While fairy obscure, you can often hear it in Irish dive bars around dusk.
Quote: FleaStiffLimes. Lyme and Old Lyme were New England towns with an abundance of tick bites that spread disease to humans.
You missed the joke.
And limes do make Corona bearable.
But I said I felt bad for Corona, but I also never supported them in the first place. But it's stupid that a business gets hurt solely on the name alone.
But I haven't bought a Corona in 21 years (senior trip to Mexico), and ain't gonna start now. If they still owned their billion-dollar blunder Ballast Point, then I might buy a 6 pack of that. I also haven't bought that in years, too expensive for the quality. But it was reported it was sold to a no-name Chicago brewery for much, much, much less in December.
As for the virus itself. Probably gonna be a fun spring. Ugh. Remember to wash your hands everyone. Bleh.
Quote: SOOPOONot to minimize the effect this is having, but I'm sure the death rate on those infected will be far less than 1%. Remember, there will be many victims who seek no medical attention, and just be sick for a while and then get better. They will not be included in the 'non fatality' group. While pretty much everyone that does die will be included. And the 90 year old metastatic cancer patient barely hanging on will be listed as a coronavirus death if infected even if he was about to die from the cancer.
I see nothing wrong with the government's response. What would you want it to do? Ban travelers from Iran? China?
No, the rate is determined mostly from overseas, where they're aggressively testing and reporting even mild cases.
As of yesterday, it was 109,xxx total cases, 3,4xx deaths, for almost exactly 3.4% . Those are real numbers, not "feel with your gut" numbers.
The mildness also relates to your age. If you're above 60, it's 10-15% death rate. Under age 9, it's 0%.
So those of us in or near the older demographic are being much more cautious - at least those of us who are relying on medical and scientific sources.
Quote: DRichWhen the mortality rate approaches 3% of the population I will start following it a lot closer.
Lol. You're a math guy. What part of my previous post was tough to understand?
Technically, we're at about 5% in the US. 338 reported cases, 17 deaths.
Quote: beachbumbabsLol. You're a math guy. What part of my previous post was tough to understand?
Technically, we're at about 5% in the US. 338 reported cases, 17 deaths.
I am speaking of 3% of the population, not 3% of identified cases. That would be over 9 million deaths in the U.S. Then I would begin some serious precautions.
Quote: DRichI am speaking of 3% of the population, not 3% of identified cases. That would be over 9 million deaths in the U.S. Then I would begin some serious precautions.
Sadly, that's not out of the question, but right now they're treating it as worst case. But with zero herd immunity, it's pretty inevitable that we all will get it unless they manage a vaccine in the next year.
Without the widespread testing we need right now and still can't do, there has to be a geometric progression on contagion going on right now. It's just math.
Math when source data is headline differs from math when source data is a bit more reliable. Luggage handlers getting sick, but not fellow passengers re-breathing the cabin air seems strange. 'People on board a ship versus people sharing stateroom air conditioning ducts produces different math.Quote: beachbumbabsIt's just math.
Quote: beachbumbabsLol. You're a math guy. What part of my previous post was tough to understand?
Technically, we're at about 5% in the US. 338 reported cases, 17 deaths.
We're one of the highest percentages worldwide. Doh. But that's partly because of that nursing home that got it. Now 70 of their workers are showing symptoms too. :(
The reported count is over 400 now.
Quote: beachbumbabsThey don't know enough yet, but one study being quoted says BEST case world-wide, given what we know now, is 15 MILLION deaths and a 2.6 Trillion economic hit.
I think that's worst case. Maybe things went more south since I last checked.
We could try to figure it out from an early starter like China, but China can enforce some pretty stringent policies. They will probably knock it down faster than any other large population, if it is possible to do so by enforcement of policies rather than specific treatment.
Quote: rxwineI think that's worst case. Maybe things went more south since I last checked.
We could try to figure it out from an early starter like China, but China can enforce some pretty stringent policies. They will probably knock it down faster than any other large population, if it is possible to do so by enforcement of policies rather than specific treatment.
I'm guessing stricter enforcement helped. Quarantines will help, but I don't know it's enough to significantly stop the spread. Iirc, this can spread when people don't have symptoms. Any disease like that is problematic.
