Skillfulbanker
Skillfulbanker
Joined: Jul 9, 2018
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 5
July 9th, 2018 at 10:12:27 AM permalink
Dealer initial totals from 3 to 7 :must hit according to player third card: but dealer initial totals 1 to 2: dealer always hit independently of player third card?thanks for your answer : this is my whatsup [redacted by Mod:OnceDear] spanish/ english.....now you got a friend if you wiser than me ......
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Jul 9, 2018
TigerWu
TigerWu
Joined: May 23, 2016
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 4022
Thanks for this post from:
Skillfulbanker
July 9th, 2018 at 11:11:50 AM permalink
Quote: Skillfulbanker

Dealer initial totals from 3 to 7 :must hit according to player third card: but dealer initial totals 1 to 2: dealer always hit independently of player third card?



Yes, banker ALWAYS hits on 0,1, and 2, regardless of what the player has.
Skillfulbanker
Skillfulbanker
Joined: Jul 9, 2018
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 5
July 9th, 2018 at 11:51:42 AM permalink
Quote: TigerWu

Yes, banker ALWAYS hits on 0,1, and 2, regardless of what the player has.



mr tiger : you are a beast :

so greatful for your wisdom which will make difference on my analysis ,although ,i regard baccarat as unplayable and proves wrong the gamblers fallacy :meaning people will gamble and never invest on baccarat ,however ,i discovered : dealer hits 21 cards after player hits third card and dealer stands 22 cards after player hits third card : player/ dealer hit 6 initial totals and player/ dealer stand 4 initial totals : so i got this creepy conclusion :21/22=4/6:now the 10 to king equals zero plus 10 digits left cancelled and ace equals one :i could apply some cabalistic reducer denominator to predict future on final totals and future reduced cancelled ten digit final totals: but physical casinos wont allow such calculations while playing but such are mind taxing or at least casino allow to write down outcomes but with online dealers live video we might have even a desk calculator and many outsiders to watch becouse dealer is the one with all the job complications on summing up but calculations are exahusting : dealers actually uses cabalistics applied to reduce beneath 10 to get below 8/9 naturals : another peculiarity is 1 to 10 players vs dealer except mini midi baccarat played in my costa rica country : and taking into account the side bonus bets ,we might come up with some very weird conclusions which i am still trying to wake up from these so called false conclusions of mine.....otherwise i will appreciate if you prove me downright wrong whatsup [redacted by mod:OnceDear]
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Jul 9, 2018
Skillfulbanker
Skillfulbanker
Joined: Jul 9, 2018
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 5
July 9th, 2018 at 12:03:41 PM permalink
22/21=1.04
21/22=0.95
For dealer stand/hit after player third: interval from 0.95 to 1.04: the value of dealer /player finals

4/6=0.66
6/4=1.5
For player/dealer initial totals: interval from 0.666 to 1.5: value of dealer/ player initials

In all from initial 1.5 to final 0.66 : dealer/player : player begins to win and ends to lose at the end of the hour becouse banker has the tendency of winning consecutively minus percent commission.....

And here is the tie tendency as a media in factualility :from 1.04 to 0.66

Baccarat is like a dragging crab baackwards according to the weed i am currently smoking ... 😂

I am driving crazy myself: is it worth the while ?but still baccarat doesnt tell me how to win other then cabalistic crap : becouse in costa rica even with multiple deck : dealer shuffles after each hand and forget about the cut card : they had it better with a dillusional genious like myself 😂
TigerWu
TigerWu
Joined: May 23, 2016
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 4022
Thanks for this post from:
Skillfulbanker
July 9th, 2018 at 12:22:25 PM permalink
I don't understand what you're asking/claiming.

But baccarat as played in any casino in the world is not mathematically beatable. You will lose in the long run.
Skillfulbanker
Skillfulbanker
Joined: Jul 9, 2018
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 5
July 9th, 2018 at 12:25:35 PM permalink
My whatsup [redacted by mod:OnceDear] ever use my stupidical conclusions agaisnt simulations...... my mother rents a house and she works half shift ..... No one calls me for a job since years ago ....i am uttery broke for more resummees and baccarat drives me crazy :but have i never played nothing for money : baccarat its unplayable at all ....i am native spanish speaker and learned english but i dont know which other language to learn among a list of 4 languages: italian,french,portuguesse and german : i got already all knowledge about them, call me to help me and enrich you whatsup [redacted by mod:OnceDear]r ....
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Jul 9, 2018
TigerWu
TigerWu
Joined: May 23, 2016
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 4022
July 9th, 2018 at 1:33:09 PM permalink
Quote: Skillfulbanker

i am native spanish speaker and learned english but i dont know which other language to learn among a list of 4 languages: italian,french,portuguesse and german :



Learn French. It's the next internationally most useful language to learn after English.
Skillfulbanker
Skillfulbanker
Joined: Jul 9, 2018
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 5
July 9th, 2018 at 1:48:32 PM permalink
I actually have the ipa chart for sounds of french and the modern french grammar : i will definetly start on french today itself.....but sure it will take so many years to get the thinking capability.....but now you got a friend whatsup [redacted by mod:Oncedear] ....or call me by natural line whensoever....love you mr tiger wu🇨🇷🔥💰
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Jul 9, 2018
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
  • Threads: 34
  • Posts: 2494
July 9th, 2018 at 2:19:54 PM permalink
The original question asks about when the banker should take a third card. If someone (rather than the house) was playing banker and knew how the player was playing (i.e. they always hits 0-5) then they would adopt the same strategy. The only difference would be if the player was occasionally allowed to stand on 5.

btw I'm not sure what your repeated reference to [redacted by mod:OnceDear] is about as the telephone number ( [redacted by mod:OnceDear] is someone in Canada.
Last edited by: unnamed administrator on Jul 9, 2018
OnceDear
Administrator
OnceDear
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
  • Threads: 49
  • Posts: 5926
July 9th, 2018 at 3:06:33 PM permalink
Quote: charliepatrick

The original question asks about when the banker should take a third card. If someone (rather than the house) was playing banker and knew how the player was playing (i.e. they always hits 0-5) then they would adopt the same strategy. The only difference would be if the player was occasionally allowed to stand on 5.

btw I'm not sure what your repeated reference to [redacted by mod:OnceDear] is about as the telephone number ( [redacted by mod:OnceDear] is someone in Canada.


This new member 'skillfulbanker' Is blitzing the forum with his whatsup phone number. I asked him why he wants us to call him and without revealing his full reply, it was an inappropriate reason. This is clearly inappropriate and so I've suspended his membership indefinitely. Awaiting opinion of other mods whether we let him stay on proviso that he never tries this again and never tries to beg from members here in any way.

edit. Skillfulbanker is nuked.
Last edited by: OnceDear on Jul 9, 2018
Beware. The earth is NOT flat. Hit and run is not a winning strategy: Pressing into trends IS not a winning strategy: Progressives are not a winning strategy: Don't Buy It! .Don't even take it for free.

  • Jump to: