Baccarat Strategy 55% who has simulator?
January 24th, 2022 at 8:03:01 PM
permalink
Hey guys, on baccarat over 100,000 shoe simulations 55% of the time after 5 players in a row the 6th will be player, and about 55.5% of the time after 5 bankers 6th will be banker. Can anyone simulate 1 million shoes to see if these results are correct? I don’t care what you think about the fact that it’s always 50/50 and strategies don’t work. For the most part i agree, but there are mathematical ways to best baccarat and I don’t care if you think otherwise.
January 24th, 2022 at 8:21:35 PM
permalink
I just ran a billion shoe simulation. Your percentages are dead accurate
It’s all about making that GTA
January 24th, 2022 at 8:35:05 PM
permalink
I can't drive 55.
January 24th, 2022 at 8:40:46 PM
permalink
Quote: Kj4646but there are mathematical ways to best baccarat and I don’t care if you think otherwise.
link to original post
If you don’t care if we think otherwise, why do you ask when you KNOW we think otherwise.
But if I actually believed what you believe, I’d be sitting at a Baccarat table with thousands of dollars waiting for that sixth hand that occurs around 1 out of 16 hands, bet whatever my bankroll could afford (use Kelly Criterion), and reap the rewards.
January 24th, 2022 at 8:49:29 PM
permalink
That's what I was doing until I became the first player to ever get 86'd from casino for playing the super secret 55% 5 player in a row strategy. It's a bug in God's coding script for lucky coin flips.Quote: SOOPOOQuote: Kj4646but there are mathematical ways to best baccarat and I don’t care if you think otherwise.
link to original post
If you don’t care if we think otherwise, why do you ask when you KNOW we think otherwise.
But if I actually believed what you believe, I’d be sitting at a Baccarat table with thousands of dollars waiting for that sixth hand that occurs around 1 out of 16 hands, bet whatever my bankroll could afford (use Kelly Criterion), and reap the rewards.
link to original post
OP why did you release this amazing trick that casinos HATE for us to know?
January 24th, 2022 at 9:11:04 PM
permalink
Quote: Kj4646Hey guys, on baccarat over 100,000 shoe simulations 55% of the time after 5 players in a row the 6th will be player, and about 55.5% of the time after 5 bankers 6th will be banker.
link to original post
Past performance does not assure future results.
All investments carry a degree of risk.
Best of luck in your endeavours.
May the cards fall in your favor.
January 24th, 2022 at 9:34:18 PM
permalink
Netflix stock is down 50% in the last 2 months. It could have been 55%, maybe tomorrow.
January 24th, 2022 at 9:49:48 PM
permalink
Quote: Ace2I just ran a billion shoe simulation. Your percentages are dead accurate
link to original post
Can’t tell if your being sarcastic or not, although I’m assuming you are because the computing power required for a 1 billion shoe simulation would have to be a lot.
January 24th, 2022 at 9:51:36 PM
permalink
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: Kj4646but there are mathematical ways to best baccarat and I don’t care if you think otherwise.
link to original post
If you don’t care if we think otherwise, why do you ask when you KNOW we think otherwise.
But if I actually believed what you believe, I’d be sitting at a Baccarat table with thousands of dollars waiting for that sixth hand that occurs around 1 out of 16 hands, bet whatever my bankroll could afford (use Kelly Criterion), and reap the rewards.
link to original post
Because I know there are ways to beat house in baccarat, I’m just not 100% sure about this particular strategy. I don’t want a whole bunch of trolls and losers spamming me and telling me that it’s impossible to beat house in baccarat. I simply want an answer to my questions backed by a simulation
January 25th, 2022 at 1:03:09 AM
permalink
After a million shoes...I assumed you bet after five in a row, looked at the result and then reset the counters.
After five Players
Betting on Player had a HouseEdge of 1.17% (lose 10604 from 906158 bets).
Betting on Banker had a HouseEdge of 1.12% (lose 10139.25)
After five Bankers
Betting on Banker had a HouseEdge of 1.03% (lose 10486.40 from 1017500 bets)
Betting on Player had a HouseEdge of 1.26% (lose 12854)
[edit - added}
2nd run confirms the same pattern
Overall Result: Exp: -0.010963695209855403 Hands: 70263753 FiveP: 906158 FivePP: 404261 FivePB: 414865 FiveB: 1017500 FiveBP: 453954 FiveBB: 466808
After five Players
Betting on Player had a HouseEdge of 1.17% (lose 10604 from 906158 bets).
Betting on Banker had a HouseEdge of 1.12% (lose 10139.25)
After five Bankers
Betting on Banker had a HouseEdge of 1.03% (lose 10486.40 from 1017500 bets)
Betting on Player had a HouseEdge of 1.26% (lose 12854)
[edit - added}
2nd run confirms the same pattern
Overall Result: Exp: -0.010931386471002547 Hands: 70266469 FiveP: 905199 FivePP: 404460 FivePB: 414547 FiveB: 1017279 FiveBP: 454148 FiveBB: 466547
