There is an approach to using the 'inside bets' of roulette to do better than 20% hit rate, for an ongoing advantage. The so called house edge is rendered totally irrelevant.
This is not a system or a method, it's an 'approach' that CANNOT fail.
I don't know what the punchline is, but I'll take the bait. What gives your approach an advantage?
I understand why you might think that, but I'm sincere.Quote: JackSpadeI think you are approaching parody.
I don't know what the punchline is, but I'll take the bait. What gives your approach an advantage?
link to original post
Jackspade, As part of my description, I'm going to assign you a number. I'll explain that later.
Thank you for your question.
It's all about bet structuring.
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
Quote: ChumpChangeSounds like you're betting 8 straight-up numbers. When you lose 30 times out of 38 times, what's a little green zero-zero mean anyway?
link to original post
Chumpchange, As part of my description, I'm going to assign you a number. I'll explain that later.
Thank you for your resonse.
The Green numbers are given equal weight and status within my approach. Apart from one minor adjustment, they are used exactly like the other numbers.
I NEVER bet the outside Even/odd red/black, Low or high.
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
Anyhoo, my question concerns sleeping columns. Anything you could share on them would be much appreciated.
Quote: billryanIf I ask you a question and you assign me a number, that might open another can of worms. Suppose I'm assigned #6 but feel like a #23. Wouldn't it be better if we could choose our numbers? Perhaps some might prefer a letter.
Anyhoo, my question concerns sleeping columns. Anything you could share on them would be much appreciated.
link to original post
Hi Bill,
I'm open to letting you assign your own number: It will be an integer between 0 and 36.
Just drop me a PM with your preference. Only two numbers have gone, so far, so you are likely to be happy with the outcome.
Sleeping columns do exist, but are not important to my approach. What do you want to know?
Quote: OnceDear
This is not a system or a method, it's an 'approach' that CANNOT fail.
link to original post
Name it as you will, until I see details, I'm filing it with the BS.
28 27 5 18 26 20 0 9 22 10 0 19 29 16 34 7 20 14 31 11 30 35 35 28 21 3 19 8 23 8 26 23 4 22 1 30 1 21 30 34 5 13 0 32 30 18 31 17 16 17 33 26 3 14 16 8 5 2 26 21 28 25 29 17 36 24 23 7 30 20 11 27 11 19 17 8 9 10
Please tell me which inside number will be next.