FULL STREETS

In roulette there are 12 streets in area 1-36 (1-3, 4-6 etc.).
When any street has come with two of its three numbers: Start betting the missing number with ONE chip per spin.
And place FOUR chips per spin on every street that has come with all three numbers.
End the session right after winning twice in a row on street. Good luck!

I'm just here for news on Baltimore...

Quote: surrender88s

I'm just here for news on Baltimore...

The city is decimated, and many of the rioters are getting released without charges because of politcal pressure.

TO OTHER MEMBERS: WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Are lunatics here in accordance with the full moon?
Are you so traumatized that you are unable to contribute with something related to my "FULL STREETS"??

Quote: Dane

In roulette there are 12 streets in area 1-36 (1-3, 4-6 etc.).
When any street has come with two of its three numbers: Start betting the missing number with ONE chip per spin.
And place FOUR chips per spin on every street that has come with all three numbers.
End the session right after winning twice in a row on street. Good luck!

Just another betting method...have you had success with it?

I don't see anything special about it at all...in fact, there is only one person here who regularly claims to beat roulette and he won't tell us anything about his system. Roulette has a high house edge, it can be exciting to win, and you get decent comps from it--my best comps as a table player were for betting on 2 of 3 groups of 12 all night long...but it was also one of my largest losing trips of all time. Now I only hit and run at roulette--$100 or less, heavy ($5-$10) on the 17 and I am out after $50 with no wins.

Quote: Dane

TO OTHER MEMBERS: WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Are lunatics here in accordance with the full moon?
Are you so traumatized that you are unable to contribute with something related to my "FULL STREETS"??

Honestly? Why the heck would you insult everyone and expect ANYONE to reply, for starters.

Roulette betting methods/systems are a dime a dozen and people here have tired of trying make people understand that the math is against them on every single bet. Someone may be a lifetime winner, but it isn't because of some "advantage play" in roulette...

Again, one person here (EvenBob) claims to beat roulette. He shares nothing.

Is calling us all lunatics really the way you want to talk to the board? Perhaps a bit of pot and kettle there...

Quote: Dane

In roulette there are 12 streets in area 1-36 (1-3, 4-6 etc.).

you bet the Layout and not the wheel?
this is an amateur move known by the Pros
in 00 Roulette example

the 1st street are the #s 28,9,26 and not 1-3
the 12th street is #s 35,14,2

bet the wheel and not the layout to be a winner

Quote: Dane

When any street has come with two of its three numbers: Start betting the missing number with ONE chip per spin.

really?
even when 4 streets are the trigger?
or just stick with the 1st street to hit 2 #s
and only the number you have seen or the numbers that spun B4 you got there

Quote: Dane

And place FOUR chips per spin on every street that has come with all three numbers.

why?
3 chips seems easier

Quote: Dane

End the session right after winning twice in a row on street. Good luck!

why is luck mentioned if this is a winning system?

Oh, you never mention that

this is for fun play and entertainment
i see
thanks for sharing
Sally

Quote: Ron C

Someone may be a lifetime winner, but it isn't because of some "advantage play" in roulette...

Again, one person here (EvenBob) claims to beat roulette. He shares nothing.

No, I claim to win as well. However, I don't beat the game, just the wheel. And yes, it's because I have the advantage.


Dane,

They're giving you a hard time because it's a well known fact that you can't beat the game by waiting for "this or that" to hit. They call that the gambler's fallacy.
What you're doing on the streets may be interesting to you for now, but in time you'll come to realize that it doesn't perform any better than betting randomly.
Detailed explanations have been provided as to why such systems won't work. The math, the history... it's all waiting out there for you to read.

Quote: Keyser

No, I claim to win as well. However, I don't beat the game, just the wheel. And yes, it's because I have the advantage.


Dane,

They're giving you a hard time because it's a well known fact that you can't beat the game by waiting for "this or that" to hit. They call that the gambler's fallacy.
What you're doing on the streets may be interesting to you for now, but in time you'll come to realize that it doesn't perform any better than betting randomly.
Detailed explanations have been provided as to why such systems won't work. The math, the history... it's all waiting out there for you to read.

Can I ask you some general questions.

Are you using a well planned proven clocking method? Or Some type of wheel bias? Is it scientific, something more than just eyeballing and thinking its good?

Oe is it something like DI and bias dice theories?

What is you're average bet?

What's your approximant edge?

Quote: Axel

Can I ask you some general questions.

Are you using a well planned proven clocking method? Or Some type of wheel bias? Is it scientific, something more than just eyeballing and thinking its good?

I play visual ballistics. I've also played biased wheels. My area of expertise is in defect spotting various manufacturers assembly problems.

Quote: Axel

Oe is it something like DI and bias dice theories?

I'm sorry, but I consider most of the DI to be absurd. However, the sliders are something different.

Quote: Axel

What is you're average bet?

$5. to $3k.

Quote: Axel

What's your approximant edge?

I won't cross the street for anything less than a 10 or 15% edge. Edge varies with many factors. However, a better question is, what is the minimum number of units I'm willing to play for per spin.
It's not enough just to have the edge.

Thanks for your replies.
There is nothing like stating the obvious. You don´t have to repeat what is against us. I do know the basic maths.

"The empty handed painter from your streets is drawing crazy patterns on your sheets" (Bob Dylan).
I simply find it easy to wager straight up and the streets. Of course you are free to choose something else.
What fascinated me in the first place was this basic fact:

If only 5 numbers in area 1-36 have not come, then at least 7 streets must have come with all of their numbers.
Similarly: 6 missing numbers = At least 6 full streets.
7 - - = At least 5 full streets.

And so forth and so on.
The basic problem: When to stop (I am aware that some of you maintain that we should never have started)!

So I added 4 chips on every full streets. Why not 3?
You may choose 3. Choosing 4 just give you a Little bit more if you hit.

Without participating in hundred of spins two hits in a row on a street is a realistic goal.
But if you (in avarage) want to make the session a bit shorter, you can choose to end after two hits in a row Straight up and/or street)

Quote: Keyser

I play visual ballistics. I've also played biased wheels. My area of expertise is in defect spotting various manufacturers assembly problems.



I'm sorry, but I consider most of the DI to be absurd. However, the sliders are something different.



$5. to $3k.



I won't cross the street for anything less than a 10 or 15% edge. Edge varies with many factors. However, a better question is, what is the minimum number of units I'm willing to play for per spin.
It's not enough just to have the edge.

Thanks. I'm seriously interested in knowing more.

Can I ask how many or how often you find situations you're betting 3k to 5k?

Daily, weekly, monthly ? how many bbets you get off.

There's been sophisticated teams with talented people that can't even boast of 10%

Visual ballistics? sounds very difficult. Even using a device and in a controlled setting, it's difficult to get 15%

Also I assume you could play 24/7/365 in many locations ?

Quote: AxelWolf

Thanks. I'm seriously interested in knowing more.

Can I ask how many or how often you find situations you're betting 3k to 5k?

Daily, weekly, monthly ? how many bbets you get off.

There's been sophisticated teams with talented people that can't even boast of 10%

Visual ballistics? sounds very difficult. Even using a device and in a controlled setting, it's difficult to get 15%

Also I assume you could play 24/7/365 in many locations ?

Seriously? This boat has more holes in it than the Titanic.

Quote: Dane

TO OTHER MEMBERS: WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Are lunatics here in accordance with the full moon?
Are you so traumatized that you are unable to contribute with something related to my "FULL STREETS"??

A great big Wizard of Vegas welcome to you, Dane! I have no roulette comments because I have never played, not even once.

You obviously enjoy roulette. You like to dabble in betting systems. Others here share those interests. You posted a question on a type of betting system in a forum dedicated to betting systems, exactly as we have been instructed to do. You've done everything right and you deserve respectful responses. While I can feel your frustration, I do not see any insults leveled by you. I'm confident that the majority of our administrators would agree.

Thanks very much!
I did not mean to be very insulting. The humour in one country differs from that of another!

The average duration of one session at a single zero roulette table (including two hits in a row on single numbers and/or streets)
seem to be close to 34.8 spins.

whiff puff