Quote: MathExtremistI'm not sure it's exploitable, but based on my knowledge of online casino software developers, I doubt they spent too much time on their craps implementation. Craps is a remarkably low-revenue game online. As a result, while I can't rule it out, I would doubt that the engineers spent much effort on their risk-mitigation software. The test I proposed above should yield a relatively low-cost answer.
I agree, it might not be exploitable. But, these same people thought that at 25% win rate on a pass/don't pass would go un-noticed. I'd be willing to bet they didn't think too far into this.
Quote: CrystalMathI agree, it might not be exploitable. But, these same people thought that at 25% win rate on a pass/don't pass would go un-noticed. I'd be willing to bet they didn't think too far into this.
I just don't see how what I described is "too far" ... I think, it is the first thing that comes to mind. Way simpler than trying to devise some kind of a "universally rigged" distribution, that would increase the house edge only in some cases, but in others.
Besides, it seems to go opposite to the OP's experience, who was losing both pass, and don't pass line bets. So, it seems that the software is indeed aware of where the money is.
Quote: TheNightflyKeeping in mind of course that a gaming site that has rigged its games is even going to pay anyone who finds a way to win...
Bingo. If I could trust them, I'd deposit $500 today. So, I'm really hoping the OP tries some different suggestions. I'm happy to watch videos and record data to help him out.
Event | Probability | Actual Results | Expected Results | Chi sqd |
---|---|---|---|---|
Come out roll win | 22.22% | 33 | 72.89 | 21.83 |
Come out roll loss | 11.11% | 66 | 36.44 | 23.97 |
Point 4 win | 2.78% | 4 | 9.11 | 2.87 |
Point 5 win | 4.44% | 10 | 14.58 | 1.44 |
Point 6 win | 6.31% | 7 | 20.71 | 9.07 |
Point 8 win | 6.31% | 11 | 20.71 | 4.55 |
Point 9 win | 4.44% | 10 | 14.58 | 1.44 |
Point 10 win | 2.78% | 6 | 9.11 | 1.06 |
Point 4 loss | 5.56% | 26 | 18.22 | 3.32 |
Point 5 loss | 6.67% | 25 | 21.87 | 0.45 |
Point 6 loss | 7.58% | 39 | 24.85 | 8.06 |
Point 8 loss | 7.58% | 38 | 24.85 | 6.96 |
Point 9 loss | 6.67% | 31 | 21.87 | 3.81 |
Point 10 loss | 5.56% | 22 | 18.22 | 0.78 |
Total | 100.00% | 328 | 328.00 | 89.61 |
The lower right cell shows a chi-squared statistic of 89.61, with 13 degrees of freedom. The probability of results this skewed or more are 1 in 6,036,452,793,441.
If that isn't convincing enough for you, let's look at just the wins and losses.
Total wins = 81
Total losses = 247
Total bets made = 328
That is a win rate of 24.7%. How unlucky is that?
The standard deviation of 328 throws is 18.11. Over 328 rolls the expected loss is 4.64 units. My actual loss was 166 units. That is 161.36 below expectations. The number of standard deviations south of the expected loss of 4.64 units is 161.36/18.11 = 8.91. The probability of results that unlucky or worse in a fair game are 1 in 3,940,183,270,432,190,000.
The prosecution rests. I plan to publish my results on my Odds site in the next day or two. First, if anyone can find a flaw in my case, have at it.
The five casinos that support BLR are:
5Dimes Casino and Sportsbook, Heritage Sports, Legend Sports, WorldWide Wagering, and Loose Lines Casino and Sportsbook.
CasinoMeister has picked up this thread.
Quote: boymimboI have absolutely no doubt in your findings, and sorry that you lost $166...CasinoMeister has picked up this thread.
I asked the casino to return the money, let's see if they do. I'm glad Bryan has taken notice.