Thread Rating:

Poll

25 votes (47.16%)
17 votes (32.07%)
7 votes (13.2%)
4 votes (7.54%)
12 votes (22.64%)
4 votes (7.54%)
6 votes (11.32%)
5 votes (9.43%)
12 votes (22.64%)
10 votes (18.86%)

53 members have voted

Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 48
  • Posts: 3089
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
October 20th, 2026 at 7:00:04 AM permalink
Let's shoot some hoops...


A basketball player’s free throw percentage describes how often they successfully throw the ball into the basket from the free throw line in official games.

If a player’s free throw percentage is initially below 75 percent and later above 75 percent, can it be said with certainty that it was exactly 75 percent at some point in between?
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 126
  • Posts: 12873
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
Thanked by
Gialmere
October 20th, 2026 at 8:14:46 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

Let's shoot some hoops...


A basketball player’s free throw percentage describes how often they successfully throw the ball into the basket from the free throw line in official games.

If a player’s free throw percentage is initially below 75 percent and later above 75 percent, can it be said with certainty that it was exactly 75 percent at some point in between?
link to original post



Intuitively I thought ‘no’. But I can’t think of any scenario that does not include an exact 75%. So I’ll say ‘yes’.

SOOPOO hit 32 straight a few days ago. And had 104/105 earlier this year.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 140
  • Posts: 8088
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Thanked by
Gialmere
October 20th, 2026 at 8:42:24 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

Let's shoot some hoops...


A basketball player’s free throw percentage describes how often they successfully throw the ball into the basket from the free throw line in official games.

If a player’s free throw percentage is initially below 75 percent and later above 75 percent, can it be said with certainty that it was exactly 75 percent at some point in between?
link to original post



No.

Proof:
Let the player have made a free throws in b attempts.
If the player went from < 75% to > 75% without ever being at exactly 75%, then it was done in one shot.
In order for this to happen, a / b < 3/4, and (a + 1) / (b + 1) > 3/4
a / b < 3/4 means 4a < 3b
(a + 1) / (b + 1) > 3/4 means 4 (a + 1) > 3 (b + 1), or 4a + 4 > 3b + 3, or 4a + 1 > 3b
4a < 3b < 4a + 1, but this is impossible if a and b are integers as 4a and 4a + 1 are consecutive integers, which means no integer is greater than one and less than the other.

Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 48
  • Posts: 3089
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
October 20th, 2026 at 4:24:25 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Intuitively I thought ‘no’. But I can’t think of any scenario that does not include an exact 75%. So I’ll say ‘yes’.


Quote: ThatDonGuy

No.

Proof:
Let the player have made a free throws in b attempts.
If the player went from < 75% to > 75% without ever being at exactly 75%, then it was done in one shot.
In order for this to happen, a / b < 3/4, and (a + 1) / (b + 1) > 3/4
a / b < 3/4 means 4a < 3b
(a + 1) / (b + 1) > 3/4 means 4 (a + 1) > 3 (b + 1), or 4a + 4 > 3b + 3, or 4a + 1 > 3b
4a < 3b < 4a + 1, but this is impossible if a and b are integers as 4a and 4a + 1 are consecutive integers, which means no integer is greater than one and less than the other.


Correct!!

Well done. (ThatDonGuy obviously meant yes.)

--------------------

Basketballs bounce when you drop them.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 48
  • Posts: 3089
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
October 21st, 2026 at 7:00:16 AM permalink
Greetings comrade gamers. Put down vodka. Pick up joystick. Now we play...



In Tetris, players try to efficiently pack a rectangular space with pieces that can have seven different shapes. As it happens, if you have exactly one of each of those seven possible pieces, then it is impossible to arrange them into a rectangle. But there is one piece you can discard that will allow you to make such an arrangement.

Which piece must be discarded?

Show the 2 rectangles that the 6 correct shapes can make. (Assuming you can think of a way to show it.)


Just as in Tetris, you may rotate pieces but not reflect them. In other words, if the pieces were cutouts on a table, then you could slide them and spin them but never lift them off the table.

Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 48
  • Posts: 3089
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
Thanked by
Wizard
October 21st, 2026 at 6:03:27 PM permalink


Buuuuzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.............

No solves comrades? Stories were true. Western powers are weak and decadent. Launching nukes.


The T-shaped piece must be discarded to form a rectangle with the remaining pieces. To see why, note that each Tetris piece comprises four squares. Imagine the rectangle that you’re trying to form has a black-and-white checkerboard pattern, where each black or white square is the same size as the squares in the Tetris pieces.

Each piece, no matter how it is placed, will cover exactly two white squares and two black squares of the rectangle’s checkerboard, except for the T-shaped piece, which will cover three of one shade and one of the other. Any rectangle built from Tetris pieces must contain an even number of squares total (four squares per piece). This means the rectangle will have an equal number of black squares and white squares. The T-shaped piece will create an imbalance that none of the other pieces can correct.

Discarding the T-shaped piece, we can create a 3 × 8 or a 4 × 6 rectangle from the other pieces like so:



Note that with two sets of pieces, the two T shapes could be offset to compensate for each other, thus allowing a rectangle to form.

---------------------

its that my mistakes pile up until the point I can't do anything about them anymore.
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
Gialmere
Gialmere
  • Threads: 48
  • Posts: 3089
Joined: Nov 26, 2018
October 22nd, 2026 at 7:00:06 AM permalink
Sun is shinin' in the sky. There ain't a cloud in sight...

Melvin and Rachel have created new thermometer scales.

On the Melvin scale, water freezes at 5° M and boils at 45° M.
On the Rachel scale, water freezes at 50° R and boils at 110° R.

What temperature on the Melvin scale is 74° R?
Have you tried 22 tonight? I said 22.
KevinAA
KevinAA
  • Threads: 22
  • Posts: 604
Joined: Jul 6, 2017
October 22nd, 2026 at 7:03:44 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

Sun is shinin' in the sky. There ain't a cloud in sight...

Melvin and Rachel have created new thermometer scales.

On the Melvin scale, water freezes at 5° M and boils at 45° M.
On the Rachel scale, water freezes at 50° R and boils at 110° R.

What temperature on the Melvin scale is 74° R?
link to original post



21
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 140
  • Posts: 8088
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
October 22nd, 2026 at 7:24:25 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

Sun is shinin' in the sky. There ain't a cloud in sight...

Melvin and Rachel have created new thermometer scales.

On the Melvin scale, water freezes at 5° M and boils at 45° M.
On the Rachel scale, water freezes at 50° R and boils at 110° R.

What temperature on the Melvin scale is 74° R?
link to original post



74° R is 24/60, or 2/5, of the way from freezing to boiling
On the Melvin scale, this would be 5 + 2/5 x (45 - 5) = 21° M

Why do I have the feeling the answer to your next question is -85° ?

gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888 
  • Threads: 71
  • Posts: 6429
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
October 22nd, 2026 at 10:32:50 AM permalink
Quote: Gialmere

Sun is shinin' in the sky. There ain't a cloud in sight...

Melvin and Rachel have created new thermometer scales.

On the Melvin scale, water freezes at 5° M and boils at 45° M.
On the Rachel scale, water freezes at 50° R and boils at 110° R.

What temperature on the Melvin scale is 74° R?
link to original post



Conventionally The letter R refers to the Rankine Temperature, so Rachel would not be able to use that nomenclature for her own temperature scale.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
  • Jump to: