Has anyone else used this money mgt?

Simply this: double deck with good rules, $25 betting to start the shoe, if winning on the shoe then $50 bets. If even or losing on the shoe, $25 bets.

Then start anew on the next shoe. $1250 day session bankroll which is 50x the base bet. Having good net results thusfar, usually have some good shoes which helps get me in the plus.

PS: I know this is not counting and counting is the only way per the math of the game.

Give up on craps D?

I used to prefer win 5 b/4 lose 6. A Benjamin + expenses.

Demango: Still love craps, bj is my second game when the craps tables are dead or cold.

Quote: dwm

Simply this: double deck with good rules, $25 betting to start the shoe, if winning on the shoe then $50 bets. If even or losing on the shoe, $25 bets.

Then start anew on the next shoe. $1250 day session bankroll which is 50x the base bet. Having good net results thusfar, usually have some good shoes which helps get me in the plus.

PS: I know this is not counting and counting is the only way per the math of the game.

Counting is the only way to get an edge, but in a double deck game with good rules, you are almost even. House edge in the 0.2 to 0.3 % range. Learn double deck basic strategy to get the edge down to that level (there are slight differences from multi-deck). Composition dependent basic strategy would be even better. From there, you are just one step away from counting and depth-charging :)

Update: Still having good results with my double deck bj betting scheme, simply doubling the starting bet when winning on the shoe spelled out above. For those not interested in counting which is the vast majority of players, this is a good one per my results.

Also, having good net results with this craps scheme, starting the new shooter with pass-odds only , wait for the first pass-odds to be made, then continuous come-odds betting along with pass-odds.

If you bet $25/$50 in the way you described then you will lose faster than if you just flat bet $25. Also, card counting is just one of many ways for an AP to get an edge over blackjack.

" Have continued to play low $ bets with a $500 day bankroll. Double deck with good rules, $10 starting bet, then upping one $5 unit after each win with max bet of $20. NO regressions. Then start anew after the next shuffle.
Example: first bet after the shuffle is $10, win this hand so next bet is $15, lose that hand so next bet remains at $15, next hand is win so next bet is $20, lose that hand so next bet remains at max of $20, win the next bet so next bet remains at $20, etc. Simply upping one unit on wins until the max bet is double the starting bet, no regressions, and need session bankroll of 50x the starting bet.

Just lucky maybe, but it sure is holding up well over many sessions now.


BUT what happened to this winning system from July 21 ? Might I ASK.

Buzz: There is no winning system as everyone should know. I simply have tried many a scheme over the years, some better than others. The upping one unit on wins did do well until it didn't, as with all schemes. It still had a net positive over many sessions, so just maybe I will be returning to it or a version of it in the future.

Craps will remain my first game, as much more enjoyable.