Thread Rating:

Poll

1 vote (3.7%)
11 votes (40.74%)
5 votes (18.51%)
1 vote (3.7%)
4 votes (14.81%)
2 votes (7.4%)
1 vote (3.7%)
2 votes (7.4%)
7 votes (25.92%)
9 votes (33.33%)

27 members have voted

Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 14th, 2017 at 7:35:22 PM permalink
The thread MEGAMILLIONS NEW 'JUST THE JACKPOT" WAGER got me to taking a new look at Mega Millions. The changed the rules in October so I had to redo my Mega Millions calculator.

As long as I took the trouble to analyze the "just the jackpot" option, I created a new page for the Mega Millions in general. There isn't a lot of data on the relationship between sales and jackpot amount since the rule change so I ignored that for now. I'll add that to my analysis once we see a Mega Millions jackpot of a half billion dollars or so. I would expect a similar relationship as in Powerball, since the two games are now so similar.

Anyway, please have a look at my new page on Mega Millions. I welcome all comments, questions, and especially corrections.

The question for the poll is do you play Mega Millions?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Ayecarumba
Ayecarumba
  • Threads: 236
  • Posts: 6763
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
December 14th, 2017 at 8:29:31 PM permalink
If you invoke the "Just the Jackpot" option, isn't the benefit from the "Megaplier" void since the jackpot is the one win that doesn't multiply?

Also, should the extra cost of the "Megaplier" be deducted from a jackpot win in the table, since it had no effect on the prize?
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
gamerfreak
gamerfreak
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 3540
Joined: Dec 28, 2014
December 14th, 2017 at 8:31:19 PM permalink
Quote: Ayecarumba

If you invoke the "Just the Jackpot" option, isn't the benefit from the "Megaplier" void since the jackpot is the one win that doesn't multiply?


I would imagine that Just The Jackpot and Megaplier are mutually exclusive.
gamerfreak
gamerfreak
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 3540
Joined: Dec 28, 2014
December 14th, 2017 at 8:47:14 PM permalink
Normal disclaimer that I am often wrong about these things, but I think you are dividing the total return of the Megaplier by 2 instead of 3 in the table on your Megamillions page.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
December 14th, 2017 at 9:14:00 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

The question for the poll is do you play Mega Millions?


DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
  • Threads: 212
  • Posts: 8277
Joined: Jan 26, 2012
December 15th, 2017 at 12:32:00 AM permalink
Is the value of just the lower prizes from two tickets worth more than $1? I'm assuming not, but it's 331 am.
I am a robot.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 7:00:23 AM permalink
Quote: Ayecarumba

If you invoke the "Just the Jackpot" option, isn't the benefit from the "Megaplier" void since the jackpot is the one win that doesn't multiply?



I doubt the player would even be allowed to do both, since the Megaplier would multiply nothing under the Just the Jackpot option. Is there something on my page that makes you think otherwise?

Quote:

Also, should the extra cost of the "Megaplier" be deducted from a jackpot win in the table, since it had no effect on the prize?



How the Lottery funds the jackpot is not my concern. I'm looking at this from the player point of view.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 8:02:13 AM permalink
Quote: gamerfreak

I would imagine that Just The Jackpot and Megaplier are mutually exclusive.



So would I.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 8:06:29 AM permalink
Quote: gamerfreak

Normal disclaimer that I am often wrong about these things, but I think you are dividing the total return of the Megaplier by 2 instead of 3 in the table on your Megamillions page.



Let's look at the line item for the $1,000,000 base prize with the Megaplier.

The expected return should be = base prize * probability of winning * average megaplier / bet amount = $1,000,000 * (1/12607306) * 4.733333 / 3 = 0.125148.

Where is my math in error?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
SM777
SM777
  • Threads: 6
  • Posts: 762
Joined: Apr 8, 2016
December 15th, 2017 at 8:28:38 AM permalink
Good luck to all on your various lottery tickets this weekend.
Ayecarumba
Ayecarumba
  • Threads: 236
  • Posts: 6763
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 8:55:53 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I doubt the player would even be allowed to do both, since the Megaplier would multiply nothing under the Just the Jackpot option. Is there something on my page that makes you think otherwise?


