, do only fans for life? This is what people struggling for money do, I'm sure they'll do okay with it, but not like the runway is years for them. I know plenty of OF creators make bank, but I don't see them hitting home runs with this in life. Their families must be so proud!
link to original post
Dan Druff from PFA alluded to their Long Term plan MIGHT be. By claiming they have an Open Relationship while simultaneously doing an OF channel, they may start having other "Stars" on the channel engaging in acts with Sarah.
This will prompt Simps and other Lonely Losers to keep paying with the Hope that they too can star in one of these videos. Which if old Vic the Prick continues his Superb Gambling ways, may just be the Ultimate fate of this venture!
This is from left field. I would have never imagined the Sarah/degen vic channel to go this route.
Sarah didn't strike me as the type to do such a thing,
She didn't dress sexy when she was the face of the channel.
And now she's engaging in sex acts video for$?!?
If vic is losing so much $, then why not leave him instead of doing this?
I don't get it for her
Quote: 100xOdds
Sarah didn't strike me as the type to do such a thing,
She didn't dress sexy when she was the face of the channel.
link to original post
Maybe not on Youtube or Twitch, but I remember looking at her Instagram page years ago and seeing some pretty sexy pics.
Quote: 7NeverWins
Dan Druff from PFA alluded to their Long Term plan MIGHT be. By claiming they have an Open Relationship while simultaneously doing an OF channel, they may start having other "Stars" on the channel engaging in acts with Sarah.
This will prompt Simps and other Lonely Losers to keep paying with the Hope that they too can star in one of these videos. Which if old Vic the Prick continues his Superb Gambling ways, may just be the Ultimate fate of this venture!
link to original post
I guess we'll have to find out.
I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
Nice scoop Mis!Quote: Mission146I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
link to original post
I guess Sarah still reads WoV even though she doesn't post?
Quote: 100xOddsNice scoop Mis!Quote: Mission146I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
link to original post
I guess Sarah still reads WoV even though she doesn't post?
link to original post
I honestly wouldn’t know. I didn’t reach out to them via WoV.
Also, thank you!
So through PFA?Quote: Mission146Quote: 100xOddsNice scoop Mis!Quote: Mission146I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
link to original post
I guess Sarah still reads WoV even though she doesn't post?
link to original post
I honestly wouldn’t know. I didn’t reach out to them via WoV.
Also, thank you!
link to original post
if so, Dan is paying you?
Or you're doing it out of your reportive curiosity?
Quote: 100xOddsAm I the only one thinking wtf OnlyFans?
This is from left field. I would have never imagined the Sarah/degen vic channel to go this route.
Sarah didn't strike me as the type to do such a thing,
She didn't dress sexy when she was the face of the channel.
And now she's engaging in sex acts video for$?!?
If vic is losing so much $, then why not leave him instead of doing this?
I don't get it for her
link to original post
It's the same reason MANY beautiful, wholesome, young women pose nude or do adult films. $$$
Many women who do this make 6 figures, some times even 7 figures in Less than a YEAR! They figure, why not flaunt it AND get paid big bucks?
Of course, they don't realize their shelf life in the industry isn't very long and they are quickly replaced with younger, more enhanced and able bodied ladies who will take less $.
They also don't realize once those photos and videos are out there, they're out FOREVER!
Quote: 100xOddsSo through PFA?Quote: Mission146Quote: 100xOddsNice scoop Mis!Quote: Mission146I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
link to original post
I guess Sarah still reads WoV even though she doesn't post?
link to original post
I honestly wouldn’t know. I didn’t reach out to them via WoV.
Also, thank you!
link to original post
if so, Dan is paying you?
Or you're doing it out of your reportive curiosity?
link to original post
Not through PFA.
I mean no offense, but if I wanted to specify how I got in touch with them, I already would have.
Dan is not paying me; I wouldn’t write anything, for profit, on any website not owned by LCB. I’ll be compensated by the site here In accordance with how I’m normally compensated.
Quote: Mission146Quote: 7NeverWins
Dan Druff from PFA alluded to their Long Term plan MIGHT be. By claiming they have an Open Relationship while simultaneously doing an OF channel, they may start having other "Stars" on the channel engaging in acts with Sarah.
This will prompt Simps and other Lonely Losers to keep paying with the Hope that they too can star in one of these videos. Which if old Vic the Prick continues his Superb Gambling ways, may just be the Ultimate fate of this venture!
link to original post
I guess we'll have to find out.
I'm actually scheduled to do an interview with ACA tomorrow, as long as nothing falls through. I've informed them that I will be asking any question that I think readers might be interested in, though they have the right to refuse any questions that they would prefer not to answer.