Better than that bartender!Quote: AxelWolfMike Pence is in charge of this? Yikes.
https://nypost.com/2020/03/05/coronavirus-patient-in-spain-reportedly-recovers-after-being-treated-with-hiv-drug/
http://www.natap.org/2020/newsUpdates/020420_02.htm
I'm pretty sure buying toilet paper would be last on my list of things to buy. Cases of Coca-Cola Minis would be the top of my list, of course.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/steem-scandal-blockchain-voting-fiasco-more-bad-crypto-news-of-the-week
Bandits wore surgical masks which have become prevalent and a common sight due to the Coronavirus
Took place last night. $270,000 cash stolen
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-resorts-world-casino-robbery-20200308-itccl477mjh3dbv65l7hm3bque-story.html
Quote: darkozWell it isn't mentioned yet as this is breaking news but looks like the first Coronavirus casino robbery has occurred
Bandits wore surgical masks which have become prevalent and a common sight due to the Coronavirus
Took place last night. $270,000 cash stolen
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-resorts-world-casino-robbery-20200308-itccl477mjh3dbv65l7hm3bque-story.html
God that's brilliant. You have to admit it. Under normal circumstances we live in an age where wearing a mask in public (even a Halloween mask on Halloween) is either illegal or looked upon with extreme suspicion. (Think of creepy clown scares or "V for Vendetta" protesters or defeated facial recognition tech.)
Now, suddenly, an opportunity presents itself to wear a mask into a public location where lots of cash is kept and nobody will even look twice at you. It seems obvious in retrospect.
Outside the building is a massive parking lot and no matter the direction it's a looong walk to the exit gates
So either they walked/ran that looong distance hauling their loot or they hopped into a getaway car waiting for them in the parking lot. Which would be really stupid. They have cameras and licence plate ID system at all the entrance and exits to the property.
And if they removed their masks while running with the loot to "saunter" nonchalantly off property I am certain the camera would catch that as well.
I'm pretty stumped at this point
Makes you wonder if the Feds have more tricks up their sleeve than they let on.
Quote: rxwineBank robberies are one of the easiest crimes to get away with initially without anyone even trying to stop you. But they also have the highest arrest rate.
Makes you wonder if the Feds have more tricks up their sleeve than they let on.
Most bank robbery arrests are made by local and state law enforcement.
Money ( daily cash ) was being transferred from one floor to a vault on another floor when the robbery happened. Obviously an inside job. Someone who knew when the transfer would take place.
And most don't involve vault access, just cash in a teller's draw so the "take" is usually miniscule.Quote: UP84Most bank robbery arrests are made by local and state law enforcement.
IF they are all young, healthy, take zinc, selenium, garlic, ginger and gin, take sauna treatments and fight it off, who cares?Quote: rawtuffwhat will be the formula to calculate the expected infections increase after 90 days?
The questions are viral load, immune system status, availability of treatment.
Quote: FleaStiff
Thanks for the non answer filled with trivia we all know since kids.
Never done that before in my life but I'm actually blocking this guy, I know he has health issues etc but his never on topic blabbering is wearing me thin.
Still looking for an answer to this one.
Quote: rawtuffGiven that currently there are 119,389 cases confirmed and the average daily rate of increase in infections is 11% what will be the formula to calculate the expected infections increase after 90 days?
If the daily increase is x% then after y days the increase is x to the y power. If the 11%/day number is valid then you're looking at ~ 12,000X increase from your base of ~120k. Unless I misplaced a decimal place, thats roughly 1.4 billion people. The current global population is 7.7 billion so we're looking at ~ 18%. By comparison, the Spanish Flu pandemic was estimated to infect ~ 27% of the global population while Swine flu hit somewhere in the range of 11-21%.
FWIW, I was taking to an MD a couple of days ago who said he had just read a report that they expect all US hospitals to be a full capacity with 100% of the beds and ICUs occupied by the end of summer.
Quote: FleaStiffIF they are all young, healthy, take zinc, selenium, garlic, ginger and gin, take sauna treatments and fight it off, who cares?
You care because they are carriers who can and will infect others.
Quote: TumblingBonesYou care because they are carriers who can and will infect others.
Frankly, I don't.Quote: TublingBonesYou care
Those "others" will decline in number and the victims will still be the very old and very sick.
This hysteria is based on poor surveillance, slow-to-act paper pushers and media use of ill-defined terminology such as 'infected' and 'quarantined'.
"cases" can refer to suspected rather than confirmed.