It could just be me, but the “Just the Jackpot” write up makes it sound like invoking the multiplier is an option.


Quote: Wizard


How the Lottery funds the jackpot is not my concern. I'm looking at this from the player point of view.



I bring this up as the multiplier table shows the jackpot win as 40 mil, but should it be 39,999,999 since the “Megaplier” was paid for but not refunded? As I type this, I have a growing suspicion that the cost was factored in the “per dollar” calculation.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
FleaStiff
December 15th, 2017 at 10:03:33 AM permalink
Quote: Ayecarumba

I bring this up as the multiplier table shows the jackpot win as 40 mil, but should it be 39,999,999 since the “Megaplier” was paid for but not refunded? As I type this, I have a growing suspicion that the cost was factored in the “per dollar” calculation.



The win shown is the base win, before the megaplier.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
miplet
miplet 
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 2105
Joined: Dec 1, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 10:13:01 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Let's look at the line item for the $1,000,000 base prize with the Megaplier.

The expected return should be = base prize * probability of winning * average megaplier / bet amount = $1,000,000 * (1/12607306) * 4.733333 / 3 = 0.125148.

Where is my math in error?


Your average Megaplier is too high. The average is 3. ( 5*2X+6*3X+3*4X+1*5X)/15. = 3X
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 11:18:52 AM permalink
Quote: miplet

Your average Megaplier is too high. The average is 3. ( 5*2X+6*3X+3*4X+1*5X)/15. = 3X



Dang. I multiplied by he probabilities by the weights, not the prizes. You're absolutely right. After making that change, I show the strategy is to buy the Megaplier at jackpots below $224,191,728. At a jackpot of exactly $224,191,728, all three options have the same expected value at 0.493963411. Above $224,191,728, the player should take the Jackpot Only option. This, as usual, is before considering taxes, the annuity, and jackpot sharing. If you factor those things in, always do the Megaplier.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
miplet
miplet 
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 2105
Joined: Dec 1, 2009
December 15th, 2017 at 2:09:19 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Dang. I multiplied by he probabilities by the weights, not the prizes. You're absolutely right. After making that change, I show the strategy is to buy the Megaplier at jackpots below $224,191,728. At a jackpot of exactly $224,191,728, all three options have the same expected value at 0.493963411. Above $224,191,728, the player should take the Jackpot Only option. This, as usual, is before considering taxes, the annuity, and jackpot sharing. If you factor those things in, always do the Megaplier.

I agree.
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
Ayecarumba
Ayecarumba
  • Threads: 236
  • Posts: 6763
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
October 14th, 2018 at 8:23:35 PM permalink
The jackpot is now 654 million dollars. Are players in positive ev territory yet?
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
October 14th, 2018 at 8:44:58 PM permalink
Nope. The odds of splits and taxes mean that it pretty much never happens.
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
October 14th, 2018 at 9:00:31 PM permalink
I'm not sure if this is the Florida
Mega Millions or Mega Money.
It goes high often but that is because its so unlikely to pay very much at lower level.

At highlevels duplicate tickets are possible.
onenickelmiracle
onenickelmiracle
  • Threads: 212
  • Posts: 8277
Joined: Jan 26, 2012
October 14th, 2018 at 9:16:14 PM permalink
Wizard does always mention duplicates being very likely, sigh, of course Mega Millions has the odds and payouts shown in a format that can't be copied and pasted. Assuming 640 million being the annuity, the cash JP being at least half(320,000,000), odds of winning 1/ 302, 575, 350, lower level prizes 10-20% return, it probably is ignoring splits and taxes. Assuming the drawing is also fair and random as well.