I would expect that article to be out either this weekend or early next week as long as the interview takes place tomorrow. I don't know that all will be revealed, but we'll get into a history of the channel's journey, Victor's entry into the channel and perhaps some insight on their future plans.
link to original post
A former SNL cast member did a bit on how Barbara Walters got her interviewees to open up. Two compliments, then hit them with the tough question.
"You graduated from Stanford at 19. You made your first million on Wall Steet at 21 and married a prince at 24.
But why the porn?"
Quote: gordonm888Mission, after you've conducted these interviews, please let us know if they required you to make a porn video with any of the stars of the SlotLady channel. If so, you might actually write an article that gets a zillion clicks.
link to original post
No such requirement was stated and I'd have declined anyway.
Unfortunately, there will not be an interview. ACA has opted to cancel the interview with the grounds being that they don't like that I post on PokerFraudAlert. That's fine. They can do an interview, or not do one, for any reason they wish.
I'd normally have kept such a thing private, but I'd already announced the upcoming article. That being the case, I owe an explanation for why it isn't happening.
Without the interview, I simply lack sufficient interest to cover the OnlyFans thing as I don't care to speculate about other gambling content creators (except for scam system sellers) without talking to them.
Quote:Will Vic pound me harder than he gets pounded at the casino!?
I LOLed
Quote: FinsRuleThis whole thread is crazy. Sorry, just had to say it.
link to original post
Imagine being one of her Simps/Subs that paid for all that "content", dreaming that she would leave Vic for them and finding THIS out?
what do you mean by THIS?Quote: 7NeverWinsQuote: FinsRuleThis whole thread is crazy. Sorry, just had to say it.
link to original post
Imagine being one of her Simps/Subs that paid for all that "content", dreaming that she would leave Vic for them and finding THIS out?
link to original post
Also, Ez just posted an update on the pair on YouTube. Worth checking out. His satire is GOLD 😂 💯
EZ SLOTS video is hilarious of him reading the post descriptions.
Quote: calwatchI saw the photos there, and on Facebook, and I saw a confident young woman showing off her workout and her attractiveness not as an invitation to anything more. She would definitely be below the median OF seller on appearance, so either she gets freakier than the usual OF model or she converts gambling viewers to OF. Except everyone in the latter knows they are supporting Victor.
link to original post
Girl next door types do very well on sugarbaby sites and even on OF. A lot of low level backpage type prostitution is from women usually with 1 to 2 small kids under 5, and they have the girl next door look to entice men for services. It's not really that surprising.
Quote: Roberto21They’re in the top 0.91% of OF’s content creators according to their bio. How does that work when they appear to be getting 20-30 likes per post max.. I feel VIC just loves to brag, whether there’s actual evidence base or not.. Poor guy must struggle deep down.
Also, Ez just posted an update on the pair on YouTube. Worth checking out. His satire is GOLD 😂 💯
link to original post
Evidently, most OF creators, to the extent they can be called that, are dormant.
Quote: ChallengedMillyMission I can't believe you almost got a chance to interview Vic. Really hoping he gets desperate and does agree to it.
link to original post
I suppose we’ll see. They have a mechanism by which they can get ahold of me. As far as I’m concerned, their answer is presently no, so I’ll not be the one to ask.
Any others?
I'm kind of curious if the blackmailer didn't end up breaking some sort of law, since they reached out to multiple people for money.
Quote: ChallengedMillyI believe theres more clips but they haven't popped up yet. Reddit mods so far have kept them off the site.
I'm kind of curious if the blackmailer didn't end up breaking some sort of law, since they reached out to multiple people for money.
link to original post
The FBI is investigating.
*wink wink*
Always a high priority for the FBI, investigating Canadian YouTubers’ nudes getting stolen.
Next.
Quote: 100xOddsSo far I've only been able to see a handful of naked pics and a few sec of her giving a bj.
Any others?
link to original post
For God's sake, what else could you possibly need?
Pornhub doesn't even age check. Plenty of porn there. I literally just looked or I wouldn't have known that. They also suggest some really disgusting shizz right on the main page!!! Good Gravy!!! If I had been aroused, my cock-a-doodle-doo would have deflated like a balloon.
Quote: ChallengedMillyI believe theres more clips but they haven't popped up yet. Reddit mods so far have kept them off the site.
I'm kind of curious if the blackmailer didn't end up breaking some sort of law, since they reached out to multiple people for money.
link to original post
Copyright, at a minimum. Unless they were the one who took the pictures/videos, in which case, they'd own them. Still can't blackmail folks, though, but they would have (shared) rights to sell them.