Japan incubated the virus aboard a cruise ship but then unleashed the victims on the world instead of treating them.
When New Zealand had a volcanic eruption it treated all victims. When China and Japan had this outbreak, they exported victims and forced other countries to shoulder the cost.
Quote: FleaStiffFrankly, I don't.Quote: TublingBonesYou care
Those "others" will decline in number and the victims will still be the very old and very sick.
This hysteria is based on poor surveillance, slow-to-act paper pushers and media use of ill-defined terminology such as 'infected' and 'quarantined'.
"cases" can refer to suspected rather than confirmed.
Japan incubated the virus aboard a cruise ship but then unleashed the victims on the world instead of treating them.
When New Zealand had a volcanic eruption it treated all victims. When China and Japan had this outbreak, they exported victims and forced other countries to shoulder the cost.
Not worth the time even trying to figure out what point this gibberish is supposed to be making, let alone responding to it.
Quote: DeMangoA shame we can’t do over/under on 1.4 billion in 90 days. We could be rich on the under.
yeah well that would be too easy, there are no 1.4 billion test kits in the world
Quote: AxelWolfApparently, a guest staying at the Mirage in LV during the first part of the month was confirmed to have have the Corona Virus. I only caught part of what they said about it on K NPR, so this needs some fact checking.
Female in 40s from New York attended Women in Power event but roomed at the Mirage. Her room is being Deep Cleaned. Implication is most of her time and close associations were not at the Mirage.
Conference ended March 8th. No explicit statement as to any subsequent guest or when Mirage received the notification.
and there won’t be 1.4 billion cases in 90 days either. Funny how it doesn’t get mentioned new cases in Wuhan are way down and all eight newly built hospitals there have closed.Quote: rawtuffyeah well that would be too easy, there are no 1.4 billion test kits in the world
Quote: DeMangoand there won’t be 1.4 billion cases in 90 days either. Funny how it doesn’t get mentioned new cases in Wuhan are way down and all eight newly built hospitals there have closed.
That's after militia surrounded the entire city and imprisoned millions in the area within the quarantine zone.
That's not gonna happen in the states
Quote: darkozThat's after militia surrounded the entire city and imprisoned millions in the area within the quarantine zone.
That's not gonna happen in the states
If I remember right, and I have already forgotten the source, figures tossed about here in US: 98 million infected, 4.8 million hospitalized and 480,000 deaths. Maybe that correlates to the 1.4 billion worldwide, maybe not. With the mass hysteria out their, which may be a good thing, everybody is on notice, or will be, and take the precautions not to let the large numbers come about. Hey it's March 12, let Mdawg out!
And the original reporter has disappeared.Quote: DeMangoand there won’t be 1.4 billion cases in 90 days either. Funny how it doesn’t get mentioned new cases in Wuhan are way down and all eight newly built hospitals there have closed.
Quote: rawtuffGiven that currently there are 119,389 cases confirmed and the average daily rate of increase in infections is 11% what will be the formula to calculate the expected infections increase after 90 days?
11% would mean doubling every 9.09 days, call it 9 days, since you're working with a flat percentage . So double your number 10 times, you'll have a raw and rough expectation after 90 days.
Quote: DeMangoIf I remember right, and I have already forgotten the source, figures tossed about here in US: 98 million infected, 4.8 million hospitalized and 480,000 deaths. Maybe that correlates to the 1.4 billion worldwide, maybe not. With the mass hysteria out their, which may be a good thing, everybody is on notice, or will be, and take the precautions not to let the large numbers come about. Hey it's March 12, let Mdawg out!
He's out, for crying out loud.
Testimony from the lead health expert to Congress (can't remember his title) yesterday said he expects between 70 million and 150 million infected in the US. That translates to between 14 and 30 million serious cases requiring hospitalization, and 2 to 4 million deaths, if worldwide statistics are accurate and hold true to us.
Ah. there's the rub!Quote: beachbumbabsif worldwide statistics are accurate and hold true to us.
Consider social proximity. In the coastal USA people stand much closer than in the MidWest. In Italy people line up extremely close and in the Middle East it is often even closer.
Alot of the current statistics involved sustained exposure in conveyances, such as planes and cruise ships. Also prior statistics involved travelers which entails disrupted circadian rhythms, malnourishment, lack of exercise and lack of prompt access to health care.
The USA is 'primed', many are over-primed.