I will be playing zero dollars.
I am a robot.
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2410
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Thanked by
onenickelmiracle
October 15th, 2018 at 6:09:27 AM permalink
Don't forget that it's $2 a play. That means the jackpot has to get to well over $1B (assuming the lump sum payout would be 57% of the annuity, which it is currently) to approach +EV territory -- and that is if you ignore splits and taxes.
"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 9:46:48 AM permalink
I'm quite sure Megamillions never goes positive, due to increased demand for tickets when the jackpot gets big and thus more players chopping the jackpot. I've shown this to be true in my Powerball analysis.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
michael99000
michael99000
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2113
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
October 15th, 2018 at 9:52:00 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I'm quite sure Megamillions never goes positive, due to increased demand for tickets when the jackpot gets big and thus more players chopping the jackpot. I've shown this to be true in my Powerball analysis.



I would like to find out the average number of winning tickets there are when the jackpot is won at 500 million or higher. Just going by memory it seems as though more often than not it’s still just one winner , even with the increased number of tickets sold
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 10:06:34 AM permalink
Quote: michael99000

Quote: Wizard

I'm quite sure Megamillions never goes positive, due to increased demand for tickets when the jackpot gets big and thus more players chopping the jackpot. I've shown this to be true in my Powerball analysis.



I would like to find out the average number of winning tickets there are when the jackpot is won at 500 million or higher. Just going by memory it seems as though more often than not it’s still just one winner , even with the increased number of tickets sold



There isn't much data for jackpots that big since Megamillions changed the rules in October 2017. Nevertheless, I'll try to find some data on ticket sales and make an estimate.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 15th, 2018 at 10:51:35 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Dang. I multiplied by he probabilities by the weights, not the prizes. You're absolutely right. After making that change, I show the strategy is to buy the Megaplier at jackpots below $224,191,728. At a jackpot of exactly $224,191,728, all three options have the same expected value at 0.493963411. Above $224,191,728, the player should take the Jackpot Only option.

This, as usual, is before considering taxes, the annuity, and jackpot sharing.
If you factor those things in, always do the Megaplier.


whoa.. WHAT?! if fed tax = 30%, state = 5% and you take the lump sum, ALWAYS take the Megaplier?
I guess mathematically, you're right.

but the only reason Im buying the lotto ticket is for the life changing jackpot.
I only play when the top prize is $300M+ and get 'Just the Jackpot.'
but am torn because the $1M second prize is also life changing for me.

so taking my condition into account, is it better to buy a regular ticket, 'Just the jackpot' or a regular ticket with Megaplier?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 11:12:16 AM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

so taking my condition into account, is it better to buy a regular ticket, 'Just the jackpot' or a regular ticket with Megaplier?



My advice is based on maximizing expected value. However, if your goal is to maximize the possible prize and minimize the amount bet, then you should invoke the "just the jackpot" option. Please share some of the prize money with Nathan if you win.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 15th, 2018 at 12:09:32 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

My advice is based on maximizing expected value. However, if your goal is to maximize the possible prize and minimize the amount bet, then you should invoke the "just the jackpot" option. Please share some of the prize money with Nathan if you win.

well, it's more for entertainment value and talking with friends about what they would do if they won.

some in the group would still buy the regular ticket because of the $1M second prize.
I said the 'Just the jackpot' is a better value when the top prize is large.

I think I'm right?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 2:29:52 PM permalink
I found some data on Mega Millions sales at LottoReport.com. One problem is they only break down sales, in dollars, as "Mega Million" or "Just the Jackpot." If you want to estimate how many competing players you're going against, what you want to know is the number of tickets, not sales. You can't directly calculate because some players will spend the extra dollar on the Megaplier. However, I tend to think most are like 100xOdds and are in it for the whole enchilada.

Assuming that, I show that ticket sales are exponential in nature up to a certain point only. At jackpots over $350 million they are better estimated using parabolic regression. For now, here is my equation of estimated ticket sales for large jackpots, where x is the jackpot amount (in millions) and y is the number of tickets sold (in millions):

y = 0.000255x^2 - 0.041892x + 12.045779

Putting the current jackpot of $654 million* into the equation, we get estimated ticket sales of 93.76 million. The probability of winning is 1 in 302,575,350. This means the expected number of winners is 0.31 and the probability of a winner is 26.6%. These numbers are likely to grow, as we still have over a day to sell more tickets.

* As of 2:30 PM PST Oct 22.

Quote: 100xOdds

I think I'm right?



Before considering taxes, the annuity, and jackpot sharing, the expected value is greater with the Just the Jackpot option if the jackpot is over $224,191,728.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 15th, 2018 at 2:55:41 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Before considering taxes, the annuity, and jackpot sharing, the expected value is greater with the Just the Jackpot option if the jackpot is over $224,191,728.


yeah, but considering taxes, lump sum, and a chance of jackpot sharing BUT ONLY CARE ABOUT a life changing prize (top prize or $1M second prize), is 'Just the Jackpot' (no $1M 2nd prize) a better buy than a regular $2 ticket ($1M prize possible) when the jackpot is $300M+?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 3:44:09 PM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

yeah, but considering taxes, lump sum, and a chance of jackpot sharing BUT ONLY CARE ABOUT a life changing prize (top prize or $1M second prize), is 'Just the Jackpot' (no $1M 2nd prize) a better buy than a regular $2 ticket ($1M prize possible) when the jackpot is $300M+?



Yes. As I think I wrote earlier, if the jackpot is above $224,191,728, then you should take the Jackpot Only option, if your goal is to maximize expected value.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
Ayecarumba
October 15th, 2018 at 3:53:45 PM permalink
Okay, here is the bottom line on the Mega Millions.

The optimal jackpot size to play is $1.252 billion. When it gets beyond that, it induces too much demand for tickets and you're more likely to have to chop the jackpot with at least one other winner.

Let's say you play at that maximum value of 1.255 billion.
I show that after the chances of sharing the jackpot, you can expect 61% of that.
Then you'll probably accept the lump sum option, leaving you 62.5% of whatever you won.
After taxes, you'll have only 55% of that amount left (this assumes losing 37% to the IRS and 8% to state/local taxes)
After all that, you'll be left with only $263 million.
You should accept the Just the Jackpot option with jackpots that high, which average to $1.50 a ticket.
The probability of winning is 1 in 302,575,350.
So, the expected return is $263 million / 302,575,350 / 1.5 = 57.9%.
There you have it -- the house edge on the Mega Millions is 42.1% at least.

For the current jackpot of $654 million, I show that after the same factors you'll be left with 198.0 million if you win. That will make the expected return 43.6%.

Any questions?
Last edited by: Wizard on Oct 15, 2018
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
unJon
unJon 
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4571
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
October 15th, 2018 at 4:20:27 PM permalink
Thanks, Mike! Really interesting breakdown. I think the missing piece would be data on how many people are not doing quick picks and whether the hand picked numbers are distributed more heavily on numbers 1-12 then 1-31 (for birthdays and kid ages, etc). Likely no good public data out there. But obviously at high jackpockts the EV is heavily dependent on the likilihood of splitting.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 4:53:39 PM permalink
Quote: unJon

Thanks, Mike! Really interesting breakdown. I think the missing piece would be data on how many people are not doing quick picks and whether the hand picked numbers are distributed more heavily on numbers 1-12 then 1-31 (for birthdays and kid ages, etc). Likely no good public data out there. But obviously at high jackpockts the EV is heavily dependent on the likilihood of splitting.



You're welcome!

Just from standing in line behind people buying lottery tickets, I think most get quick picks.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
GWAE
GWAE
  • Threads: 93
  • Posts: 9854
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
October 15th, 2018 at 6:27:02 PM permalink
we should all poll tickets and buy a bunch. I think it would be ironic if a gambling website won the bet that is possibly the worst one that is out there after talking about all of the good bets.
Expect the worst and you will never be disappointed. I AM NOT PART OF GWAE RADIO SHOW
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3675
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
October 15th, 2018 at 6:29:59 PM permalink
I detest Mega Millions. I have never gotten back more than a couple of dollars back playing this game. Crappy game for me.
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 7:15:49 PM permalink
Quote: Nathan

I detest Mega Millions. I have never gotten back more than a couple of dollars back playing this game. Crappy game for me.



I think 100xOdds would say it is a feast or famine game. You don't play it to win $200, you play it to win $200 million. It shouldn't come as a big surprise if you don't hit it.

If your goal is a high hit frequency, I agree, stay away from it. I still say you, and everybody on earth, should say away from every lottery game. However, if you must throw your money away, know your goals and play accordingly.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
October 15th, 2018 at 7:31:15 PM permalink
Quote: Nathan

I detest Mega Millions. I have never gotten back more than a couple of dollars back playing this game. Crappy game for me.



A .20 quick pick pick 6 at Gulfstream has a +ev.... the horseplayers welcome you with open arms Nathan.
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3675
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
October 16th, 2018 at 2:49:17 AM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

A .20 quick pick pick 6 at Gulfstream has a +ev.... the horseplayers welcome you with open arms Nathan.



I thought the Horse racing Game at Gulfstream was $2 a Minimum. If it is only .20 I just might bite. :)
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3675
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
October 16th, 2018 at 2:56:39 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I think 100xOdds would say it is a feast or famine game. You don't play it to win $200, you play it to win $200 million. It shouldn't come as a big surprise if you don't hit it.

If your goal is a high hit frequency, I agree, stay away from it. I still say you, and everybody on earth, should say away from every lottery game. However, if you must throw your money away, know your goals and play accordingly.



But to be fair, many slots have a .50 cent Minimum spin and you can play .50 for the Pick 2, Pick 3, Pick 4, and Pick 5 in The Florida Lottery. I played .50 in Wolf Run a while ago and I got a bunch of winning lines and I won roughly $18, 36 times my bet, not too shabby. I won $100 on a .50 cent Pick 4 game a while ago, 200 times my bet, a really good profit in my money.
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 16th, 2018 at 6:13:25 AM permalink
Quote: Nathan

But to be fair, many slots have a .50 cent Minimum spin and you can play .50 for the Pick 2, Pick 3, Pick 4, and Pick 5 in The Florida Lottery. I played .50 in Wolf Run a while ago and I got a bunch of winning lines and I won roughly $18, 36 times my bet, not too shabby. I won $100 on a .50 cent Pick 4 game a while ago, 200 times my bet, a really good profit in my money.



If your point is that slots are a better value than the lottery, then you're absolutely right.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
gamerfreak
gamerfreak
  • Threads: 57
  • Posts: 3540
Joined: Dec 28, 2014
Thanked by
SOOPOOMichaelBluejay
October 16th, 2018 at 7:44:01 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

If your point is that slots are a better value than the lottery, then you're absolutely right.


I realize the house edge on lottery is much higher, but as a practical matter I disagree.

The amount wagered by an average lottery player in a given period of time is significantly lower than the amount wagered by an average slot player.
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
October 16th, 2018 at 7:53:26 AM permalink
Quote: Nathan

I thought the Horse racing Game at Gulfstream was $2 a Minimum. If it is only .20 I just might bite. :)



The jackpot pick 6 is 20 cents.
The pick 3, 4, 5 are 50 cents. Those aren’t usually +ev, but they are a ton better than lotto odds.
Joeman
Joeman
  • Threads: 36
  • Posts: 2410
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Thanked by
MichaelBluejay
October 16th, 2018 at 8:49:58 AM permalink
Ok, I'll probably be shot for saying this, but does the RTP even matter for jackpots >$100M? For me the lottery (which I may play $10 in a given year) is all about winning a life changing amount. I can't see how I'd live any differently with $100M in the bank vs $300M. I mean, do you really think Richie Rich's lifestyle is three times better than Scrooge McDuck? :)

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the analysis, Wiz. And yes, overall, lottery HE's border on criminal.
"Dealer has 'rock'... Pay 'paper!'"
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 16th, 2018 at 10:20:27 AM permalink
Quote: Joeman

Ok, I'll probably be shot for saying this, but does the RTP even matter for jackpots >$100M?
For me the lottery (which I may play $10 in a given year) is all about winning a life changing amount.
I can't see how I'd live any differently with $100M in the bank vs $300M. I mean, do you really think Richie Rich's lifestyle is three times better than Scrooge McDuck? :)

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the analysis, Wiz. And yes, overall, lottery HE's border on criminal.


even winning the minimum $40m prize would be a life changing event. (still 8 figures after lump sum payout + taxes)
but I don't do it because I know the odds of winning is astronomical.

I buy lotto tix (only when jackpots are high) for entertainment value.
ie: talking with friends/coworkers what you would do if won
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
October 16th, 2018 at 11:02:58 AM permalink
Quote: gamerfreak

The amount wagered by an average lottery player in a given period of time is significantly lower than the amount wagered by an average slot player.



If somebody will get equal entertainment value between betting $20 on the lottery as $200 on slots, then, yes, you'll lose less money on average on the lottery. However, I'm a math guy. I view the house edge as the cost for playing. I will strive for the most action at the least possible cost wherever I can.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
camapl
October 16th, 2018 at 11:05:49 AM permalink
Quote: Joeman

Ok, I'll probably be shot for saying this, but does the RTP even matter for jackpots >$100M?



Every Mega Millions and Powerball player seems to make this argument in one way or another. Let me ask the players of the 9-figure lotteries this question. How much entertainment value do you get from a losing $2 ticket?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
DRich
DRich
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 11596
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
Thanked by
MaxPen
October 16th, 2018 at 11:13:47 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Every Mega Millions and Powerball player seems to make this argument in one way or another. Let me ask the players of the 9-figure lotteries this question. How much entertainment value do you get from a losing $2 ticket?



I think in all gambling the entertainment value comes prior to the outcome. For many people I believe they spend time thinking about what they would do if they happened to win. If for example they spent two hours thinking about it and talking with friends about it, $2 would be much cheaper than other forms of two hour entertainment (A movie costs about $12 for two hours).
At my age, a "Life In Prison" sentence is not much of a deterrent.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 16th, 2018 at 12:09:38 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

Quote: Wizard

Let me ask the players of the 9-figure lotteries this question.
How much entertainment value do you get from a losing $2 ticket?


If for example they spent two hours thinking about it and talking with friends about it, $2 would be much cheaper than other forms of two hour entertainment (A movie costs about $12 for two hours).

this!
it'll actually be $3 for me because of 'Just the Jackpot'.
:)
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
michael99000
michael99000
  • Threads: 9
  • Posts: 2113
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
October 16th, 2018 at 12:18:13 PM permalink
Quote: DRich

Quote: Wizard

Every Mega Millions and Powerball player seems to make this argument in one way or another. Let me ask the players of the 9-figure lotteries this question. How much entertainment value do you get from a losing $2 ticket?



I think in all gambling the entertainment value comes prior to the outcome. For many people I believe they spend time thinking about what they would do if they happened to win. If for example they spent two hours thinking about it and talking with friends about it, $2 would be much cheaper than other forms of two hour entertainment (A movie costs about $12 for two hours).



If you are trying to quantify the overall entertainment/enjoyment of a losing $2 ticket, you also have to subtract the disappointment afterwards. And if you say there is no disappointment because you never really believed you had a chance to win , then the net entertainment value is zero.
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4256
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
October 16th, 2018 at 12:54:27 PM permalink
Quote: michael99000

If you are trying to quantify the overall entertainment/enjoyment of a losing $2 ticket, you also have to subtract the disappointment afterwards.
And if you say there is no disappointment because you never really believed you had a chance to win , then the net entertainment value is zero.


can you elaborate cause I cant wrap my head around the net being zero?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
Thanked by
Mission146camapl
October 16th, 2018 at 4:47:11 PM permalink
At the end of the day, I think the lottery is a tax on the mathematically challenged. All I can do is try to teach some math and hopefully save at least some people from wasting their money on the sucker bet that the lottery is. However, I can't save everybody. I'm not sure I even want to. If nobody purchased lottery tickets, the states would have to raise taxes to make up the lost revenue.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
  • Jump to: